ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Among patient with early‐stage breast cancer, breast conservation surgery (BCS) is the most performed surgery, utilized in approximately two‐thirds of patients. While 5‐year overall‐survival rates are strong—typically above 90%—additional re‐excisions can occur in up to 25% of patients who undergo index BCS and some patients will require subsequent surgery for new breast cancer or recurrences. As such, these additional procedures can complicate patients’ pathway to survivorship, negatively impact quality of life, and lead to excess healthcare costs. Methods This retrospective cohort study used linked claims and an electronic healthcare record database to (1) characterize patients at higher risk for additional breast oncologic surgery (aBOS) following BCS, and (2) quantify the long‐term financial impact of aBOS after BCS. In total, 87,190 patients with breast cancer, who had an index BCS between January 1, 2012, to March 31, 2023, were followed for up to 5‐years post‐operatively. Patients with and without aBOS were analyzed, comparing demographics, tumor characteristics, healthcare utilization, and per‐person‐per‐month (PPPM) costs. Results Twenty‐three percent ( n = 20,212) of patients underwent aBOS. These patients were younger, had higher tumor grades and larger tumor sizes, and incurred greater healthcare costs compared to patients who did not undergo a secondary surgery. Conclusion This study highlights significant factors influencing BCS outcomes and healthcare utilization, underscoring the need for tailored therapeutic strategies for patients with breast cancer.
Comparing Complications Between Shape‐Sensing Robotic‐Assisted Bronchoscopy and Trans‐Thoracic Needle Pulmonary Biopsy Approaches: Insights From a Large Nationally Representative Administrative Database
ABSTRACT Background Shape‐sensing robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) is a navigation platform for biopsy of indeterminate pulmonary lesions. Large‐scale, real‐world evidence confirming the safety profile of ssRAB compared to transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB) is needed. Study Design and Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed using the PINC AI healthcare database among patients who underwent ssRAB or TTNB lung lesion biopsy at participating hospitals between April 2019 and March 2023. Outcomes were rates of pneumothorax and pneumothorax requiring chest‐tube intervention within 3 days, and rates of in‐hospital bleeding or all‐cause death. Quasi‐binomial logistic regression analysis was performed after one‐to‐five propensity score matching (PSM) accounting for patient‐ and hospital‐related characteristics. Results A total of 119 424 patients (5121 ssRAB, 114 303 TTNB) were identified with 4554 ssRAB and 14 319 TTNB patients after PSM. Relative to ssRAB, TTNB had significantly higher risk of pneumothorax (18.4% vs. 2.6%, OR = 7.10, p < 0.001) and pneumothorax requiring chest‐tube (10.8% vs. 1.4%, OR = 7.62, p < 0.001). TTNB was associated with a higher risk for bleeding (1.5% vs. 0.6%, OR = 2.20, p < 0.001) and all‐cause death (0.48% vs. 0.15%, OR = 2.47, p = 0.023); however, rates for both outcomes were relatively low. Interpretation In this large‐scale, real‐world database analysis with diverse patient populations, physician experience, and health care settings, ssRAB demonstrated a better safety profile compared to TTNB. Superior safety combined with a potentially comparable performance profile and known advantages of bronchoscopy, including concurrent staging, support ssRAB as an optimal choice for non‐surgical biopsies for suspicious pulmonary lesions.