Back to Authors

Jones, Peter Simon

0000-0001-9695-0702

Mayo Clinic

University of Cambridge

Citations 5

Peripheral and central inflammation associated with progressive cognitive decline in dementia with Lewy bodies
Swann, Peter, White, Simon R, Mak, Elijah , Surendranathan, Ajenthan, Jones, P Simon, Su, Li, Savulich, George , Kigar, Stacey, Mckeever, Anna, Fryer, Tim, Hong, Young T, Aigbirhio, Franklin I, Rowe, James B, Malpetti, Maura , Chouliaras, Leonidas , Mak, Elijah , Savulich, George , O'Brien, John Tiernan , Swann, Peter , Malpetti, Maura , White, Simon Richard , Surendranathan, Ajenthan , Jones, Peter Simon , Kigar, Stacey L. , McKeever, Anna , Fryer, Tim, Aigbirhio, Franklin I. , Rowe, James B.

Brain Communications | July 11, 2026 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/braincomms/fcag274 Get It

Abstract Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most common cause of neurodegenerative dementia, pathologically defined by the presence of Lewy bodies. Peripheral and central inflammation are increasingly recognized in DLB in clinical, post-mortem and animal studies. Finding clinically relevant biomarkers of inflammation in DLB will support the identification of novel pathways for disease-modifying therapies or use in clinical trials of immunomodulatory agents. Whilst there are cross-sectional studies of inflammation markers in DLB, there is limited evidence on the association between these markers and cognitive decline over time. Twenty participants with DLB underwent blood sampling for serum inflammatory markers, paired with PET imaging of the translocator protein (TSPO) and up to 4 years of longitudinal cognitive testing. Thirty participants with Alzheimer’s disease—comprising both Alzheimer’s dementia and/or mild cognitive impairment with biomarker evidence of amyloid pathology (AD/MCI+)—and 28 controls were also recruited for group comparisons. Data from 42 baseline cytokine immunoassays and TSPO PET were used as predictors of longitudinal cognitive scores in linear mixed-effects models. Partial least squares regression was used to test the association between peripheral and central inflammation. Using peripheral inflammatory markers as single predictors, we identified 14 associated with either a slower or faster rate of cognitive decline in DLB, whilst no single marker was predictive of decline in AD/MCI+. As many inflammatory markers were highly correlated, we used principal component analysis to identify a cytokine component associated with reduced cognitive decline in both DLB and AD/MCI+, that overlapped with the single markers identified in the previous analysis. A separate component was associated with cognitive decline in AD/MCI+ or DLB with Alzheimer’s dementia co-pathology (ascertained by amyloid PET). Widespread TSPO binding was associated with reduced cognitive decline in DLB, whilst a fronto-temporal pattern was associated with more rapid cognitive decline in both DLB and AD/MCI+. There were associations between peripheral cytokines and TSPO PET in AD/MCI+, but these were not significant in DLB. Overall, peripheral and central inflammation predicted cognitive decline in DLB. Specific patterns associated with both faster and slower rates of decline were identified. These profiles had both overlapping and contrasting associations when compared to AD/MCI+. Collectively, these data add to a body of evidence suggesting clinically relevant levels of inflammation in DLB. Future studies in larger, multi-site cohorts with multiple biomarker sampling points are required to understand the impact and dynamics of inflammation across all stages of the disease.
Heterogeneous tau patterns in atypical AD are explained by connectivity‐associated tau progression
Bruin, Hannah de , Groot, Colin , (ADNI), Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Barthel, Henryk, Bischof, Gérard N. , Boon, Baayla D.C., Brendel, Matthias, Cash, David M, Day, Gregory S, Dickerson, Brad C., Dyck, Christopher H van, Flier, Wiesje M. van der, Fredericks, Carolyn , Fryer, Tim D. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de, Gordon, Brian A., Radford, Jonathan Graff, Hansson, Oskar H., Höglinger, Günter U, Hönig, Merle C., Irwin, David J., Jones, P Simon, Josephs, Keith A., Katsumi, Yuta , Lee, Eddie B., Xiong, Chengjie , McGinnis, Scott M., Mecca, Adam P. , O'Brien, John T, O'Dell, Ryan S, Rabinovici, Gil D., Rahmouni, Nesrine, Rosa‐Neto, Pedro, Sabri, Osama, Schott, Jonathan M, Schroeter, Matthias L, Seeley, William W., Servaes, Stijn, Sintini, Irene , Smith, Ruben, Stevenson, Jenna , Strandberg, Olof, Therriault, Joseph, Tideman, Pontus , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Trainer, Anne, Wekselman, Fattin, Weston, Philip SJ., Whitwell, Jennifer L., Yong, Keir X X, O’Brien, John T. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Day, Gregory S. , O'Brien, John Tiernan , Day, Gregory S , Xiong, Chengjie , Rabinovici, Gil D , Groot, Colin , Initiative, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging, Blazhenets, Ganna , Boellaard, Ronald , Boon, Baayla D.C. , Brendel, Matthias , Cash, David M. , Coath, William , Dickerson, Brad C., Doering, Elena , Drzezga, Alexander E. , Dyck, Christopher H. van , Eimeren, Thilo van , Flier, Wiesje M. van der , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Gordon, Brian A. , Grinberg, Lea T. , Hansson, Oskar , Hobbs, Diana A. , Höglinger, Günter U. , Irwin, David J. , Jones, Peter Simon , Josephs, Keith A. , Joie, Renaud La , Lee, Eddie B, Malpetti, Maura , Mohanty, Rosaleena , Nasrallah, Ilya M. , O’Dell, Ryan S. , Palleis, Carla , Perneczky, Robert , Phillips, Jeffrey S , Putcha, Deepti , Rahmouni, Nesrine , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Rowe, James B. , Rullmann, Michael , Saur, Dorothee , Schildan, Andreas , Schott, Jonathan M. , Schroeter, Matthias L , Seeley, William W. , Servaes, Stijn , Spina, Salvatore , Stomrud, Erik , Therriault, Joseph , Visser, Denise , Weston, Philip S.J. , Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Wolk, David A. , Yong, Keir , Pijnenburg, Yolande A.L. , Franzmeier, Nicolai , Ossenkoppele, Rik

