Citations

AbstractBackgroundIt is important to determine the natural history of sporadic and familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and generate clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and biofluid data for planning disease‐modifying trials.MethodAs part of the ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD; U19 AG063911) protocol, investigators at 19 centers in North America will enroll 2100 participants with FTLD over the next 5 years beginning in early 2020.ResultAs of 1/20/20, the ARTFL/LEFFTDS (A/L) Consortium had enrolled 1832 participants, including 850 in kindreds with familial FTLD (239 associated with mutations in MAPT, 192 in GRN, 370 in C9orf72, 4 with mutations in both GRN and C9orf72, and 45 with a mutation in a different gene or no mutation in any known FTLD‐associated gene). Over 500 participants have undergone 2 or more annual visits to date. MRI has been performed in 1105. Biofluid samples have also been collected, with blood (DNA, plasma, serum, mRNA, PBMC) in 1413 and CSF in 303. Over 60 manuscripts using A/L data or samples have been published to date. Five clinical trials involving A/L and ALLFTD participants are in progress or planned. The longitudinal arm in ALLFTD will enroll 500 of existing A/L and 600 future participants for annual assessments with similar methodology to A/L. An additional 1000 FTLD patients will undergo focused one‐time clinical evaluations and biofluid collection.ConclusionThe data/samples from already‐enrolled and planned participants in ALLFTD and findings published to date underscore the utility of evaluating FTLD subjects. The absence of identifiable mutations in some with familial FTLD suggests that other genes are yet to be discovered. ALLFTD data will inform clinical trial design, and many participants will be eligible for future trials. The key data and samples in ALLFTD are available to interested investigators worldwide. Supported by: AG063911, AG045390, NS092089, AG016976, AG21886.

AbstractObjectiveMAPT mutations typically cause behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia with or without parkinsonism. Previous studies have shown that symptomatic MAPT mutation carriers have frontotemporal atrophy, yet studies have shown mixed results as to whether presymptomatic carriers have low gray matter volumes. To elucidate whether presymptomatic carriers have lower structural brain volumes within regions atrophied during the symptomatic phase, we studied a large cohort of MAPT mutation carriers using a voxelwise approach.MethodsWe studied 22 symptomatic carriers (age 54.7 ± 9.1, 13 female) and 43 presymptomatic carriers (age 39.2 ± 10.4, 21 female). Symptomatic carriers’ clinical syndromes included: behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (18), an amnestic dementia syndrome (2), Parkinson’s disease (1), and mild cognitive impairment (1). We performed voxel‐based morphometry on T1 images and assessed brain volumetrics by clinical subgroup, age, and mutation subtype.ResultsSymptomatic carriers showed gray matter atrophy in bilateral frontotemporal cortex, insula, and striatum, and white matter atrophy in bilateral corpus callosum and uncinate fasciculus. Approximately 20% of presymptomatic carriers had low gray matter volumes in bilateral hippocampus, amygdala, and lateral temporal cortex. Within these regions, low gray matter volumes emerged in a subset of presymptomatic carriers as early as their thirties. Low white matter volumes arose infrequently among presymptomatic carriers.InterpretationA subset of presymptomatic MAPT mutation carriers showed low volumes in mesial temporal lobe, the region ubiquitously atrophied in all symptomatic carriers. With each decade of age, an increasing percentage of presymptomatic carriers showed low mesial temporal volume, suggestive of early neurodegeneration.

SummaryMeasurable residual disease (MRD) assessment by marrow‐based next‐generation flow cytometry (NGF) following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) may lead to false‐negative results due to patchy marrow involvement and extramedullary disease in patients with multiple myeloma. We assessed the value of simultaneous MRD evaluation with NGF and serum matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (MASS‐FIX). Of all 61 complete responders who were NGF‐negative for MRD, around day‐100 post ASCT, 59% were MASS‐FIX‐positive. At median follow‐up of 26 months, 69% of MASS‐FIX(+)/NGF(−) patients were alive and progression‐free versus 96% of MASS‐FIX(‐)/NGF(−) patients, P = 0·02. MASS‐FIX, a simple peripheral blood‐based assay complements marrow‐based NGF to accurately prognosticate patients with myeloma.

