Citations

Introduction: Hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains a major source of morbidity and mortality. While previous studies have shown outpatient intravenous (IV) diuretic therapy to be safe and cost-effective, there have been no randomized controlled trials to evaluate the utilization of continued outpatient IV furosemide diuretic maintenance treatment in patients with HF following hospitalization for ADHF. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that 30-day hospital readmission from ADHF would be lower with routine, standardized outpatient IV diuretic treatment along with a comprehensive HF care approach vs standard treatment. Methods: In a single center, prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 100 patients were randomized to receive standard of care (Group 1), IV placebo infusion (Group 2), or IV furosemide infusion (Group 3) over 3 hours, biweekly for a one-month period following hospitalization for ADHF. Patients in Groups 2 and 3 also received a comprehensive HF care protocol including bi-weekly clinic visits for dose-adjusted IV-diuretics, medication adjustment, laboratory, weight, and blood pressure-monitoring, and education during infusion visits. Echocardiography, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and depression questionnaires were performed at baseline and 30-day follow-up. The primary outcome was 30-day re-hospitalization for ADHF. Results: Overall, a total of 94 patients were included in the study (mean age 64 years, 56% males, 69% African American, 70% HF reduced ejection fraction). There were a total of 14 (15%) readmissions for ADHF at 30 days, 6 (17.1%) in Group 1, 7 (22.6%) in Group 2, and 1 (3.7%) in Group 3 (overall p=0.11; p=0.037 comparing Group 2 and Group 3). Patients receiving IV furosemide infusion experienced significantly greater urine output and weight loss compared to those receiving placebo without any significant increase creatinine and no significant between group differences in echocardiography parameters, KCCQ or depression scores. Conclusions: The use of a standardized protocol of outpatient IV furosemide infusion for a one-month period following hospitalization for ADHF was found to be safe and efficacious in reducing 30-day re-hospitalization.

Introduction: The mechanisms linking obesity to increased mortality in patients with coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19) are unclear. Hypothesis: We hypothesised that obesity would be associated with adverse right ventricular (RV) remodelling and function which might be further exacerbated by COVID-19 associated increases in RV afterload/demand. Methods: We used echocardiography and computed tomography to establish links between RV dimensions and function and bodyweight in patients with severe COVID-19. In obese and non-obese participants without COVID-19, we used cardiovascular magnetic resonance to define the effects of obesity upon RV volumes, energetics, systolic function and stress reserve. Results: In patients with severe COVID-19, increasing bodyweight was associated with disproportionate RV dilatation (n=26, echocardiography, R=0.42, P=0.03, CT n=34, R=0.23, P=0.004) and impairment of RV systolic function (fractional area change (FAC) R=-0.45, P=0.04); obesity (BMI >30kg/m2) was associated with a 32% reduction in RV FAC (P=0.03). Similar associations were seen in a validation cohort (n=91, all P<0.05). In participants without COVID-19, class III obesity (n=54, BMI 47±4 kg/m 2 ) was associated with RV remodelling, impaired cardiac energetics (PCr/ATP ratio 23% lower, P<0.001) and reduction in RV systolic function at rest (by 3±1%, P=0.01), which was related to reduced energetics (R=0.3, P=0.04). Participants with class I-II obesity (BMI 35±5 kg/m 2 , n=27) had impaired RV diastolic filling rate at rest (P<0.001) and blunted RV dobutamine stress systolic response (by 68%, P=0.03) and diastolic response (by 78%, P=0.008). Surgical weight loss in patients obesity (n=37, 34±15kg weight loss) was associated with improvement in RV volume (12±26 ml lower, P=0.006) and function (ejection fraction 2±5% higher, P=0.03). Conclusions: Increasing body weight is associated with both significant alterations in RV volumes, systolic function and stress responses which are mitigated with weight loss and also with disproportionate RV dilatation and dysfunction in severe COVID-19. RV dysfunction is a modifiable mechanism which might link obesity to adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and other disorders stressing the right heart.