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 7, 2026 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70856_104871 Get It

Abstract Background The link between regional tau load and clinical manifestation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) highlights the importance of characterizing spatial tau distribution. In typical (memory‐predominant) AD, the spatial progression of tau pathology mirrors the functional connections from temporal lobe epicenters. However, atypical (non‐amnestic‐predominant) AD variants with heterogeneous tau patterns provide a key opportunity to assess the universality of connectivity as a scaffold for tau progression. Method We included tau‐PET data from 320 subjects with atypical AD, characterized by highly heterogeneous tau patterns ( n = 139 posterior cortical atrophy/PCA‐AD; n = 103 logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia/lvPPA‐AD; n = 35 behavioural variant AD/bvAD; n = 43 corticobasal syndrome/CBS‐AD) from 14 sites, with a subset of patients ( n = 78) having longitudinal tau‐PET data. As an independent sample, we further included regional post‐mortem tau stainings from 93 atypical AD patients from two sites ( n = 19 PCA‐AD, n = 32 lvPPA‐AD, n = 23 bvAD, n = 19 CBS‐AD). Gaussian mixture modeling was used to harmonize different tau‐PET tracers by transforming tau‐PET standardized uptake value ratios to tau positivity probabilities (a uniform scale ranging from 0% to 100%). Using linear regression, we assessed whether 1) brain regions with stronger functional connectivity showed greater covariance in cross‐sectional and longitudinal tau‐PET and post‐mortem tau pathology, and 2) functional connectivity of tau‐PET epicenters and tau‐PET accumulation epicenters was associated with cross‐sectional and longitudinal tau patterns. Result Tau‐PET epicenters—defined as the 5% brain regions with the highest tau load—aligned with clinical variants, e.g. a posterior pattern in PCA‐AD (“visual AD”) and left‐hemispheric temporal predominance in lvPPA‐AD (“language AD”) (Figure 1). More strongly functionally connected regions showed correlated concurrent tau‐PET levels, which was confirmed with post‐mortem data (Figure 2). Moreover, the connectivity profile of tau‐PET epicenters and accumulation epicenters corresponded to tau‐PET progression patterns (Figure 3). Conclusion Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that tau propagation occurs along functional connections originating from local epicenters, across all AD clinical variants. Since tau proteinopathy is a key driver of neurodegeneration and cognitive decline, this finding may advance personalized medicine and participant‐specific endpoints in clinical trials.
Connectivity as a universal predictor of tau progression in atypical Alzheimer’s disease
Bruin, Hannah de , Groot, Colin , Barthel, Henryk , Bischof, Gérard N. , Boon, Baayla D.C. , Brendel, Matthias , Cash, David M. , Coath, William , Day, Gregory S. , Dyck, Christopher H. van , Fredericks, Carolyn , Fryer, Tim D. , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Hobbs, Diana A. , Hoenig, Merle C. , Josephs, Keith A. , Katsumi, Yuta , Joie, Renaud La , Xiong, Chengjie , Malpetti, Maura , McGinnis, Scott M., Mecca, Adam P. , O’Brien, John T. , Putcha, Deepti , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Rahmouni, Nesrine , Rullmann, Michael , Saur, Dorothee , Servaes, Stijn , Sintini, Irene , Stevenson, Jenna , Stomrud, Erik , Strandberg, Olof, Tideman, Pontus , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Trainer, Anne, Wekselman, Fattin, Weston, Philip S.J. , Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Yong, Keir , de Bruin, Hannah , Brendel, Matthias , Cash, David M , Coath, William , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , van Eimeren, Thilo , van der Flier, Wiesje M , Fredericks, Carolyn A , Gordon, Brian A , Graff-Radford, Jonathan , Grinberg, Lea , Hansson, Oskar , Irwin, David J , Josephs, Keith A , Katsumi, Yuta , La Joie, Renaud , Lee, Edward B , Xiong, Chengjie , Malpetti, Maura , Mohanty, Rosaleena , O'Brien, John Tiernan , Palleis, Carla , Phillips, Jeffrey S , Putcha, Deepti , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Schott, Jonathan M , Schroeter, Matthias L , Smith, Ruben , Spina, Salvatore , Therriault, Joseph , Whitwell, Jennifer , Yong, Keir X X , Franzmeier, Nicolai , Day, Gregory S , Stomrud, Erik , Rabinovici, Gil D , Blazhenets, Ganna , Boellaard, Ronald , Doering, Elena , Drzezga, Alexander E. , Flier, Wiesje M. van der , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Gordon, Brian A. , Grinberg, Lea T. , Hansson, Oskar , Höglinger, Günter U. , Irwin, David J. , Jones, Peter Simon , Lee, Edward B. , Mohanty, Rosaleena , Nasrallah, Ilya M. , O’Dell, Ryan S. , Perneczky, Robert , Rowe, James B. , Sabri, Osama , Schildan, Andreas , Schott, Jonathan M. , Seeley, William W. , Servaes, Stijn , Spina, Salvatore , Visser, Denise , Wolk, David A. , Pijnenburg, Yolande A.L. , Franzmeier, Nicolai , Ossenkoppele, Rik

