Citations

Introduction: Right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing appears to have detrimental effects on cardiac function and long term outcomes. Right ventricular non-apical (RVNA) pacing, especially in the septal position, has been postulated as an alternative that may lead to less morbidity and mortality. Prior studies have shown conflicting results and been limited by small numbers and short follow-up. We aimed to determine if right ventricular septal lead position was associated with a reduction in long-term mortality compared to RVA lead position. Methods: Patients who underwent dual-chamber pacemaker implantation from 2004 through 2013 were evaluated for right ventricular lead position based on chest radiographs. Lead positions were divided in to apical or non-apical. Non-apical lead positions were subdivided to isolate a septal lead position group. Mortality was compared between these groups. Results: During the study period, 3456 patients underwent dual-chamber pacemaker placement and had images appropriate for lead position evaluation. The group was 53.5% male with a mean age of 74 ± 13 years. RVNA lead position was found in 976 (28.2%) patients, including 243 (7.0%) with a septal position. There was no significant difference in age or prior heart failure diagnosis between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis did not reveal a significant difference in mortality between patients with RVA versus RVNA lead position during 5 year follow-up (p = 0.82). However, septal lead position was associated with a significantly lower mortality compared with RVA position (p = 0.03) (figure). Conclusions: Right ventricular septal lead position is associated with a lower long-term mortality than RVA lead position. This has substantial implications regarding the preferred site for ventricular pacing lead placement.

Abstract Background Pneumopericardium is an uncommon clinical finding. It most commonly occurs after chest trauma but can also emerge as a complication following interventional or surgical procedures and can result in life-threatening complications. A high index of clinical suspicion should be present and once the condition is recognized, it should be managed promptly. Paucity of literature on pneumopericardium makes outlining any new case of paramount importance to emphasize the aspects of diagnosis and management of this rare condition. Case summary A 59-year-old woman with severe mitral valve and moderate tricuspid valve regurgitation underwent mitral and tricuspid valve repair with uneventful post-operative in-hospital stay. She presented 10 days after discharge with progressive shortness of breath. Chest X-ray revealed right hydropneumothorax. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) performed in the emergency department showed an apparently small pericardial effusion with patient in supine position; the effusion size increased substantially when imaging in left lateral decubitus, with presence of intrapericardial air bubbles. Computed tomography scan of the chest confirmed the presence of right hydropneumothorax and hydropneumopericardium, with a communicating pleuro-pericardial tract. The patient underwent chest tube placement which successfully decompressed both pleural and pericardial space. Discussion Hydropneumopericardium is a rare post-operative complication. Comprehensive TTE with imaging from multiple acoustic windows is mandatory when evaluating the extent of pericardial effusion. Presence of cardiac tamponade is crucial in determining the management plan.

AbstractIntroductionCardiac pacing from the right ventricular apex is associated with detrimental long‐term effects and nonapical pacing locations may be associated with improved outcomes. There is little data regarding complications with nonapical lead positions. The aim of this study was to assess long‐term outcomes and lead‐related complications associated with differing ventricular lead tip position.Methods and resultsAll adult patients who underwent dual‐chamber pacemaker implantation from 2004 to 2014 were included if they had postprocedure chest radiographs amenable to lead position determination. Long‐term outcomes and lead‐related complication rates were recorded. These were compared at 5 years between: (1) apical and septal leads, (2) apical and nonseptal nonapical (NSNA), and (3) apical and septal with >40% ventricular pacing. We retrospectively evaluated 3,450 patients, which included 238 with a septal position and 733 with NSNA lead positions. Septal lead position was associated with a lower mortality compared to apical leads (24% vs. 31%, P = 0.02). In patients with greater than 40% pacing, septal leads were associated with significantly higher rates of incident atrial fibrillation compared to apical leads (49% vs. 34%, P = 0.04). NSNA positions were associated with a significantly higher rate of lead dislodgement (4% vs. 2%, P = 0.005) and need for revision (8% vs. 5%, P = 0.005).ConclusionsSeptal pacemaker lead position is associated with a lower mortality compared to apically placed leads, but a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation with higher percentage ventricular pacing. NSNA lead locations are associated with more complications and should be avoided.