Citations

The middle mesenteric artery is a rare anomalous mesenteric vessel that may supply variable segments of the colon. Occlusion of this artery during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair may bear a significant risk of bowel ischemia. We report the successful interventional treatment of a patient with a 5.3 cm infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, sparing a dominant middle mesenteric artery.

Currently available aortic stent-grafts require bilateral femoral incisions for device deployment. The incidence of morbidity (infection, lymphatic complications, breakdown) of vertical, infrainguinal incisions used in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) was assessed, and the natural history of asymptomatic groin fluid collections following such procedures was determined. Between June 1999 and February 2001, 77 consecutive patients underwent EVAR for AAAs utilizing bilateral vertical femoral incisions. Fifty-nine (77%) bifurcated stent-grafts (BSGs), and 18 (23%) aortouniiliac (AUI) devices, with femorofemoral bypass were performed. Patients returned at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 6 months for physical examination, and 1 month and 6 months for abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans. The presence of fluid collections was determined from the dictation report of the attending radiologist. Data are reported as (n) mean ± SE. Patient characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact test; p <0.05 considered significant. There were 72 males and 5 females, age 75 ±6.4 years and aneurysm size (77) 5.6 ±0.8 cm. There were no cases of wound breakdown or lymph fistula. Wound infections occurred in 3/150 incisions (2%), 2/34 AUI incisions (6%), and 1/1 16 BSG incisions (0.86%). There was no statistical difference (p =0.13) between graft types (BSG vs AUI). All infections were diagnosed clinically before the 1-month CT scan, treated without operative intervention or hospitalization, and resolved. There was a significant decrease in the BSG group and overall in asymptomatic wound fluid collections from 1 to 6 months postoperatively. At 1 and 6 months, respectively, the BSG group had 17 (14.6%) and 3 (2.6%) fluid collections out of 116 incisions (p = 0.003); the AUI group had 6 (17.6%) and 1 (2.9%) fluid collection(s) out of 34 incisions (p = 0. 13); and overall 23 (15.3%) and 4 (2.6%) out of 150 incisions (p = 0.004). The present study demonstrates that bilateral vertical femoral incisions used in EVAR have a wound infection rate of 2.0%. Infections are usually detected and treated clinically and empirically without the need for hospitalization or surgery. Asymptomatic groin wound fluid collections resolve significantly within 6 months without intervention. Therefore, surgical femoral artery exposure adds little morbidity to the endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Carotid-carotid bypass grafting is a procedure only rarely performed. However, in selected cases it may provide an excellent treatment alternative. The authors report on two patients who were treated by carotid-carotid bypass. The first patient had recurrent cerebral emboli from a chronic aortic dissection extending into the right innominate, common carotid, and internal carotid artery. The second patient was symptomatic from a recurrent high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis and an ulcerated plaque in the right common carotid artery following radical neck dissection and radiotherapy. The indications for this procedure are described and the related literature is reviewed.

Ureteral obstructions following aortoiliac or aortofemoral bypass grafting for aortoiliac occlusive and aneurysmal disease are infrequently reported. Ureteral obstructions can be self-limiting and resolve without further treatment or can signify a more serious underlying complication such as graft infection or a pseudoaneurysm formation. The authors present a series of five patients with ureteral obstruction secondary to aortobifemoral bypass grafting. Different treatment options are described and an algorithm for the management of these complications is presented.

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is frequently associated with cardiovascular disease. Epidemiological data on the frequency of ED in vascular surgery patients is rarely reported. We evaluated the prevalence of this comorbidity in patients consulting the vascular surgery outpatient clinic. Over a 6-month period, a short version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire consisting of six EDrelevant questions was handed out to 440 vascular surgery outpatients. Clinical data were collected from patients' records. Linear regression models with forward selection were used to investigate associations between erectile function score and possible risk factors. The return rate was 31% (137 patients). Eight patients (6%) were taking phosphodiesterase inhibitors. ED, as defined by an erectile function score of 25 or less and/or use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors, was found in 90% (95% CI: 84% to 95%) of cases. Moderate or severe ED, as defined by an erectile function score of 16 or less and/or use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors, was found in 70% (95% CI: 62% to 78%) of cases. Increased age, abdominal aortic aneurysm, peripheral arterial disease, urologic disease, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and use of beta-blockers were significantly associated with a lower erectile function score. In conclusion, erectile dysfunction is a frequent and often missed comorbidity in vascular surgery patients. While ED may have a profound impact on the patient's quality of life, attention should also be paid to the patient's preoperative sexual function, considering the availability of oral pharmacotherapies and possible consequences concerning liability in postoperative patients in whom pre-existing ED was not identified properly.

