Back to Authors

Tohsche, Peter

Mayo Clinic

No affiliation available

Citations 1

A world-wide study on delirium assessments and presence of protocols
Nydahl, Peter , Liu, Keibun , Bellelli, Giuseppe , Calle, Gabi Heras-La, Hoffmann, Magdalena , Jeitziner, Marie‐Madlen , Krewulak, Karla D. , Paulino, Maria Carolina , Haken, Rebecca von , Group, the WDAD Study, Abdalgany, Ahmed Gaber Ahmed, Aburaas, Amjad, Albakosh, Bashir Abobaker, Alhamdan, Hamza Ismail Ahmad, Aljbali, Akram Waled Rajab M, Al-Kandari, Fareeda, Anders, Daniel, Anderson, Marsali, Ashkenazy, Shelly , Avelino, Thiago, Bail, Kasia , Bakri, Ashraf , Baroum, Alaa Mohamed Ali , Brendt-Müller, Jennifer, Brobeil, Angelika, Byrnes, Tru , Cahill, Maria, Canelas, Maria Ana , Carroll, Ida, Conley, Amy, Cotton, Shannon A. , Couser, Mandy, Salgado, A., Cusworth, Elizabeth, Cvoro, Vera , Deosaran, Jordanna, Diebels, Merel, Docherty, Elaine A, Dossow, Vera von , Drennan, Megan, Egdeer, Akram Amin, Eichelsheim, Patrick, Elagili, Aissha Ali Saleh, Elsahl, Saifaleslam Jamal, Elshaikh, Hajer Alsadeg Mohammed, Fathi, Azza , Feige, Melanie, Fiest, Kirsten M. , Fong, Marleta Irene Joy, Fuchita, Mikita , Gaffney, Carol, Vich, Carola Giménez-Esparza, Feldmann, Nicole , Fitzpatrick, Neasa , Fong, Marleta Irene Joy, Goldberg, María Adela , Golüke, Nienke M.S. , Graaf, Marinette van der , Groenewald, Engelina , Gross, Renate , Segers, Camilla Grube, Hadi, Renate, Hamdan, Qusai Ahmad Hasan, Hamida, Bahaeddin Ben, Hamza, Monalyce, Hopkins, Jane , Hopkins, John , Jeyaseelan, Arveen , Kadhim, Ali Jawad, Kohler, S., Kooken, Rens , Khutwah, Ayman Salim Abu, Lange, Puck, Liefrink, Sharon, Lin, Yu‐Min , Loo, Shi Pei , Rodrigues, Sara Beatriz Lopes, MacDonald, Allan S., Madders, G, Massaro, Claudia, Maya, Kerri, Manioudaki, Sofia, Stewart, McKenna, Coimbra, Isabel , Miranda, Teresa, Mohamed, Mohamed A. , Mohammed, Mushin Mohammed Elhadi Agbna, Naeem, Fariha , Nam, Mi-Ryeo, Newman, Elaine, Nicol, Renae, Noonan, Claire, Lopes, Maria Inês, Otmani, Zina , O’Reilly, Susan, Ozorio, Valerie, Palakashappa, Jessica, Pandya, Tej , Papadea, Panagiota, Papanikolaou, Metaxia, Pinardi, Elena , Pereira, Inês Filipa Pinto, Premathilaka, Chirantha , Pop‐Purceleanu, Monica , Puchegger, Marlene, Qalhoud, Nouralddeen Mohammed, Raasing, Maike, Ragheb, Dalia Talaat, Ramadan, Nuri, Rubel, Mushabbir Hossain, Sainsbury, Kate, Schimböck, Florian , Schmädig, Roman , Schoon, Yvonne , Sethia, Deepak , Sextl, Edith, Shah, Bhagyesh , Shaout, Dua’a, Sharabi, Alaa Fouad, Shields, Lynn, Smith, Kendall A. , Dam, Linda Smulders-van, Soiza, Roy L. , Spiegler, Andrea, Stocks, Lucy, Sumerauer, Stefan, Tam, Stephanie , Tan, Aik Haw, Tohsche, Peter, Torres, Raquel Gouveia, Toth, Chantal, Tousgaard, Iben, Vogt, Birgit, Walsh, Erica M., Ward‐Stockham, Kristel , Mart, Melinda Webb‐St, Wijnen-Meijer, Mariajne Elisabeth, Zastrow, Inke , Nydahl, Peter , Jeitziner, Marie-Madlen , Krewulak, Karla D , Benbenishty, Julie Sarah , Boogaard, Mark van den , Caplan, Gideon A. , Chung, Chi Ryang , Elhadi, Muhammed , Gurjar, Mohan , Mailhot, Tanya , Morandi, Alessandro , Nawa, Ricardo Kenji , Oh, Esther S , Collet, Marie Oxenbøll , Lindroth, Heidi , Group, the WDAD Study, Abdelmohsen, Sarah Magdy , Aggar, Christina , Alkandari, Farah, Alkaseek, Akram Mohammed , Anders, Daniel, Anderson, Marsali, Blackwood, Bronagh , Brendt-Müller, Jennifer , Burke, Richard, Cacciatore, Stefano , Cahill, Maria, Conley, Amy, Costello, Maria , Diebels, Merel, Elshaikh, Hajer Alsadeg Mohammed, Emme, Christina , Exl, Matthias Thomas , Fong, Marleta Irene Joy, Gaffney, Carol, Fitzgerald, Rachel, Fong, Marleta Irene Joy, Graaf, Mirjam, Segers, Camilla Grube, Hadi, Renate, Hamdan, Qusai, Hetland, Breanna , Hopkins, Jane Adele, Ibrahim, Said A. , Imbrìaco, Guglielmo , Inoue, Shigeaki , Kadhim, Ali Jawad, Kohler, Sabrina, Korompeli, Anna , Krüger, Lars , Lange, Puck, Rodrigues, Sara Beatriz Lopes, MacDonald, Allan, McAndrew, Natalie S. , Mohamed, Mohamed Anwar Abdelsalam, Mohammed, Mushin Mohammed Elhadi Agbna, Mulkey, Malissa , Nakamura, Kensuke , Nam, Mi-Ryeo, Newman, Elaine, Nicol, Renae, Olotu, Cynthia , Ornago, Alice Margherita , O’Reilly, Susan, Penfold, Rose , Pereira, Inês Filipa Pinto, Quinn, Terence J , Raasing, Maike Wm, Rajhans, Prasad Anant , Ramadan, Nuri, Rubel, Mushabbir Hossain, Sainsbury, Kate, Salis, Francesco , Sharabi, Alaa Fouad, Smith, Kendall, Tam, Stephanie, Timmons, Suzanne , Torres, Raquel Gouveia, Tsolaki, Vasiliki , Castro, Roberta Esteves Vieira de , Vogt, Birgit, Walsh, Erica, Wefer, Franziska , Wøien, Hilde , Zazzara, Maria Beatrice

