Citations

Abstract Aims We aimed to assess regression and development rates of ≥moderate secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receiving contemporary guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Methods Patients with a <1 year diagnosis of HFrEF with mildly (40% ≤ EF < 50%) or moderately (<40%) reduced EF enrolled in GDMT titration programme 2019–2024 were identified. Regression rates of ≥moderate MR/TR to ≤mild and development rates of incident ≥moderate MR/TR were calculated. Results Among 844 patients [median age 64; 68% men; 26% mildly reduced EF; 24% New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III/IV], 28% had ≥moderate MR and 14% had ≥moderate TR. Over median 7.1 months, 171 (75%) patients with ≥moderate MR and 87 (75%) of patients with ≥moderate TR experienced regression to no/mild MR and TR, respectively. Conversely, over median 13 months, incident ≥moderate MR and TR developed in 5% and 6%, respectively, of patients with no/mild baseline MR and TR. Number of GDMT medications at follow-up was less in patients who did not have MR/TR regression (vs who did) and in patients who developed MR/TR (vs who did not). Patients with NYHA Class I/II received a similar number of GDMT and had a similar rate of MR and TR regression and development vs patients with NYHA Class III/IV. However, patients with mildly reduced EF received less GDMT medications vs patients with moderately reduced EF and experienced less MR regression. Conclusion In patients with a recent diagnosis of HFrEF receiving contemporary GDMT, the majority with ≥moderate secondary MR and TR achieved regression of MR/TR, and the minority without significant baseline MR/TR developed ≥moderate regurgitation at follow-up.

Background Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are widely employed in facet and sacroiliac joint pain. Similar to CSIs at other sites (peripheral nerve blocks, joints, epidural), these injections are associated with potential adverse events. These multisociety consensus recommendations aim to develop evidence-based statements and recommendations on the safe use of CSIs in facet joint and sacroiliac joint injections. Methods Development of the consensus recommendations was approved by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Board of Directors and several other societies that agreed to participate. The scope of statements and recommendations was agreed on to include safety of the injection technique (landmark-guided, ultrasound, or radiology-aided injections); effect of the addition of the corticosteroid on effectiveness (vs local anesthetic or saline); and adverse events related to the injection. Experts were assigned topics to perform a comprehensive literature review and draft statements and recommendations, which were refined and voted for consensus (>75% agreement) using a modified Delphi process. A modified version of the US Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence and strength of recommendation was followed. Results All statements and recommendations were approved by all participants after four rounds of discussion. The Practice Guidelines Committees and Boards of Directors of the participating societies also approved all statements and recommendations. Injection of corticosteroid into the facet joint in patients with joint inflammation may relieve pain and improves function. Intra-articular, extra-articular (periarticular), and combined administration are effective for sacroiliac joint injections. No dose-response studies exist, but CSIs containing 10 mg of methylprednisolone or triamcinolone per facet joint and 40 mg per sacroiliac joint (SIJ) (or their respective pharmacologic equivalents) are reasonable. Conclusions In this practice recommendation, we provide statements and recommendations on facet and sacroiliac joint CSIs, the optimal doses, and intervals and criteria for repeating the CSIs in patients with facet joint and sacroiliac joint pain.

