Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

972 citation(s) found for "Urík, Milan".

Common alleles at 6q25.1 and 1p11.2 are associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
Antoniou, Antonis C. , Sinilnikova, Olga M., Soucy, Penny, McGuffog, Lesley, Healey, Sue, Peterlongo, Paolo , Manoukian, Siranoush , Peissel, Bernard , Zaffaroni, Daniela , Cattaneo, Elisa , Barile, Monica, Pensotti, Valeria , Pasini, Barbara , Dolcetti, Riccardo , Giannini, Giuseppe , Putignano, Anna Laura , Varesco, Liliana , Radice, Paolo , Mai, Phuong L., Greene, Mark H. , Andrulis, Irene L. , Glendon, Gord , Özçelik, Hilmi, Thomassen, Mads , Gerdes, Anne‐Marie , Kruse, Torben A., Jensen, Uffe Birk , Crüger, Dorthe Gylling, Caligo, Maria A. , Laitman, Yael , Milgrom, Roni, Friedman, Eitan , Loman, Niklas, Harbst, Katja , Lindblom, Annika , Arver, Brita, Ehrencrona, Hans , Melin, Beatrice , SWE-BRCA, Nathanson, Katherine L. , Rebbeck, Timothy R., Jakubowska, Anna , Lubiński, Jan , Huzarski, Tomasz , Byrski, Tomasz , Cybulski, Cezary, Górski, Bohdan , Osório, Ana , Hamann, Ute, Hogervorst, Frans B.L., Rookus, Matti A. , Hooning, Maartje J. , Nelen, Marcel , Luijt, Rob B. van der , Os, Theo A.M. van, Meijers‐Heijboer, Hanne , Gómez, E. , HEBON, Peock, Susan, Cook, Margaret , Frost, Debra, Platte, Radka, Leyland, Jean, Evans, D. Gareth , Lalloo, Fiona, Eeles, Rosalind A. , Izatt, Louise , Adlard, Julian , Davidson, Rosemarie, Eccles, Diana , Ong, Kai-Ren, Douglas, Fiona, Paterson, Joan, Miedzybrodzka, Zosia , EMBRACE, Buecher, Bruno , Belotti, Muriel, Tirapo, Carole, Mazoyer, Sylvie , Barjhoux, Laure, Lasset, Christine , Leroux, Dominique, Faivre, Laurence, Bronner, Myriam , Prieur, Fabienne, Noguès, Catherine , Rouleau, Étienne , Coupier, Isabelle, Frénay, Marc, Collaborators, CEMO Study, Daly, Mary B., Terry, Mary Beth , John, Esther M. , Yassin, Yosuf, Miron, Alexander, Goldgar, David E., Registry, Breast Cancer Family, Singer, Christian F., Tea, Muy‐Kheng, Pfeiler, Georg , Dressler, Anne Catharina, Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Jønson, Lars, Ejlertsen, Bent , Barkardóttir, Rósa B. , Kirchhoff, Tomas , Offit, Kenneth, Piedmonte, Marion, Rodriguez, Gustavo C. , Small, Laurie, Boggess, John F., Blank, Stephanie V. , Basil, Jack, Montagna, Marco , Tognazzo, Silvia , Imyanitov, Evgeny , Janavičius, Ramūnas , Lázaro, Conxi , Blanco, Ignacio , Sucheston, Lara, Walsh, Christine , Oláh, Edith , Bozsik, Anikó , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Seldon, Joyce, Beattie, Mary, Rensburg, Elizabeth J. van , Sluiter, Michelle D., Dı́ez, Orland , Schmutzler, Rita K., Wappenschmidt, Barbara , Engel, Christoph , Meindl, Alfons , Ruehl, I., Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda, Kast, Karin, Deißler, Helmut , Niederacher, Dieter , Arnold, Norbert , Gadzicki, Dorothea, Schönbuchner, Ines, Caldes, Trinidad, Hoya, Miguel de la , Nevanlinna, Heli , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Dumont, Martine , Chiquette, Jocelyne , Chen, Xiaoqing, Beesley, Jonathan, Spurdle, Amanda B. , investigators, kConFab, Ding, Yuan Chun , Fredericksen, Zachary, Simard, Jacques , Easton, Douglas F. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , CIMBA, on behalf of, Sutter, Christian , Vasen, Hans F. A. , Durocher, Francine , Rahman, Nazneen , Karlsson, Per , Nordling, Margareta , Olsson, Håkan , Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline , Waisfisz, Quinten , Barton, David , Tobias, Edward S. , Jacobs, Chris , Ellis, Ian O. , Castro, Elena , Lucassen, Anneke , Gladieff, Laurence , Thorne, Heather , Stenmark‐Askmalm, Marie , Faivre, Laurence , Kartsonaki, Christiana , Lee, Andrew , Mai, Phuong L., Kaufman, Bella , Paluch–Shimon, Shani , SWE-BRCA, Domchek, Susan M. , Gronwald, Jacek , Cajal, Teresa Ramón y , Fostira, Florentia , Andrés, Raquel , Benı́tez, Javier , Asperen, Christi J. van , Devilee, Peter , HEBON, Cook, Jackie A , Kennedy, Michael John , EMBRACE, Godwin, Andrew K. , Stoppa‐Lyonnet, Dominique , Pujol, Pascal , Collaborators, CEMO Study, Hopper, John L. , Buys, Saundra S. , Registry, Breast Cancer Family, Singer, Christian F. , Azodi, Masoud , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Agata, Simona , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Karlan, Beth Y. , Meindl, Alfons , Caldes, Trinidad, Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Chen, Xiaoqing, investigators, kConFab, Neuhausen, Susan L. , Wang, Xianshu , Pankratz, V. Shane , Couch, Fergus J. , CIMBA, on behalf of, Nevanlinna, H , Caligo, Maria A , Peterlongo, Paolo , Spurdle, Amanda B , Teo, Soo H , van Rensburg, Elizabeth J , Eccles, Diana , de la Hoya, Miguel , Diez, Orland , Radice, Paolo , Adlard, Julian , Arnold, Norbert , Eeles, Rosalind A , Ehrencrona, Hans , Evans, D Gareth , John, Esther M , van der Luijt, Rob B , Jakubowska, Anna , Nathanson, Katherine L , Bozsik, Aniko , Engel, Christoph , Lazaro, Conxi , Montagna, Marco , Simard, Jacques , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Huzarski, Tomasz , Faivre, Laurence , Gómez-García, Encarna B , Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Pasini, Barbara , Manoukian, Siranoush , Lubinski, Jan , Terry, Mary Beth , Lindblom, Annika , Ellis, Ian

