Citations

Abstract Introduction Penile augmentation or penis enlargement surgery refers to any technique aimed at enhancing penile length or girth. These male enhancement surgical techniques can increase total penile length, either flaccid or erect, while others add to the penile shaft’s girth and/or glans size. Proposed strategies include physical methods such as various penile exercises, mechanical traction devices, and medical therapy, while surgical interventions include cosmetic and phallic reconstructive techniques and use of fillers, sleeves, grafts, and flaps to augment penile size. Objectives The International Consultation on Sexual Medicine (ICSM) consensus statements provide evidence-based recommendations and aim to guide a clinical framework in penile aesthetic and augmentation. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify published literature relevant to penile augmentation or enhancement. Preliminary consensus was presented to the delegates attending the 5th ICSM meeting, and feedback was incorporated into the final document. Results Twenty new recommendations are provided with corresponding levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Conclusions Due to the controversies and lack of longer-term data regarding penile augmentation and cosmetic procedures, comprehensive assessments and careful patient counseling weighing the pros and cons, as well as potential complications, are mandatory before embarking on any treatment. Surgeons should be experienced in anatomy and various surgical techniques, and it is important to individualize surgical options based on patient condition(s) and needs, surgeon expertise, and local resources.

Abstract Introduction There is no ideal treatment for Peyronie’s Disease (PD) since every patient has different needs with varying perceived risks versus benefits of individual treatment options, coupled with the degree of impact relating to PD on sexual function and beyond. Objectives The 5th International Consultation on Sexual Medicine (ICSM) guideline on PD provides an update to the previous ICSM with an aim to provide a clinical framework and best-evidenced consensus recommendations to assist clinicians in managing PD. Methodology Available literature was reviewed, and a modified Delphi consensus was undertaken by leading sexual medicine experts to achieve a set of Quality of Evidence and strength of recommendations. This guideline was developed as an authoritative best-evidenced consensus incorporating state-of-the-art knowledge and contemporary literature. Results A total of thirty-one recommendations were made on PD guidelines. New updates to the 4th ICSM on PD have been made in definition, pathophysiology, and treatment strategies. The presence of penile pain with erection could occur in the chronic phase due to torque or stretch on the penile scar and surrounding tissue. Oral therapy works best during the acute phase and should be provided concurrently with other treatment modalities. Penile traction therapy can reduce penile deformity as monotherapy or may be offered as part of a multimodal therapy approach. There is no convincing evidence supporting cellular-based therapy. The type of plication procedure used depends on the surgeon and patient preference, although excision of the tunica followed by plication may have a higher complication rate. There is currently no ideal graft, and graft contracture can occur postoperatively. Adjunctive procedures such as penile modeling, tunical plication, plaque incision/excision and grafting can be performed when penile deformity and/or penile curvature persist following penile prosthesis implantation. Conclusions The management of PD should be individualized based on the patient’s needs and preferences while balancing the benefits and risks of each treatment option.