Abstract Background: DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) isoforms 1, 3A and 3B are enzymes that regulate DNA methylation, controlling gene expression, chromatin stability and genetic imprinting. We have previously shown that DNMT3A protein expression in early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with more aggressive clinicopathologic features (higher tumor grade, tumor proliferation and frequency of nodal metastases) and worse clinical outcomes in the absence of chemotherapy (Leon-Ferre et al, SABCS 2024). Pre-clinically, we have shown that DNMT3A protein expression predicts sensitivity to DNMT inhibitors (Yu J et al., J Clin Invest 2018), and that DNMT inhibitor treatment leads to downregulation of DNMT3A, enhanced expression of immune-related pathways, and halted tumor growth, particularly in combination with immunotherapy and paclitaxel. Methods: This is a phase 1, open-label, multicenter study evaluating the safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the oral DNMT inhibitor ASTX727 + paclitaxel + pembrolizumab in metastatic TNBC. ASTX727 is an oral fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet of 35 mg decitabine (active agent) and 100 mg cedazuridine (a cytidine deaminase inhibitor that prevents decitabine degradation in the bowel and liver, allowing oral delivery). The study consists of two parts: Part 1 is a dose-finding cohort, using a 3+3 design, with 5 dose levels (Table), and its primary objective is to determine the RP2D. Part 2 is an expansion cohort (n=6), with the primary objective to confirm tolerability of the regimen at the RP2D. Secondary objectives are to record the antitumor activity of the regimen, describe the AE profile, explore the association of baseline gene expression profiles with clinical benefit, and to evaluate impact of treatment on tumor and ctDNA methylation. Exploratory objectives will evaluate the association of baseline DNMT3A protein expression and antitumor activity, and the impact of treatment on the tumor and peripheral blood immune phenotype. Eligible patients are adults 18 years or older with metastatic TNBC (ER/PR ≤10%, and HER2-negative per ASCO/CAP guidelines), independent of PD-L1 expression. Patients are allowed to have received 0-3 prior lines of systemic therapy in the metastatic setting, including prior immune checkpoint inhibitors in the early and/or metastatic settings. Patients must be eligible for taxanes and have adequate organ and bone marrow function. Patients with treated brain metastases are eligible if previously treated without evidence of progression after 4 weeks. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is not allowed. Patients must have an ECOG performance status of ≤2 and have no gastrointestinal disorders impacting absorption of oral medications. As of June 20, 2025, the study is enrolling patients, with 10 patients dosed in the dose-finding phase. Citation Format: R. Leon-Ferre, D. M. Zahrieh, P. P. Advani, D. Quiroga, K. V. Giridhar, P. J. Dizona, D. Stover, X. Wang, A. J. Tevaarwerk, G. M. Choong, S. Yasir, K. R. Kalari, J. Foldi, R. Parajuli, M. H. Hackney, H. K. Chew, R. Wajeeha, H. Bear, E. Sharon, B. Ko, G. I. Shapiro, S. Gore, L. Pelosof, L. Wang, M. P. Goetz. Trial in progress: Phase 1 Study Targeting DNA Methyltransferases in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (NCI Protocol #10546) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-07-20.

Abstract Background: Most patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with endocrine therapy (ET) will ultimately develop resistance. A large unmet need exists especially when resistance occurs following treatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i), which is potentially driven by a mutation in the ERα-coding gene, ESR1. Lasofoxifene (LAS), an oral, next-generation ET and ER breast antagonist, was evaluated in two phase 2 studies of women with ER+/HER2- mBC and an ESR1 mutation who had disease progression on previous ET and CDK4/6i. In the ELAINE 1 trial, LAS monotherapy provided numerically greater progression-free survival (PFS, median 5.6 mos vs 3.7 mos; HR: 0.669 [95% CI, 0.445‒1.125], P=0.138), objective response rate (ORR, 13% vs 3%; P=0.124), and clinical benefit rate (CBR, 37% vs 22%; P=0.117) compared with the ER degrader fulvestrant (fulv), with a favorable safety profile (Goetz MP et al. Ann Oncol 2023;34:1141‒51). The single-arm, ELAINE 2 trial showed that LAS combined with abemaciclib (Abema) was well tolerated with a median PFS of ∼13 mos, ORR of 56%, and CBR of 66% (Damodaran S et al. Ann Oncol 2023;34:1131‒40). The phase 3, registrational, ELAINE 3 trial was initiated based on these promising earlier-phase data. Recent results from postMONARCH confirmed superior efficacy of fulv/Abema over fulv/placebo (mPFS 6.0 mos vs 5.3 mos, HR 0.73 [0.57‒0.95], nominal P-value 0.017) in non-biomarker‒selected, mBC patients after progression on a prior CDK4/6i and aromatase inhibitor (AI), with similar HR in an ESR1-mutated cohort (Kalinsky K et al. J Clin Oncol 2025;43:1101‒12). Additionally, recent data from EMBER-3 demonstrated meaningful PFS with a novel ET combined with abemaciclib after progression on AI/CDK4/6i (Jhaveri KL et al. N Engl J Med 2025;392:1189‒202). The ELAINE 3, global trial will compare LAS/Abema with fulv/Abema in a post-CDK4/6i, ESR1-mutation‒selected, mBC population. Methods: ELAINE 3 (NCT05696626) is an open-label, phase 3, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LAS plus Abema versus fulv plus Abema. Patients are being enrolled at approximately 152 sites in 13 countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, France, Italy, Israel, Poland, Romania, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States). Key inclusion criteria are pre- and postmenopausal women and men aged ≥18 yrs; ER+/HER2-, locally advanced and/or mBC (measurable and/or non-measurable disease); ≥1 acquired ESR1 mutation; progression on an AI plus palbociclib or ribociclib as their first hormonal treatment for advanced/mBC; and ≤1 line of chemotherapy in the advanced/metastatic setting. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive LAS 5 mg/day plus Abema 150 mg BID, or fulv 500 mg IM (days 1, 15, and 29, then once monthly) plus Abema 150 mg BID. Treatment will continue until progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from the study. The primary endpoint is PFS per RESIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR); key secondary endpoints are ORR, overall survival, CBR, duration of response, and time to response. Safety, time to cytotoxic chemotherapy, and quality of life (including vaginal health) will also be evaluated. Blood samples for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) will be collected for genomic analyses at screening, at weeks 4 and 8 and every 8 weeks thereafter, and at the final visit. Outcomes with LAS/Abema and fulv/Abema will be compared using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model and stratified logrank test with an expected PFS hazard ratio of 0.68 at final analysis. Enrollment is currently ongoing to meet the target sample size of 500 patients. Citation Format: M. P. Goetz, S. A. Wander, T. Bachelot, G. Curigliano, A. de Nonneville, E. N. Gal-Yam, K. Jhaveri, S. L. Sammons, S. Shen, C. J. Twelves, G. Gasper, P. V. Plourde, D. J. Portman, S. Damodaran. Open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 3, ELAINE 3 study of the efficacy and safety of lasofoxifene plus abemaciclib for treating ER+/HER2-, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-07-30.

Abstract Background: Despite the success treating hematologic malignancies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies face challenges in breast cancer and other solid tumors due to lack of targets that distinguish tumor from normal cells. Epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a critical role in oncogenesis across several cancers and is often upregulated [1]. While monoclonal antibodies targeting EGFR have demonstrated efficacy, these approaches are often limited by on-target, off-tumor toxicities, such as skin and gastrointestinal toxicity, which constrains dose escalation and efficacy [2]. A2B395 is an allogeneic, logic-gated, EGFR-targeted, TmodTM CAR T therapy designed to address these limitations and provide a convenient and consistent off-the-shelf option. This therapy incorporates 2 CARs: an activator targeting EGFR and a blocker targeting human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02. The activator recognizes EGFR on both tumor and normal cells, whereas the blocker inhibits CAR T activity against normal cells (with preserved HLA expression) while allowing activation