Human Molecular Genetics | May 19, 2011 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 16 | Pages: 3304-3321

10.1093/hmg/ddr226 | PMID 21593217 Get It

Preliminary Analysis of the Feasibility and Safety of Salvage Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Radiation Failure: Multi-Institutional Perioperative and Short-Term Functional Outcomes
Chauhan, Sanket, Patel, Manoj , Coelho, Rafael F. , Liss, Michael A. , Rocco, Bernardo , Sivaraman, Ananth K., Palmer, Kenneth J. , Coughlin, Geoffrey D. , Ferrigni, Robert G., Castle, Erik P., Ahlering, Thomas E. , Parra-Davila, Eduard, Patel, Vipul , Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan , Parra‐Dávila, Eduardo

Journal of Endourology | May 13, 2011 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1013-1019

10.1089/end.2010.0564 | PMID 21568696 Get It

The Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF): International Prospective Validation and Reliability Trial in 402 patients
Scherber, Robyn M. , Dueck, Amylou C. , Johansson, Peter , Barbui, Tiziano , Passamonti, Francesco , Andréasson, Björn , Ferarri, Maria L, Rambaldi, Alessandro , Samuelsson, Jan , Birgegård, Gunnar , Tefferi, Ayalew , Harrison, Claire , Radia, Deepti , Barosi, Giovanni , Vannucchi, Alessandro M. , Mesa, Ruben A. , Dueck, A. C. , Rambaldi, Alessandro , Passamonti, Francesco

Blood | May 2, 2011 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 401-408

