Citations

Abstract Background Some centres advocate preoperative radiotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer and arterial involvement despite a lack of Level 1 evidence on survival benefit. Although it has been suggested that preoperative radiotherapy may increase the risk of postpancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH) and morbidity, evidence is again lacking. This study investigated the association between preoperative radiotherapy and both PPH and major morbidity following arterial divestment/resection during pancreatic adenocarcinoma resection after chemotherapy. Methods Consecutive patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and > 180° arterial involvement who were treated with preoperative chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy followed by pancreatic resection with arterial divestment/resection were included in the study. Logistic regression analyses including propensity score-based overlap weighting were performed to investigate associations between radiotherapy and in-hospital PPH grade B/C and major morbidity, expressed as adjusted risk differences (aRDs). Results Overall, 246 patients undergoing pancreatic resection with arterial resection (169, 69%) or divestment (77, 31%) were included. Radiotherapy was not associated with PPH (aRD 6%; 95% confidence interval (c.i.) −3 to 14), regardless of arterial divestment (aRD 3%; 95% c.i. −5 to 11) or arterial resection (aRD 12%; 95% c.i. 1 to 23; Pinteraction = 0.189). Radiotherapy was associated with a 14% (95% c.i. 2 to 25) higher risk of major morbidity, especially after arterial resection (aRD 27%; 95% c.i. 11 to 43) compared with arterial divestment (aRD −12%; 95% c.i. −35 to 11; Pinteraction = 0.006) and after external beam radiotherapy (aRD 21%; 95% c.i. 8 to 32) compared with stereotactic body radiotherapy (aRD −12%; 95% c.i. −27 to 6; Pinteraction = 0.0001). Ninety-day mortality was increased, albeit not significantly, after preoperative radiotherapy (10 (8%) versus 3 (3%) deaths with versus without preoperative radiotherapy, respectively; P = 0.067). Conclusions Radiotherapy before resection of pancreatic cancer with > 180° arterial involvement was associated with an increased risk of postoperative major morbidity when arterial resection, but not arterial divestment, was performed. This risk should be taken into account when considering preoperative radiotherapy in patients who may require arterial resection.

Abstract Background The increased use of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) divestment has been a driver behind the increased resection rate for locally advanced pancreatic cancer following preoperative therapy. This has also resulted in an increase in the rate of postoperative neurogenic diarrhoea, but knowledge about postoperative neurogenic diarrhoea is lacking. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence, risk factors, management, and outcomes of neurogenic diarrhoea after SMA divestment/resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods This multicentre retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing pancreatic adenocarcinoma resection, including SMA divestment/resection, after preoperative chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy between 2016 and 2022. Primary endpoints were the incidence of postoperative neurogenic diarrhoea, associated factors, treatment strategies, and outcomes. Secondary endpoints were the rate of adjuvant chemotherapy and the impact of neurogenic diarrhoea on overall survival (OS). Results Overall, 291 patients who underwent pancreatic resection with concomitant SMA divestment (240, 82%) or resection (51, 18%) were included in the study. Postoperative neurogenic diarrhoea was diagnosed in 193 patients. The adjusted risk of developing neurogenic diarrhoea was 59% (95% confidence interval (c.i.) 46 to 73) after ≤ 180° SMA divestment, 80% (95% c.i. 67 to 93) after > 180° SMA divestment, and 77% (95% c.i. 66 to 88) after SMA resection. Postoperative neurogenic diarrhoea was treated with non-opioid drugs (29, 15%), non-opium opioids (140, 73%), opium tincture (69, 36%), and/or octreotide (49, 25%), and normalized in 51% of patients. After adjusting for confounders, neurogenic diarrhoea was not significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio 0.83; 95% c.i. 0.55 to 1.25). Conclusion Neurogenic diarrhoea occurred in two-thirds of patients following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with concomitant SMA divestment/resection, particularly after > 180° SMA divestment or SMA resection. Although challenging to manage, neurogenic diarrhoea is not associated with impaired OS. Evidence-based treatment strategies are needed for adequate management.

Abstract Background Liver surgery carries a high risk of complications due to the complex interplay of patient-related factors, disease characteristics, and liver function. Expertise is essential for healthcare professionals managing hepatobiliary patients. This European consensus provides evidence-based guidance on selected aspects of peri- and postoperative care. Methods A modified Delphi process was used to achieve consensus, with a 70% agreement threshold. The expert panel comprised hepatobiliary surgeons, anaesthetists, hepatologists, a specialist nurse, and a physiotherapist. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Six topics were addressed: thromboprophylaxis; perioperative antibiotics; prehabilitation/nutrition/mobilization; bile leak including bilioenteric anastomosis leaks; post-hepatectomy haemorrhage; and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Evidence appraisal and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. A patient representative reviewed the guideline. Results Searching the literature yielded 204 included publications from an initial 6514. Thirty-two statements were formulated with a median evidence level of 2. Evidence strength varied by topic with noticeably lower evidence levels in complex surgery settings and less prevalent conditions. In some topics, study heterogeneity and specific inclusion criteria resulted in conditional recommendations, despite high-level evidence. Notably, the weakest evidence was found for perioperative thromboprophylaxis and PHLF management. Strong recommendations were formulated for prehabilitation, early postoperative mobilization, and avoidance of routine drain use. Several evidence gaps warranting multicentre studies were identified. Conclusion Optimizing peri- and postoperative care after liver resection remains challenging. Standardizing key practices and addressing evidence gaps through collaborative research are vital to improve outcomes.

