Back to Authors

Zaniboni, Alberto

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2140-7040

Mayo Clinic

Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero

Citations 4

Microsatellite Instability in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer Receiving Fluoropyrimidine With or Without Oxaliplatin: An ACCENT Pooled Analysis of 12 Adjuvant Trials
Cohen, Romain , Taı̈eb, Julien , Fiskum, Jack, Yothers, Greg , Goldberg, Richard M. , Yoshino, Takayuki , Alberts, Steven R. , Allegra, Carmen J. , Gramont, Aimery de , Seitz, J. F., Haller, Daniel G. , Erlichman, Charles , Zaniboni, Alberto , Shi, Qian , Goldberg, Richard M , Alberts, Steven R , O'Connell, Michael, Lonardi, Sara , Sinicrope, Frank A , André, Thierry , Shi, Qian , Yoshino, Takayuki , Yothers, Greg , Taieb, Julien , Cohen, Romain , O’Connell, Michael J. , Wolmark, Norman , Lonardi, Sara , Kerr, Rachel , Grothey, Axel , Sinicrope, Frank A. , André, Thierry

Journal of Clinical Oncology | December 23, 2020 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 642-651

10.1200/jco.20.01600 Get It

PURPOSE: In patients with stage III colon cancer (CC) whose tumors demonstrate microsatellite instability (MSI), the efficacy of adjuvant fluoropyrimidine (FP) with or without oxaliplatin has not been clearly demonstrated and the prognostic value of MSI remains uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individual patient data from the ACCENT database were used to evaluate the effect of FP with or without oxaliplatin on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with MSI stage III CC and the prognostic value of MSI in patients treated with FP plus oxaliplatin, by stratified Cox models adjusted for demographic and clinicopathological factors. RESULTS: MSI status was available for 5,457 patients (609 MSI, 11.2%; 4848 microsatellite stable [MSS], 88.8%) from 12 randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Oxaliplatin significantly improved OS of MSI patients from the two RCTs testing FP with or without oxaliplatin (n = 185; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.93). Among the 4,250 patients treated with FP plus oxaliplatin (461 MSI and 3789 MSS), MSI was associated with better OS in the N1 group compared with MSS (aHR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.95) but similar survival in the N2 population (aHR = 1.13; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.48; P interaction = .029). The main independent prognosticators of MSI patients treated with FP plus oxaliplatin were T stage (aHR = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.38) and N stage (aHR = 3.57; 95% CI, 2.32 to 5.48). Similar results were observed for DFS in all analyses. CONCLUSION: Adding oxaliplatin to FP improves OS and DFS in patients with MSI stage III CC. Compared with MSS, MSI patients experienced better outcomes in the N1 group but similar survival in the N2 group.
Regorafenib in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Analysis of age subgroups in the open-label phase IIIb CONSIGN trial.
Seitz, Jean François, Hofheinz, Ralf‐Dieter , Arriaga, Yull , Verma, Udit, Grothey, Axel, Miriyala, Ashok, Kalmus, J., Kappeler, Christian, Zaniboni, Alberto , Cutsem, Eric Van , Ciardiello, Fortunato , Ychou, Marc , García‐Carbonero, Rocio , Falcone, Alfredo

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 3524-3524

10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.3524 Get It

Regorafenib for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Progressed After Standard Therapy: Results of the Large, Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase IIIb CONSIGN Study
Cascinu, Stefano , Sobrero, Alberto F. , Banzi, Maria , Seitz, Jean‐François, Barone, Carlo , Brenner, Baruch , Hofheinz, Ralf‐Dieter , Spallanzani, Andrea , García‐Carbonero, Rocio , Arriaga, Yull , Verma, Udit, Kappeler, Christian, Miriyala, Ashok, Kalmus, J., Falcone, Alfredo , Zaniboni, Alberto , Falcone, Alfredo , Cutsem, Eric Van , Martinelli, Erika , Ychou, Marc , Peeters, Marc , Maiello, Evaristo , André, Thierry , Grothey, Axel