Background: Effective risk factor modification, including management of obesity and diabetes mellitus (DM), is essential to mitigating cardiovascular complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Given the growing use of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), large-scale studies are needed to assess their cardiovascular impact in patients undergoing HSCT. Methods: Using the TriNetX network, we identified patients who underwent HSCT and had DM or obesity. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: those who received GLP-1 RAs and those who did not. Outcomes, including all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), atrial fibrillation (AF), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and heart failure (HF) exacerbation, were assessed at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years follow-up. Cohorts were propensity score-matched based on medical comorbidities, transplant diagnoses, and conditioning regimens. Results: Of the initial 17,475 patients with HSCT and DM/obesity, 876 (5.0%, 46.0% females, mean age 58.4 +/- 11.3 years old) received GLP-1 RA and 16,599 (95.0%, 40.8% females, mean age 55.6 +/- 14.3 years old) did not. After propensity score matching, 873 patients were divided equally into each cohort (Table). GLP-1 RA was associated with lower odds of all-cause mortality (1-year: odds ratio [OR]: 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38–0.76; p<0.01; 3-year: OR: 0.52; CI: 0.40–0.69; p<0.01; 5-year: OR: 0.44; CI: 0.33–0.58; p<0.01), all-cause hospitalization (1-year: OR: 0.74; CI: 0.61–0.89; p<0.01; 3-year: OR: 0.66; CI: 0.55–0.79; p<0.01; 5-year: OR: 0.72; CI: 0.59–0.87; p<0.01), and HF exacerbation (1-year: OR: 0.65; CI: 0.44–0.96; p=0.03; 3-year: OR: 0.59; CI: 0.43–0.81; p<0.01; 5-year: OR: 0.53; CI: 0.38–0.74; p<0.01), compared to the non–GLP-1 RA group. At 5-year follow-up, GLP-1 RA use was also associated with lower odds of AF (OR: 0.71; CI: 0.53–0.94; p=0.02). No significant differences were noted in AMI or CVA at 1-, 3-, and 5-years of follow-up. Conclusion: After propensity score-matching in this retrospective cohort study, GLP-1 RA use was associated with significantly lower odds of all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and heart failure exacerbation at 1-, 3-, and 5-year of follow-up in patients with DM/obesity who underwent HSCT. At 5 years, use of GLP-1 RA was associated with lower odds of AF.

Abstract Background Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), characterized by its Bragg peak and a reduced lateral scattering compared to proton radiotherapy (PT), offers excellent dose conformity in radiation treatment. Meanwhile, compared to PT, CIRT causes more complex and severe DNA damage in tumor cells, which results in a higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE), making it particularly advantageous in treating radioresistant and hypoxia tissues than conventional radiotherapy. However, CIRT's high RBE and the nuclear fragmentation dose tail outside the target presents challenges in sparing organ at risk (OARs). Combining PT and CIRT offers a potential hybrid modality that leverages the biological effectiveness of carbon ions while minimizing normal tissue toxicity with high biological damage. Purpose Despite the potential of combining PT and CIRT, balancing their respective advantages while mitigating disadvantages remains a significant challenge. This study aims to develop an optimized treatment approach that automatically adjusts the relative contributions of protons and carbon ions, improving target dose conformity while minimizing biological impact on OARs. Methods We propose a biological optimization framework for multi‐modality combining PT and CIRT (CCIPRT). The biological dose is modeled as the product of the physical dose and RBE. Through iterative Jacobian‐based linearization, the biological dose of carbon ion is expressed in a linear model, enabling the formulation of a linear least‐square objective. The biological dose of proton is formulated as a linear model using the physical dose and dose‐averaged linear energy transfer (LET). The joint optimization problem is then solved using iterative convex relaxation and the alternating direction method of multipliers. For comparison, single‐modality PT and CIRT were also implemented. Results When the target dose of CCIPRT is prescribed in terms of the physical dose, compared to PT, CCIPRT increased the mean biological dose in the target by 37.7%, 29.6%, and 31.1% for brain, lung, and abdomen, respectively; compared to CIRT, CCIPRT reduced the biological dose in CTV1cm (ring surrounding CTV with 1 cm width) by 47.2%, 32.3%, and 40.4% for brain, lung, and abdomen, respectively. When the target dose of CCIPRT is prescribed in terms of the biological dose, compared to PT, CCIPRT achieved higher conformity index (CCIPRT: 0.96 and 0.97; PT: 0.93 and 0.96 for brain and liver cases, respectively) and reduced the dose in CTV1cm by 9.5% and 7.0% for brain and liver cases, respectively; compared to CIRT, CCIPRT enhanced healthy tissue sparing, reducing the dose to the body by 7.5% and 9.2% for brain and liver cases, respectively. Conclusions A novel multi‐modality CCIPRT treatment planning is developed with demonstrated superior performance over single‐modality PT or CIRT, with enhanced biological effectiveness and dose conformity compared to PT and reduced OAR dose compared to CIRT.