Abstract WSD0922-Fu is an oral, CNS-penetrant, small molecule EGFR inhibitor which potently inhibits EGFR aberrations specific to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and glioblastoma (GBM). MC1914 (NCT04197934) is a first-in-human phase 1 trial in patients with EGFR aberrant recurrent GBM and NSCLC. After determining the maximum tolerated dose, adults with recurrent GBM were treated in two expansion cohorts: (a) non-surgical cohort (6/12 patients thus far): EGFRvIII mutation, first recurrence; food-effect study included (b) surgical cohort (6/6 patients), any EGFR mutation, any recurrence; window-of-opportunity study (WOO) included. Among these 12 patients, median age = 60 years; 50% female; 58% ECOG 0). All patients received prior radiation and temozolomide. After the WOO or food-effect study, patients were dosed at 120 mg BID (5 days on, 2 days off), and escalated to 160 mg BID (5 days on, 2 days off) based on tolerability. Common adverse events (>40%) are comparable to other EGFR inhibitors (acneiform rash, diarrhea, fatigue, xerosis, pruritis). Treatment-related grade 3+ adverse events were limited to lymphopenia (n = 1). WSD0922-Fu exposure in the fed state exceeded the fasted state (median plasma Cmax and AUC0-24h are 1.6x and 1.3x, respectively) with a delayed Tmax (6.0 vs 1.8 hours). For the WOO, time between last dose administered to tumor collection ranged between 4 - 13.5 hours. Median tumor WSD0922-Fu concentration was 0.76 µg/g; estimated median unbound tumor concentration was 24.9 ng/g and within expectations for pharmacodynamic effect. Median brain/plasma ratio = 0.59; median unbound brain/unbound plasma = 0.88. Enrollment to the non-surgical cohort is ongoing, so formal efficacy data remain immature. However, examples of clinical efficacy will be shown along with data on recurrence patterns. Phase 2 clinical trial development is in progress.

Abstract Hereditary adult-onset ataxias are a heterogeneous group of phenotypically overlapping conditions, often caused by pathogenic expansions of short tandem repeats. Currently, 18 repeat disorders with a core phenotype of adult-onset ataxia are known. Diagnosis typically relies on sequential PCR-based methods, which are labour-intensive and lack precision. Long-read sequencing (LRS) has the potential to overcome these limitations and is currently implemented and validated in clinical genetics. Using clinical nanopore Cas9-targeted sequencing (Clin-CATS) for parallel in-depth repeat analysis, we evaluated a diagnostic cohort of 513 adult-onset ataxia patients, determining frequencies of all known repeat-associated ataxias except Spinocerebellar ataxia 4 (SCA4), as well as the carrier frequencies for autosomal-recessive disorders, RFC1 spectrum disorder and Friedreich’s ataxia (FRDA). Additionally, phenotypes of patients with established genetic diagnoses were characterized, especially those of patients living with RFC1 spectrum disorder and SCA27B. Repeat-associated ataxias were confirmed in 33.3% of cases, including rare ataxias, such as SCA10, SCA36 and SCA37, alongside as the most prevalent conditions SCA27B and RFC1 spectrum disorder. Potentially pathogenic expansions in FGF14 were identified in an additional 4.7% of patients. Testing of another 347 patients for ZFHX3 expansions linked to SCA4 did not identify any cases. Dual diagnoses were frequent, occurring in 6.4% of patients with repeat-associated ataxia. We confirmed a high RFC1 spectrum disorder carrier frequency (7.2%) and reclassified certain FXN expansions as likely non-pathogenic, resulting in a lower than estimated carrier frequency for FRDA of 0.8%. We also identified novel repeat configurations in several loci and illustrated the high heterogeneity of repeat expansions in RFC1, highlighting it as a potential source of false results when using PCR-based methods. This study underscores the diagnostic advantages of LRS for comprehensive repeat analysis and recommends its adoption as a standard in clinical genetics, replacing Southern blot and PCR-based approaches. Furthermore, based on our findings in a large patient cohort a re-evaluation of existing phenotype-genotype correlations is recommended as well as evaluating additional parameters alongside the repeat length to improve diagnostic precision of repeat analysis.

