Back to Authors

Dempsey, Eugene

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6266-3462

Mayo Clinic

University College Cork

Citations 2

A core outcome set for the treatment of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes: an international consensus study
Kgosidialwa, Oratile , Bogdanet, Delia , Egan, Aoife M. , O’Shea, Paula , Newman, Christine , Griffin, Tomás P. , McDonagh, C, O'Shea, C, Carmody, Louise , Cooray, Shamil D. , Anastasiou, E., Wender‐Ożegowska, Ewa, Clarson, Cheril , Spadola, Alexandra, Alvarado, Fernanda , Noctor, Eoin , Dempsey, Eugene , Napoli, Angela , Galjaard, Sander , Loeken, Mary R. , Maresh, M., Gillespie, Paddy , Valk, Harold de, Biesty, Linda , Devane, Declan , Dunne, Fidelma , Kgosidialwa, O , Bogdanet, D , Egan, A M , Cooray, S D , O'Shea, Paula M , Gillespie, Paddy , Dunne, Fidelma P , Crowther, Caroline Anne , Agostini, Andrea

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology | July 4, 2021 | Volume: 128 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1855-1868

10.1111/1471-0528.16825 Get It

Objective To develop a core outcome set (COS) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM). Design A consensus developmental study. Setting International. Population Two hundred and five stakeholders completed the first round. Methods The study consisted of three components. (1) A systematic review of the literature to produce a list of outcomes reported in RCTs assessing the effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of pregnant women with PGDM. (2) A three‐round, online eDelphi survey to prioritise these outcomes by international stakeholders (including healthcare professionals, researchers and women with PGDM). (3) A consensus meeting where stakeholders from each group decided on the final COS. Main outcome measures All outcomes were extracted from the literature. Results We extracted 131 unique outcomes from 67 records meeting the full inclusion criteria. Of the 205 stakeholders who completed the first round, 174/205 (85%) and 165/174 (95%) completed rounds 2 and 3, respectively. Participants at the subsequent consensus meeting chose 19 outcomes for inclusion into the COS: trimester‐specific haemoglobin A1c, maternal weight gain during pregnancy, severe maternal hypoglycaemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, miscarriage, pregnancy‐induced hypertension, pre‐eclampsia, maternal death, birthweight, large for gestational age, small for gestational age, gestational age at birth, preterm birth, mode of birth, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycaemia, congenital malformations, stillbirth and neonatal death. Conclusions This COS will enable better comparison between RCTs to produce robust evidence synthesis, improve trial reporting and optimise research efficiency in studies assessing treatment of pregnant women with PGDM. Tweetable abstract 165 key stakeholders have developed #Treatment #CoreOutcomes in pregnant women with #diabetes existing before pregnancy.
Gestational diabetes prevention and treatment: a protocol for developing core outcome sets
Egan, Aoife M. , Dunne, Fidelma , Biesty, Linda , Bogdanet, Delia , Dempsey, Eugene , Thangaratinam, Shakila , Devane, Declan , Fhelelboom, Narjes, Egan, A M , Bogdanet, D , Dunne, Fidelma P , Crowther, Caroline Anne

BMJ Open | November 14, 2019 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 11 | Pages: e030574

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030574 Get It

Introduction Selective reporting bias, inconsistency in the chosen outcomes between trials and irrelevance of the chosen outcomes for women, limit the efficiency and value of research for prevention and treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). One way to address these challenges is to develop core outcome sets (COSs). Methods and analysis The aim of this manuscript is to present a protocol for a study to develop COSs for GDM prevention and treatment. This is a three-phase project consisting of (1) a systematic review of the literature to create two lists of outcomes that have been reported in trials and systematic reviews of trials of interventions for the prevention and treatment of GDM, (2) a three-round, web-based e-Delphi survey with key stakeholders to prioritise these outcomes and (3) a consensus meeting to resolve any remaining disagreements and to agree on two COSs. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained from the ethics committee at Galway University Hospitals on 13 December 2018 (Reference: C.A.2078). We will disseminate our research findings through peer-reviewed, open access publications and present at international conferences to reach a wide range of knowledge users.