The Oncologist | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 185-192

10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0072 Get It

Abstract Background In the phase III CORRECT trial, regorafenib significantly improved survival in treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The CONSIGN study was designed to further characterize regorafenib safety and allow patients access to regorafenib before market authorization. Methods This prospective, single-arm study enrolled patients in 25 countries at 186 sites. Patients with treatment-refractory mCRC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤1 received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was safety. Progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment was the only efficacy evaluation. Results In total, 2,872 patients were assigned to treatment and 2,864 were treated. Median age was 62 years, ECOG PS 0/1 was 47%/53%, and 74% had received at least three prior regimens for metastatic disease. Median treatment duration was three cycles. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) led to dose reduction in 46% of patients. Regorafenib-related TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 9%. Grade 5 regorafenib-related TEAEs occurred in <1%. The most common grade ≥3 regorafenib-related TEAEs were hypertension (15%), hand–foot skin reaction (14%), fatigue (13%), diarrhea (5%), and hypophosphatemia (5%). Treatment-emergent grade 3–4 laboratory toxicities included alanine aminotransferase (6%), aspartate aminotransferase (7%), and bilirubin (13%). Ongoing monitoring identified one nonfatal case of regorafenib-related severe drug-induced liver injury per DILI Working Group criteria. Median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 2.7 months (2.6–2.7). Conclusion In CONSIGN, the frequency and severity of TEAEs were consistent with the known safety profile of regorafenib. PFS was similar to reports of phase III trials. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01538680. Implications for Practice Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who fail treatment with standard therapies, including chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor or epidermal growth factor receptor, have few treatment options. The multikinase inhibitor regorafenib was shown to improve survival in patients with treatment-refractory mCRC in the phase III CORRECT (N = 760) and CONCUR (N = 204) trials. However, safety data on regorafenib for mCRC in a larger number of patients were not available. The CONSIGN trial, carried out prospectively in more than 2,800 patients across 25 countries, confirmed the safety profile of regorafenib from the phase III trials and reinforced the importance of using treatment modifications to manage adverse events.
Defective Mismatch Repair As a Predictive Marker for Lack of Efficacy of Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Therapy in Colon Cancer
Sargent, Daniel J. , Marsoni, Silvia , Monges, Geneviève, Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Labianca, Roberto , French, Amy J. , Kabat, Brian, Foster, Nathan R. , Torri, Valter , Ribic, Christine, Moore, Malcolm , Zaniboni, Alberto , Seitz, J. F., Sinicrope, Frank, Gallinger, Steven , Hamilton, Stanley R. , Grothey, Axel , Sargent, Daniel J , Marsoni, Silvia

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 24, 2010 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 20 | Pages: 3219-3226

10.1200/jco.2009.27.1825 Get It

Purpose Prior reports have indicated that patients with colon cancer who demonstrate high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) have improved survival and receive no benefit from fluorouracil (FU) -based adjuvant therapy compared with patients who have microsatellite-stable or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumors. We examined MMR status as a predictor of adjuvant therapy benefit in patients with stages II and III colon cancer. Methods MSI assay or immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins were performed on 457 patients who were previously randomly assigned to FU-based therapy (either FU + levamisole or FU + leucovorin; n = 229) versus no postsurgical treatment (n = 228). Data were subsequently pooled with data from a previous analysis. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Results Overall, 70 (15%) of 457 patients exhibited dMMR. Adjuvant therapy significantly improved DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.93; P = .02) in patients with pMMR tumors. Patients with dMMR tumors receiving FU had no improvement in DFS (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.91; P = .85) compared with those randomly assigned to surgery alone. In the pooled data set of 1,027 patients (n = 165 with dMMR), these findings were maintained; in patients with stage II disease and with dMMR tumors, treatment was associated with reduced overall survival (HR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.02 to 8.54; P = .04). Conclusion Patient stratification by MMR status may provide a more tailored approach to colon cancer adjuvant therapy. These data support MMR status assessment for patients being considered for FU therapy alone and consideration of MMR status in treatment decision making.