Citations

Background Evidence to guide the optimal timing of antiplatelet and oral anticoagulants (OACs) therapy after hemorrhagic infarction (HI) versus parenchymal hematoma (PH) is limited and inconsistent, leading to substantial variation in practice. This study's goal was to study the practice pattern and compare clinical outcomes associated with early‐versus‐delayed initiation of antiplatelet/OACs after hemorrhagic transformation (HT). Methods This multicenter, retrospective, cross‐sectional study included patients with acute ischemic stroke and HT. Patients with an HI or PH were categorized by HT to antithrombotic initiation time, and their outcomes—30‐day HT exacerbation, composite outcomes of recurrent stroke/systemic emboli, 90‐day vascular death, and functional outcomes—were compared. Results Of 748 patients, 496 received antiplatelets, and 252 received OACs after HT. The median HT‐to‐antiplatelet time was significantly shorter after HI than PH (1 [interquartile range, 0–2] versus 3 [interquartile range, 1–5] days; P <0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in HT exacerbation and composite outcomes (30‐day), as well as vascular death and unfavorable functional outcomes (90‐day), between patients who received same‐day, early (HI, <1 day; PH, <3 days), or late (HI, >1 day; PH, >3 days) antiplatelets after either HI or PH. Among patients on OACs, those with HI had shorter median HT‐to‐OAC time than PH (7 [interquartile range, 2–15] versus 15 [interquartile range, 7–32] days; P <0.001). Although HT exacerbation rates (30‐day) were comparable between early (HI, <7 days; PH, <15 days) and late (HI, >7 days; PH, >15 days) OAC initiation after either HI or PH, late initiation after PH was accompanied by higher rates of composite outcomes (30‐day) than early initiation (20.7% versus 3%; P =0.044). Regression models adjusted for demographics, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and stroke severity showed no statistically significant association between early initiation of antiplatelets or OACs with HT exacerbation risk. Conclusions Our study found no statistically significant difference in HT exacerbation between early and late initiation of antiplatelets or OACs among patients with HI/PH, while prolonged delay among patients with PH were accompanied by increased systemic thromboembolic events. Although these findings offer preliminary clinical insight, prospective studies are needed.

ABSTRACT Background The brain–heart axis is central to vascular health, yet no imaging biomarkers capture integrated dysfunction across neural and coronary microvascular networks. Although coronary microvascular dysfunction links to cognitive decline, neural correlates connecting cerebral efficiency with coronary physiology remain unclear. Objectives To determine whether the Unified Structural and Functional Connectivity (USFC)—a multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) “traffic map” of brain network efficiency—predicts coronary endothelial function and cognition in women with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). Methods Thirty‐three women with suspected INOCA from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study (NCT03876223) underwent invasive coronary function testing, cardiac MRI, cognitive evaluation, and multimodal brain MRI. USFC, structural connectivity (SC), and functional connectivity (FC) were computed for predefined 10 backbone pathways. Support vector regression and logistic classification assessed predictive performance. Results USFC explained 16%–20% more variance in coronary endothelial function, myocardial perfusion reserve, and cognition than SC or FC alone ( p < 0.05). Connectivity between the left caudate–superior medial orbital gyrus and right calcarine–inferior occipital gyrus emerged as robust predictors of crystallized cognition ( r = –0.78, p FDR < 0.05) and coronary endothelial function ( r = 0.70, p FDR < 0.05), respectively. USFC also best discriminated low versus high coronary blood flow (area under the ROC curve [AUC]: USFC 0.622 vs. SC 0.349 and FC 0.425; p < 0.05). Conclusions USFC identifies neuro–cardiac pathways linking cerebral efficiency with coronary endothelial function. These results introduce a sensitive biomarker of systemic vulnerability, highlighting occipital and frontostriatal pathways as shared substrates of dysfunction. USFC offers a mechanistic framework for detecting vascular risk across metabolically demanding tissues. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03876223