Brain | August 8, 2025 | Volume: 148 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 3893-3912

10.1093/brain/awaf279 Get It

Abstract The link between regional tau load and clinical manifestation of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) highlights the importance of characterizing spatial tau distribution across disease variants. In typical (memory-predominant) AD, the spatial progression of tau pathology mirrors the functional connections from temporal lobe epicentres. However, given the limited spatial heterogeneity of tau in typical AD, atypical (non-amnestic-predominant) AD variants with distinct tau patterns provide a key opportunity to investigate the universality of connectivity as a scaffold for tau progression. In this large-scale, multicentre study across 14 international sites, we included cross-sectional tau-PET data from 320 individuals with atypical AD (n = 139 posterior cortical atrophy/PCA-AD; n = 103 logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia/lvPPA-AD; n = 35 behavioural variant AD/bvAD; n = 43 corticobasal syndrome/CBS-AD), with a subset of individuals (n = 78) having longitudinal tau-PET data. Additionally, as an independent sample, we included regional post-mortem tau stainings from 93 atypical AD patients from two sites (n = 19 PCA-AD, n = 32 lvPPA-AD, n = 23 bvAD, n = 19 CBS-AD). Gaussian mixture modelling was used to harmonize different tau-PET tracers by transforming tau-PET standardized uptake value ratios to tau positivity probabilities (a uniform scale ranging from 0% to 100%). Using linear regression, we assessed whether brain regions with stronger resting-state functional MRI-based functional connectivity, derived from healthy elderly controls in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), showed greater covariance in cross-sectional and longitudinal tau-PET and post-mortem tau pathology. Furthermore, we examined whether functional connectivity of tau-PET epicentres (i.e. the top 5% of regions with the highest baseline tau load) and tau-PET accumulation epicentres (i.e. the top 5% of regions with the highest tau accumulation rates) was associated with cross-sectional and longitudinal tau patterns. Our findings show that tau-PET epicentres aligned with clinical variants, e.g. a visual network predominant pattern in PCA-AD (‘visual AD’) and left-hemispheric temporal predominance, particularly within the language network, in lvPPA-AD (‘language AD’). Moreover, more strongly functionally connected regions showed correlated concurrent tau-PET levels (confirmed with post-mortem data) and tau-PET accumulation rates. The functional connectivity profile of tau-PET epicentres and accumulation epicentres corresponded to tau-PET progression patterns, with higher tau-PET levels and accumulation rates in functionally close regions, and lower tau-PET levels and accumulation rates in functionally distant regions. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that tau propagation occurs along functional connections originating from local epicentres, across all AD clinical variants. Since tau proteinopathy is a major driver of neurodegeneration and cognitive decline, this finding may advance personalized medicine and participant-specific end points in clinical trials.
Connectivity as a universal predictor of tau spreading in typical and atypical Alzheimer’s disease
Bruin, Hannah de , Groot, Colin , ADNI, Barthel, Henryk , Bischof, Gérard N. , Brendel, Matthias, Dickerson, Brad C., Dyck, Christopher H van, Fredericks, Carolyn , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan, Hönig, Merle C., Jones, P Simon, Josephs, Keith A. , Katsumi, Yuta , Lee, Eddie B, McGinnis, Scott M., Mecca, Adam P. , O’Brien, John T. , Rahmouni, Nesrine , Sabri, Osama, Servaes, Stijn , Sintini, Irene , Stevenson, Jenna , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Trainer, Anne, Whitwell, Jennifer L., O'Brien, John Tiernan , Groot, Colin , ADNI, Boellaard, Ronald , Brendel, Matthias , Cash, David M. , Coath, William , Day, Gregory S. , Doering, Elena , Drzezga, Alexander E. , Dyck, Christopher van , Eimeren, Thilo van , Flier, Wiesje M. van der , Fryer, Tim D. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Gordon, Brian A. , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Hobbs, Diana A. , Höglinger, Günter U. , Irwin, David J. , Jones, Peter Simon , Xiong, Chengjie , Malpetti, Maura , Nasrallah, Ilya M. , O’Dell, Ryan S. , Palleis, Carla , Perneczky, Robert , Phillips, Jeffrey S , Pijnenburg, Yolande A.L. , Putcha, Deepti , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Rowe, James B. , Rullmann, Michael , Saur, Dorothee , Schildan, Andreas , Schott, Jonathan M. , Schroeter, Matthias L , Therriault, Joseph , Visser, Denise , Weston, Philip S.J. , Whitwell, Jennifer , Wolk, David A. , Franzmeier, Nicolai , Ossenkoppele, Rik

