Yoon, Jang W.

OBJECTIVESpinal peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs) are a group of rare tumors originating from the nerve and its supporting structures. Standard surgical management typically entails laminectomy with or without facetectomy to gain adequate tumor exposure. Arthrodesis is occasionally performed to maintain spinal stability and mitigate the risk of postoperative deformity, pain, or neurological deficit. However, the factors associated with the need for instrumentation in addition to PNST resection in the same setting remain unclear.METHODSAn institutional tumor registry at a tertiary care center was queried for patients treated surgically for a primary diagnosis of spinal PNST between 2002 and 2016. An analysis focused on patients in whom a facetectomy was performed during the resection. The addition of arthrodesis at the index procedure comprised the primary outcome. The authors also recorded baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, and surgery-related variables. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with increased risk of fusion surgery.RESULTSA total of 163 patients were identified, of which 56 (32 had facetectomy with fusion, 24 had facetectomy alone) were analyzed. The median age was 48 years, and 50% of the cohort was female. Age, sex, and race, as well as tumor histology and size, were evenly distributed between patients who received facetectomy alone and those who had facetectomy and fusion. On univariate analysis, total versus subtotal facetectomy (OR 9.0, 95% CI 2.01–64.2; p = 0.009) and cervicothoracic versus other spinal region (OR 9.0, 95% CI 1.51–172.9; p = 0.048) were significantly associated with increased odds of performing immediate fusion. On multivariable analysis, only the effect of total facetectomy remained statistically significant (OR 6.75, 95% CI 1.47–48.8; p = 0.025).CONCLUSIONSThe authors found that total facetectomy and cervicothoracic involvement may be highly associated with the need for concomitant arthrodesis at the time of index surgery. These findings may help surgeons to determine the best surgical planning for patients with PNST.

AbstractIntroductionSince the introduction of wearable head‐up displays, there has been much interest in the surgical community adapting this technology into routine surgical practice.MethodsWe used the keywords augmented reality OR wearable device OR head‐up display AND surgery using PubMed, EBSCO, IEEE and SCOPUS databases. After exclusions, 74 published articles that evaluated the utility of wearable head‐up displays in surgical settings were included in our review.ResultsAcross all studies, the most common use of head‐up displays was in cases of live streaming from surgical microscopes, navigation, monitoring of vital signs, and display of preoperative images. The most commonly used head‐up display was Google Glass. Head‐up displays enhanced surgeons' operating experience; common disadvantages include limited battery life, display size and discomfort.ConclusionsDue to ergonomic issues with dual‐screen devices, augmented reality devices with the capacity to overlay images onto the surgical field will be key features of next‐generation surgical head‐up displays.

AbstractBackgroundWearable technology is growing in popularity as a result of its ability to interface with normal human movement and function.MethodsUsing proprietary hardware and software, neuronavigation images were captured and transferred wirelessly via a password‐encrypted network to the head‐up display. The operating surgeon wore a loupe‐mounted wearable head‐up display during image‐guided parieto‐occipital ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in two patients.ResultsThe shunt placement was completed successfully without complications. The tip of the catheter ended well within the ventricles away from the ventricular wall. The wearable device allowed for continuous monitoring of neuronavigation images in the right upper corner of the surgeon's visual field without the need for the surgeon to turn his head to view the monitors.ConclusionsThe adaptable nature of this proposed system permits the display of video data to the operating surgeon without diverting attention away from the operative task. This technology has the potential to enhance image‐guided procedures.

AbstractBackgroundThe primary aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of capturing and streaming neuronavigation images onto a head‐up display during spine instrumentation.MethodsUsing a novel device, neuronavigation images were captured and transferred wirelessly via a password‐encrypted network to the head‐up display. At the end of the procedure, the surgeons completed a survey to gather their opinions of the system.ResultsForty pedicle screws were placed using the head‐up display. The average screw placement time was slightly shorter when the head‐up display was used (4.13 min with vs. 4.86 min without). The post‐procedure survey demonstrated that 79% of surgeon's responses were positive.ConclusionA wearable head‐up display can benefit current neuronavigation systems, but larger, outcomes‐based trials are needed. Higher processing speed would allow streaming of higher resolution images. Along with an enlarged display, these may significantly improve utilization of this technology. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AbstractBackgroundPedicle screws are a preferred method for spinal fixation because of their three‐column support and rigid posterior stabilization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients requiring pedicle screw redirection, and to describe a technique using cone‐beam computed tomography (cbCT).MethodsA retrospective review of 30 patients undergoing revision spinal fusion with redirection of pedicle screws was performed. Fifty pedicle screws were redirected in these patients using cbCT‐based 3D image guidance. They were graded pre‐ and post‐operatively using an established grading system.ResultsNo complications occurred in this study as a result of redirection. No pedicle breach was noted in all of the redirected pedicle screws.ConclusionRedirection of misplaced pedicle screws using cbCT‐based 3D image guidance seems to be safe and accurate in our experience. Further studies are needed to establish its safety, accuracy, fusion rate, and clinical outcome compared with other methods. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.