Abstract Introduction The lower urinary tract injury, although often not life-threatening, can result in devastating long-term morbidity and, in some cases, permanent disability. Male genital trauma adversely affects male sexual function. Aim This 5th International Consultation on Sexual Medicine guideline on male genitalia trauma evaluates urologic trauma literature to guide clinicians in the best-evidenced management with specific emphasis on preservation and optimization of male sexual function. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant English-language publications and contemporary guidelines using the PubMed database (search dates January 1, 1990 to June 1, 2024) on the following terms: “trauma,” “penis,” “urethra,” “testis,” and “scrotum.” The available literature was discussed, and selected articles with the highest evidence available were used to create consensus guideline statements, categorized based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information was provided as a Clinical Principle or Expert Opinion. Results Fourteen recommendations are provided with corresponding levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Conclusions Treating clinicians should be mindful that both the male genitalia trauma itself and treatment outcomes invariably affect various male sexual functions. Optimal treatment of male genitalia trauma is essential and should incorporate patient tolerances, needs, and preferences to minimize long-term sexual dysfunction.

Objectives: For locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (R-ACA), a nonoperative management (NOM) approach has emerged as a guideline-supported treatment option. However, the variables associated with NOM receipt are unknown. Methods: Utilizing the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of adults with stage 1 to 3 R-ACA managed with curative intent from 2004 to 2018. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving NOM versus surgery. The secondary outcome was survival among NOM patients. Results: A total of 128,297 patients were included. In all, 115,888 (90.3%) received surgery and 12,409 (9.7%) received NOM. Receipt of NOM was associated with age above 70, Charlson-Deyo score of 0, race (Black, Asian or Pacific Islander, or other vs. White), insurance status, geographical region, treatment in a community facility, year of diagnosis (2012-2018 vs. 2004-2011), tumor grade 1 versus ≥ 2, clinical T-stage ≥ 2, and clinical N1 or N2 versus N0. In the NOM cohort, poorer overall survival was associated with age 70 and above, male sex, Charlson-Deyo score ≥ 1, insurance status, geographical region, rural urban density versus metro/urban, treatment in a community facility, year of diagnosis (2004-2011 vs. 2012-2018), clinical T4 versus T1, clinical N1 or N2 versus N0, grade 3 versus 1, treatment with a radiotherapy dose <45 Gy versus 45 to 54 Gy, and omission of chemotherapy. Conclusions: Several demographic factors and social determinants of health were associated with receipt of NOM and overall survival. With the increasing utilization of NOM, it will be important to understand the drivers of treatment decisions and influences on access to the desired treatment approach.

While anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is a successful procedure that provides reliable pain relief and restoration of function in most patients, its success has been limited by glenoid component loosening. While series reporting the outcomes of inlay glenoid components have demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes with low rates of component loosening and need for revision, surgeons have been hesitant to adopt these implants due to concerns of inadequate pain relief secondary to the remaining glenoid rim contacting the humeral head implant. The inset glenoid component, a variant of the traditional inlay components, has gained interest because its design aims to achieve similar stability to traditional inlay components through implantation within strong subchondral bone, reduce the amount of glenoid vault removed compared to inlay components, and has a glenoid face designed to limit the rocking-horse phenomenon. In limited series, the inset glenoid component has demonstrated superior biomechanical and clinical performance compared to traditional onlay glenoid components. Although there have been minimal clinical studies investigating the inset glenoid in comparison to onlay and inlay components to date, a subset of case series with short-term follow-up have demonstrated favorable outcomes. The purpose of this article was to review the design rationale, biomechanical evidence, and clinical performance of the inset glenoid component.