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.085869 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThere is a strong link between tau and progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), necessitating an understanding of tau spreading mechanisms. Prior research, predominantly in typical AD, suggested that tau propagates from epicenters (regions with earliest tau) to functionally connected regions. However, given the constrained spatial heterogeneity of tau in typical AD, validating this connectivity‐based tau spreading model in AD variants with distinct tau deposition patterns is crucial.MethodWe included 269 amyloid‐β‐positive (PET/CSF) individuals with clinically diagnosed atypical AD (113 posterior cortical atrophy, PCA‐AD; 83 logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia, lvPPA‐AD; 33 behavioural variant AD, bvAD; 40 corticobasal syndrome, CBS‐AD) and 68 with typical AD from 12 international cohorts, who underwent tau‐PET (54% [18F]AV1451/[18F]flortaucipir/Tauvid, 27% [18F]MK6240, 19% [18F]PI2620). Using Gaussian mixture modeling including amyloid‐β‐negative controls, cross‐sectional tau‐PET standardized uptake value ratios within Schaefer‐200 atlas regions were transformed to tau positivity probabilities. Tau epicenters were defined as the 5% regions with highest tau positivity probabilities. For each variant, the association between functional connectivity‐based distance (using the 30% strongest positive region‐to‐region connections of a group‐average connectivity matrix from ADNI elderly controls) and tau‐PET covariance (group‐average correlation per region pair) was assessed through linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, site, and Euclidean distance. Regions were categorized based on functional proximity to the epicenter (quartiles 1‐4) and tau positivity probabilities were assessed accordingly.ResultTau positivity probabilities matched clinical variants, with a posterior pattern in PCA‐AD, left‐hemispheric dominant pattern in lvPPA‐AD, widespread pattern in bvAD, sensorimotor cortex involvement in CBS‐AD, and temporo‐parietal predominance in typical AD (Figure 1). In line with this, tau epicenters were highly heterogeneous across variants (Figure 1). In all variants, greater tau‐PET covariance was associated with shorter functional connectivity‐based distance (Figure 2). We observed that regions in closer functional proximity to the epicenter exhibited higher tau positivity probabilities than regions functionally further away (p<0.05, Figure 3).ConclusionThis multi‐center study shows that the brain’s functional architecture serves as a universal predictor of tau spreading in AD. Since tau is a key driver of neurodegeneration and cognitive decline in AD, this finding holds potential for personalized medicine and defining participant‐specific endpoints in clinical trials.
Connectivity as a universal predictor of tau spreading in typical and atypical Alzheimer’s disease
Bruin, Hannah de , Groot, Colin , ADNI, Barthel, Henryk , Bischof, Gérard N. , Brendel, Matthias, Dickerson, Brad C., Dyck, Christopher H van, Fredericks, Carolyn , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan, Hönig, Merle C., Jones, P Simon, Josephs, Keith A. , Katsumi, Yuta , Lee, Eddie B, McGinnis, Scott M., Mecca, Adam P. , Rahmouni, Nesrine , Servaes, Stijn , Sintini, Irene , Stevenson, Jenna , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Trainer, Anne, Whitwell, Jennifer L., ADNI, Boellaard, Ronald , Brendel, Matthias , Cash, David M. , Coath, William , Day, Gregory S. , Doering, Elena , Drzezga, Alexander E. , Dyck, Christopher van , Eimeren, Thilo van , Flier, Wiesje M. van der , Fryer, Tim D. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Gordon, Brian A. , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Hobbs, Diana A. , Höglinger, Günter U. , Irwin, David J. , Jones, Peter Simon , Xiong, Chengjie , Malpetti, Maura , Nasrallah, Ilya M. , O'Brien, John Tiernan , O’Dell, Ryan S. , Palleis, Carla , Perneczky, Robert , Phillips, Jeffrey S , Pijnenburg, Yolande A.L. , Putcha, Deepti , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Rowe, James B. , Rullmann, Michael , Sabri, Osama , Saur, Dorothee , Schildan, Andreas , Schott, Jonathan M. , Schroeter, Matthias L , Therriault, Joseph , Visser, Denise , Weston, Philip S.J. , Whitwell, Jennifer , Wolk, David A. , Franzmeier, Nicolai , Ossenkoppele, Rik