Abstract Background Few antiviral therapies have been studied in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and kidney impairment. Herein, the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of remdesivir, its metabolites, and sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin excipient were evaluated in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and severe kidney impairment. Methods In REDPINE, a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, participants aged ≥12 years hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia with acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, or kidney failure were randomized 2:1 to receive intravenous remdesivir (200 mg on day 1; 100 mg daily up to day 5) or placebo (enrollment from March 2021 to March 2022). The primary efficacy end point was the composite of the all-cause mortality rate or invasive mechanical ventilation rate through day 29. Safety was evaluated through day 60. Results Although enrollment concluded early, 243 participants were enrolled and treated (remdesivir, n = 163; placebo, n = 80). At baseline, 90 participants (37.0%) had acute kidney injury (remdesivir, n = 60; placebo, n = 30), 64 (26.3%) had chronic kidney disease (remdesivir, n = 44; placebo, n = 20), and 89 (36.6%) had kidney failure (remdesivir, n = 59; placebo, n = 30); and 31 (12.8%) were vaccinated against COVID-19. Composite all-cause mortality or invasive mechanical ventilation rates through day 29 were 29.4% and 32.5% in the remdesivir and placebo group, respectively (P = .61). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 80.4% for remdesivir versus 77.5% for placebo, and serious adverse events in 50.3% versus 50.0%, respectively. Pharmacokinetic plasma exposure to remdesivir was not affected by kidney function. Conclusions Although the study was underpowered, no significant difference in efficacy was observed between treatment groups. REDPINE demonstrated that remdesivir is safe in patients with COVID-19 and severe kidney impairment. Clinical Trials Registration EudraCT 2020-005416-22; Clinical Trials.gov NCT04745351.

Abstract Background Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality after liver surgery. Standardized assessment of preoperative liver function is crucial to identify patients at risk. These European consensus guidelines provide guidance for preoperative patient assessment. Methods A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus. The expert panel consisted of hepatobiliary surgeons, radiologists, nuclear medicine specialists, and hepatologists. The guideline process was supervised by a methodologist and reviewed by a patient representative. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Evidence assessment and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. Results Based on 271 publications covering 4 key areas, 21 statements (at least 85 per cent agreement) were produced (median level of evidence 2− to 2+). Only a few systematic reviews (2++) and one RCT (1+) were identified. Preoperative liver function assessment should be considered before complex resections, and in patients with suspected or known underlying liver disease, or chemotherapy-associated or drug-induced liver injury. Clinical assessment and blood-based scores reflecting liver function or portal hypertension (for example albumin/bilirubin, platelet count) aid in identifying risk of PHLF. Volumetry of the future liver remnant represents the foundation for assessment, and can be combined with indocyanine green clearance or LiMAx® according to local expertise and availability. Functional MRI and liver scintigraphy are alternatives, combining FLR volume and function in one examination. Conclusion These guidelines reflect established methods to assess preoperative liver function and PHLF risk, and have uncovered evidence gaps of interest for future research.

Renal diseases pose a significant socio‐economic burden on healthcare systems. The development of better diagnostics and prognostics is well‐recognized as a key strategy to resolve these challenges. Central to these developments are MRI biomarkers, due to their potential for monitoring of early pathophysiological changes, renal disease progression or treatment effects. The surge in renal MRI involves major cross‐domain initiatives, large clinical studies, and educational programs. In parallel with these translational efforts, the need for greater (patho)physiological specificity remains, to enable engagement with clinical nephrologists and increase the associated health impact. The ISMRM 2022 Member Initiated Symposium (MIS) on renal MRI spotlighted this issue with the goal of inspiring more solutions from the ISMRM community. This work is a summary of the MIS presentations devoted to: 1) educating imaging scientists and clinicians on renal (patho)physiology and demands from clinical nephrologists, 2) elucidating the connection of MRI parameters with renal physiology, 3) presenting the current state of leading MR surrogates in assessing renal structure and functions as well as their next generation of innovation, and 4) describing the potential of these imaging markers for providing clinically meaningful renal characterization to guide or supplement clinical decision making. We hope to continue momentum of recent years and introduce new entrants to the development process, connecting (patho)physiology with (bio)physics, and conceiving new clinical applications. We envision this process to benefit from cross‐disciplinary collaboration and analogous efforts in other body organs, but also to maximally leverage the unique opportunities of renal physiology.Level of Evidence1Technical Efficacy Stage2

AbstractIntroductionDespite important advances in many areas of hepatobiliary surgical practice during the past decades, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) still represents an important clinical challenge for the hepatobiliary surgeon. The aim of this review is to present the current body of evidence regarding different aspects of PHLF.MethodsA literature review was conducted to identify relevant articles for each topic of PHLF covered in this review. The literature search was performed using Medical Subject Heading terms on PubMed for articles on PHLF in English until May 2022.ResultsUniform reporting on PHLF is lacking due to the use of various definitions in the literature. There is no consensus on optimal preoperative assessment before major hepatectomy to avoid PHLF, although many try to estimate future liver remnant function. Once PHLF occurs, there is still no effective treatment, except liver transplantation, where the reported experience is limited.DiscussionStrict adherence to one definition is advised when reporting data on PHLF. The use of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery criteria of PHLF is recommended. There is still no widespread established method for future liver remnant function assessment. Liver transplantation is currently the only effective way to treat severe, intractable PHLF, but for many indications, this treatment is not available in most countries.