Comparing Complications Between Shape‐Sensing Robotic‐Assisted Bronchoscopy and Trans‐Thoracic Needle Pulmonary Biopsy Approaches: Insights From a Large Nationally Representative Administrative Database
ABSTRACT Background Shape‐sensing robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) is a navigation platform for biopsy of indeterminate pulmonary lesions. Large‐scale, real‐world evidence confirming the safety profile of ssRAB compared to transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB) is needed. Study Design and Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed using the PINC AI healthcare database among patients who underwent ssRAB or TTNB lung lesion biopsy at participating hospitals between April 2019 and March 2023. Outcomes were rates of pneumothorax and pneumothorax requiring chest‐tube intervention within 3 days, and rates of in‐hospital bleeding or all‐cause death. Quasi‐binomial logistic regression analysis was performed after one‐to‐five propensity score matching (PSM) accounting for patient‐ and hospital‐related characteristics. Results A total of 119 424 patients (5121 ssRAB, 114 303 TTNB) were identified with 4554 ssRAB and 14 319 TTNB patients after PSM. Relative to ssRAB, TTNB had significantly higher risk of pneumothorax (18.4% vs. 2.6%, OR = 7.10, p < 0.001) and pneumothorax requiring chest‐tube (10.8% vs. 1.4%, OR = 7.62, p < 0.001). TTNB was associated with a higher risk for bleeding (1.5% vs. 0.6%, OR = 2.20, p < 0.001) and all‐cause death (0.48% vs. 0.15%, OR = 2.47, p = 0.023); however, rates for both outcomes were relatively low. Interpretation In this large‐scale, real‐world database analysis with diverse patient populations, physician experience, and health care settings, ssRAB demonstrated a better safety profile compared to TTNB. Superior safety combined with a potentially comparable performance profile and known advantages of bronchoscopy, including concurrent staging, support ssRAB as an optimal choice for non‐surgical biopsies for suspicious pulmonary lesions.
Shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy with integrated mobile cone-beam CT for small nodules: results from the prospective multicentre CONFIRM study
Background The use of 3D imaging with navigation bronchoscopy has increased with the introduction of mobile cone-beam CT (mCBCT). Shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) integrated with mCBCT has been introduced to correct for CT to body divergence (CT-BD) during the biopsy of peripheral pulmonary nodules (PPNs). Methods Prospective observational multicentre study, enrolling patients with a PPN of ≤20 mm suspicious for malignancy, assessing tool-in-lesion (TIL), diagnostic yield, sensitivity for malignancy and incidence of pneumothorax or airway bleeding. Non-malignant index biopsies were followed for 12 months. Descriptive statistics are reported for all variables along with 95% CI for primary endpoints. Results 155 consecutive patients were enrolled at six centres. Median nodule size was 14.0 mm (IQR 11.0–17.0), with 54.8% of nodules (85/155) in the upper lobes, 25.8% (40/155) with CT bronchus sign present and median distance to the nearest pleural surface of 8.2 mm (IQR 1.8–20.0). TIL was achieved in 154/155 (99.4%, 95% CI 96.5 to 100.0) procedures. A median of two (IQR 1–3) mCBCT spins were performed, with median dose area product of 25.7 Gy · cm 2 (IQR 11.0–46.7). Diagnostic yield per the American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians (ATC/ACCP) definition was 89.0% (n=138/155; 95% CI 83.0 to 93.5) and sensitivity for malignancy was 91.5% (95% CI 86.4 to 96.5). No pneumothorax (0%, 95% CI 0.0 to 2.4) and two Nashville Grade three bleeding events were reported (1.3%, 95% CI 0.2 to 4.6). Interpretation The first prospective multicentre study of integrated ssRAB and mCBCT for small peripheral nodules resulted in diagnostic outcomes similar to those reported for transthoracic biopsy with a more favourable safety profile. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05562895 .
Training Guidelines for Tracheostomy and Gastrostomy Tube Placements: A Systematic Review
A24. EPIDEMIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT IN PLEURAL DISEASE AND IP | July 7, 2020 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A1121-A1121