Vogel, Rachel I

230 Background: The burden of symptoms and financial toxicity are well-documented adverse effects of cancer treatments. Recently, logistic toxicity has emerged, referring to the detrimental impact of logistical demands associated with cancer treatment on patient well-being. For non- English speaking patients, language barriers can affect their treatment experience, increasing logistic burdens. Methods: Between September 2024 and May 2025, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 21 low English proficiency (LEP)/non-English speaking adults with cancer. The interviews explored logistic challenges faced due to LEP and its impact on patients' cancer care experience. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Results: Of the 39 identified eligible individuals, 26 provided consent, and 21 (81%) completed the interview. The most common primary language of the participants was Spanish (9, 43%), followed by Somali (3, 14%), Arabic and Korean (2, 9%), and Amharic, Mandarin, Hmong, Russian, and Vietnamese (1, 5%). Seven major themes emerged regarding the logistic burdens of cancer care: (1) communication challenges, (2) navigating healthcare systems, (3) emotional distress from diagnosis and communication barriers, (4) financial toxicity, (5) transportation challenges, (6) adverse treatment effects, and (7) concerns about the political climate and its impact on resources. Conclusions: The increase in non-English languages in the U.S. highlights the need to understand the unique challenges faced by these patients. This study identified logistic toxicity themes consistent with previous research, while also revealing unique challenges. Further research is necessary to explore strategies to mitigate logistic burdens among those with LEP. Theme Illustrative Quotes Communication challenges “Communication with the psychologist was challenging … I couldn’t express myself effectively and it left me unsatisfied with the interaction.” Navigating healthcare systems “dealing with the insurance, it has been difficult … I have to depend on another person to help me” Emotional distress from diagnosis and communication barriers “In addition to my sickness, the lack of communication and understanding… makes me very sad.” Financial toxicity “...there's no income. There is nothing to feed our children.” Transportation challenges “I have to leave home 2 or 3 hours in advance because people will help me, not within my time, but within their own time.” Adverse treatment effects “I noticed weird feelings in my limbs. I'm not able to write down or hold anything. It makes everything difficult.” Concerns about current political climate and its impact on existing resources “… that they don't want Spanish spoken in the United States. They're not going to provide help for people like me at the hospitals…”

Goal of this study was to examine the impact of immunotherapy on overall survival (OS) in patients with female genital tract melanoma (GTM). This retrospective cohort study utilized the National Cancer Database to identify individuals with invasive vulvar or vaginal melanoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2019. Kaplan–Meier plots and multivariate Cox regression were used to describe the impact of immunotherapy on OS and to examine predictors of OS among those who received immunotherapy for those with vulvar or vaginal melanoma. Of the 870 patients with vaginal melanoma, 23.6% received immunotherapy. Receiving immunotherapy for treatment of vaginal melanoma was associated with improved OS (median: 21.8 versus 18.9 months; P = 0.01); this association remained after adjustment for other prognostic factors [hazard ratio (HR), 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62–0.95; P = 0.01]. The survival advantage was more pronounced among those who did not receive primary surgical resection (median: 18.6 versus 12.2 months; P = 0.0009). Among 3123 patients with vulvar melanoma, 15.3% received immunotherapy. Receiving immunotherapy for treatment of vulvar melanoma was associated with an improvement in OS (median: 43.6 versus 57.7 months; P = 0.06; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74–1.00; P = 0.04). Survival benefit was more pronounced when restricted to patients with advanced or unknown stage disease (median OS, 31.6 versus 24.2 months; P = 0.002; adjusted HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61–0.89; P = 0.002) and among the small subset who did not receive primary surgical resection (median: 19.8 versus 9.6 months; P = 0.0005). Immunotherapy was associated with improved OS in patients with female GTM, with some subsets particularly benefitting.

Abstract Purpose: Clear cell ovarian carcinoma (CCOC) is an aggressive disease that often demonstrates resistance to standard chemotherapies. Approximately 25% of patients with CCOC show a strong APOBEC mutation signature. Here, we determine which APOBEC3 enzymes are expressed in CCOC, establish clinical correlates, and identify a new biomarker for detection and intervention. Experimental Designs: APOBEC3 expression was analyzed by IHC and qRT-PCR in a pilot set of CCOC specimens (n = 9 tumors). The IHC analysis of APOBEC3B was extended to a larger cohort to identify clinical correlates (n = 48). Dose-response experiments with platinum-based drugs in CCOC cell lines and carboplatin treatment of patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) were done to address mechanistic linkages. Results: One DNA deaminase, APOBEC3B, is overexpressed in a formidable subset of CCOC tumors and is low or absent in normal ovarian and fallopian tube epithelial tissues. High APOBEC3B expression associates with improved progression-free survival (P = 0.026) and moderately with overall survival (P = 0.057). Cell-based studies link APOBEC3B activity and subsequent uracil processing to sensitivity to cisplatin and carboplatin. PDX studies extend this mechanistic relationship to CCOC tissues. Conclusions: These studies demonstrate that APOBEC3B is overexpressed in a subset of CCOC and, contrary to initial expectations, associated with improved (not worse) clinical outcomes. A likely molecular explanation is that APOBEC3B-induced DNA damage sensitizes cells to additional genotoxic stress by cisplatin. Thus, APOBEC3B is a molecular determinant and a candidate predictive biomarker of the therapeutic response to platinum-based chemotherapy. These findings may have broader translational relevance, as APOBEC3B is overexpressed in many different cancer types.

Abstract Ovarian cancer is a clinically and molecularly heterogeneous disease. The driving forces behind this variability are unknown. Here, we report wide variation in the expression of the DNA cytosine deaminase APOBEC3B, with elevated expression in the majority of ovarian cancer cell lines (three SDs above the mean of normal ovarian surface epithelial cells) and high-grade primary ovarian cancers. APOBEC3B is active in the nucleus of several ovarian cancer cell lines and elicits a biochemical preference for deamination of cytosines in 5′-TC dinucleotides. Importantly, examination of whole-genome sequence from 16 ovarian cancers reveals that APOBEC3B expression correlates with total mutation load as well as elevated levels of transversion mutations. In particular, high APOBEC3B expression correlates with C-to-A and C-to-G transversion mutations within 5′-TC dinucleotide motifs in early-stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer genomes, suggesting that APOBEC3B-catalyzed genomic uracil lesions are further processed by downstream DNA "repair" enzymes including error-prone translesion polymerases. These data identify a potential role for APOBEC3B in serous ovarian cancer genomic instability. Cancer Res; 73(24); 7222–31. ©2013 AACR.