10.1182/blood-2011-01-328955 | PMID 21536863 Get It

Abstract Symptomatic burden in myeloproliferative neoplasms is present in most patients and compromises quality of life. We sought to validate a broadly applicable 18-item instrument (Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form [MPN-SAF], coadministered with the Brief Fatigue Inventory) to assess symptoms of myelofibrosis, essential thrombocythemia, and polycythemia vera among prospective cohorts in the United States, Sweden, and Italy. A total of 402 MPN-SAF surveys were administered (English [25%], Italian [46%], and Swedish [28%]) in 161 patients with essential thrombocythemia, 145 patients with polycythemia vera, and 96 patients with myelofibrosis. Responses among the 3 administered languages showed great consistency after controlling for MPN subtype. Strong correlations existed between individual items and key symptomatic elements represented on both the MPN-SAF and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30. Enrolling physicians' blinded opinion of patient symptoms (6 symptoms assessed) were highly correlated with corresponding patients' responses. Serial administration of the English MPN-SAF among 53 patients showed that most MPN-SAF items are well correlated (r > 0.5, P < .001) and highly reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.7). The MPN-SAF is a comprehensive and reliable instrument that is available in multiple languages to evaluate symptoms associated with all types of MPNs in clinical trials globally.
Risk factors for arterial and venous thrombosis in WHO-defined essential thrombocythemia: an international study of 891 patients
Carobbio, Alessandra , Thiele, Jüergen, Passamonti, Francesco , Rumi, Elisa , Ruggeri, Marco , Rodeghiero, Francesco, Randi, Maria Luigia , Bertozzi, Irene , Antonioli, Elisabetta , Gisslinger, Heinz , Buxhofer‐Ausch, Veronika , Gangat, Naseema , Tefferi, Ayalew , Barbui, Tiziano , Vannucchi, Alessandro M. , Finazzi, Guido , Passamonti, Francesco

Blood | April 13, 2011 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 22 | Pages: 5857-5859

10.1182/blood-2011-02-339002 | PMID 21490340 Get It

Abstract In an international collaborative study, a central histologic review identified 891 patients with essential thrombocythemia, strictly defined by World Health Organization criteria. After a median follow-up of 6.2 years, 109 (12%) patients experienced arterial (n = 79) or venous (n = 37) thrombosis. In multivariable analysis, predictors of arterial thrombosis included age more than 60 years (P = .03; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.7), thrombosis history (P = .003; HR = 2.1), cardiovascular risk factors including tobacco use, hypertension, or diabetes mellitus (P = .007; HR = 1.9), leukocytosis (> 11 × 109/L; P = .04; HR = 1.7), and presence of JAK2V617F (P = .009; HR = 2.6). In contrast, only male gender predicted venous thrombosis. Platelet count more than 1000 × 109/L was associated with a lower risk of arterial thrombosis (P = .007; HR = 0.4). These associations, except the one with leukocytosis, remained significant (or near significant) when analysis was restricted to JAK2V617F-positive cases. The current study clarifies the contribution of specific disease and host characteristics to the risk of arterial versus venous thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia.
DIPSS Plus: A Refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis That Incorporates Prognostic Information From Karyotype, Platelet Count, and Transfusion Status
Gangat, Naseema , Caramazza, Domenica , Vaidya, Rakhee , George, Geeta, Begna, Kebede H. , Schwager, Susan M., Dyke, Daniel Van, Hanson, Curtis A. , Wu, Wenting , Pardanani, Animesh , Cervantes, Francisco , Passamonti, Francesco , Tefferi, Ayalew , Dyke, Daniel L. Van , Passamonti, Francesco

Journal of Clinical Oncology | December 13, 2010 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 392-397

10.1200/jco.2010.32.2446 | PMID 21149668 Get It

Purpose The Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) uses five risk factors to predict survival: age older than 65 years, hemoglobin lower than 10 g/dL, leukocytes higher than 25 × 10 9 /L, circulating blasts ≥ 1%, and constitutional symptoms. The main objective of this study was to refine DIPSS by incorporating prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. Patients and Methods Mayo Clinic databases for PMF were used to identify patients with available bone marrow histologic and cytogenetic information. Results Seven hundred ninety-three consecutive patients were selected and divided into two groups based on whether or not their referral occurred within (n = 428; training set) or after (n = 365; test set) 1 year of diagnosis. Multivariable analysis identified DIPSS, unfavorable karyotype, platelets lower than 100 × 10 9 /L, and transfusion need as independent predictors of inferior survival. Hazard ratio (HR) –weighted adverse points were assigned to these variables to develop a composite prognostic model using the training set. The model was subsequently validated in the test set, and its application to all 793 patients resulted in median survivals of 185, 78, 35, and 16 months for low, intermediate-1 (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.6), intermediate-2 (HR, 4.9; 95% CI, 3.2 to 7.7), and high-risk groups (HR, 10.7; 95% CI, 6.8 to 16.9), respectively (P < .001). Leukemia-free survival was predicted by the presence of thrombocytopenia or unfavorable karyotype (10-year risk of 31% v 12%; HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.9 to 5.6). Conclusion DIPSS plus effectively combines prognostic information from DIPSS, karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status to predict overall survival in PMF. In addition, unfavorable karyotype or thrombocytopenia predicts inferior leukemia-free survival.
Long-Term Outcome After ICD and CRT Implantation and Influence of Remote Device Follow-Up
Saxon, Leslie A. , Hayes, David L. , Gilliam, F. Roosevelt, Heidenreich, Paul A. , Seth, Milan, Meyer, Timothy E. , Jones, Paul W. , Boehmer, John , Day, John