against tumor cells (with HLA-A*02 loss of heterozygosity [LOH]). This approach is designed to avoid on-target, off-tumor toxicity, a significant limitation to CAR T treatment of solid tumors [3]. To address potential graft-vs-host response, a short-hairpin RNA expression module targeting beta-2 microglobulin is included in the Tmod construct, which significantly reduces major histocompatibility complex class I levels and subsequent host immune response [4]. Importantly, the Tmod system is modular and adaptable to multiple targets. Initial data on autologous Tmod CAR T therapy suggest reduced off-tumor toxicity and encouraging clinical efficacy [5]. A2B395 represents a novel approach for targeting EGFR-expressing solid tumors with HLA-A*02 loss of heterozygosity. Methods: DENALI-1 is a phase 1/2, open-label, nonrandomized study evaluating the safety and efficacy of A2B395 in adults. Patients are enrolled through BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119), a master prescreening study that identifies patients with HLA loss of heterozygosity at any time in the course of their disease via next-generation sequencing. Key inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed recurrent, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancers associated with EGFR expression, including triple-negative breast, colorectal, non-small cell lung, squamous cell head and neck, and renal cell cancers. Patients must have received ≥1 line of prior therapy, such as a checkpoint inhibitor, molecular targeted therapy, or chemotherapy. The primary objective of the phase 1 portion is to evaluate safety, tolerability, and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) using a Bayesian optimal interval design for dose escalation. The dose-expansion phase will confirm the RP2D and collect and analyze biomarker data. The Phase 2 portion will assess overall response rate per RECIST v1.1. As of 03 July 2025, the first patient dosed with A2B395, who has breast cancer, completed the 28-day safety review period. Dose-escalation is ongoing. Citation Format: J. M. Specht, S. R. Punekar, M. Ulrickson, D. J. Wong, J. R. Hecht, M. Maus, P. M. Grierson, J. B. Sunwoo, J. R. Molina, D. G. Maloney, K. Spencer, H. E. Fuentes Bayne, M. Davila, S. P. Patel, B. Creelan, D. B. Zhen, J. Niu, D. C. Prasad, R. L. Marar, N. A. Bagegni, G. Palluconi, J. Lee, A. Mardiros, W. Bretzlaff, W. J. Langeberg, J. S. Welch, E. Ng, W. Y. Go, K. Kirtane, R. A. Shatsky. Denali-1: a seamless phase 1/2 study of A2B395, a logic-gated, allogeneic, Tmod chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy, in patients with triple-negative breast cancer and other EGFR-expressing solid tumors with HLA-A*02 loss of heterozygosity (LOH) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-08-03.

Abstract Introduction Serial assessments of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) provide independent prognostic significance for progression free survival and overall survival. A low CTC burden (<5 CTCs / 7.5mL blood) at baseline is favorable prognostically, and reduction of CTCs during treatment indicates response to treatment (Janni, CCR 2025). Despite increasing evidence supporting its clinical validity, real-time serial CTC enumeration has not been utilized broadly in clinical practice in the U.S. The ACT-MBC study is a prospective observational study to evaluate the impact of serial CTC testing on treatment decisions and response assessment (NCT05662345). Provider (physician or advanced practitioner) perception of CTC testing is measured with questionnaires at baseline (PQ1), and for each pt during the first restaging visit (PQ2), and at the end of the study (PQ3). We previously reported PQ1 results (Giridhar, SABCS 2024). Here, we report on results of PQ2. Methods ACT-MBC prospectively enrolled patients (pts) at Mayo Clinic Rochester and Mayo Clinic Health Systems sites (Mankato, Albert Lea and Eau Claire). Pts with MBC were enrolled at time of progressive disease during any line of therapy (TNBC) or ≥2nd line metastatic therapy for ER+/HER2- disease. Pts were tested for CTCs using the FDA-cleared CellSearch® assay which included enumeration and biomarker testing on CTCs for ER, HER2, and PD-L1. The treating clinician determined the regimen and timing of restaging scans. CTC testing was performed once per cycle (every 3-4 weeks) with