Knight, Jennifer

Radiology is often incorporated into medical school anatomy courses. Radiology education furthers understanding of anatomical relationships and prepares students to apply anatomical knowledge in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate how cognitive performance on the radiology components (RC) of a first‐year medical school anatomy course are related to performance on non‐radiological components (NRC). We hypothesized that there is no correlation between these two performance variables, because they rely on different cognitive skills. Thus, anatomy education alone will not prepare students for the interpretation of normal anatomy on radiological images. Medical students (n=51) enrolled in a first‐year anatomy course at Mayo Clinic School of Medicine were included in this study. Assessment data from three lab practical examinations were collected, and RC and NRC questions were compared. A bivariate linear regression and statistical tests were conducted. A subgroup analysis was used to compare students whose RC performance was greater than their NRC performance (RC>NRC, n=33) to students whose RC performance was less than their NRC performance (RC<NRC, n=18). When considering all three exams, students correctly answered 71.1% of the RC questions and 68.3% of NRC questions (p=0.047). Bivariate linear regression demonstrated a moderate positive correlation between RC and NRC performance (p<0.01, r= 0.51); however, performance on RC questions only accounted for 24% of the variability of NRC scores. Additionally, students in the RC>NRC group had significantly higher scores on RC questions than the students in the RC<NRC group (74% vs 66%, p<0.02). Conversely, students in the RC>NRC group had significantly lower scores on NRC questions than the students in the RC<NRC group (61% vs 74%, p=0.001). These results indicate that while RC performance has some influence on NRC performance it does not account for the majority of the difference observed. Such results suggest that the cognitive skills involved in both radiology and anatomy education are different. Therefore, dedicated radiology education is an important component of an anatomy course as it fosters the development of novel skills that are necessary when interpreting normal anatomy on radiological images in a clinical setting. Support or Funding Information None

Ultrasound has been used more frequently in the anatomical sciences to reinforce core anatomy concepts in the classroom and introduce commonly applied imaging technologies encountered in a clinical setting. Interprofessional Education (IPE) is being incorporated into health sciences training as a learning model for real world interactions. The primary objective of the current study was to determine the impact of an IPE ultrasound curriculum on students' anatomy and ultrasound knowledge, as well as attitudes towards interprofessional collaboration. We hypothesized that students who participated in an IPE experience would have improved recall of anatomical and ultrasound concepts as well as improved attitudes and perceptions towards IPE when compared to students who did not participate in an IPE session. First year medical students (MD, n = 40) and first year physical therapy students (PT, n = 25) were randomly assigned to PT‐only, MD‐only, or mixed PT‐MD ultrasound instruction groups studying the shoulder. Students were assessed using an anatomy and ultrasound knowledge test and University of the West of England Interprofessional Questionnaire (UWEIPQ) prior to and following the session. The results of this study suggest that while ultrasound instruction significantly improves ultrasound post‐test scores when compared to pre‐test scores regardless of group assignment (PT‐only: p < 0.001; MD‐only: p = 0.007; PT‐MD: p < 0.001), learning in an interprofessional PT‐MD group did not significantly impact knowledge recall of ultrasound concepts when compared to non‐IPE groups. Interestingly, students in PT‐MD groups had significantly higher anatomy post‐test scores when compared to the MD‐only groups (PT‐MD post‐test = 93.2%; MD‐only post‐test = 84.1%; p = 0.041), but not when compared to the PT‐only groups. Additionally, the results of the UWEIPQ are consistent with the impression that students who participate in an IPE experience are more likely to be cognizant of inherent biases in the interactions between different health professionals as well as demonstrate increased confidence in their interprofessional relationships. In conclusion, our study reinforces that IPE programs should quantify knowledge recall in order to assess the effectiveness of a specific program. Furthermore, such endeavors should assess important competencies including communication, teamwork, and interdisciplinary respect that are necessary to succeed in a multidisciplinary health care team. Support or Funding Information Department of Anatomy, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Social Science and Humanities Research Council, Government of Canada