Abstract Clinical question What are the benefits and harms of medications for adults with type 2 diabetes at varied risks of cardiovascular and kidney related complications? Context Emerging clinical trials of novel medications have demonstrated benefits on cardiovascular, kidney, and weight related outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes. Dynamically updated practice guidelines adhering to standards of trustworthiness are necessary in response to a rapidly evolving evidence base and the availability of multiple medication alternatives. This living practice guideline incorporates the latest available medications and evidence and provides recommendations stratified by risks of cardiovascular and kidney complications to inform diabetes management. Recommendations The panel issued risk-stratified recommendations regarding four prioritised medications for adults with type 2 diabetes (SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, finerenone and tirzepatide): • Lower risk (three or fewer cardiovascular risk factors without established cardiovascular disease (CVD) or chronic kidney disease (CKD)): weak recommendation against SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists. • Moderate risk (more than three cardiovascular risk factors without established CVD or CKD; or established CVD and/or CKD at lower risk of complications): weak recommendation in favour of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists; and a weak recommendation against finerenone in adults with CKD. • Higher risk (established CVD and/or CKD at higher risk of complications, or established heart failure): strong recommendation in favour of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists; and a weak recommendation in favour of finerenone in adults with CKD. • Across risk strata: weak recommendation in favour of tirzepatide in adults with obesity. About this guideline and how it was created An international panel including two patient partners, clinicians, and methodologists produced these recommendations. The panel followed standards for trustworthy guidelines and used the GRADE approach, explicitly considering the balance of benefits, harms and burdens of treatment from an individual patient perspective. Recommendations were informed by a linked living systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluating relative benefits and harms updated to 31 July 2024; and by linked systematic reviews addressing risk prediction models and values and preferences of adults with type 2 diabetes. Candidate therapeutics are prioritised based on availability of sufficient randomised trial data, relevance to a global audience and likelihood of changing practice. This is the first version of the living guideline. The guideline is part of the BMJ Rapid Recommendations series. MAGICapp displays the most recent version of the guideline and full content including evidence summaries and decision aids; major updates will be published in The BMJ . We encourage re-use, adaptation and translation of these living guidelines, and recognise that the lack of availability or high costs of some medications may be prohibitive and will impact on how these recommendations are implemented across different health care systems.

Abstract Background Dose‐driven continuous scanning (DDCS) is a type of beam delivery in Hitachi pencil beam scanning (PBS) particle therapy system. Particle beam is irradiated continuously between spots to achieve a higher effective dose rate and a shorter beam delivery time. The beam is only turned off at break spots, the end of a treatment layer and during spill change. The break spot is a unique feature of the DDCS introduced by the treatment planning system (TPS) to interrupt continuous scanning. DDCS separates the dose delivery of a spot into a move dose and stop dose components. The move dose is controlled by the scanning speed and beam current, while the stop dose delivers the remaining monitor units (MUs). Hence, rigorous quality assurance (QA) of the scanning speed and functionality of break spot are required to ensure safe and successful DDCS delivery. Purpose We aim to report for the first time the QA methodology and result for DDCS, focusing on the scanning speed and break spot validation. Methods A rectangular spiral irradiation pattern with different degree of break spots were irradiated on a 2D strip ionization chamber (CROSSmini) detector using 50 time resolution to validate the break spots. Four methods of measuring scanning speeds were proposed. Using a spiral irradiation pattern, methods one and two applied linear regression to the scanning time measured by the CROSSmini for different inter‐spot distances, with measurements taken at sampling rates of 5 and 20 kHz, respectively. Methods three and four measured the scanning time of single inter‐spot distances in the X and Y directions. Method three measured the scanning time with the CROSSmini while method four measured the rise and fall time of the scanning magnet (SCM) current. All measurements were performed with 70.2, 150.2 and 228.7 MeV proton beam energies and three different beam currents of 8, 14 and 20 MU/s. Lastly, the scanning speed tolerance limit was calculated analytically under the requirement of avoiding a beam abort when the stop dose was less than zero. Results The data recorded by the CROSSmini under the spiral irradiation patterns with break spots was reconstructed into a 2D dose, and the break spots’ operations were visually validated for all the energies and beam currents. There were no statistically significant difference in the measured X and Y scanning speeds across the four methods. However, the last method involving the SCM current yielded the largest type A uncertainty of up to 25% () due to the noisy signal. The first method with the linear regression and 5 kHz acquisition rate was preferred due to a smaller type A uncertainty of up to 2.0% and a lower false negative rate in detecting the rising and falling edges during scanning. The calculated tolerance limit based on our current DDCS setting was found to be 0.50 times of the expected scanning speed. Conclusion We have introduced QA protocols for DDCS, designed to ensure complete and safe beam delivery without interruptions caused by move doses exceeding planned spot doses.