Age and Ageing | June 12, 2024 | Volume: 53 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ageing/afae129 Get It

Abstract Background Delirium is a common complication of older people in hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. Objective To assess the worldwide use of validated delirium assessment tools and the presence of delirium management protocols. Design Secondary analysis of a worldwide one-day point prevalence study on World Delirium Awareness Day, 15 March 2023. Setting Cross-sectional online survey including hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. Methods Participating clinicians reported data on delirium, the presence of protocols, delirium assessments, delirium-awareness interventions, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, and ward/unit-specific barriers. Results Data from 44 countries, 1664 wards/units and 36 048 patients were analysed. Validated delirium assessments were used in 66.7% (n = 1110) of wards/units, 18.6% (n = 310) used personal judgement or no assessment, and 10% (n = 166) used other assessment methods. A delirium management protocol was reported in 66.8% (n = 1094) of wards/units. The presence of protocols for delirium management varied across continents, ranging from 21.6% (on 21/97 wards/units) in Africa to 90.4% (235/260) in Australia, similar to the use of validated delirium assessments with 29.6% (29/98) in Africa to 93.5% (116/124) in North America. Wards/units with a delirium management protocol [n = 1094/1664, 66.8%] were more likely to use a validated delirium test than those without a protocol [odds ratio 6.97 (95% confidence interval 5.289–9.185)]. The presence of a delirium protocol increased the chances for valid delirium assessment and, likely, evidence-based interventions. Conclusion Wards/units that reported the presence of delirium management protocols had a higher probability of using validated delirium assessments tools to assess for delirium.