Introduction: Since 2018, immunoenrichment-based matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS), termed MASS-FIX, has replaced immunofixation for the detection and isotyping of serum monoclonal proteins at Mayo Clinic. MASS-FIX has advantages including increased sensitivity, specificity, and the ability to distinguish therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Herein, we report the laboratory characteristics and distribution of diagnoses of patients tested clinically at Mayo Clinic. Methods: MASS-FIX was performed on patient samples as previously described (Kohlhagen et. al. Clin Chem Lab 2020). Demographics and laboratory data, including quantitative M-spike, serum free light chains (FLC), and quantitative immunoglobulins at the time of MASS-FIX were recorded. For patients with multiple samples during the study period, only the initial MASS-FIX was evaluated. We identified 9195 unique patients with MASS-FIX performed between 7/24/2018 and 3/6/2020. Seven-thousand nine hundred and forty-six patients provided consent for study enrollment, and 7689 had data available on index diagnosis. Given considerable variability in the interpretation of diagnostic criteria for light chain (LC) MGUS, patients with this diagnosis (1360, 18%) were excluded. Patients were considered to have negative results (2211 in total) on MASS-FIX if: 1) no monoclonal protein was identified (1081, 49%); 2) the interpretation was "cannot rule out monoclonal protein" (945, 43%); 3) multiple, nonspecific spectral peaks were identified consistent with immune reconstitution (29, 1%); or 4) the only monoclonal protein identified was consistent with a therapeutic monoclonal antibody (156, 7%). Results: The final cohort consisted of 4118 patients with a positive MASS-FIX and 2211 patients with a negative MASS-FIX, all in the setting of underlying PCDs. Figure 1 illustrates the numbers and percentages of patients who are MASS-FIX positive versus MASS-FIX negative by diagnosis. MGUS and multiple myeloma (MM) were the most common diagnoses overall, and both were more common in the MASS-FIX positive cohort. More than 90% of patients with Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM), smoldering WM, smoldering MM, and cold agglutinin disease were positive by MASS-FIX. For MASS-FIX positive patients, IgG isotype was identified in 2575 patients (63%), IgA in 703 (17%) and IgM in 710 (17%). Bence Jones proteinemia was identified in 283 patients (7%) with lambda restriction being the most common (57%). 3625 patients (88%) had a monoclonal pattern, 228 patients (6%) had a bi-clonal pattern, and 7 (<1%) had a tri-clonal pattern. The majority of patients (58%) were kappa LC restricted by MASS-FIX, 222 (5%) had N-glycosylated LC, and 2 patients (<1%) had a heavy chain with no light chain. Conclusions: This single institution experience illustrates the practicality of MASS-FIX in detecting and following monoclonal proteins for a wide range of PCDs in a tertiary center. In this cohort, the percentage of patients who were MASS-FIX positive varied by diagnosis, reflecting cross sectional sampling of patients throughout their disease course. Disclosures Gertz: Research to Practice: Other; Springer Publishing: Patents & Royalties; Aurora Bio: Other; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Other; Amgen: Other: personal fee; Appellis: Other: personal fee; Annexon: Other: personal fee; Spectrum: Other: personal fee, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: personal fee; Prothena: Other: personal fee; Alnylam: Other: personal fee; Ionis/Akcea: Other: personal fee; Proclara: Other; DAVA oncology: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other; Teva: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Other; Physicians Education Resource: Other: personal fee; Medscape: Other: personal fee, Speakers Bureau. Kumar:AbbVie: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Carsgen: Other, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Other: Independent Review Committee; IRC member; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments, Research Funding; Genecentrix: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Tenebio: Other, Research Funding; Cellectar: Other; Genentech/Roche: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Celgene/BMS: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments. Kapoor:Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Dingli:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy. Lin:Merck: Research Funding; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vineti: Consultancy. Murray:The Binding Site: Patents & Royalties: Patent Use of Mass Spec to identify monoclonal proteins licensed to The Binding Site. Dispenzieri:Alnylam, Intellia, Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer, Prothena, Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Introduction: Truncating mutations in Additional Sex Combs-Like 1 (ASXL1) are associated with a high-risk disease phenotype in myeloid malignancies. In chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), truncating ASXL1 