Citations

2534 Background: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 were derived from an international collaborative effort supported by data from clinical trials (16 studies, 9147 patients) on cytotoxic chemotherapy (CT), providing a standard tool for response assessment. RECIST’s role has been questioned for TCA. Using a pooled individual patient database (IPD) from clinical trials performed by industry and cooperative groups, we assessed whether modifications to RECIST are required to evaluate antitumor activity of TCA. Methods: Data were collected from phase 2 and 3 clinical trials testing TCA in solid tumors. To study the occurrence of mixed responses, the variability of response of lesions within patients was studied. Furthermore, response was correlated with survival through landmark analyses and time dependent Cox models. Results: Clinical data were obtained from 23,259 patients, mainly with lung (36%), colorectal (28%) or breast cancer (11%). 15,620 patients (67%) received a TCA, mainly transduction or angiogenesis inhibitors, either as single agent (37%) or combined with other TCAs (7%) or CT (56%); 28% received CT only and 5% best supportive care or placebo. Within-patient variability reduced as the number of lesions used for response assessment increased, and did so similarly for TCAs (+/- CT) and CT. Mixed responses seemed to occur similarly across these treatment categories as well. Landmark analyses showed improving overall survival by % tumor shrinkage and a clear distinction between the effect of tumor shrinkage and progressive disease (PD) according to RECIST 1.1. This was confirmed by time dependent analysis. In addition target lesion growth showed no marked improvement in overall survival prediction over and above the other components of RECIST 1.1 PD (new lesions, non-target PD), regardless of treatment (TCA, CT or both) received. Similar results were seen focusing on major tumor types and classes of TCA. Conclusions: Using a large IPD dataset we demonstrated that RECIST 1.1 performs equally well for response assessment of TCA as for CT. No modifications are required.

e20599 Background: The anti-PD-1 antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab have demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in a subset of patients with metastatic or locally advanced lung cancer (LC). To date, no blood biomarkers have been identified to predict clinical outcome to anti-PD-1 agents. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 52 patients with advanced LC and treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies in a single institution was performed. White blood cell count (WBC), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), absolute neutrophil to absolute lymphocyte count ratio (ANC/ALC), absolute eosinophil count (AEC), and platelet counts at baseline before start of anti-PD-1 antibody were assessed. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis were done. Results: 48 patients were treated with nivolumab (92.3%) and 4 patients with pembrolizumab (7.7%). Median follow up was 13.6 months and median OS was 26 months. Higher baseline ANC and ANC/ALC ratio significantly correlated with worse clinical outcomes. Patients with baseline ANC > 6060/mm3 had a significantly increased risk of death [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.46; 95% CI 1.12–5.42, P = 0.025] and of progression on anti-PD-1 antibody [HR = 2.41; 95% CI 1.25–4.64, P = 0.009] compared with patients with ANC ≤6060/mm3. Similarly, patients with baseline ANC/ALC ratio ≥ 4.59 had a significantly increased risk of death [HR = 2.41; 95% CI 1.11–5.24, P = 0.027] and of progression on anti-PD-1 antibody [HR = 2.08; 95% CI 1.10–3.95, P = 0.027] compared with patients with ANC/ALC < 4.59. One year survival rate in patients who had ANC < 3390/mm3, ANC 3390-6060/mm3 and ANC > 6060/mm3 were 86.5%, 76.9% and 48.1% respectively. Conclusions: Increased baseline ANC and ANC/ALC were associated with poor PFS and OS in LC patients treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies. Although these findings need to be validated in a large sample size, our data suggested that baseline ANC and ANC/ALC ratio might help the risk stratification and assist treatment strategies. The potential predictive value of peripheral blood biomarkers for clinical outcomes to anti-PD-1 antibody should be further investigated in a prospective study.

7512 Background: Outcomes in activated B cell subtype diffuse large B cell lymphoma (ABC-DLBCL) and r-NHL are poor (Sehn Blood 2015, Crump ASCO 2016). ZUMA-1 is the first, multicenter trial of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, axi-cel, in r-NHL. Methods: Dosing and eligibility were per Neelapu ASH 2016. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Cell of origin (COO) and CD19 status were assessed centrally using Lymphoma Subtyping Test NanoString (Wallden JCO 2015) and a validated immunohistochemistry assay, respectively. Results: As of Jan 27, 2017, 111 patients (pts) were enrolled; the manufacturing success rate was 99% with an average 17-d turnaround time; 101 pts (modified intent-to-treat [mITT] population) received axi-cel. In the mITT population, the ORR was 82% (complete response [CR], 54%). With 8.7 m median follow-up, 44% remain in response and 39% in CR. The median DOR was 8.1 m and not reached (NR) for pts with CR. Median OS was NR. Results for clinical and biologic covariates are listed in the table. In pts who received tocilizumab (n = 43) and/or steroids (n = 27) for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and/or neurologic events (NE), ORR was 84% and 78%, respectively. Most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (66%), leukopenia (44%), anemia (43%), febrile neutropenia (31%), thrombocytopenia (24%), and encephalopathy (21%). Rates of grade ≥3 CRS and NE were 13% and 28%, respectively. There were 3 grade 5 AEs (Neelapu ASH 2016). Conclusions: Axi-cel induced an ORR of 82% in pts with r-NHL, response is ongoing in 44% of pts at 8.7 m. Similar clinical responses were observed in pts with r-ABC-DLBCL. AEs were manageable and the use of tocilizumab/steroids did not appear to impact ORR. Drs Locke and Neelapu contributed equally. Funding source: Kite Pharma and Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program Clinical trial information: NCT02348216. [Table: see text]