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S9 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.093663 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThere is a strong link between tau and progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), necessitating an understanding of tau spreading mechanisms. Prior research, predominantly in typical AD, suggested that tau propagates from epicenters (regions with earliest tau) to functionally connected regions. However, given the constrained spatial heterogeneity of tau in typical AD, validating this connectivity‐based tau spreading model in AD variants with distinct tau deposition patterns is crucial.MethodWe included 269 amyloid‐ß‐positive (PET/CSF) individuals with clinically diagnosed atypical AD (113 posterior cortical atrophy, PCA‐AD; 83 logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia, lvPPA‐AD; 33 behavioural variant AD, bvAD; 40 corticobasal syndrome, CBS‐AD) and 68 with typical AD from 12 international cohorts, who underwent tau‐PET (54% [18F]AV1451/[18F]flortaucipir/Tauvid, 27% [18F]MK6240, 19% [18F]PI2620). Using Gaussian mixture modeling including amyloid‐ß‐negative controls, cross‐sectional tau‐PET standardized uptake value ratios within Schaefer‐200 atlas regions were transformed to tau positivity probabilities. Tau epicenters were defined as the 5% regions with highest tau positivity probabilities. For each variant, the association between functional connectivity‐based distance (using the 30% strongest positive region‐to‐region connections of a group‐average connectivity matrix from ADNI elderly controls) and tau‐PET covariance (group‐average correlation per region pair) was assessed through linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, site, and Euclidean distance. Regions were categorized based on functional proximity to the epicenter (quartiles 1‐4) and tau positivity probabilities were assessed accordingly.ResultTau positivity probabilities matched clinical variants, with a posterior pattern in PCA‐AD, left‐hemispheric dominant pattern in lvPPA‐AD, widespread pattern in bvAD, sensorimotor cortex involvement in CBS‐AD, and temporo‐parietal predominance in typical AD (Fig.1). In line with this, tau epicenters were highly heterogeneous across variants (Fig.1). In all variants, greater tau‐PET covariance was associated with shorter functional connectivity‐based distance (Fig.2). We observed that regions in closer functional proximity to the epicenter exhibited higher tau positivity probabilities than regions functionally further away (p<0.05, Fig.3).ConclusionThis multi‐center study shows that the brain’s functional architecture serves as a universal predictor of tau spreading in AD. Since tau is a key driver of neurodegeneration and cognitive decline in AD, this finding holds potential for personalized medicine and defining participant‐specific endpoints in clinical trials.