Circulation | November 23, 2010 | Volume: 122 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 2359-2367

10.1161/circulationaha.110.960633 | PMID 21098452 Get It

Background— Outcome data for patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy–defibrillator (CRT-D) devices treated outside of clinical trials are lacking. No clinical trial has evaluated mortality after device implantation or after shock therapy in large numbers of patients with implanted devices that regularly transmit device data over a network. Methods and Results— Survival status in patients implanted with ICD and CRT devices across the United States from a single manufacturer was assessed. Outcomes were compared between patients followed in device clinic settings and those who regularly transmit remote data collected from the device an average of 4 times monthly. Shock delivery and electrogram analysis could be ascertained from patients followed on the network, enabling survival after ICD shock to be evaluated. One- and 5-year survival rates in 185 778 patients after ICD implantation were 92% and 68% and were 88% and 54% for CRT-D device recipients. In 8228 patients implanted with CRT-only devices, survival was 82% and 48% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. For the 69 556 ICD and CRT-D patients receiving remote follow-up on the network, 1- and 5-year survival rates were higher compared with those in the 116 222 patients who received device follow-up in device clinics only (50% reduction; P <0.0001). There were no differences between patients followed on or off the remote network for the characteristics of age, gender, implanted device year or type, and economic or educational status. Shock therapy was associated with subsequent mortality risk for both ICD and CRT-D recipients. Conclusions— Survival after ICD and CRT-D implantation in patients treated in naturalistic practice compares favorably with survival rates observed in clinical trials. Remote follow-up of device data is associated with excellent survival, but arrhythmias that result in device therapy in this population are associated with a higher mortality risk compared with patients who do not require shock therapy.
Summary of the Recommendations on Sexual Dysfunctions in Men
Montorsi, Francesco , Adaikan, Ganesan, Becher, Edgardo, Khoury, Saad, Lue, Tom F. , Sharlip, Ira D., Althof, Stanley E., Andersson, Karl-Eric, Brock, Gerald, Broderick, Gregory A. , Buvat, Jacques, Dean, John, Donatucci, Craig F., Eardley, Ian , Fugl-Meyer, Kerstin , Hackett, Geoff , Hatzichristou, Dimitris, Hellstrom, Wayne J.G. , Incrocci, Luca , Jackson, Graham, Levine, Laurence A. , Lewis, Ronald W., McCabe, Marita P. , McMahon, Chris G., Montague, Drogo K. , Montorsi, Piero, Mulhall, John P. , Pfaus, Jim, Porst, Hartmut, Ralph, David , Rosen, Raymond C., Sadeghi‐Nejad, Hossein , Shabsigh, Ridwan, Vardi, Yoram, Wallen, Kim , Wasserman, Marlene, Larcher, Alessandro , Giuliano, François , Burnett, Arthur L. “Bud” , Buvat, Jacques, Goldstein, Irwin , Kadıoğlu, Ateş , Maggi, Mario , Rowland, David L. , Stief, Christian G.

The Journal of Sexual Medicine | October 29, 2010 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 3572-3588

10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02062.x | PMID 21040491 Get It

ABSTRACT Introduction Sexual health is an integral part of overall health. Sexual dysfunction can have a major impact on quality of life and psychosocial and emotional well-being. Aim To provide evidence-based, expert-opinion consensus guidelines for clinical management of sexual dysfunction in men. Methods An international consultation collaborating with major urologic and sexual medicine societies convened in Paris, July 2009. More than 190 multidisciplinary experts from 33 countries were assembled into 25 consultation committees. Committee members established scope and objectives for each chapter. Following an exhaustive review of available data and publications, committees developed evidence-based guidelines in each area. Main Outcome Measures New algorithms and guidelines for assessment and treatment of sexual dysfunctions were developed based on work of previous consultations and evidence from scientific literature published from 2003 to 2009. The Oxford system of evidence-based review was systematically applied. Expert opinion was based on systematic grading of medical literature, and cultural and ethical considerations. Results Algorithms, recommendations, and guidelines for sexual dysfunction in men are presented. These guidelines were developed in an evidence-based, patient-centered, multidisciplinary manner. It was felt that all sexual dysfunctions should be evaluated and managed following a uniform strategy, thus the International Consultation of Sexual Medicine (ICSM-5) developed a stepwise diagnostic and treatment algorithm for sexual dysfunction. The main goal of ICSM-5 is to unmask the underlying etiology and/or indicate appropriate treatment options according to men’s and women’s individual needs (patient-centered medicine) using the best available data from population-based research (evidence-based medicine). Specific evaluation, treatment guidelines, and algorithms were developed for every sexual dysfunction in men, including erectile dysfunction; disorders of libido, orgasm, and ejaculation; Peyronie’s disease; and priapism. Conclusions Sexual dysfunction in men represents a group of common medical conditions that need to be managed from a multidisciplinary perspective.
Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) predicts progression to acute myeloid leukemia in primary myelofibrosis
Passamonti, Francesco , Cervantes, Francisco , Morra, Enrica, Rumi, Elisa , Cazzola, Mario , Tefferi, Ayalew , Vannucchi, Alessandro M. , Passamonti, Francesco , Cazzola, Mario

