Citations

ABSTRACT Bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by opportunistic yeasts, namely those of the genus Candida , demonstrate strikingly high mortality rates and require early therapeutic intervention to optimize patient outcomes. Advancements in microbiological diagnosis of BSIs have introduced rapid molecular methods, including multiplex PCR panels, to detect common organisms directly from blood culture media. The BIOFIRE FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) assay is one such method and detects seven of the most common yeast species responsible for fungemia, enabling timelier therapeutic optimization by clinicians. Here, we evaluated the clinical performance of BCID2 for yeast identification from positive blood cultures between 2021 and 2025 at a tertiary medical center, compared to the reference standard method, which couples subculturing and diagnostic mass spectrometry. A total of 252 individual yeast identification events were confirmed using the reference method during our study period, 33 (13%) of which represent organisms that lack BCID2 PCR-based targets and 219 (87%) represent organisms targeted by this assay. Of the 219 identifications compatible with the BCID2 panel targets, 209 (95%) were correctly identified. Discordance between BCID2 and the reference method commonly stemmed from the inability of BCID2 to target all yeasts encountered clinically in blood culture, as well as its reduced accuracy in cultures where >1 yeast is present. Overall, these data suggest that the BCID2 assay is a rapid and accurate method to identify the most common organisms causing yeast BSI from blood culture; however, subculture-based reference techniques are important complementary tools in the clinical microbiology laboratory. IMPORTANCE Invasive fungal diseases, including bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by yeasts, are increasing in prevalence alongside the growing global population of immunocompromised individuals. Prompt and targeted treatment is necessary for effective management of yeast BSI, and microbiological diagnostics play an important role in tailoring patient treatment. Rapid molecular assays that simultaneously detect multiple pathogens associated with a specific syndrome are attractive strategies to expedite pathogen identification. This includes the BIOFIRE FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) assay, which detects 33 organisms including 7 yeasts commonly associated with fungemia, directly from blood culture media. Its performance has been well established for the detection of bacteria and bacterial resistance markers from blood cultures. Here, we provide a yeast-specific snapshot into the microbiological performance of BCID2, highlighting its accuracy as well as limitations in detecting medically important yeasts compared to standard culture-based identification from a four-year specimen cohort collected in a tertiary care hospital.

Background: Health disparities between racial groups continue to exist. There is a paucity of data regarding presentation severity for acute diverticulitis (AD) and surgery need by race. This study’s aim was to evaluate outcomes of AD in United States racial groups. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2016–2019 National Inpatient Sample of adult patients discharged for AD. Patients were classified into six racial and ethnic groups: Caucasian, African American (AA), Hispanic, Asian, Native American (NA), and other. Multivariate regression analysis adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics was performed for primary and secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 647,119 admissions with acute diverticulitis (AD) were identified. Most patients were Caucasian (about three-quarters), followed by Hispanics (11%), AA (9%), Asians (1%), Native Americans (<1%), and other (2%). Minority groups were generally younger than Caucasians and less likely to undergo colonoscopy or surgical procedures such as partial or total colectomy. In the multivariable analysis, both Hispanics and AA were less likely to present with complicated diverticulitis. Despite this, their hospitalizations were associated with higher overall charges and costs. No significant differences were found across groups in terms of inpatient mortality or the need for percutaneous abscess drainage. Conclusions: Hispanic and AA have higher healthcare- related charges and costs compared to Caucasians when admitted with AD. Further studies are needed to understand the healthcare-related spending variations seen in these groups despite them often having less complicated AD.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an important class of cancer treatment. Endocrine immune-related adverse events (E-irAEs) account for a significant proportion of irAEs in ICI-treated patients. Diagnosing E-irAEs accurately and timely can be challenging in the absence of clear categorization and standardization across oncology, endocrinology and other specialties. While existing guidelines provide some broad directions to diagnosis and management, they lack clarity on irAE-specific symptom evaluation and work-up, as well as assessment of severity. These limitations can then impact triage, time-sensitive management and care escalation to specialists such as oncoendocrinologists. The objective of this study was to develop consensus-based statements on disease definitions for E-irAEs. A core working group of endocrinologists with expertise in the oncoendocrinology field drafted a survey with statements outlining the general approach to E-irAEs, disease definition and management approach of six specific diagnoses: ir-thyroiditis thyrotoxic phase, ir-thyroiditis hypothyroidism, ir-Graves’ disease, ir-hypophysitis, ir-adrenalitis and ir-type 1 diabetes mellitus. Severity grading tables were drafted for three disease categories—“thyroid”, “pituitary and adrenal”, and “diabetes mellitus”. A two-round modified Delphi process, using the RAND/University of California Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) Appropriateness Method, was employed. In this process, a 25-member voting panel consisting of endocrinologists, oncologists and other specialists and healthcare providers with experience in management of ICI-treated patients and irAEs was recruited. The panel rated anonymously on usability, accuracy, appropriateness or agreement of 41 items on a 9-point scale in Survey 1, after which a meeting was convened. Statements were modified based on voting results from Survey 1 and Meeting 1, and the process was repeated in Survey 2 and Meeting 2. At the end of this process, consensus was achieved for all statements. Our study findings address the gap in standardized nomenclature, clinical, laboratory and radiological evaluations, and management principles of E-irAEs. With consensus achieved from a panel of experts from a variety of disciplines, we anticipate that the statements can form the basis for standardization of the diagnostic process and improvement of patient care.