e16555 Background: The ProtecT trial underscores the importance of treatment in men with prostate cancer and life expectancies > 10 years and the validity of radiation therapy (RT). RT can be given with photons or protons (PT). To address the controversy of which is better, clinical outcomes of photon-based intensity modulated RT (IMRT) and PT cohorts from 2 institutions were directly compared. Methods: Under respective IRB approvals, data from 2 cohorts were analyzed. The first was 301 men treated with ultrasound image guided IMRT from 2000-05 to 75.6 Gy in 42 fractions. The second was 1214 men treated with fiducial image guided PT from 2006-10 to 78 CGE in 39 fractions. Median age and followup were 74 y and 7.2 y for IMRT and 66 y and 5.6 y for PT. Hormone therapy (ADT) was used with IMRT and PT, respectively, in 3% and 7% of low-risk patients, 25% and 9.9% of intermediate-risk, and 91% and 57.8% of high-risk. Comparative endpoints were age-stratified 5-year (5Y) survival (OS), ≥ grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) and urologic (GU) toxicity, and 5Y freedom from biochemical progression (FFBP). Results: There was a lower prevalence of GI (1.3% vs 0.1%, p = 0.0065) and GU (4.3% vs 0.1%, p < 0.0001) toxicity at last follow-up in the PT group. In the IMRT and PT cohorts, OS rates were 90.8% and 88.7% in men ≥75 (p = 0.4083). In men < 75, OS rates were 91.6% and 97.5% in the IMRT and PT low-risk patients (p = 0.003), 92.1% and 95.5% in the IMRT and PT intermediate-risk (p = 0.0535), and 92.0% and 90.0% (p = 0.4975) in the IMRT and PT high-risk. In the IMRT and PT cohorts, respectively, FFBP rates were 92.2% and 98.9% for low-risk patients (p < 0.0001), 87.3% and 94.5% for intermediate-risk patients(p = 0.0226), and 80.3% and 74.4% for high-risk patients (p = 0.5154). Conclusions: In this retrospective comparison of outcomes in cohorts of men treated with IMRT and PT for prostate cancer, FFBP rates were better with PT for men with low- and intermediate-risk disease and similar in men with high-risk disease despite longer and more frequent use of ADT in the IMRT cohort. This study underscores the difficulty of comparing retrospective series, with differences noted in age, RT dose, and ADT use between cohorts. However, the magnitude of improvement with PT is intriguing and warrants prospective testing.

3025 Background: Axi-cel is an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy. ZUMA-1 is a multicenter, registrational trial of axi-cel in patients (pts) with refractory/aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). In a pre-specified interim analysis, ZUMA-1 met its primary endpoint with 76% objective response rate and 47% complete response (Blood 2016;128:LBA-6). We describe, for the first time, a tumor microenvironment immune gene signature associated with CAR T cell treatment (tx) of NHL pts. Methods: Paired biopsies, pre- and within 3 weeks post-axi-cel tx, were analyzed by digital gene expression followed by a pre-specified bioinformatics algorithm applied to IGES15 and IGES21 genes involved in immune-mediated tumor regression (Immunosign; Galon Immunity 2013). Immunosign profiles expression of a pre-defined set of effector T cell, Th1, chemokine, and cytokine genes. Expression analysis and hierarchical clustering were used to define an axi-cel-related tumor immune gene signature. Wilcoxon signed rank test with multiple test correction by FDR (Benjamini-Yekutieli) was used. Results: Gene expression profile comparisons of pre- and post-axi-cel tx biopsies from 14 pts showed profound changes in gene expression within the tumor environment after infusion. The most upregulated genes post-axi-cel tx were CCL5 (RANTES), CTLA4, and GZMA (log2 fold change > 2, P< 0.05, FDR < 0.050). Immune checkpoints PD-L1 and LAG3 were also upregulated post-axi-cel (log2 fold change > 1.6, P< 0.05, FDR < 0.055). Other genes associated with T cell proliferation, homing, and effector function were also upregulated: IL-15, GZMK, CXC3CL1 (Fractalkine), CD8A, and STAT4 (log2 fold change > 1.6; P< 0.05, FDR < 0.074). Additional baseline tumor characteristics and associative analysis will be presented. Conclusions: We define a mechanistic tumor immune gene signature in NHL pts associated with axi-cel tx. This signature comprises upregulation of T cell activation, effector, chemokine, and immune checkpoint genes. These data will potentially lead to rational optimization of T cell interventions in cancer Clinical trial information: NCT02348216.