Abstract Background: Hypoparathyroidism (HP) is characterized by insufficient levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH), resulting in hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, hypercalciuria, and a reduced quality of life (QoL). PTH replacement therapy should restore physiologic levels of PTH and restore downstream physiologic levels of calcitriol, promoting independence from Ca and active vitamin D supplements and normalization of QoL. TransCon PTH is an investigational long-acting prodrug of PTH(1–34) for the treatment of HP. During the initial 4-week fixed-dose period of the PaTH Forward Trial, TransCon PTH enabled 82% of subjects to achieve independence from standard of care (SoC; no active vitamin D and Ca ≤ 500 mg/day) compared to 15% with placebo. Here, we report 6-month (Week 26) results from the open-label extension (OLE). Methods: PaTH Forward is a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating TransCon PTH in adult HP patients treated with SoC. Subjects received fixed doses of TransCon PTH 15, 18, or 21 µg PTH(1–34)/day or placebo for 4 weeks, followed by an OLE period during which TransCon PTH dose was titrated (6–30 µg PTH[1–34]/day) per individual dosing requirement. Safety and efficacy endpoints were evaluated at predefined timepoints over the OLE. Endpoints were evaluated at Week 26 including 1) sCa, 2) 24-hour uCa, 3) independence from active vitamin D, and 4) independence from therapeutics doses of oral calcium. QoL was assessed by the SF-36 and the Hypoparathyroidism Patient Experience Scales (HPES). Results: All 59 subjects completed the initial 4-week period and continued in the OLE; 58 subjects continue in the OLE beyond 6 months (1 withdrew unrelated to safety or efficacy). TransCon PTH enabled independence from SoC (no active vitamin D and Ca ≤ 500 mg/day) in 91% of subjects and independence from all supplements (no active vitamin D and no Ca) in 76% of subjects by Week 26. Mean 24-hour uCa decreased from a baseline mean of 415 mg/24h to 178 mg/24h by Week 26 (n = 44) while maintaining sCa, and reducing sP and CaxP to fall within the normal range. The mean scores for all SF-36 summary and domains increased from below normal at baseline to within the normal range by Week 26. The HPES Symptom and Impact scores continuously improved through 26 weeks for TransCon PTH and placebo subjects switching to TransCon PTH. TransCon PTH continued to be well-tolerated with no treatment-related serious or severe adverse events. Conclusions: Results from the OLE of the PaTH Forward Trial demonstrated that TransCon PTH continued to enable independence from active vitamin D and Ca supplements for most subjects while maintaining normal sCa, sP, uCa, and demonstrating enhanced quality of life, supporting its potential as a hormone replacement therapy for patients with HP. TransCon PTH will be further evaluated in the phase 3 PaTHway Trial.

Abstract Comparative data guiding initial therapy for Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), an infrequently encountered non‐Hodgkin lymphoma, are sparse. We evaluated three commonly used rituximab‐based frontline regimens: rituximab‐bendamustine (R‐Benda); dexamethasone, rituximab, cyclophosphamide (DRC); and bortezomib, dexamethasone, rituximab (BDR) in 220 treatment‐naïve patients with WM, seen at Mayo Clinic between November 1, 2000 and October 31, 2019. The median follow‐up was 4.5 (95%CI: 4–5) years. The R‐Benda cohort (n = 83) demonstrated superior overall response rate (ORR: 98%), in comparison to DRC (n = 92, ORR: 78%) or BDR (n = 45, ORR: 84%) cohorts, p = 0.003. Similarly, longer progression‐free survival (PFS) was evident with R‐Benda use [median 5.2 vs. 4.3 (DRC) and 1.8 years (BDR), p < 0.001]. The time‐to‐next therapy (TTNT) favored R‐Benda [median, not‐reached, 4.4 (DRC) and 2.6 years (BDR), p < 0.001). These endpoints were comparable between the DRC and BDR cohorts. Overall survival (OS) was similar across the three cohorts, p = 0.77. In a subset analysis of 142 patients genotyped for MYD88 L265P mutation, the ORR, PFS and TTNT were unaffected by the patients' MYD88 signature within each cohort. In conclusion, ORR, PFS and TTNT with R‐Benda are superior compared to DRC or BDR in treatment‐naïve patients with active WM. The patient outcomes with any one of these three regimens are unaffected by the MYD88 L265P mutation status.

Background: Financial key performance indicators are often used to evaluate performance. Understanding of key performance indicators can be crucial for career advancement and bargaining leverage in resource negotiations. This study aimed to identify the most important key performance indicators used in surgical funding requests and understand how to use these metrics in clinical practice. Methods: In two tertiary medical centers, funding requests for surgeon gap support (2019 to 2020) and equipment (2017 to 2019) within departments of surgery were reviewed. The requesting department, approval status, and amount allotted were recorded. In requests for gap support, projections for contribution margin, operating room volume, charges, collections, and relative value units were tracked. Projected contribution margin and cost savings were recorded for equipment funding requests. Results: There were 40 gap support and 24 equipment requests, and all were approved. Most gap support requests included collections (90.0 percent), charges (87.5 percent), operating room cases (80.0 percent), relative value units (77.5 percent), and hospital contribution margin (77.5 percent). The most represented departments were general surgery (37.5 percent), neurosurgery (22.5 percent), and plastic surgery (15.0 percent). The departments that submitted the most equipment requests were general surgery (28.0 percent) and neurosurgery (28.0 percent). Most requests included projections for contribution margin (95.8 percent) and cost savings (87.4 percent). Projected hospital contribution margin correlated with the amount of funds allotted for surgeon support (r = 0.409; p = 0.022). Conclusions: This multicenter study identified the importance of using key performance indicators for a successful financial outcome in funding requests. In addition, the authors demonstrate the need for surgeons to understand their own key performance indicators. Surgeons should advocate for increased transparency to better understand their financial contributions and performance.

