Citations

356 Background: Autologous anti-claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) CAR T cell, satricabtagene autoleucel (satri-cel), was developed to treat solid tumors. We report the completed results of the Phase 1b ELIMYN18.2 study (Cohort A) in gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GC/GEJ) and pancreatic cancer (PC). Methods: This single-arm, open-label, Phase 1b/2 study (NCT04404595) evaluated the safety and efficacy of satri-cel in patients with CLDN18.2-positive advanced GC/GEJ or PC. Cohort A consisted of a modified 3+3 design. After a conditioning regimen of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and nab-paclitaxel, patients were administered 1-3 cycles of satri-cel. The primary objectives were safety and determination of the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Adverse Events (AEs) were graded per CTCAE 5.0, objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) including CR, PR, and ≥6-month SD were assessed by the investigator per RECIST 1.1. Results: As of May 14, 2023, twenty-four patients underwent leukapheresis in Cohort A. Nineteen patients (7 GC/GEJ and 12 PC) with a median of 3 (range: 1-8) prior therapeutic lines had satri-cel at three dose levels (DLs) between 250×106 and 600×106 cells. Seven patients received a 2nd dose and two patients received a 3rd dose of satri-cel at a median of 113 and 259 days, respectively, post-first infusion. All 19 patients experienced at least one AE. No DLTs occurred and 17 patients experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Two cases of Grade 3 CRS were reported, and all other CRS were Grade 1 or 2. Two Grade 1 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred. All CRS and ICANS were resolved. No severe gastrointestinal-related AEs were found. No increased toxicities were reported after any reinfusion. No satri-cel treatment-related death occurred. For all patients, the best ORR was 26.3%, the median DOR was 3.7 months and the CBR was 42.1%. The median PFS was 5.2 months, and overall survival was 12.8 months (95% CI 5.7-NE) after leukapheresis, and the median PFS was 3.3 months, and overall survival was 8.9 months (95% CI 3.3-NE) after the first infusion. In the GC/GEJ group, the ORR was 42.9% (3/7), the median DOR was 6.9 months and the CBR was 57.1%. In the PC group, the ORR was 16.7% (2/12), the median DOR was 3.4 months and the CBR was 33.3%. An ORR of 42.9% (3/7) and a CBR of 71.4% were reported at the DL3 of 600×106 cells which was selected as RP2D. At DL3, one GC patient achieved a CR and two PC patients had PR, suggesting the PC group achieved an ORR of 40% (2/5) and the GC group achieved an ORR of 50% (1/2). In addition, tumor shrinkage was detected in 73.7 % (14/19) of patients. Conclusions: The safety profile and therapeutic efficacy of satri-cel were shown to be promising in heavily pretreated patients with CLDN18.2-positive advanced GC/GEJ and PC . In the Phase 2 study, the first patient with GC received satri-cel in May 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT04404595 .

The 2023 Joint International Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS), the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association (ELITA), and the Liver Intensive Care Group of Europe (LICAGE) held in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, marked a significant recovery milestone for the liver transplant community after COVID-19. With 1159 participants and a surge in abstract submissions, the event focused on “Liver Disorders and Transplantation: Innovations and Evolving Indications.” This conference report provides a comprehensive overview of the key themes discussed during the event, encompassing Hepatology, Anesthesia and Critical Care, Acute Liver Failure, Infectious Disease, Immunosuppression, Pediatric Liver Transplantation, Living Donor Liver Transplantation, Transplant Oncology, Surgical Approaches, and Machine Perfusion. The congress provided a platform for extensive discussions on a wide range of topics, reflecting the continuous advancements and collaborative efforts within the liver transplant community.

We describes the development of a poly-lactic-coglycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticle-based system for conjugation of targeting peptides to PLGA nanoparticles and delivery of the therapeutic gene SOX9 to damaged astrocytes in a mouse stroke model.

