Citations

Abstract Pralatrexate is a folate antagonist that selectively enters cells expressing reduced folate carrier type 1 and competitively inhibits dihydrofolate reductase, leading to interruption of RNA synthesis, DNA replication, and apoptosis. This phase 1 study was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pralatrexate in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen (part 1) and the response and pharmacokinetics of 6 cycles of this combination (CHOP + Folotyn 30 mg/m2 [Fol-CHOP]) in patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). In part 1, on days 1 and 8 of each cycle, patients were treated with 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 mg/m2 of pralatrexate in combination with CHOP, per dose escalation, in 5 sequential cohorts. No patients experienced DLTs in cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. The pralatrexate dose of 30 mg/m2 was selected to be combined with CHOP for part 2 and administered to 33 additional patients in the expansion cohort. At the MTD, the Fol-CHOP regimen was generally well tolerated in patients with PTCL, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 83.9% (20 complete response and 6 partial response), as assessed by treating investigators. Thirty-five patients (67.3%) experienced grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, the most common of which were anemia (21.2%), neutropenia (19.2%), febrile neutropenia (11.5%), fatigue, mucosal inflammation, nausea, and vomiting (7.7% each). In conclusion, Fol-CHOP was found to be a safe and effective treatment for newly diagnosed PTCL and deemed worthy of further investigation. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02594267.

Background: Quadriceps muscle atrophy remains a limiting factor in returning to activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy may accelerate quadriceps strengthening in the perioperative period. Purpose: To evaluate postoperative isometric quadriceps strength in patients who underwent ACLR with a perioperative BFR program. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients indicated for ACLR were randomized into 2 groups, BFR and control, at their initial clinic visit. All patients underwent 2 weeks of prehabilitation preoperatively, with the BFR group performing exercises with a pneumatic cuff set to 80% limb occlusion pressure placed over the proximal thigh. All patients also underwent a standardized postoperative 12-week physical therapy protocol, with the BFR group using pneumatic cuffs during exercise. Quadriceps strength was measured as peak and mean torque during seated leg extension and presented as quadriceps index (percentage vs healthy limb). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), knee range of motion, and quadriceps circumference were also gathered at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively, and adverse effects were recorded. Results: Included were 46 patients, 22 in the BFR group (mean age, 25.4 ± 10.6 years) and 24 in the control group (mean age, 27.5 ± 12.0 years). At 6 weeks postoperatively, the BFR group demonstrated significantly greater strength compared with the controls (quadriceps index: 57% ± 24% vs 40% ± 18%; P = .029), and the BFR group had significantly better Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System–Physical Function (42.69 ± 5.64 vs 39.20 ± 5.51; P = .001) and International Knee Documentation Committee (58.22 ± 7.64 vs 47.05 ± 13.50; P = .011) scores. At 6 weeks postoperatively, controls demonstrated a significant drop in the peak torque generation of the operative versus nonoperative leg. There were no significant differences in strength or PROs at 3 or 6 months postoperatively. Three patients elected to drop out of the BFR group secondary to cuff intolerance during exercise; otherwise, no other severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Integrating BFR into perioperative physical therapy protocols led to improved strength and increased PROs at 6 weeks after ACLR. No differences in strength or PROs were found at 3 and 6 months between the 2 groups. Registration: NCT04374968 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Abstract Background The 2023 Duke-ISCVID criteria for IE were recently introduced to improve classification of IE for research and clinical purposes (Table 1). We compared the diagnostic accuracy of the new criteria with the 2000 modified Duke criteria, the 2015 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) criteria and a clinically adjudicated reference standard by a panel of international experts on IE.Table 1:Overview of changes in criteria from 2000 modified Duke to 2023 Duke-ISCVIDAdapted from: Fowler et al, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2023 Methods The study population consisted of consecutively enrolled patients suspected to have IE and discussed by the