Abstract Background and study aims Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are effective medical therapy options for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, 20 % to 40 % of patients report symptoms despite taking daily PPI. Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF2) and magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) are less invasive options for the treatment of refractory GERD and are increasingly gaining popularity. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases to identify relevant studies. Our primary aim was to compare the efficacy of both interventions reported as improvement in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) score, overall patient satisfaction, improvement in post-procedure regurgitation, and fraction of patients completely off PPI therapy at follow up. Results Twenty-four studies with 1942 patients were included in the final analysis. Both MSA and TIF2 had comparable technical success and clinical success based on improvement in GERD-HRQL scores i. e. 98.8 % (CI 95.6,99.7) vs 98.5 % (CI 95.7,99.5) and 80.4 % (CI 66,89.6) vs 77.7 % (CI 64.1,87.2), respectively. A significantly greater proportion of patients reported improvement in regurgitation, i. e. 91.1 % (CI 83.8,95.3) vs 73.1 % (CI 62.5,81.7) and were able to completely discontinue PPI therapy with MSA compared to TIF2 i. e. 91.3 % (CI 81.5,96.2) vs 63.8 % (CI 51.6,74.4). Patients’ BMI and presence of a hiatal hernia did not have any effect on procedural outcomes. Conclusion Both procedures performed at par when comparing clinical success in terms of improvement in GERD-HRQL scores. In terms of overall patient satisfaction, post procedure regurgitation and cumulative number of patients off PPI therapy, MSA outperforms TIF2.

Abstract Background:Racial disparities in multiple myeloma (MM) outcomes are well established. Clinical characteristics and cytogenetic abnormalities dictate outcomes in MM but historically they have been mostly defined in White patients with paucity of information regarding racial-ethnic minorities. Hispanics are the fastest growing racial-ethnic subgroup in United States and have the worst overall survival (OS) in MM but differences in disease presentation among Hispanics compared to Whites, the historical control, are undefined. Methods: MM patients seen at Mayo Clinic in Florida (MCF) and Arizona (MCA) between 1/1/2000-06/15/2017 were included. Patient and disease characteristics including gender, age at diagnosis, bone marrow (BM) plasmacytosis, laboratory data [M spike, creatinine (Cr), beta-2-microglobulin (B2M), Hemoglobin (Hb), calcium (Ca)], MM subtype [IgG, IgA, light chain (LC), other], LC subtype (κ, λ, biclonal), presence of lytic bone lesions, disease stage (DS, ISS, R-ISS), mSMRT cytogenetic risk category, presence of individual cytogenetic mutations (deletions, translocations, gains, trisomy/hyperdiploidy) was collected. Comparisons between Hispanic study cohort characteristics and historical control were made by Chi-square, Fischer's exact and Signed rank tests, where applicable, using data from previous publications [Kyle et al, 2003 (n=1027) and Fonseca et al, 2003 (n=351)]. Patients with missing data on a certain clinical or disease feature were not included in the statistical analysis of that specific characteristic. Results: A total of 1705 MM patients were screened and 266 Hispanic patients seen at either site between the specified dates were identified for the analysis. These included equal number of males and females (n=133 each) with a median age of 58 years (range 25-87). IgG disease was seen in 52% with IgA and LC subtypes in 23% each. LC subtype was κ in 67%, λ in 31% and biclonal in 2% cases. Lytic and extramedullary disease were noted in 71% and 44% patients, respectively. DS and R-ISS stage at the time of MM diagnosis was not available in most patients while ISS stage among 150 patients showed stage 1, 2 and 3 in 48%, 28% and 24% patients, respectively. mSMART risk categories were present in 226 patients and included high, intermediate and standard risk in 12%, 11% and 77% patients, respectively. Of these 226 patients, cytogenetic disease prior to starting any MM treatment was available in 153 patients with similar risk category distribution. Median follow up for the whole Hispanic cohort was 38.6 months with a median OS 10.7 years (Figure 1). Comparison with historical control datasets which were 97% or greater comprised of White patients showed some significant differences for the Hispanic cohort including gender distribution, median age, BM plasmacytosis at the time of diagnosis, median Hb, Cr or M spike at presentation, light chain subtype, presence of lytic bone disease and certain cytogenetic alterations including t(4;14) and del13q/monosomy (Table 1). We did not note differences in high-risk cytogenetics between Hispanics and historical White controls. Conclusions: We report the first description of clinical and cytogenetic characteristics of Hispanic MM patients. The current and historical datasets that we have used are all from Mayo Clinic experience, thus making reasonable comparisons possible. We were able to confirm previous reports of demographic differences in Hispanics e.g., younger age at diagnosis. While some characteristics were significantly different, the clinical and cytogenetic differences we note do not clearly explain the inferior OS noted for Hispanics in population-based studies. Significant differences that we report warrant continued exploration in larger institutional and public databases in addition to a continued look into healthcare access and utilization. An ongoing collaborative analysis with data from Mayo Clinic, University of Miami and University of Southern California, Los Angeles is ongoing. Disclosures Fonseca: AMGEN: Consultancy; Jansen: Consultancy; Mayo Clinic & Dr Fonseca: Patents & Royalties: Prognostication of myeloma via FISH, ~$2000/year; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Kelly: Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Jannsen: Honoraria. Sher: LAM Therapeutics, Inc: Research Funding. Ailawadhi: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.