Citations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There has been limited assessment between anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. We sought to compare PROMs from two-level ACDF with single-level ACCF procedures. We evaluate these results in the context of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds, which have not been performed previously. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Quality Outcomes Database Spine Collaborative Research Study Group compared two-level ACDF and single-level ACCF at 3-, 12-, and 24 months postoperatively. PROMs included arm pain Numeric Rating Scale, neck pain Numeric Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index, and North American Spine Society Patient Satisfaction Index. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine differences in perioperative outcomes, as well as the impact of two-level ACDF vs one-level ACCF on PROMs. MCID thresholds were based off previously established limits. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty patients were included (236 ACDF, 94 ACCF), and the follow-up rate was 82% at 2 years. There was a significantly higher baseline age, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, proportion of diabetes, osteoarthritis, ambulation dependence, and myelopathy severity in the ACCF cohort. On multivariable analysis, the ACCF group had greater average length of stay and estimated blood loss. There were no significant differences between reoperation rates or nonroutine discharge. There were similar rates of MCID achievement for PROMs at all time points. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that both ACDF and ACCF procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy are able to achieve similar, clinically meaningful improvements in PROMs by 2 years. Patients undergoing single-level ACCF have more estimated blood loss and longer length of stay, as well as worse baseline myelopathy. Both procedures have efficacious, durable outcomes. It is reasonable that other factors, such as radiographic characteristics and patient symptoms, may influence patient selection for ACDF vs ACCF.

ABSTRACTA core tenant of the Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research Network 2.0—Advancing Dementia Care (GEAR 2.0‐ADC) is the inclusion of community members during all stages of clinical research. As such, we deliberately integrated and supported patient and public involvement in the evaluation and selection of GEAR 2.0‐ADC Pilot Research Grants by developing and adapting traditional grant application review structures, with input from community members, to create the GEAR 2.0‐ADC Community Review Committee approach. Community members, including persons living with dementia, effectively participated in all three rounds of research grant application review and selection, complementing the traditional scientific review process. The structure and flexibility of the GEAR 2.0‐ADC Community Review Committee approach serve as a model for patient and public grant application review involvement with strong potential for applications across grant reviews in other medical specialties.

Histamine appears to be intimately involved with skeletal muscle responses during and following exercise. Blocking histamine’s actions during endurance exercise training by taking common over-the-counter antihistamines resulted in diminished gains in fitness. These results indicate that exercise-induced histamine release is important in generating many of the positive adaptations to exercise training.

Background: Osteochondral allograft transplant and autograft transplant for femoral head defects have emerged as promising treatments for concomitant cartilage and subchondral bone injuries in young patients. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent osteochondral allograft or autograft transplant for femoral head defects and identify any risk factors that may lead to conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All patients who underwent osteochondral allograft or autograft transplant for femoral head defects across 2 institutions were analyzed. Clinical outcomes were assessed at final follow-up with the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score–Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). Complications and reoperations were recorded. Patients were assessed radiographically preoperatively and at final follow-up for osteoarthritis using Tönnis grading. Results: A total of 27 patients were included in this study (19 osteochondral allograft transplant, 8 osteochondral autograft transplant). The mean follow-up for the allograft and autograft cohorts was 2.8 and 9.5 years, respectively. The mean defect size for patients who underwent allograft and autograft transplant was 2.8 × 2.1 cm and 1.6 × 1.0 cm, respectively. The mean mHHS, HOS-ADL, HOS-SSS, and iHOT-12 for the allograft cohort were 86.7, 92.8, 81.4, and 79.0, respectively, and for the autograft cohort were 87.6, 92.7, 83.1, and 82.0, respectively. No significant difference in outcomes was noted for patients who underwent femoral head allograft versus nonorthotopic femoral condyle allograft transplant. For the allograft cohort, 4 patients (21.1%) underwent conversion to THA at a mean of 1.9 years. Of the remaining 15 allograft patients, only 1 patient (6.7%) had radiographic osteoarthritis progression. None of the patients in the autograft cohort underwent conversion to THA. Conclusion: Osteochondral allograft and autograft transplant for femoral head defects demonstrated overall favorable clinical outcomes and rates of conversion to THA. Additionally, nonorthotopic femoral condyle allografts demonstrated similar outcomes to femoral head allografts. Both osteochondral allograft and autograft transplant should be considered for patients with focal femoral head defects.

ABSTRACTBackgroundPrior studies have documented that patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).ObjectivesTo examine coronary artery calcium (CAC) as a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis and its association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with CRC across the cancer treatment trajectory.MethodsAdults with newly diagnosed CRC were enrolled in the prospective ColoCare study from 2017 to 2024. CAC was measured from routine diagnostic computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography‐CT scans at CRC diagnosis until 5 years post‐diagnosis. Atherosclerosis was defined as the presence of CAC. We used multivariable‐adjusted Fine and Gray models to assess the association between CAC and MACE risk, accounting for competing risks.ResultsAmong 300 CRC patients, the most common CVD risk factors at cancer diagnosis were hypertension (37%), hyperlipidemia (24%), and diabetes (14%). During follow‐up (median = 5.3 years), 75 (25%) individuals experienced MACE: stroke (3%), new/worsening HF (9%), HF exacerbation requiring hospitalization (2%), coronary revascularization (3%), and death (19%). Among individuals with imaging at baseline (n = 101), 37 (36.6%) had CAC, and statins were not prescribed in 11 (55.0%) patients with moderate/high CAC. For those with serial imaging (n = 61), 31.1% showed worsening CAC and 3% developed new CAC. Baseline CAC conferred a higher risk of MACE (HR = 4.79; 95% CI: 1.05–21.75, p = 0.04) after accounting for cancer‐related deaths as a competing risk.ConclusionsSubclinical atherosclerosis and MACE are common among patients with CRC. Integrating CAC from routine cancer imaging can identify patients who may benefit from cardio‐preventive treatment.