results returned to the treating provider within 7 days. We descriptively summarized PQ2 responses from providers who had at least one on-treatment CTC result available by the first restaging visit. We report the proportion (90% CI) of providers who agreed or strongly agreed that assessing CTCs enhanced their ability to determine response to therapy and that the CTC results helped guide their decision to continue or change therapy (co-primary endpoints) while accounting for within provider correlation. Results As of June 25, 2025, 15 providers enrolled a median of 2 pts each (range: 1 to 15 pts) and completed PQ2 surveys on 40 pts. 7 providers (47%) practiced in the community setting and 4 (27%) were nurse practitioners. Most pts were female (98%), White (98%), and had ER+/HER2- MBC (80%). Baseline (C1) CTC results were elevated (≥5 CTCs) in 24 (60%) pts (CTC range 0-609). At C2 (n=39), CTC values remained undetected in 7 pts, decreased in 21 pts, increased in 8 pts, and remained unchanged in 3 pts. At PQ2 (n=40), based on clinician interpretation of radiographic findings, results showed 2.5% of pts with complete response, 20% with partial response, 25% with stable disease, 17.5% with mixed response, and 35% with progressive disease. Clinicians reported that CTC results were concordant with imaging results in 34 (85%) responses, discordant with imaging in 7.5% of responses, and unclear in the remaining 7.5% of responses. Most clinicians (82.5%) agreed or strongly agreed that assessing CTCs enhanced their ability to determine response to therapy (90% CI: 68.3%, 96.7%). Further, 70% of providers agreed or strongly agreed that the CTC results helped guide their decision to continue or change therapy (90% CI: 50.8%, 89.2%). 32.5% of the time, CTCs results influenced the timing of the first restaging scans. In 11/25 pts without progressing disease, CTC results influenced the timing of future scans. In the 7/8 pts with a mixed response at first restaging scans with decreasing CTCs, 4 remained on the same systemic therapy. Conclusions Oncologists in academic and community practice responded that serial CTC assessments enhance ability to determine response of therapy, guide decisions to continue or change treatments, and influence timing of radiographic assessments. Citation Format: K. V. Giridhar, D. Zahrieh, M. Hanna, A. Singh, E. Al-Hattab, P. Schumacher, J. Carroll, J. Hoppenworth, T. Haddad, A. Tevaarwerk, B. Rudder, G. M. Choong, S. Basu, R. A. Leon-Ferre, T. O'Brien, A. Lewis, F. de Snoo, L. Stork-Sloots, F. K. Kuhr, S. Lazaro, R. Prendergast, D. S. Spinner, M. P. Goetz. Assessing the impact of real-time serial circulating tumor cell results on the management of patients with metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-03-10.

Abstract Background: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in HER2+ and triple-negative breast cancer (BC) are prognostic and associated with therapy response; however, there are few data regarding distribution and significance of TIL values in ER+ HER2-negative (HER2-) MBC patients (pts) treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). CDK4/6 inhibition may promote antitumor immunity by production of type III interferons and tumor antigen presentation, and by inhibition of regulatory T cells (Goel, Nature 2017). Further, the addition of immune checkpoint therapy to palbociclib numerically prolonged PFS in the 2nd line (2L) setting (Mayer, JCO 2024). We aimed to investigate the prognostic role of TILs derived from fresh metastatic tumor biopsies in pts with ER+HER2- MBC prior to starting CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy (ET) in the first line (1L) and 2L setting. Methods: PROMISE (NCT0281902) is a multicenter, prospective study that enrolled women commencing the CDK4/6i palbociclib (Pb) with letrozole (1L) or fulvestrant (2L) for HR+HER2- MBC. The primary goal was to identify novel genomic variants and pathways associated with PFS. Here, we performed a secondary analysis to quantitate stromal TILs using protocol mandated pretreatment tumor biopsies and determine their association with PFS. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, we reported median PFS (mPFS) and 3-year PFS percentage (%) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) by TILs [≥20% vs <20%] separately within 1L and 2L. As sample TIL values were generally concentrated at zero (27/58 = 46.6%), coupled with wide spread of sample TIL values ≥20% [range: 20%- 80%], we applied a ≥20% threshold for PFS analysis (high vs low TIL group) as described by Luen, Salgado et al. Lancet Oncol 2017. Statistical significance was based on the Wilcoxon test of the null hypothesis that there was no difference in the PFS curves by TILs. PFS is reported at median follow-up of 21 months. Results: Pretreatment tumor biopsies from 58/68 (85.3 %) pts were evaluable (42 in 1L and 16 in 2L). Median [Q1, Q2] TIL values were higher in 1L (5% [0, 10]) vs 2L (0% [0, 15]). The most common biopsy sites were bone (44.8%), lymph node (17.2%), liver (17.2%) and breast (12%). Overall, TILs frequency (>20%) by the 4 most common biopsy sites were bone (2/20, 10%), lymph node (4/7, 57%), liver (2/6, 33%), and breast (1/7, 14%). In 1L, although PFS was not significantly different (P = 0.237), mPFS (44 vs 34 months) and 3-year PFS 75.0%, [95% CI: 50.3%, 100%] vs 46.4% [95% CI: 31.0%, 69.5%]) were longer in pts with high versus low TILS, respectively. In 2L, the 3-year PFS was numerically similar comparing high and low TILs groups, (25.0%, [95% CI: 4.6%, 100%] vs 22.5% [95% CI: 6.7%, 76.1%]) with no significant difference in PFS (P = 0.761). Conclusions: In pts with ER+HER2- MBC treated with Pb and ET, PFS was numerically longer comparing high vs low TIL values in 1L but not 2L settings. Future studies evaluating TILs in larger datasets are needed to validate these findings. Genomic analysis (DNA/RNA) and its association with TIL levels is underway and will be presented at the meeting. Funding: The Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic Breast Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE P50CA116201); Mayo Clinic Cancer Center (CA15083-40A2); TEMPUS (https://www.tempus.com/) and Conquer Cancer Foundation of ASCO (Career Development Award 2018, Dr. O’Sullivan) Citation Format: C. C. O'Sullivan, A. M. Moyer, A. Nassar, D. M. Zahrieh, V. Suman, X. Tang, K. J. Thompson, R. C. Hentz, J. J. Harrington, A. Moreno-Aspitia, D. W. Northfelt, T. C. Haddad, S. Chumsri, P. P. Peethambaram, K. J. Ruddy, K. V. Giridhar, R. A. Leon-Ferre, R. Weinshilboum, L. Wang, K. R. Kalari, M. P. Goetz. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in advanced ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer prior to treatment with palbociclib and endocrine therapy: a retrospective analysis of the PROMISE study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-10-22.

Background The use of 3D imaging with navigation bronchoscopy has increased with the introduction of mobile cone-beam CT (mCBCT). Shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) integrated with mCBCT has been introduced to correct for CT to body divergence (CT-BD) during the biopsy of peripheral pulmonary nodules (PPNs). Methods Prospective observational multicentre study, enrolling patients with a PPN of ≤20 mm suspicious for malignancy, assessing tool-in-lesion (TIL), diagnostic yield, sensitivity for malignancy and incidence of pneumothorax or airway bleeding. Non-malignant index biopsies were followed for 12 months. Descriptive statistics are reported for all variables along with 95% CI for primary endpoints. Results 155 consecutive patients were enrolled at six centres. Median nodule size was 14.0 mm (IQR 11.0–17.0), with 54.8% of nodules (85/155) in the upper lobes, 25.8% (40/155) with CT bronchus sign present and median distance to the nearest pleural surface of 8.2 mm (IQR 1.8–20.0). TIL was achieved in 154/155 (99.4%, 95% CI 96.5 to 100.0) procedures. A median of two (IQR 1–3) mCBCT spins were performed, with median dose area product of 25.7 Gy · cm 2 (IQR 11.0–46.7). Diagnostic yield per the American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians (ATC/ACCP) definition was 89.0% (n=138/155; 95% CI 83.0 to 93.5) and sensitivity for malignancy was 91.5% (95% CI 86.4 to 96.5). No pneumothorax (0%, 95% CI 0.0 to 2.4) and two Nashville Grade three bleeding events were reported (1.3%, 95% CI 0.2 to 4.6). Interpretation The first prospective multicentre study of integrated ssRAB and mCBCT for small peripheral nodules resulted in diagnostic outcomes similar to those reported for transthoracic biopsy with a more favourable safety profile. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05562895 .