mutations are known to increase transcriptional activity of leukemic driver genes and have been associated with gene body hypermethylation. We interrogated the transcriptome and methylome of patients with ASXL1-mutant (MT) and -wildtype (WT) CMML using a multi-omics approach to test the hypothesis that gene expression is mediated through gene body methylation. Methods: Bone marrow mononuclear cells from patients with ASXL1 WT (n=8) and MT (n=8) CMML were subjected to targeted NGS of DNA, whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing (RNA-seq), and immunoprecipitation of DNA methyl residues (DIP-seq). After quality control all samples were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 before further processing and data analysis. Differential gene expression analysis was performed to identify genes up-regulated in MT CMML. The samples in the two groups were treated as biological replicates and subjected to a consensus peak calling strategy requiring an overlap of at least 30% between samples and an adjusted p-value < 5x10-5 for a methylation peak to be considered statistically significant. For validation purposes methylation analysis was performed on 3 ASXL1 MT and 3 WT CMML patients using Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC microarrays and differentially methylated regions were identified using a bump hunting strategy. Gene body methylation was defined as methylation in gene bodies (outside the promoter region, i.e. transcription start site ±2kb). Gene body methylation was compared between WT and MT CMML for the up-regulated genes and correlated with expression of all genes in MT CMML. Results: Sixteen WHO-defined CMML patients were included, median age 69 years (48-77), 63% male, 50% had truncating ASXL1 frame shift mutations. Abnormal karyotypes were observed in the same number of patients and the burden of co-mutations was similar between the two groups (median number per group 3 vs. 3, p=0.508). This included several modulators of DNA methylation including TET2, DNMT3A, and IDH2 (median number per group 1 vs. 1, p=0.699). There was a predominant up-regulation of gene expression in MT CMML: 707 genes up- and 124 down-regulated (FDR<0.050) without evidence of differential methylation in promoter regions of the differentially expressed genes. There was no difference in the number of genes with consensus methylation peaks in the gene body or the extent of gene body methylation (area under the consensus peaks) between MT and WT CMML for the differentially expressed genes (Figure 1a). We further validated these results using methylation microarrays (Figure 1b). Among the MT CMML patients, there was a curvilinear relationship between gene body methylation and gene expression across all genes with intermediate gene body methylation being associated with the highest gene expression (Figure 1c). As an alternative unbiased approach, we identified 1595 differentially methylated regions (DMR, regions with FDR<0.05) in the validation data set. We mapped all hypermethylated regions to gene bodies requiring that there was no concurrent hypermethylation of the promoter region of the same gene. With this approach we identified one of the 707 up-regulated genes (0.14%) with evidence of isolated gene body hypermethylation (HBZ, log2-fold change in gene expression 4.25, FDR=0.0008, DMR area=1.61, DMR FDR=0.018). Representative examples of up-regulated mitotic kinases without evidence of differential gene body methylation are shown in Figure 1d (pie charts represent the mean β-values of microarray probes, p-values represent the comparisons of mean β-values between MT and WT CMML per gene). Conclusions: Gene body methylation was positively associated with gene expression in MT CMML. However, the lack of differential gene body methylation between WT and MT CMML for the up-regulated genes make it an unlikely explanation for the observed increase in transcriptional activity among patients with MT CMML. Figure 1 Disclosures Ordog: Millipore Sigma: Patents & Royalties.

Introduction: Since 2018, immunoenrichment-based matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS), termed MASS-FIX, has replaced standard gel-based immunofixation for the detection and isotyping of serum monoclonal proteins at Mayo Clinic. MASS-FIX can readily identify N-glycosylation of involved light chains (LC N-glycosylation) by its unique, polytypic spectral pattern. LC N-glycosylation is identified more commonly in light chain amyloidosis (AL) than other plasma cell disorders (PCDs), and is associated with an increased risk of progression from MGUS to both AL and other PCDs (Dispenzieri et. al. Leukemia 2020). Herein, we report the mass spectral characteristics and distribution of diagnoses among 222 patients with LC N-glycosylation detected during a 20 month period in our clinical lab. Methods: MASS-FIX was performed on patient samples as previously described (Kohlhagen et. al. Clin Chem Lab 2020). Demographics and laboratory data, including quantitative M-spike, serum free light chains (FLC), and quantitative immunoglobulins at the time of MASS-FIX were recorded. For patients with multiple samples during the study period, only the initial MASS-FIX was evaluated. 