OBJECTIVE: To review currently available devices on pressure injury (PI) early detection, summarize challenges and opportunities to clinical implementation, and propose evaluation standards for device categories. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) databases. STUDY SELECTION: Published in English from peer-reviewed journals with full text available. Excluded if opinion statements, lack of empirical data, or unrelated to project’s objective. DATA EXTRACTION: For both clinical device and research equipment: measurement mechanisms, measurement types, outcome/output, FDA classification, and indications for use. Addition data were extracted for clinical devices: instruction for use, end user, order requirement, and billable code. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 4 clinical devices are ultrasound, long-wave infrared thermography, subepidermal moisture assessment, and nearinfrared spectroscopy. The 3 research devices are laser Doppler flowmetry, laser speckle contrast imaging, and colorimetry. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement mechanisms of all devices are unique and different from each other. One commonality is that they could measure the nonvisual signs of PI (eg, inflammation, edema, ischemia, and hypoxia) except colorimeter. Some clinical devices are promising to assist with early identification of PIs, especially in individuals with dark skin tones. Currently, there is no reimbursement available for early detection of PI. Current evidence did not support replacing the standard skin assessment of visual inspection and palpation with the devices reviewed, rather using validated devices to augment the current practice standard. This is especially recommended for individuals identified as high risk for a PI on admission to a facility.

Abstract eSource – particularly EHR-to-EDC – is an emerging paradigm in clinical research that enables automated transfer of electronic health record (EHR) data into electronic data capture (EDC) systems, with the potential to reduce site burden, improve data quality and accelerate oncology clinical trial workflows. However, widespread implementation remains limited due to technical, regulatory and operational barriers. To address these challenges, the European Institute for Innovation through Health Data (i~HD) launched the eSource Scale-Up Task Force in 2024. This multi-stakeholder initiative brings together leading oncology centres and pharmaceutical sponsors to establish a consensus-driven roadmap for eSource adoption. Central to this effort are three foundational resources: readiness criteria for early adopters, a performance indicator framework for monitoring success and an operational playbook to guide implementation. This article provides a structured overview of the Task Force’s objectives, collaborative model and outputs, with specific attention to its focus on interoperability, regulatory alignment and real-world validation. While initially developed for oncology, the Task Force’s framework is applicable across therapeutic areas characterized by data-intensive workflows.

230 Background: The burden of symptoms and financial toxicity are well-documented adverse effects of cancer treatments. Recently, logistic toxicity has emerged, referring to the detrimental impact of logistical demands associated with cancer treatment on patient well-being. For non- English speaking patients, language barriers can affect their treatment experience, increasing logistic burdens. Methods: Between September 2024 and May 2025, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 21 low English proficiency (LEP)/non-English speaking adults with cancer. The interviews explored logistic challenges faced due to LEP and its impact on patients' cancer care experience. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Results: Of the 39 identified eligible individuals, 26 provided consent, and 21 (81%) completed the interview. The most common primary language of the participants was Spanish (9, 43%), followed by Somali (3, 14%), Arabic and Korean (2, 9%), and Amharic, Mandarin, Hmong, Russian, and Vietnamese (1, 5%). Seven major themes emerged regarding the logistic burdens of cancer care: (1) communication challenges, (2) navigating healthcare systems, (3) emotional distress from diagnosis and communication barriers, (4) financial toxicity, (5) transportation challenges, (6) adverse treatment effects, and (7) concerns about the political climate and its impact on resources. Conclusions: The increase in non-English languages in the U.S. highlights the need to understand the unique challenges faced by these patients. This study identified logistic toxicity themes consistent with previous research, while also revealing unique challenges. Further research is necessary to explore strategies to mitigate logistic burdens among those with LEP. Theme Illustrative Quotes Communication challenges “Communication with the psychologist was challenging … I couldn’t express myself effectively and it left me unsatisfied with the interaction.” Navigating healthcare systems “dealing with the insurance, it has been difficult … I have to depend on another person to help me” Emotional distress from diagnosis and communication barriers “In addition to my sickness, the lack of communication and understanding… makes me very sad.” Financial toxicity “...there's no income. There is nothing to feed our children.” Transportation challenges “I have to leave home 2 or 3 hours in advance because people will help me, not within my time, but within their own time.” Adverse treatment effects “I noticed weird feelings in my limbs. I'm not able to write down or hold anything. It makes everything difficult.” Concerns about current political climate and its impact on existing resources “… that they don't want Spanish spoken in the United States. They're not going to provide help for people like me at the hospitals…”

Background Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Multidisciplinary approaches to chronic pain can support resilience in recovery of functioning. The ancient arts of t’ai chi and qigong have been touted for centuries as multimodal approaches to health and healing. An RCT of an on-line t’ai chi and qigong program for individuals with chronic low back pain found clinically significant improvements in pain, physical function, and quality of life. The program consisted of the integrated practice of t’ai chi movement and the stillness of qigong practice. Meditations in the program focused on developing positive mental attitudes to support resilience in managing the emotional challenges of pain and disease. Objective The purpose of the current qualitative study aimed to better understand participants’ experiences during the online Heal and Strengthen the Spine with T’ai Chi and Qigong (HSSTQ) program. Methods Written feedback was received from 96 program participants, and semi-structured interviews were completed with 20 participants. Interviews were transcribed and coded based upon the written feedback and interview questions. A thematic narrative was developed from the coded segments of texts and reviewed by participants in a member check. Results Three interlocking themes characterized the experiences of participants in the program: (1) participants learned skills to relieve back pain including moderation in movement; (2) the holistic nature of the program enabled a range of benefits for participants beyond pain reduction; and (3) personal healing experience, the enthusiasm of the instructor, the program itself, and available staff resources motivated individuals to participate. Conclusion The conclusion from this study and the initial RCT is that a virtually delivered integrated tai chi, qigong, and meditation program may be a viable treatment option for adults with low back pain.