Objective Present the rationale for the development of a new, patient-facing vital sign for adult hearing. Study Design Structured A3 process. Setting Fourteen virtual meetings and two in-person meetings held between May 2021 and June 2022. Main Outcome Measure(s) Identification and refinement of a countermeasure to develop and imbed a hearing health vital sign for adult hearing. Results Through a rigorous, structured A3 process, the Hearing Health Collaborative identified and refined the rationale for and the qualities associated with a public-facing vital sign for adult hearing loss. Specifically, such a vital sign must embody five qualities: simple, accessible, stable, inclusive, and meaningful. These qualities together would ensure that a hearing health vital sign would be useful not only as a screening tool but also as an instrument to guide next steps in workup and potentially treatment. Conclusions Successful identification and implementation of a hearing metric or “vital sign” for the presence of adult hearing loss, using precedent convention of other medical diseases, may help reframe public perceptions surrounding hearing loss, improve awareness and literacy regarding the presence of the disease, and prompt action to seek diagnostic assessment.

Radiomic parenchymal phenotypes on mammograms were used to predict breast cancer risk among both Black and White women, notably for false-negative findings and symptomatic interval cancer.

Summary The eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS) measures endoscopic severity. While a score of ≤2 has been proposed for endoscopic response, it is unknown whether achieving this threshold results in clinically important outcomes. We aimed to determine whether an EREFS response to topical steroids (tCS) is associated with a decreased need for future esophageal dilation. In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with a new diagnosis of EoE who underwent esophageal dilation, were then treated with tCS, and had at least two follow-up endoscopies. Endoscopic response was defined as EREFS ≤2. Histological and global symptom responses were recorded. We compared patients with and without endoscopic response and calculated the number of subsequent dilations in each group. Of 113 EoE patients, 55 (49%) had endoscopic response post-tCS. Compared to endoscopic non-responders, responders were older (43.4 vs 34.4 years; p = 0.001) and had lower EREFS (4.4 ± 1.6 vs. 6.3 ± 1.5; p < 0.001) at baseline. EREFS responders required fewer dilations on their initial post-treatment endoscopy (65% vs 90%; p = 0.002) and had greater symptom (92% vs 64%; p = 0.005) and histologic responses (82% vs 24% <15 eos/hpf; p < 0.001). Over the median follow-up time of 1106 days, EREFS responders required fewer dilations than non-responders (4.5 ± 2.9 vs 6.2 ± 4.5; p = 0.03). Endoscopic responders to tCS required fewer esophageal dilations compared to non-responders. Responders also had better symptom and histologic responses. These results provide evidence that endoscopic response is associated with important clinical outcomes including a reduction in future esophageal dilations.

Abstract Rationale: Adverse social determinants of health (SDOH) are common in COPD and associated with increased mortality. However, cause-specific mortality is understudied. We evaluated associations of neighborhood-level SDOH with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among individuals with or at-risk for COPD. Methods: SPIROMICS is an ongoing, multi-center, longitudinal observational study of individuals across the US with current or former personal smoking histories (≥20 pack-years), with or without spirometrically-defined COPD. We established geocoded neighborhood-level SDOH at baseline using 2010 census tract data, including specifically, area deprivation index (ADI) (range 0-100, 100 = most disadvantaged), poverty level (percentage of households below the poverty line), poor food access (>1/3 of residents with no access to fresh food stores within 1 mile in urban areas and 10 miles in rural areas), and food desert (low income plus poor food access). We ascertained all-cause and cause-specific mortality through 12/31/2021 using the National Death Index. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we evaluated the risk of all-cause mortality for each SDOH. We utilized competing-risk regression models to evaluate the risk of cardiovascular, respiratory, COPD (a subset of respiratory), and neoplastic causes of death individually with each SDOH. Models were adjusted for demographics, smoking status, pack-years, BMI categories, coronary heart disease, FEV1% predicted and study site. Effect modification by lung function was assessed using multiplicative interactions between SDOH and FEV1% predicted. Results: Among 2977 participants, mean ADI was 40.1±27.8. Within a participant's neighborhood, on average 10.4±10.4% of households were below the poverty line, 933 (31.3%) had poor food access, and 220 (7.4%) resided in a food desert. During a median follow-up of 7.8 years (IQR 5.6-9.2), 744 (25.0%) participants died, most commonly from respiratory causes including COPD. Neither ADI nor neighborhood poverty level were associated with all-cause mortality or any specific cause of death (Table). Despite lack of associations between food access and mortality (Table), individuals residing in a food desert had elevated risks of all-cause (HR: 1.36 [95%CI: 1.03-1.79]) and cardiovascular (HR: 2.62 [95%CI: 1.5-4.35]) deaths. There was no significant effect modification by lung function. Conclusions: In a large cohort of individuals with personal smoking histories, with or without COPD, living in a food desert was associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. However, neighborhood poverty level and food access, the two components of food desert, were not independently associated with mortality, suggesting the association of multimodal SDOH variables with mortality in this population.