Chua, Clifford Ghee Ann

Abstract Background An accurate discrete spot scanning (DSS) beam delivery time (BDT) model is essential, particularly as 4D dynamic dose accumulation calculations rely on machine‐specific time models for reliable interplay evaluation. Purpose To derive a BDT model for a synchrotron‐based Hitachi Probeat PBS proton system from oscilloscope measurements of key BDT structures, including multi‐energy extraction (MEE) characteristics. Methods Key BDT structures were characterized using oscilloscope measurements, supplemented by delivery log files where appropriate. Spot‐to‐spot scanning trajectories were visualized using a CROSSmini 2D strip ionization chamber (Liverage Biomedical Inc, Taiwan) via the dose‐driven continuous scanning (DDCS) mode. The MEE design and MEE charge recapture efficiencies were also characterized. In addition, the impact of the number of delivered spots on both the extractable fraction of charge and MEE recapture efficiency was investigated. Results An improved synchrotron‐based BDT model was derived that incorporates dead times between radiofrequency knockout (RFK) and high‐speed steering magnet (HSST) signals. Spot‐to‐spot movement follows a “hockey‐stick”‐like behavior where the effective spot‐to‐spot move time is governed by the slower axis. An energy‐dependent variation in the number of MEE layers deliverable per spill was also observed, with fewer MEE layers per spill (1–3) was observed in low and high energy ranges compared to the mid‐energy range (4–5), deviating from the nominal vendor value of five MEE layers per spill per block. A reduction in the extractable fraction of charge was observed with an increasing number of spots per spill, while increasing the number of delivered spots in the preceding layer significantly reduced the MEE recapture efficiency. Conclusion MEE characteristics should be incorporated into synchrotron‐based time models for accurate beam delivery modeling. The methodology presented here also provides a framework for centers seeking to derive machine‐specific delivery time models for their proton systems.

Abstract Background Dose‐driven continuous scanning (DDCS) is a type of beam delivery in Hitachi pencil beam scanning (PBS) particle therapy system. Particle beam is irradiated continuously between spots to achieve a higher effective dose rate and a shorter beam delivery time. The beam is only turned off at break spots, the end of a treatment layer and during spill change. The break spot is a unique feature of the DDCS introduced by the treatment planning system (TPS) to interrupt continuous scanning. DDCS separates the dose delivery of a spot into a move dose and stop dose components. The move dose is controlled by the scanning speed and beam current, while the stop dose delivers the remaining monitor units (MUs). Hence, rigorous quality assurance (QA) of the scanning speed and functionality of break spot are required to ensure safe and successful DDCS delivery. Purpose We aim to report for the first time the QA methodology and result for DDCS, focusing on the scanning speed and break spot validation. Methods A rectangular spiral irradiation pattern with different degree of break spots were irradiated on a 2D strip ionization chamber (CROSSmini) detector using 50 time resolution to validate the break spots. Four methods of measuring scanning speeds were proposed. Using a spiral irradiation pattern, methods one and two applied linear regression to the scanning time measured by the CROSSmini for different inter‐spot distances, with measurements taken at sampling rates of 5 and 20 kHz, respectively. Methods three and four measured the scanning time of single inter‐spot distances in the X and Y directions. Method three measured the scanning time with the CROSSmini while method four measured the rise and fall time of the scanning magnet (SCM) current. All measurements were performed with 70.2, 150.2 and 228.7 MeV proton beam energies and three different beam currents of 8, 14 and 20 MU/s. Lastly, the scanning speed tolerance limit was calculated analytically under the requirement of avoiding a beam abort when the stop dose was less than zero. Results The data recorded by the CROSSmini under the spiral irradiation patterns with break spots was reconstructed into a 2D dose, and the break spots’ operations were visually validated for all the energies and beam currents. There were no statistically significant difference in the measured X and Y scanning speeds across the four methods. However, the last method involving the SCM current yielded the largest type A uncertainty of up to 25% () due to the noisy signal. The first method with the linear regression and 5 kHz acquisition rate was preferred due to a smaller type A uncertainty of up to 2.0% and a lower false negative rate in detecting the rising and falling edges during scanning. The calculated tolerance limit based on our current DDCS setting was found to be 0.50 times of the expected scanning speed. Conclusion We have introduced QA protocols for DDCS, designed to ensure complete and safe beam delivery without interruptions caused by move doses exceeding planned spot doses.