Citations

ABSTRACT Objective(s) Fetal pleural effusion is a rare condition that may significantly impact fetal and neonatal outcomes. Currently, no universal standardized approach exists for diagnosing and managing primary fetal pleural effusions. This study aimed to develop structured, expert‐based clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, monitoring, management, and follow‐up care of primary fetal pleural effusion. Methods A Delphi method was employed to achieve consensus among an international panel of experts in fetal medicine. Experts were selected based on their clinical expertise, affiliations, and relevant publications. A three‐round anonymous electronic survey was sent to the full panel. In the initial two rounds, participants rated each statement on a Likert scale (1–5) and provided suggestions for modifications. Statements with a median score of five and no suggested changes were accepted as consensus. Statements with a median score below four were rejected. Statements scoring a median of four were revised according to suggestions and reconsidered in the subsequent round. In the final round, participants indicated their agreement or disagreement with the remaining statements. Consensus was defined as agreement from more than 70% of participants with no suggestions for further changes. Results A total of 101 expert clinicians accepted the invitation and completed the first round with 73 (72%) completing all three rounds. Consensus statements were achieved on aspects of diagnosis, monitoring, intervention, post‐intervention management, and delivery. Key recommendations concerning the diagnosis of primary fetal pleural effusion include the use of ultrasound as the primary modality for identifying fetal pleural effusion and excluding secondary causes through detailed genetic, infectious, and metabolic evaluations. Management strategies emphasized thoracoamniotic shunting as the preferred intervention in hydropic fetuses with primary pleural effusion. Experts reached consensus that shunt placement could be offered as early as 16 weeks. No consensus was reached for isolated effusion without hydrops, as management was considered case‐dependent. The importance of ultrasonographic monitoring of fetal status at least weekly post‐intervention was strongly endorsed. Conclusion(s) The Delphi method facilitated the development of a consensus‐based protocol for diagnosing and managing primary fetal pleural effusion. These standardized guidelines are intended to enhance clinical practice across various settings, improve perinatal outcomes, and serve as a foundation for future research for this high‐risk fetal condition.

The Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a group of heterogenous hematologic malignancies characterized by the proliferation of blood cells and consist of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia. The NCCN Guidelines for MPN were developed as a result of meetings convened by a multidisciplinary panel with expertise in MPN, with the aim of providing recommendations for the comprehensive care of adults with these diseases. The panel of experts convenes at least once a year to discuss requested changes to the Guidelines and to evaluate emerging data. These Guideline Insights focus on some of the recent updates for myelofibrosis.

Cellular senescence is an irreversible stress response, which leads to loss of cellular function and remodeling of the cellular secretory profile. In humans, pancreatic β cells undergo cellular senescence during the progression to type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the mechanism linking β cell senescence to islet dysfunction remains unknown, and thus the therapeutic potential of targeting senescent cells in T2D is not established. Herein, we identified a subpopulation of senescent β cells expressing p21, which emerged early in the progression of T2D in humans and mice. Spatial transcriptomics and proteomics analyses confirmed senescence and loss of cellular identity in this subpopulation in humans. Functional analysis revealed lack of glucose responsiveness, high basal insulin secretion, and transcription of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) factors. SASP factors from p21 + β cells induced secondary senescence in neighboring cells, characterized by dysfunction and loss of identity. JAK inhibitors counteracted the induction of secondary senescence and restored β cell function in islets from humans with T2D and in mice fed a high-fat diet. These findings reveal the critical role of p21 + β cells in T2D pathogenesis and the therapeutic potential of targeting this pathophysiological process.

ABSTRACT Biological aging greatly impacts the body’s ability to handle glucose, and represents a major risk factor the development and progression of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Nonetheless, despite advances in cellular senescence research and the development of new senolytic therapies, the heterogeneity of cellular senescence in the human endocrine pancreas, as well as its roles in normal aging, remains to be elucidated at the single-cell level. Here, we performed single-cell–resolved spatial proteomics and transcriptomics on intact pancreas from 26 donors (ages 20–80) and multiplexed single-cell RNA sequencing and functional assays on dispersed islets from 14 donors (ages 34–69). We identify two discrete SnC subpopulations distinguished by relative expression of CDKN1A and CDKN2A. CDKN1A ⁺ senescent cells (SnCs) exhibit loss of β-cell identity, impaired insulin secretion, and a proinflammatory SASP associated with increased islet immune infiltration. In contrast, CDKN2A ⁺ SnCs retain transcriptional identity and functional competence, with lower inflammatory signaling. Together, these findings identify heterogeneous and functionally divergent senotypes in the human pancreas, distinguishing an adaptive ( CDKN2A ⁺) from a maladaptive ( CDKN1A ⁺) senescence program, thus providing a mechanism-guided framework for senescence-targeted therapies in T2D.

