Citations

Stress and its attendant psychosocial and lifestyle variables have been associated with coronary artery disease (CAD), yet the contribution of socioeconomic status (SES) has not been addressed. The aim of this study is to determine if stress assessment is associated with CAD independent of SES, and is incremental to the Framingham Score. The study group consisted of 325 executive patients undergoing comprehensive health assessment. Stress was assessed utilizing the validated “Self-Rated Stress” (SRS) instrument. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) served to assess the degree of atherosclerosis, a CAD equivalent and risk assessment tool. The relationship between SRS and CAC was assessed, with adjustment by potential confounders. CAC was modeled by a variety of cut points (>0, ≥5, ≥100, ≥200) for the test of trend across stress levels per Mantel-Haenszel chi-square (1 df) with nonsignificant P values of 0.9960, 0.5242, 0.1692, 0.3233, respectively. A logistic regression model with SRS as a categorically ranked and continuous variable to predict binary outcome of calcification yielded P values of 0.2366 and 0.9644; this relationship, further adjusted by age, fruit and vegetable consumption, exercise, and education, yielded no statistically significant association. No improvement of fit was observed for the established Framingham Score to CAC relation utilizing SRS. The study concluded that SRS did not play a role in early CAD when focusing on a population in higher socioeconomic strata, and SRS did not add predictive value beyond patient age or calculated Framingham risk. Future studies should focus on additional validated instruments of stress to differentiate between subtypes of stress for varying SES strata. ( Population Health Management 2013;16:332–340)

Controlling the overall cost of medical care requires controlling the number of physician visits. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants (NPs/PAs) may function as lower-cost substitutes for physicians or they may complement physician services. The association between NP/PA and physician visits when NPs/PAs are not working as primary care providers (PCPs) has not been thoroughly studied. A sample of 400 family medicine patients drawn from 1 large multisite practice was studied using multiple logistic regression analysis. NPs/PAs did not function as PCPs during the study period. Patients were defined as outliers if they visited physicians more than 5 times in a year. Patients who visited NPs/PAs in non-retail clinics were significantly more likely to be physician visit outliers. Visits to NPs/PAs in retail clinics were not related to physician visits. NP/PA visits in standard medical office settings complement physician visits when the NPs/PAs were not working as PCPs in this large multisite practice. Health care reform proposals relying on increased use of NPs/PAs may be more cost-efficient if NPs/PAs are located in retail settings or function as PCPs. ( Population Health Management 2013;16:242–245)