Abstract PURPOSE Previous analysis of NRG-CC001 suggested pre-treatment WMI volume was a significant imaging-biomarker predictor of post-treatment neurocognitive decline at 4-and 12-months following HA-WBRT+Memantine. This suggested patients with greater pre-treatment WMI were more susceptible to neurocognitive decline, specifically when undergoing HA-WBRT, but not standard-WBRT. The current analysis examined the relationship between changes in MR-determined WMI and NCF 6-months following WBRT+memantine+/-HA. METHODS NCF-testing was performed at baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months post-WBRT, and included Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised (HVLT-R), Trail Making Test (TMT) Parts A and B, and Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA). Pre-treatment WMI was measured by FLAIR-volume corrected for whole brain volume and corrected for the FLAIR volume associated with metastases (met vol) (FLAIR-volume/(whole brain volume–met-vol). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between pre-treatment WMI and change from baseline to 6-months for each standardized NCF score. RESULTS Of the 518 randomized patients, 443 (217 patients WBRT+Memantine and 226 HA-WBRT+Memantine) had WMI data available at baseline, and of those, 162 patients (89 patients WBRT+Memantine and 73 HA-WBRT+Memantine) had both baseline and 6-month imaging available. For these patients, there was only a trend toward significance for change in corrected FLAIR-volume from baseline to 6-months (p = 0.174) but no significant change in met-vol (p = 0.438) or whole brain volume (p = 0.977). The change in standardized TMT Part A and B and the change in composite 6-month change scores were moderately correlated with change in corrected FLAIR volume adjusted for met-vol but only in the WBRT+Memantine arm (rho=-0.35, -0.34, -0.39 and p-value = 0.003, 0.006, 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Despite an increase in post-WBRT MR-WMI at 6-months, analysis did not show strong correlation between NCF and MR-WMI as determined by FLAIR-volume change between baseline and 6-months. Similar analyses are underway for the NRG-CC003 imaging data.

Abstract PURPOSE Hippocampal volume (HV) is a predictor of neurocognitive function (NCF) in neurodegenerative disease. The role of patient-specific anatomic variables has not been well investigated in patients with brain metastases. This work aimed to evaluate HV at baseline and 6 months as a predictor of NCF and differential benefit from HA-WBRT for patients enrolled on CC001. MATERIALS HV was calculated at baseline and 6 months. HV at baseline and 6 months were correlated with baseline and 2, 4, and 6-month NCF scores (HVLT-R Total and Delayed Recall, Delayed Recognition, TMT Parts A and B, and COWA) using Pearson correlation. Correlation was defined as weak if ρ ≤0.35. A cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the impact of baseline HV on time to NCF failure. RESULTS Of 518 patients randomized on CC001, 277 had baseline imaging, and 135 had 6-month imaging. However, only 87 patients were analyzable at both baseline and 6-month periods. At baseline, HV was not significantly associated with NCF score for any measure (p-value range: 0.06-0.72). Additionally, there was no association between baseline HV and time to NCF failure (p = 0.16). Additionally, the impact of treatment arm allocation on HV was examined but found to be non-significant (p = 0.06). Lastly, baseline HV and NCF scores were noted to have weak correlation at 2, 4, 6, and 12 month timepoints (ρ: range, -0.17-0.15; P-value range, 0.04-0.98). At 6 months, the correlation between HV, baseline NCF change, and 6 month standardized NCF change were also noted to be weak (ρ: range, 0.05-0.16; P-value range, 0.06-0.76). CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy is known to have deleterious effects on neurocognition. In neurodegenerative disease, HV and rate of HV change are known predictors for NCF. However, baseline HV is not an independent predictor of neurocognitive changes after WBRT or HA-WBRT for patients with brain metastases.

PURPOSE CNS progression or relapse is an uncommon but devastating complication of aggressive B-cell lymphoma. There is no consensus regarding the optimal approach to CNS prophylaxis. This study was designed to determine whether high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is effective at preventing CNS progression in patients at high risk of this complication. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients age 18-80 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and high risk of CNS progression, treated with curative-intent anti–CD20-based chemoimmunotherapy, were included in this international, retrospective, observational study. Cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and cumulative risks of CNS progression were calculated according to use of HD-MTX, with time to CNS progression calculated from diagnosis for all patients (all-pts) and from completion of frontline systemic lymphoma induction therapy, for patients in complete response at completion of chemoimmunotherapy (CR-pts). RESULTS Two thousand four hundred eighteen all-pts (HD-MTX; n = 425) and 1,616 CR-pts (HD-MTX; n = 356) were included. CNS International Prognostic Index was 4-6 in 83.4% all-pts. Patients treated with HD-MTX had a lower risk of CNS progression (adjusted HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.90]; P = .014), but significance was not retained when confined to CR-pts (adjusted HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.42 to 1.30]; P = .29), with 5-year adjusted risk difference of 1.6% (95% CI, –1.5 to 4.4; all-pts) and 1.4% (95% CI, –1.5 to 4.1; CR-pts). Subgroups were underpowered to draw definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of HD-MTX in individual high-risk clinical scenarios; however, there was no clear reduction in CNS progression risk with HD-MTX in any high-risk subgroup. CONCLUSION In this large study, high-risk patients receiving HD-MTX had a 7.2% 2-year risk of CNS progression, consistent with the progression risk in previously reported high-risk cohorts. Use of HD-MTX was not associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in risk of CNS progression.