Citations

5510 Background: Transcriptional profiling of ovarian cancers has proven to be complex. As such it has been difficult to validate existing signatures across studies. Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) researchers have identified four molecular subtypes of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). However, survival duration did not differ significantly for the TCGA subtypes. Potential limitations of the TCGA data include short clinical follow-up (45% were alive at the time of last follow-up) and the need to unify gene expression measures from multiple platforms. Methods: Clinically annotated stage-II–IV HGSOC samples (n = 175) with >70% tumor cell content were profiled using the Agilent Whole Human Genome 4 x 44K chip. To identify subtypes non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) of mRNA expression was performed using ~2000 genes with the highest variability across patients. In parallel differentially expressed genes were identified using the Rosetta Similarity Search Tool as well as analysis of variance based on genes known to be involved in epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Results: Median follow-up time was 35 months (range, 0–202 months, 12% were alive at the time of last follow-up). NMF clustering confirmed four HGSOC subtypes (immunoreactive, differentiated, proliferative, and mesenchymal) on the basis of gene content in the clusters. Pathway signatures with therapeutic potential were identified for individual or multiple subtypes. Survival differed significantly between the four molecular subgroups in univariate (Hazard Ratio [HR] 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-4.1, p = 0.007) and multivariate (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0, p = 0.003) analyses when accounting for age, stage, grade, and postoperative residual tumor. Using the supervised clustering approach two distinct molecular subtypes of HGSOC based on epithelial and mesenchymal gene expression signatures were identified with significantly different survival outcomes. Conclusions: Here we independently validate and expand upon the molecular TCGA classification of HGSOC. The potential of these two prognostic classifiers may lie in their ability to recognize categories of patients that are more likely to respond to particular therapies.

TPS2621 Background: TKM-080301 is a lipid nanoparticle formulation of a small interfering RNA (siRNA) directed against PLK1, a serine/threonine kinase that regulates multiple critical aspects of cell cycle progression and mitosis. Anti-tumor activity, RNA interference and pharmacodynamic effects of PLK1 inhibition have been conclusively demonstrated in preclinical models. Demonstration of pharmacodynamic effects of PLK1 inhibition in patient biopsy samples is an exploratory objective of this first-in-human study. Methods: TKME080301 is being evaluated in an open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation study in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Sequential cohorts of 3 to 6 patients receive TKME080301 as a 30-minute intravenous infusion on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment can continue until disease progression, based on overall clinical benefit. Tumor response is determined according to RECIST criteria. Primary study objectives include determination of safety, maximum tolerated dose and dose limiting toxicities. Secondary objectives include characterization of pharmacokinetics and the preliminary assessment of anti-tumor activity. Five cohorts have been enrolled and a tentative Phase 2 dose has been identified. An expansion cohort of 10 patients began enrolling in February, 2013. The focus of the expansion cohort will be to collect additional safety and pharmacokinetic data at the tentative Phase 2 dose, as well as pharmacodynamic data from mandatory biopsy samples. Pre- and post-dose biopsy samples will be evaluated for potential evidence of PLK1 inhibition using 5’ RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) polymerase chain reaction (to identify the predicted PLK1 mRNA cleavage product), histology (to assess for the presence of aberrant mitotic figures) and immunohistochemistry. An update on enrollment and pharmacodynamic evaluations will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01262235.

5087 Background: Indication, technique and extent of lymph-node-dissection (LND) in endometrial cancer (EC) remains controversial and is strongly debated in cancer community. We conducted a national- and at a second step an international-survey evaluating the current status-quo of the surgical and medical management of EC. Methods: A validated 15-item-questionnaire regarding surgical and adjuvant procedures of EC was sent to all major gynaecological cancer societies and study groups worldwide. The questionnaire could also be answered online. Results: In a phase-I-national trial, the questionnaire was validated on basis of 316 German institutions. On the phase-II-international survey a total of 302 questionnaires were answered from 24 countries, mainly from Japan (38.7%), Spain (8.3%), Austria (7%), United-Kingdom (6.3%), Italy (6%), USA (4.3%) and Canada (4%). The vast majority of the participating clinics were academic (62.8%), while 75.2% of them belonged to gynaecology. Only 0.7% of the clinics internationally reported never performing LND in EC. 62.3% of the clinics perform both a pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection. 59.1% of the participants performed a systematic lymph node dissection with the intention of both adequate staging and for therapeutic value. 15.05% of the clinics perform LND up to the common-iliac-arteries, 9.03% up to the inferior-mesenteric-artery and 70.6% up to the renal-veins. The most common risk-factors to indicate LND were: high-grading (93%), non-endometrioid-histology (90.1%), lymphovascular-invasion (55.3%), blood-vessel invasion (45.4%) and tumor-diameter >2cm (38.4%). For advanced stage III&IV disease the vast majority (60% and 80%, respectively) of the physicians indicated systemic chemotherapy alone. Conclusions: This study presents the large variety in clinical management of EC worldwide, underlining so the high need of future prospective randomised trials which will establish standard and evidence based treatment guidelines for EC- disease.