IE team of the Amsterdam University Medical Center (AMC) between October 2016 and March 2021. A panel of international experts on IE assigned a final diagnosis, which served as the reference standard. We compared the definite classification of the 2023 Duke-ISCVID criteria against this reference standard. We also evaluated accuracy of the new criteria, excluding data obtained from cardiac surgery and pathology (“Clinical Criteria”). Lastly, we quantified the added value of the proposed changes to the criteria, and compared the 2023 Duke-ISCVID to previous criteria using the McNemar test. We performed sensitivity analyses in patients who underwent cardiac surgery and patients who underwent TEE. Results 595 patients with suspected IE were included, of whom 399 (67%) were adjudicated as having IE. 111 patients (19%) had prosthetic valve IE, 48 (8%) had cardiac implantable electronic device IE. The 2023 Duke-ISCVID criteria were more sensitive than the modified Duke or ESC criteria (84.2 vs 74.9 vs 80%,respectively, p < 0.001 for ISCVID vs ESC criteria) without significant loss of specificity (Table 2). After excluding cardiac surgery/pathology results, the 2023 Duke-ISCVID Clinical Criteria also had significantly better sensitivity than the modified Duke and ESC criteria, again without losing specificity. The changes in the 'major microbiological' and 'imaging' criteria had the most impact (Figure 1). Findings were robust in sensitivity analyses (Table 3). When classifying ‘definite’ and ‘possible’ IE as a positive test, the 2023 Duke-ISCVID criteria had 99% sensitivity compared to the reference standard, but specificity decreased to 21%.Table 2:Diagnostic accuracy of modified Duke, ESC and Duke-ISCVID criteria Sensitivity and specificity are against the reference standard (adjudication panel). The Clinical Criteria classification is the Duke-ISCVID classification when results from surgery or post-mortem studies are not used to determine classification.Table 3:Sensitivity analyses of accuracy of Duke-ISCVID criteria In the Definite + Possible analysis, patients with possible IE according to the Duke-ISCVID criteria were also considered as having IE. All comparisons are against the reference standard (adjudication panel). Conclusion In this cohort, the 2023 Duke-ISCVID criteria represent a significant advance in the diagnostic classification of patients suspected of IE. Added value of new Duke-ISCVID criteria compared to modified Duke criteria Each point (red square for sensitivity, blue circle for specificity) provides the diagnostic accuracy measure for the 2000 modified Duke Criteria with addition of a specific change from the Duke-ISCVID criteria. The horizontal bars represent the 95% confidence interval for the point estimate. The top points represent the modified Duke criteria without addition, the bottom points are the complete Duke-ISCVID criteria. Disclosures Larry M. Baddour, MD, Boston Scientific: Advisor/Consultant|Roivant Sciences: Advisor/Consultant Arnold S. Bayer, MD, Akagera Medicines: Grant/Research Support|ContraFect Corporation: Grant/Research Support Emanuele Durante Mangoni, MD,, PhD, Advanz pharma: Advisor/Consultant|Advanz pharma: Grant/Research Support|Advanz pharma: Honoraria|Angelini: Grant/Research Support|Angelini: Honoraria|Genentech: Advisor/Consultant|Genentech: Board Member|Genentech: Honoraria|Infectopharm: Grant/Research Support|Menarini: Board Member|Menarini: Honoraria|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Board Member|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Roche: Advisor/Consultant|Roche: Board Member|Roche: Honoraria Thomas L. Holland, MD, Aridis: Advisor/Consultant|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Advisor/Consultant|Karius: Advisor/Consultant|Lysovant: Advisor/Consultant Adolf W. Karchmer, MD, Karius: Grant/Research Support|Up To Date: Honoraria Vance G. Fowler, MD, MHS, Amphliphi Biosciences, Integrated Biotherapeutics; C3J, Armata, Valanbio; Akagera, Aridis, Roche, Astra Zeneca: Advisor/Consultant|Genentech, Regeneron, Deep Blue, Basilea, Janssen;: Grant/Research Support|Infectious Diseases Society of America: Honoraria|MedImmune, Allergan, Pfizer, Advanced Liquid Logics, Theravance, Novartis, Merck; Medical Biosurfaces; Locus; Affinergy; Contrafect; Karius;: Grant/Research Support|Novartis, Debiopharm, Genentech, Achaogen, Affinium, Medicines Co., MedImmune, Bayer, Basilea, Affinergy, Janssen, Contrafect, Regeneron, Destiny,: Advisor/Consultant|Sepsis diagnostic: Patent pending|UpToDate: Royalties|Valanbio and ArcBio: Stock Options