9195 unique patients had MASS-FIX performed from 7/24/2018 to 03/06/2020. Inclusion criteria for this retrospective study included: 1) consent for record review; 2) a monoclonal protein identified on MASS-FIX; 3) an underlying PCD. Patients were considered to have negative results (2211 in total) on MASS-FIX if: 1) no monoclonal protein was identified (1081, 49%); 2) the interpretation was "cannot rule out monoclonal protein" (945, 43%); 3) multiple, nonspecific spectral peaks were identified consistent with immune reconstitution (29, 1%); or 4) the only monoclonal protein identified was consistent with a therapeutic monoclonal antibody (156, 7%). The final positive cohort consisted of 4118 patients with definitive monoclonal proteins on MASS-FIX. Results: Two-hundred and twenty-two (5%) of the 4118 patients with a positive MASS-FIX had LC N-glycosylation. 202 patients (91%) had FLC assays performed. Of these, 110 (54%) were kappa LC restricted, 22 (11%) were lambda restricted, and 70 (35%) were normal. A quantifiable M-spike was identified in 110 patients (85%) of 129 patients who had serum protein electrophoresis performed. By MASS-FIX, 139 patients (63%) had an IgG isotype, 18 (8%) an IgA, and 55 (25%) an IgM. Two of these patients had a bi-clonal pattern in which both IgG kappa and IgM kappa LCs were N-glycosylated. 12 patients (5%) had monoclonal light chains with no corresponding heavy chain. Overall, 173 (78%) of 222 patients were kappa LC restricted and 44 (22%) were lambda. 189 patients (85%) had a monoclonal pattern, 18 (8%) had a bi-clonal pattern, and 3 (1%) had a tri-clonal pattern. The most common PCD diagnoses for the 222 patients with LC N-glycosylation were MGUS (45%), multiple myeloma (MM) (31%), and immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) (8%). The percentage of MASS-FIX positive patients with LC N-glycosylation by diagnosis, stratified by kappa and lambda LC restriction, is illustrated in Figure 1. Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) had the highest relative percentage of patients with LC N-glycosylation, regardless of LC restriction. Eighteen AL patients (5%) had LC N-glycosylation; the percentage was higher in kappa restricted (13%) than lambda restricted AL patients (2%). Of note, LC N-glycosylation was not detected in patients with plasma cell leukemia, non-AL amyloidosis with associated MGUS, POEMS Syndrome or Castleman's Disease in this cross sectional sampling of patients. Conclusions: This retrospective study demonstrates that 5% of patients in a routine clinical setting with positive MASS-FIX have glycosylated LCs. Consistent with prior observations, CAD had the highest relative percentage of LC N-glycosylated patients. The percentage of AL patients with LC N-glycosylation in this cohort is lower than previously reported for newly diagnosed AL patients (Kumar et. al. Leukemia 2019), which is not surprising given that the current cohort study is a cross sectional evaluation of patients at various stages of diagnosis and treatment rather than a prevalence study. Further study will be done to exclude the presence of latent AL in patients with N-glycosylated LC and diagnoses of MGUS, SMM, MM, and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. Disclosures Gertz: Springer Publishing: Patents & Royalties; Proclara: Other; DAVA oncology: Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; Teva: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Other; Research to Practice: Other; Celgene: Other; Abbvie: Other; Physicians Education Resource: Other: personal fee; Medscape: Other: personal fee, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Other: personal fee; Appellis: Other: personal fee; Annexon: Other: personal fee; Spectrum: Other: personal fee, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: personal fee; Prothena: Other: personal fee; Alnylam: Other: personal fee; Ionis/Akcea: Other: personal fee; Aurora Bio: Other. Kumar:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments, Research Funding; Carsgen: Other, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Other: Independent Review Committee; IRC member; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Celgene/BMS: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; AbbVie: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; MedImmune: Research Funding; Genecentrix: Consultancy; Tenebio: Other, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Sanofi: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectar: Other. Kapoor:Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectar: Consultancy. Dingli:Alexion: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy. Lin:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vineti: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Murray:The Binding Site: Patents & Royalties: Patent Use of Mass Spec to identify monoclonal proteins licensed to The Binding Site. Dispenzieri:Intellia: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding.