5577 Background: Perioperative red blood cell transfusion (PRBCT) may be a negative prognostic marker in surgical oncology. We assessed PRBCT as an independent risk factor for recurrence and death from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in the largest cohort to date. Methods: Patient characteristics and process-of-care variables (NSQIP-defined, >130 variables) were retrospectively abstracted from 587 women who underwent primary staging and cytoreduction for EOC (1/1/03-12/29/08). Evaluated using propensity scoring with univariate logistic regression and odds ratios (OR) and Cox proportional hazards regression and hazard ratios (HR). Factors with p<0.1 used in multivariate models. Results: Rate of PRBCT was 77.0% (452/587). In univariable analysis, PRBCT was associated with older age (OR 1.25[95% CI 1.06, 1.48]/10yr increase), stage≥IIIa (4.66[3.04, 7.13]), splenectomy (26.63[3.67, 193.17]), higher surgical complexity (1.86[1.17, 2.95] score 2; 21.48 [7.37, 62.59] 3; referent 1), serous histology (2.36[1.57, 3.55]vs non-serous), longer operating time (1.58[1.36, 1.83]/hr increase), and residual disease (3.26[1.97, 5.41]≤1cm; 1.97[1.09, 3.56]>1cm), and lower preop hemoglobin (Hb) (1.89[1.59, 2.27]per 1g/dL decrease). In univariable analysis, PRBCT was associated with a higher risk of recurrence (HR 1.96[95% CI 1.43, 2.68]) and death (1.71[1.28, 2.28]). However, in multivariable analysis, stage≥IIIa (4.03[2.05, 6.49]), splenectomy (1.41[1.02, 1.95]), residual disease (1.86[1.41, 2.46]≤1cm; 2.91[2.02, 4.18]>1cm), and lower preop Hb (1.09[1.01, 1.19]) were associated with higher risk of recurrence. Older age (1.24[1.12, 1.37]), stage≥IIIa (3.07[1.93, 4.90]), albumin ≤3 g/dL (2.06[1.28, 3.31]), residual disease (1.63[1.22, 2.19]≤1cm; 3.03[2.19, 4.18]>1cm), and low Hb (1.08[1.00, 1.19]) were associated with higher risk of death. Serous histology (0.70[0.52, 0.95]) associated with lower risk of death. Conclusions: PRBCT does not appear to be directly associated with disease-free and overall survival in EOC. Lower preoperative Hb was associated with a higher risk of both recurrence and death. The need for PRBCT appears to be a stronger prognostic indicator than the receipt of PRBCT.

8590 Background: Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous malignancy of neuroendocrine origin associated with immunosuppression presumably through infection with Merkel Cell Polyomavirus present in >80% of patients (pts). The impact of immune status on clinical outcomes in pts with MCC is unknown. The primary objective of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and outcomes of pts with MCC who are immunosuppressed (ISP) versus non-immunosuppressed (non-ISP). Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review on pts with MCC diagnosed at the Mayo Clinic between 1981 and 2009. A dermatopathologist confirmed all cases. ISP was defined as pts diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, HIV, solid organ transplant recipients, or chronic immunosuppressive medication. The association between ISP status and overall survival was summarized using the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) estimated from a Cox regression model. Results: Of the 268 pts identified and included in the study, 38 (14%) were ISP. We found no differences in age, tumor size, tumor location, stage of disease, or recurrence rate in ISP vs Non-ISP. Among pts who had Stage 3-4 disease, there was no difference in the size of the primary between groups. Among pts with Stage 1-2 disease, ISP status was not significantly associated with poorer survival (HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.7-3.3). However, among pts with Stage 3-4 disease, ISP pts had significantly poorer survival compared to non-ISP pts (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2 - 6.2). Conclusions: Baseline clinical characteristics of pts with MCC do not differ based on immunosuppression, and outcomes do not differ in pts in regards to immunosuppression in early stage MCC (Stage 1-2). However, in pts with Stage III-IV MCC, ISP pts have a worse clinical outcome suggesting that metastatic MCC either behaves more aggressively in ISP pts either through intrinsic differences in the biology of the tumor or improved immune evasion in ISP pts. These results should be cautiously interpreted given the small number (n=12) of immunosuppressed pts with advanced stage MCC. The authors will update their data with an additional 58 patients by the date of presentation.