PURPOSE Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The higher incidence and earlier onset of HCC in sub-Saharan Africa suggest a potential role for a genetic predisposition. This study evaluated the association of TERT -rs2242652-(A), a variant linked to lower HCC risk, with HCC in populations from Ghana, Nigeria, and Cameroon, compared with a population from the United States. METHODS The study included 537 patients with HCC: United States (n = 348), Ghana (n = 79), Nigeria (n = 43), and Cameroon (n = 67). The control group had 2,872 cancer-free individuals: United States (n = 2,399), Ghana (n = 323), Nigeria (n = 85), and Cameroon (n = 65). Whole-exome sequencing was conducted using germline DNA, and data for TERT -rs2242652 were analyzed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated using unconditional logistic regression. Chi-square tests assessed protective allele frequencies. RESULTS In the US cohort, TERT -rs2242652 was significantly associated with lower HCC risk (OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.96]; P = .02), with an allele frequency of 18.8% (15.4% in HCC cases v 19.3% in controls). In the combined sub-Saharan African population, no significant association was observed, but there was a trend toward decreased HCC risk (OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.22]; P = .29), with an allele frequency of 12.2% (10.6% in HCC cases v 12.9% in controls). Separate analyses of Ghanaian, Nigerian, and Cameroonian populations showed similar nonsignificant trends. The protective allele frequency in the combined African populations was significantly lower than in the US cohort ( P < .0001). CONCLUSION In sub-Saharan African populations, there was a lower frequency of the HCC protective allele TERT -rs2242652 compared with European Americans. These findings underscore the importance of multiethnic genetic studies in understanding population differences in HCC risk and developing prevention strategies.

Abstract Background Sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been associated with improved outcomes in heart failure patients, reducing hospitalizations and mortality. However, patients with cardiac amyloidosis were largely excluded from major trials. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the potential benefits of SGLT2i in this population. Purpose To assess the potential benefits of SGLT2i in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. Methods We searched PubMed and Embase for studies comparing SGLT2i use with placebo in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. The primary outcomes analyzed were: (1) all-cause mortality, (2) cardiovascular mortality, (3) hospitalizations, and (4) NT-proBNP levels. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q test and I² statistics. Results We included five observational studies comprising 5,101 patients, of whom 2,528 were receiving SGLT2i. The mean follow-up period ranged from 3 months to 8.7 years. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the SGLT2i group compared to controls (Figure 1a: RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28–0.49; p &lt; 0.00001; I² = 12%). Cardiovascular mortality was also significantly reduced in the SGLT2i group (Figure 1b: RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.16–0.55; p &lt; 0.00001; I² = 25%). NT-proBNP levels were significantly lower in the SGLT2i group (Figure 2a: MD -299.66; 95% CI -493.24 to -106.08; p = 0.002; I² = 0%). There was no significant difference in hospitalization rates between groups (Figure 2b: RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.17–3.38; p = 0.70; I² = 94%). Conclusion These findings suggest that SGLT2i use in cardiac amyloidosis is associated with significant reductions in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and NT-proBNP levels. However, no significant impact on hospitalization rates was observed. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these results

Sharing research code in an open access version-controlled repository offers significant benefits for both science as a whole and for individual researchers. In this article, we focus on this practice, which is fully aligned with the NIH’s Gold Standard Science (GSS) program as well as FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) and TRUST (transparency, responsibility, user focus, sustainability, technology) principles. Gold Standard Science supports open science by emphasizing transparency, reproducibility, and the use of best practices that enable others to verify and extend research. Pairing a research article’s cited data snapshot with a versioned, environment-specific code release, deposited in a companion code repository, ensures that, upon submission to a medical journal, readers and reviewers can directly verify results. An executable and updatable companion code repository complements, rather than replaces, established research data repositories. When code underlying medical research results is made openly available, then other scientists can inspect, run, and validate analyses. These activities enhance reproducibility, which is a core aim of GSS. Shared code also facilitates collaborative innovation by allowing researchers to extend the utility of the code to new datasets and applications. For researchers, code sharing can increase visibility, credibility, and citation impact. Demonstrating transparency through shared executable and updatable code builds trust with journal readers, peer reviewers, funders, and peers. Shared code in an open access repository signals adherence to high standards of scientific integrity and attracts opportunities for collaboration. A researcher who shares code receives recognition as a leader in reproducible, trustworthy research consistent with NIH’s GSS principles.

Background: There is no consensus scoring system for staging and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Commonly used systems include the albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) score, the Barcelona staging classification (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, BCLC), the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), and the model to estimate survival in ambulatory HCC patients (MESIAH). Liver secretion of pseudocholinesterase (PCHE) has been linked to liver function but is poorly studied in the natural history of HCC. We evaluated whether serum PCHE level predicts HCC mortality and whether it enhances existing scoring systems. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of individuals diagnosed with HCC. We collected variables including PCHE level, clinical data used in scoring systems, and time to mortality or liver transplant. We then analyzed the association between these variables and survival using Kaplan–Meier curves, Cox proportional hazards regression models, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and area under the curve (AUC) calculations. Results: We identified 420 individuals with HCC who were tested for PCHE levels, with a follow-up time of more than 20 years. There was a strong inverse relationship between PCHE level and overall survival, with the lowest quartile having high mortality and poor outcomes. Low PCHE level was associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, vascular invasion, poor liver function, and a high likelihood of liver transplant. In contrast, the highest quartile was associated with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) as the underlying cause. Compared with validated scoring systems, ALBI, BCLC, MELD 3.0, and MESIAH, the PCHE level was an independent predictor of mortality. PCHE levels could predict 3-month survival as well as or better than the other scoring systems, with an AUC of 0.74. PCHE level could also predict mortality related to hepatectomy. The addition of PCHE level to MESIAH and ALBI scoring systems could further improve the ability to predict overall mortality in HCC. Conclusions: PCHE is a reliable stand-alone biomarker of HCC prognosis. It is an independent predictor of mortality and can improve the accuracy of existing scoring systems. Improved risk stratification could improve outcomes by informing treatment decisions regarding hepatectomy or other interventions.