Blood | October 14, 2010 | Volume: 116 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 2857-2858

10.1182/blood-2010-06-293415 | PMID 20947690 Get It

Defective Mismatch Repair As a Predictive Marker for Lack of Efficacy of Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Therapy in Colon Cancer
Sargent, Daniel J. , Marsoni, Silvia , Monges, Geneviève, Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Labianca, Roberto , French, Amy J. , Kabat, Brian, Foster, Nathan R. , Torri, Valter , Ribic, Christine, Moore, Malcolm , Zaniboni, Alberto , Seitz, J. F., Sinicrope, Frank, Gallinger, Steven , Hamilton, Stanley R. , Grothey, Axel , Sargent, Daniel J , Marsoni, Silvia

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 24, 2010 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 20 | Pages: 3219-3226

10.1200/jco.2009.27.1825 | PMID 20498393 Get It

Purpose Prior reports have indicated that patients with colon cancer who demonstrate high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) have improved survival and receive no benefit from fluorouracil (FU) -based adjuvant therapy compared with patients who have microsatellite-stable or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumors. We examined MMR status as a predictor of adjuvant therapy benefit in patients with stages II and III colon cancer. Methods MSI assay or immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins were performed on 457 patients who were previously randomly assigned to FU-based therapy (either FU + levamisole or FU + leucovorin; n = 229) versus no postsurgical treatment (n = 228). Data were subsequently pooled with data from a previous analysis. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Results Overall, 70 (15%) of 457 patients exhibited dMMR. Adjuvant therapy significantly improved DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.93; P = .02) in patients with pMMR tumors. Patients with dMMR tumors receiving FU had no improvement in DFS (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.91; P = .85) compared with those randomly assigned to surgery alone. In the pooled data set of 1,027 patients (n = 165 with dMMR), these findings were maintained; in patients with stage II disease and with dMMR tumors, treatment was associated with reduced overall survival (HR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.02 to 8.54; P = .04). Conclusion Patient stratification by MMR status may provide a more tailored approach to colon cancer adjuvant therapy. These data support MMR status assessment for patients being considered for FU therapy alone and consideration of MMR status in treatment decision making.
A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment)
Passamonti, Francesco , Cervantes, Francisco , Morra, Enrica, Rumi, Elisa , Pereira, Arturo , Guglielmelli, Paola , Pungolino, Ester , Caramella, Marianna, Maffioli, Margherita , Pascutto, Cristiana, Lazzarino, Mario, Cazzola, Mario , Tefferi, Ayalew , Vannucchi, Alessandro M. , Passamonti, Francesco , Cazzola, Mario , Guglielmelli, Paola

Blood | December 14, 2009 | Volume: 115 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1703-1708

10.1182/blood-2009-09-245837 | PMID 20008785 Get It

Abstract Age older than 65 years, hemoglobin level lower than 100 g/L (10 g/dL), white blood cell count greater than 25 × 109/L, peripheral blood blasts 1% or higher, and constitutional symptoms have been shown to predict poor survival in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) at diagnosis. To investigate whether the acquisition of these factors during follow-up predicts survival, we studied 525 PMF patients regularly followed. All 5 variables had a significant impact on survival when analyzed as time-dependent covariates in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model and were included in 2 separate models, 1 for all patients (Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System [DIPSS]) and 1 for patients younger than 65 years (age-adjusted DIPSS). Risk factors were assigned score values based on hazard ratios (HRs). Risk categories were low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high in both models. Survival was estimated by the HR. When shifting to the next risk category, the HR was 4.13 for low risk, 4.61 for intermediate-1, and 2.54 for intermediate-2 according to DIPSS; 3.97 for low risk, 2.84 for intermediate-1, and 1.81 for intermediate-2 according to the age-adjusted DIPSS. The novelty of these models is the prognostic assessment of patients with PMF anytime during their clinical course, which may be useful for treatment decision-making.