5004 Background: Since 1999, patients with low-risk endometrial cancer (EC) as defined by the Mayo criteria have preferably not undergone lymphadenectomy (LND) at our institution. We assess survival, sites of recurrence, morbidity, and cost per up-staged case in this low-risk cohort. Methods: Consecutive patients with Mayo-defined low-risk EC managed without (non-LND) and with LND were compared. Cause-specific survival (CSS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. 30-day cost analyses were equated to 2010 Medicare dollars. Results: Among 1,393 consecutive surgically managed EC cases, 385 (27.6%) met the Mayo low-risk criteria, accounting for 34.1% of type I EC. The 5-year CSS of the low-risk cases was 98.6 %. There were 80 LND cases (median # nodes, 29) and 305 non-LND cases. Complications within 30 days occurred in 37.5% and 19.3% of LND and non-LND cases, respectively (P<0.001). Nodal metastasis was identified in a single LND case (1.3%). There were 11 recurrences, 6 of which were vaginal. Not a single recurrence was detected in the pelvic or paraaortic nodal areas in these 385 patients, with a median follow-up of 5.4 years. The estimated prevalence (combining surgery and surveillance) of lymph node metastasis was 0.3%. The 5-year CSS in LND and non-LND cases was 97.3% and 99.0%, respectively (P=0.32). Patients were more than seven times as likely to die of co-morbidities than from EC. The 30-day median cost of care was $15,678 for LND cases compared to $11,028 for non-LND cases (P<0.001). The estimated cost per up-staged low-risk case was $439,990 if performed via endoscopy and $327,866 via laparotomy. If the 305 non-LND cases had been subjected to LND, an estimated additional $1,418,189 would have been expended. Conclusions: For patients with low-risk EC as defined by the Mayo criteria, lymphadenectomy dramatically increases morbidity and 30-day cost of care without discernible short- or long-term benefits: CSS was 99% with a 0.3% rate of nodal metastasis. In these low-risk patients, hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy alone is appropriate surgical management and should be standard of care.

1534 Background: PIOL is a hemopoietic tumor that arises in the retina, vitreous or optic nerve head, and carries a high risk of ocular and CNS relapse. The natural history and optimal management are unknown. Methods: A retrospective series of 81 patients with PIOL was assembled from 15 centers in 7 countries. Only patients with isolated ocular lymphoma were included; none had brain, spinal cord, or systemic lymphoma at diagnosis. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 65 (24–85). 58% were women. The median ECOG performance status was 0, and only three had a score > 1. The median latency from symptom onset to diagnosis was 6 months (0– 36). Slit lamp exam was positive in 51, negative in 6, and not reported in 24. Vitrectomy was positive in 72 and negative in 2. 6 had a positive choroidal or retinal biopsy and 1 had no ocular surgery. CSF cytology was positive in 10 (17%), negative in 48, and unknown in 23. 21 received local therapy at diagnosis: 6 intra-ocular methotrexate (400 ug), 14 ocular radiation (median 3600 cGy), and 1 both modalities. 52 received more extensive therapy including systemic chemotherapy alone in 20 and a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in 32. 5 received no treatment and details are unknown in 3. 47 patients (58%) relapsed a median of 19 months (0.5–180) after initial therapy. Sites of relapse included brain 47%, eyes 30%, brain and eyes 15%, and systemic 8%. Patients treated with ocular therapy alone did not have an increased risk of failing in the brain (p = 0.6). Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 29.6 and 57 months respectively and were unaffected by the choice of therapy. CNS disease was the cause of death in 19/33 (58%). Conclusions: In this series, treatment type did not affect sites of relapse, PFS or OS in patients with PIOL. To minimize toxicity, the best initial therapy should be limited to intraocular chemotherapy or focal radiotherapy. Prospective clinical trials are needed to improve our understanding and treatment of this disease. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Background: Myelitis accompanied by a negative spinal cord MRI may lead to diagnostic uncertainty. Objective and Methods: We retrospectively investigated the frequency of negative spinal cord MRI (performed <6 weeks from onset) in Mayo Clinic patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG-associated myelitis (2000–2019). Results: The initial spinal cord MRI was negative in 7/73 (10%) patients, despite severe acute disability (median EDSS, 7 (range, 4.5–8)); myelitis symptoms/signs were frequent (paraparesis, neurogenic bladder, sensory level, Lhermitte’s phenomenon). Myelitis lesions became overt at follow-up MRI in three patients. Conclusions: A negative spinal cord MRI should not dissuade from MOG-IgG testing in patients with acute/subacute myelitis.