Introduction: Additional Sex Combs-Like 1 (ASXL1) is a chromatin modifier frequently affected by truncating mutations in myeloid malignancies. In chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), truncating ASXL1 mutations are associated with the overexpression of leukemogenic driver genes, however the molecular mechanisms underlying this transcriptional activation remain controversial. We performed single-cell chromatin accessibility studies of ASXL1-mutant (MT) and -wildtype (WT) CMML to identify cis-regulatory elements (CREs) such as distal enhancer elements that may explain the observed transcriptional activity in MT CMML. Methods: Bone marrow mononuclear cells from a patient with WT and a patient with MT CMML were subjected to single-cell DNA transposase accessibility studies (scATAC-seq). The cryopreserved cells were thawed and resuspended and approximately 100000 viable mononuclear cells per sample were subjected to transposase assays before proceeding to single-cell partitioning into gel beads in emulsion, barcoding, library construction, and sequencing following an established 10X Genomics workflow. The target cell recovery was approximately 2000 cells per sample. Genomic libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 before demultiplexing, alignment to the reference genome, and post-alignment quality control. The 10X Genomics Cell Ranger ATAC software was used for demultiplexing, alignment of the reads to the GRCh38 reference genome, filtering and quality control, counting of barcodes and unique molecular identifiers, identification of transposase cut sites, detection of accessible chromatin peaks, count matrix generation for peaks and transcription factors, clustering, and differential accessibility analysis. The two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for equality of distribution functions was used to compare the distributions of single-cell entropies. Single-cell cis-co-accessibility scores were estimated using Cicero. Results: To mitigate potential effects on the analysis introduced by unequal cell recovery due to experimental conditions, we randomly sampled 1500 single cells from each genotype. Visualizing the first two principal components of the chromatin accessibility data revealed the differences in chromatin conformation between genotypes and also the increased heterogeneity within the MT sample (Figure 1a). To quantify this increase in intratumoral heterogeneity of chromatin accessibility in MT CMML, we calculated the single-cell entropies for both genotypes. There was an increase in the dispersion of single-cell entropy values (mean 0.793±0.026 versus 0.811±0.012, p=6.19x10-151) in MT compared to WT disease (Figure 1b). To leverage the power of the single-cell chromatin accessibility data, we estimated cis-co-accessibility scores (two-way chromatin interactions). There were 631 genes involved in two-way chromatin interactions that were either specific to MT CMML or were shared between MT and WT CMML and showed an increase in co-accessibility in MT CMML. Co-accessibility was higher in MT compared to WT CMML, regardless whether the chromatin interaction was MT-specific or shared between the genotypes (Figure 1c). Gene ontology analysis revealed increased chromatin accessibility in genes involved in the regulation of cell cycle, nuclear division, chromosome organization, cell cycle phase transition, DNA conformation change, and DNA replication (FDR<1.00x10-5). The construction of cis-co-accessibility networks demonstrated a remodeling of the chromatin landscape with MT-specific chromatin interactions involving key mitotic kinases such as MAP2K3 (Figure 1d). Conclusions: MT CMML is characterized by an increase in intratumoral heterogeneity and increased chromatin accessibility. The increased chromatin co-accessibility involved key mitotic kinases and may serve as a plausible explanation for the increased transcriptional activity observed in MT CMML. Figure 1 Disclosures Ordog: Millipore Sigma: Patents & Royalties.

Abstract In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Cardio-Oncology and Imaging Councils of the American College of Cardiology offers recommendations to clinicians regarding the cardiovascular care of cardio-oncology patients in this expert consensus statement. Cardio-oncology patients—individuals with an active or prior cancer history and with or at risk of cardiovascular disease—are a rapidly growing population who are at increased risk of infection, and experiencing severe and/or lethal complications by COVID-19. Recommendations for optimizing screening and monitoring visits to detect cardiac dysfunction are discussed. In addition, judicious use of multimodality imaging and biomarkers are proposed to identify myocardial, valvular, vascular, and pericardial involvement in cancer patients. The difficulties of diagnosing the etiology of cardiovascular complications in patients with cancer and COVID-19 are outlined, along with weighing the advantages against risks of exposure, with the modification of existing cardiovascular treatments and cardiotoxicity surveillance in patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstract Background Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is one of the most common monogenetic disorders in humans and is characterized by numerous fluid-filled cysts that grow slowly, resulting in end-stage renal disease in the majority of patients. Preclinical studies have indicated that treatment with low-dose thiazolidinediones, such as pioglitazone, decrease cyst growth in rodent models of PKD. Methods This Phase 1b cross-over study compared the safety of treatment with a low dose (15 mg) of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) agonist pioglitazone or placebo in PKD patients, with each treatment given for 1 year. The study monitored known side effects of PPAR-γ agonist treatment, including fluid retention and edema. Liver enzymes and risk of hypoglycemia were assessed throughout the study. As a secondary objective, the efficacy of low-dose pioglitazone was followed using a primary assessment of total kidney volume (TKV), blood pressure (BP) and kidney function. Results Eighteen patients were randomized and 15 completed both arms. Compared with placebo, allocation to pioglitazone resulted in a significant decrease in total body water as assessed by bioimpedance analysis {mean difference 0.16 Ω [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24–2.96], P = 0.024} and no differences in episodes of heart failure, clinical edema or change in echocardiography. Allocation to pioglitazone led to no difference in the percent change in TKV of −3.5% (95% CI −8.4–1.4, P = 0.14), diastolic BP and microalbumin:creatinine ratio. Conclusions In this small pilot trial in people with ADPKD but without diabetes, pioglitazone 15 mg was found to be as safe as placebo. Larger and longer-term randomized trials powered to assess effects on TKV are needed.