Abstract Background Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB) have become increasingly challenging to manage due to the limited number of available effective oral agents. Minocycline, a second-generation tetracycline with a broad antimicrobial spectrum and reasonable urinary concentration, has recently gained attention as a potential treatment option for MDR-GNB UTIs. In this study, we aim to review the in vitro minocycline susceptibility against a wide spectrum of urinary GNB isolates performed at our reference lab. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all minocycline susceptibility testing performed on urinary GNB isolates performed at the Mayo Clinic reference lab between 2013-2022. We stratified our results for different species based on phenotypic resistance profiles as well as known species-specific resistance association. Results During the study timeframe, we identified 28,388 GNB isolates that underwent minocycline susceptibility testing. Among the Escherichia coli (E.Coli) isolates resistant to ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, or meropenem, minocycline susceptibility was noted to be 78%, 46%, 76%, respectively (Fig 1). Among the Klebsiella pneumonia (KP) isolate resistant to ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, or meropenem, minocycline susceptibilities were 47%, 40%, and 53% respectively (Fig 1). Among the high risk Amp-C group Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter Cloacae and Klebsiella aerogenes, minocycline susceptibility rate was noted to be 87%, 77%, and 89%, respectively (Fig 2). Finally, among the isolate group of non-fermenters including Achromobacter spp, Acinetobacter spp & Stenotrophomonas spp, susceptibility rates were noted to be 65%, 94%, and 100%, respectively (Fig 3). Conclusion Minocycline showed in vitro activity against many hard to treat GNB urinary isolates, including ceftriaxone and meropenem resistant E.coli & KP isolates. High-risk Amp-C producing GN species & some of the less common GN including Stenotrophomonas, Acinetobacter, and Achromobacter. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Radiology is often incorporated into medical school anatomy courses. Radiology education furthers understanding of anatomical relationships and prepares students to apply anatomical knowledge in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate how cognitive performance on the radiology components (RC) of a first‐year medical school anatomy course are related to performance on non‐radiological components (NRC). We hypothesized that there is no correlation between these two performance variables, because they rely on different cognitive skills. Thus, anatomy education alone will not prepare students for the interpretation of normal anatomy on radiological images. Medical students (n=51) enrolled in a first‐year anatomy course at Mayo Clinic School of Medicine were included in this study. Assessment data from three lab practical examinations were collected, and RC and NRC questions were compared. A bivariate linear regression and statistical tests were conducted. A subgroup analysis was used to compare students whose RC performance was greater than their NRC performance (RC>NRC, n=33) to students whose RC performance was less than their NRC performance (RC<NRC, n=18). When considering all three exams, students correctly answered 71.1% of the RC questions and 68.3% of NRC questions (p=0.047). Bivariate linear regression demonstrated a moderate positive correlation between RC and NRC performance (p<0.01, r= 0.51); however, performance on RC questions only accounted for 24% of the variability of NRC scores. Additionally, students in the RC>NRC group had significantly higher scores on RC questions than the students in the RC<NRC group (74% vs 66%, p<0.02). Conversely, students in the RC>NRC group had significantly lower scores on NRC questions than the students in the RC<NRC group (61% vs 74%, p=0.001). These results indicate that while RC performance has some influence on NRC performance it does not account for the majority of the difference observed. Such results suggest that the cognitive skills involved in both radiology and anatomy education are different. Therefore, dedicated radiology education is an important component of an anatomy course as it fosters the development of novel skills that are necessary when interpreting normal anatomy on radiological images in a clinical setting. Support or Funding Information None

