Citations

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathy classically presents as a painful asymmetric axonal neuropathy, multiple mononeuropathies or radiculoplexus neuropathy. Demyelinating electrophysiologic features are rare and may lead to misdiagnosis. We describe a patient with biopsy‐proven vasculitic neuropathy presenting as a severe symmetric demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Methods Clinical, electrophysiologic, imaging, laboratory, and histopathologic findings are presented. Results A 57‐year‐old man developed acute ascending weakness, sensory loss, facial weakness, and areflexia following a febrile illness, with initial improvement before developing recurrent neurological decline 6 weeks after initial symptom onset despite treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange. Cerebrospinal fluid protein was elevated. Nerve conduction studies demonstrated prolonged distal motor latencies, slowed conduction velocities, conduction block, and prolonged blink reflex latencies, fulfilling 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society electrodiagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). MRI demonstrated mild but diffuse lumbosacral plexus enlargement and T2 hyperintensity. Sural nerve biopsy ultimately demonstrated evidence of epineurial inflammation and microvasculitis with ischemic nerve injury, accompanied by both increased rates of axonal degeneration (12%) and segmental demyelination (9%) on teased fiber analysis. Treatment with corticosteroids and rituximab resulted in complete neurological recovery. Interpretation Vasculitic neuropathy may closely mimic CIDP clinically, radiologically, and electrophysiologically. Clues to the vasculitis diagnosis were prominent neuropathic pain, dense denervation on electrophysiology, and poor response to typical CIDP treatment. Peripheral nerve biopsy remains a critical tool in the evaluation of atypical or treatment‐refractory inflammatory neuropathies.

Abstract In response to a Cochrane review (published in April 2026) on the clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies targeting beta amyloid, this perspective outlines a number of critiques. The scientists, methodologists, subject‐matter experts, and clinicians on this perspective strongly recommend that the Cochrane editorial board consider a call for editorial response, correction of press materials, or commissioned reply to this review for four overarching reasons: (1) decision to pool antibodies that do and do not clear beta amyloid, (2) decision to include studies from a time when biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease were not available, (3) analytical and methodological limitations of the approach used, (4) conflating the distinct roles and methodological processes of systematic review and guideline methodologies, (5) contextualizing the present critique within the existing evidence‐synthesis literature, and (6) mechanistic inference beyond the scope of the presented analyses. Conclusions that may not accurately reflect treatment‐specific effects could cause significant downstream clinical and psychosocial harm to those currently undergoing treatment and their family members as well as individuals considering participation in Alzheimer's clinical trials.

BACKGROUND Perineural spread (PNS) of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is a rare and challenging diagnosis. Its clinical and radiological presentation is often subtle and can overlap with radiation-induced neuropathy and malignant nerve tumors, complicating timely diagnosis. The role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the detection of PNS has not been previously described. OBSERVATIONS A 48-year-old man with a history of rectal cancer and perineural invasion presented with progressive, refractory sciatic neuropathic pain. Conventional surveillance imaging was initially negative despite subtle rising of carcinoembryonic antigen and ctDNA levels. Subsequent MRI revealed abnormalities of the lumbosacral plexus and sciatic nerve, and fascicular biopsy confirmed metastatic CRC involving the sciatic nerve, establishing the diagnosis of PNS. LESSONS This case highlights PNS as a rare but important consideration in patients with focal neuropathic symptoms and prior CRC. Circulating tumor DNA positivity may serve as an early indicator of occult tumor activity even within the nerves when imaging is equivocal. However, currently histopathological confirmation remains the only definitive method to distinguish PNS from alternative diagnoses and is essential to guide appropriate management. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25997

Abstract Background The link between regional tau load and clinical manifestation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) highlights the importance of characterizing spatial tau distribution. In typical (memory‐predominant) AD, the spatial progression of tau pathology mirrors the functional connections from temporal lobe epicenters. However, atypical (non‐amnestic‐predominant) AD variants with heterogeneous tau patterns provide a key opportunity to assess the universality of connectivity as a scaffold for tau progression. Method We included tau‐PET data from 320 subjects with atypical AD, characterized by highly heterogeneous tau patterns ( n = 139 posterior cortical atrophy/PCA‐AD; n = 103 logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia/lvPPA‐AD; n = 35 behavioural variant AD/bvAD; n = 43 corticobasal syndrome/CBS‐AD) from 14 sites, with a subset of patients ( n = 78) having longitudinal tau‐PET data. As an independent sample, we further included regional post‐mortem tau stainings from 93 atypical AD patients from two sites ( n = 19 PCA‐AD, n = 32 lvPPA‐AD, n = 23 bvAD, n = 19 CBS‐AD). Gaussian mixture modeling was used to harmonize different tau‐PET tracers by transforming tau‐PET standardized uptake value ratios to tau positivity probabilities (a uniform scale ranging from 0% to 100%). Using linear regression, we assessed whether 1) brain regions with stronger functional connectivity showed greater covariance in cross‐sectional and longitudinal tau‐PET and post‐mortem tau pathology, and 2) functional connectivity of tau‐PET epicenters and tau‐PET accumulation epicenters was associated with cross‐sectional and longitudinal tau patterns. Result Tau‐PET epicenters—defined as the 5% brain regions with the highest tau load—aligned with clinical variants, e.g. a posterior pattern in PCA‐AD (“visual AD”) and left‐hemispheric temporal predominance in lvPPA‐AD (“language AD”) (Figure 1). More strongly functionally connected regions showed correlated concurrent tau‐PET levels, which was confirmed with post‐mortem data (Figure 2). Moreover, the connectivity profile of tau‐PET epicenters and accumulation epicenters corresponded to tau‐PET progression patterns (Figure 3). Conclusion Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that tau propagation occurs along functional connections originating from local epicenters, across all AD clinical variants. Since tau proteinopathy is a key driver of neurodegeneration and cognitive decline, this finding may advance personalized medicine and participant‐specific endpoints in clinical trials.