Citations

Introduction: US rural areas have a disproportionate burden of CVD and hypertension. Physical inactivity is a major risk factor, with 25% prevalence in US adults. However, rural disparities in physical inactivity are incompletely described. The aim was to evaluate differences in prevalence of physical inactivity based on county-level rurality. Methods: We used CDC county-level data for adults aged ≥20 years, 2004–2019, available for 97.6% of US counties (n=3148/3226). CDC defined physical inactivity as self-reported lack of leisure time physical activity in the month preceding the survey. Rurality was based on six categories ordered from least rural (large central metro) to most rural (noncore). We used weighted least squares regression to compare prevalence by rurality level, adjusting for 13 county-level sociodemographic factors; results reported as prevalence ratios (95% CI) with partial F -tests and P -values. Results: In age and sex ratio adjusted analysis (model 1), we observed a gradient in the prevalence of physical inactivity across levels of rurality, with significantly higher rates in small metro (1.03 [1.00–1.06]), micropolitan (1.05 [1.02–1.07]), and noncore (1.05 [1.02–1.08]) compared with large central metro counties ( F -statistic=7.5; P <.001). With further adjustment for other sociodemographic factors (model 2), the relative differences were negated in noncore counties (0.99 [0.97-1.02]), attenuated in intermediate counties, and accentuated in large fringe metro counties (1.06 [1.04-1.08]) ( F -statistic=14.3; P <.001). Further adjustment for obesity (model 3) largely attenuated the association of rurality with physical inactivity, resulting in no significant differences relative to large central metro counties ( F -statistic=4.8; P <.001). Conclusions: County-level rurality was associated with prevalence of physical inactivity. These disparities were largely accounted for by obesity, which may be targeted for intervention.

Introduction: US rural, compared with nonrural, counties have a higher burden of CVD. Obesity is a major CVD risk factor with 40% prevalence in adults. However, the rural-nonrural disparities in obesity are incompletely described. We aimed to evaluate differences in prevalence of obesity by county-level rurality. Methods: We used CDC county-level data for adults aged ≥20 years, 2004–2019, available for 97.6% of US counties (n=3148/3226). CDC defined obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 ) using self-reported weight and height. Rurality was based on six levels from large central metro (most urban) to noncore (most rural). We compared prevalence by rurality level using weighted least squares regression, adjusting for 13 county-level sociodemographic measures, and reported prevalence ratios (95% CI). Results: Counties with increasing rurality reflected older populations, as indicated by higher median age (from 35.6 years to 42.4 years). Also, increasing rurality was associated with differences in income and proportion uninsured. In age and sex ratio adjusted analysis (model 1), obesity prevalence was 1.05- to 1.06-fold higher in medium metro, small metro, and micropolitan counties compared with large central metro counties (global test, P <.001). With further adjustment for sociodemographic measures (model 2; model 1 covariates plus race, state, income, proportion uninsured) these relative differences were preserved but attenuated (each 1.03-fold higher), while a greater difference was revealed for large fringe metro (1.06-fold higher) counties. In both models, differences in obesity prevalence between noncore and large central metro counties were minimal. (Table) Conclusion: Counties with intermediate rurality were associated with higher obesity prevalence. The association was partly accounted for by nonmodifiable and modifiable sociodemographic measures, which may be targeted to reduce rural-nonrural disparities in obesity.

Background: Lower (worse) left atrial (LA) function is associated with higher dementia risk. It is unclear whether lower LA function is associated with vascular brain injury on brain MRI, an established correlate for higher dementia risk. Using data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, we assessed the cross-sectional association between LA function measures and brain MRI markers of vascular brain injury (cerebral microbleeds, brain infarcts). Hypothesis: Participants with lower LA function will be more likely to have presence of > 1 cerebral microbleed or brain infarct. Methods: ARIC participants who had both an echocardiogram and brain MRI at visit 5 (2011-13) were included. We excluded those with prevalent dementia, stroke, or atrial fibrillation. LA function measures were obtained from 2D-echocardiograms and assessed in quartiles (highest quartile was the reference). Brain MRI measures were assessed as the presence or absence of > 1 cerebral microbleed or brain infarct. Logistic regression was used. Results: Of the 1502 participants (mean [SD] age 76 [5], 60% female, 27% Black) in this analysis, 345 (23%) and 351 (23%) had > 1 cerebral microbleed or brain infarct present. Compared to the highest quartile, lower LA reservoir and conduit strain quartiles were associated with higher odds of cerebral microbleeds. LA contractile strain was not associated with cerebral microbleeds. Compared to the highest quartile, the lowest LA conduit strain quartile, but not reservoir strain, was associated with higher odds of brain infarcts. LA contractile strain was inversely associated with brain infarcts. Conclusion: In this community-based cohort, lower LA function was cross-sectionally associated with cerebral microbleeds and brain infarcts. The inverse relationship with LA contractile strain may be due to contractile function compensating for a decrease in early diastolic filling. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract Purpose: The neutralizing peptibody trebananib prevents angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 from binding with Tie2 receptors, inhibiting angiogenesis and proliferation. Trebananib was combined with paclitaxel±trastuzumab in the I-SPY2 breast cancer trial. Patients and Methods: I-SPY2, a phase II neoadjuvant trial, adaptively randomizes patients with high-risk, early-stage breast cancer to one of several experimental therapies or control based on receptor subtypes as defined by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status and MammaPrint risk (MP1, MP2). The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR). A therapy “graduates” if/when it achieves 85% Bayesian probability of success in a phase III trial within a given subtype. Patients received weekly paclitaxel (plus trastuzumab if HER2-positive) without (control) or with weekly intravenous trebananib, followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and surgery. Pathway-specific biomarkers were assessed for response prediction. Results: There were 134 participants randomized to trebananib and 133 to control. Although trebananib did not graduate in any signature [phase III probabilities: Hazard ratio (HR)-negative (78%), HR-negative/HER2-positive (74%), HR-negative/HER2-negative (77%), and MP2 (79%)], it demonstrated high probability of superior pCR rates over control (92%–99%) among these subtypes. Trebananib improved 3-year event-free survival (HR 0.67), with no significant increase in adverse events. Activation levels of the Tie2 receptor and downstream signaling partners predicted trebananib response in HER2-positive disease; high expression of a CD8 T-cell gene signature predicted response in HR-negative/HER2-negative disease. Conclusions: The angiopoietin (Ang)/Tie2 axis inhibitor trebananib combined with standard neoadjuvant therapy increased estimated pCR rates across HR-negative and MP2 subtypes, with probabilities of superiority &gt;90%. Further study of Ang/Tie2 receptor axis inhibitors in validated, biomarker-predicted sensitive subtypes is warranted.