Abstract Background To evaluate the long-term clinical performance, the impact of procedural configurations and post-procedure medications in atrial fibrillation patients with percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Methods The RECORD study was a prospective, all-comers registry conducted in 39 Chinese centers that consecutively enrolling patients who received LAAO between 1st April 2019 and 31st October 2020 with minimum inclusion and exclusion criteria. Events including any death, any stroke, systemic embolism and bleeding event were collected at 1 year and adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee. Cox proportional hazard models with multivariable adjustments were applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for each outcome. Results Of the 3,096 participants, 3,082 successfully received an LAAO implant and 3,013 (97.8%) completed the 1-year follow-up. Participants had a high risk of stroke (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score of 4.0) and a moderate-to-high risk of bleeding (mean HAS-BLED score of 2.4). Local anesthetic was performed in 1,287 (41.6%) patients and fluoroscopy guidance in 492 (16.0%) patients. In 1295 (42.0%) cases, one-stage combination procedures of LAAO and radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation (CA) were performed. At 1 year, the composite ischemic endpoint of death, stroke, and systemic embolism occurred in 133 (4.51%) patients. Any life-threatening, disabling or major bleeding events occurred in 71 (2.36%) patients. There was no significant association between the type of anesthesia (general versus local), modality of image guidance (TEE, ICE, or fluoroscopy) with the ischemic or bleeding events. Combination procedures of LAAO plus CA was associated with a significantly lower rate of death, stroke, or systemic embolism than performing LAAO only (3.5% versus 5.2%, HRadjusted:0.69, 95%CI:0.48-0.98, P=0.041). The commonest antithrombotic strategy was OAC | APT | APT (38.1%; corresponded to medication prescribed at discharge | 45 days | 6 months), followed by OAC | OAC | APT (27.0%). Compared with OAC | APT | APT, the OAC | OAC | APT group was associated with a higher risk of life-threatening, disabling or major bleeding (1.2% versus 2.5%, HRadjusted:0.50, 95%CI: 0.25-0.99, P=0.47); whereas the risk of death, stroke and SE was numerically similar (2.9% versus 3.0%, HRadjusted:1.05, 95%CI: 0.61-1.78, P=0.867). There was no significant difference between OAC | APT | APT and OAC+APT | APT | APT groups regarding ischemic events; however, in patients with HAS-BLED ≥ 3, OAC | APT | APT was associated with lower rates of life-threatening, disabling or major bleeding events (1.1% versus 4.8%, HRadjusted:4.55, 95%CI: 1.31-15.81, P=0.017). Conclusion In Chinese centers, patients with a WATCHMAN LAAO device had low rates of ischemic and bleeding events at 1 year. One-stage combination procedures of LAAO and catheter ablation was associated with a significantly lower rate of ischemic events than performing LAAO only.Procedural configurations to outcomesPost-LAAO antithrombotic medications

Abstract Background Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a critical supportive therapy in cardiovascular surgery (CVS). Donor selection and testing have reduced the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections; however, risks remain from bacteria, emerging viruses, pathogens for which testing is not performed and from residual donor leukocytes. Amustaline (S-303)/glutathione (GSH) treatment pathogen reduction technology is designed to inactivate a broad spectrum of infectious agents and leucocytes in RBC concentrates. The ReCePI study is a Phase 3 clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pathogen reduced RBCs transfused for acute anemia in CVS compared to conventional RBCs, and to assess the clinical significance of treatment-emergent RBC antibodies. Methods ReCePI is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, paralleldesign, non-inferiority study. Eligible subjects will be randomized up to 7 days before surgery to receive either leukoreduced Test (pathogen reduced) or Control (conventional) RBCs from surgery up to Day 7 post-surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients transfused with at least one study transfusion with an acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis defined as any increased serum creatinine (sCr) level ≥0.3 mg/dL (or 26.5 µmol/L) from presurgery baseline within 48±4 hours of the end of surgery. The primary safety endpoints are the proportion of patients with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to study RBC transfusion through 28 days, and the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent antibodies with confirmed specificity to pathogen reduced RBCs through 75 days after the last study transfusion. With ≥292 evaluable, transfused patients (>146 per arm), the study has 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority, defined as a Test group AKI incidence increase of no more than 50% of the Control group rate, assuming a Control incidence of 30%. Discussion RBCs are transfused to prevent tissue hypoxia caused by surgery-induced bleeding and anemia. AKI is a sensitive indicator of renal hypoxia and a novel endpoint for assessing RBC efficacy. The ReCePI study is intended to demonstrate the non-inferiority of pathogen reduced RBCs to conventional RBCs in the support of renal tissue oxygenation due to acute anemia and to characterize the incidence of treatment-related antibodies to RBC.