AbstractBackgroundThe purpose of the present study was to compare surgical and endovascular revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI).MethodsForty‐nine patients underwent surgical (SG) or endovascular (EG) treatment. Relief of symptoms was considered the primary endpoint; patency, morbidity, and mortality were secondary endpoints. For statistical analysis, significance was assumed if P values ≤ 0.05.ResultsTwenty‐six patients (53%) underwent surgical revascularization; 23 patients (47%), endovascular repair. Mean follow‐up was 25 ± 21 months (SG) versus 10 ± 10 (EG) months (P = 0.07). Except for body mass indices (SG 18.9 ± 2.7 versus EG 23.6 ± 4.8; P = 0.001), preoperative data were comparable. Freedom from symptoms was 100% (SG) versus 90% (EG) after intervention (P = 0.194), and 89% (SG) versus 75% (EG) at the end of follow‐up. Reocclusion or re‐stenosis occurred in 8% (SG) versus 25% (EG) (log‐rank test: P = 0.003), and mesenteric ischemia developed in 0% (SG) versus 9% (EG) (P = 0.04). Reintervention for CMI was required in 0% (SG) versus 13% (EG) (P = 0.01). Surgical patients experienced more early complications (42% versus EG 4%; P = 0.02) and longer hospital stays (11.6 ± 10.9 days versus EG 1.3 ± 0.5 days; P < 0.001). Overall mortality at the end of follow‐up was 31% (SG) versus 4% (EG) (log‐rank test: P = 0.08), including all patients with combined open mesenteric and aortic reconstruction (P = 0.001).ConclusionsSurgical treatment has superior long‐term patency and requires fewer reinterventions, but it is also more invasive with greater morbidity and mortality compared to endovascular treatment. Endovascular techniques may be preferable in patients with significant co‐morbidities, concomitant aortic disease, or indeterminate symptoms.

The purpose of this paper is to describe the intraoperative management of a type IIIb endoleak after deployment of a bifurcated endograft in a patient with narrow iliac access vessels. A 62-year-old man underwent elective endovascular repair (EVAR) of a 53 mm abdominal aortic aneurysm. After device deployment, a large IIIb endoleak, arising from the main body of the device, was visualized. Narrow iliac vessels precluded deployment of a second bifurcated graft, and the endoleak was successfully excluded with an aortomonoiliac device, followed by contralateral iliac occlusion and subsequent creation of a femorofemoral bypass. At 1-year follow-up, the aneurysm remains excluded and is decreasing in size. Type III endoleaks are a known complication of EVAR, requiring immediate treatment through their association with aneurysm enlargement and rupture. If an additional bifurcated graft cannot be used, aortomonoiliac conversion represents a feasible endovascular alternative treatment for type III endoleaks, other than conversion to open surgical repair. Therefore, aortomonoiliac converters with appropriate occluder devices should be readily available during deployment of bifurcated devices.

Stent-grafts are ideally terminated within the common iliac artery (CIA). However, CIA ectasia may require hypogastric artery occlusion, with stent-graft extension to the external iliac artery. Alternatively, the diameter of the distal stent-graft may be increased, or flared, to allow exclusion of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. This report details the authors’ experience with this technique. Forty-one patients received bifurcated stent-grafts (BSG): 20 received an AneuRx device, and 21 received a Zenith device. CIA ectasia (diameter 15–25 mm) was treated with a distal flare of 2–4 mm greater than the CIA diameter. Patients were followed up with computed tomography scan at 1, 6, and 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA within groups and unpaired two-tailed t test between groups. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Eight of 20 patients (40%) (11 CIA) received an AneuRx device and 13/21 (62%) (17 CIA) received a Zenith device, with a distal flare. Values are (n) mean (mm) ± SE. There were no deaths, endoleaks, migrations, or conversions to open repair. Follow-up mean was 24.7 and 20.6 (range 15–28) months for AneuRx and Zenith groups, respectively. In comparing initial and 12-month CIA diameters, AneuRx grafts 20 ±0.8 vs 21.5 ±1.0 were not significantly different, p= 0.2, nor was the same comparison for Zenith, 17 ±0.5 vs 19.1 ±0.4, significant, p= 0.57. At a mean follow-up of 12 months, distal flare of iliac limbs with either AneuRx or Zenith devices affords a seal for CIA ectasia and/or aneurysms complicating EVAR.

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical utility of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as a screening method for the detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Patients and methods: Each patient who was referred to the echocardiography laboratory TTE was included into the study. After complete cardiac assessment the abdominal aorta was evaluated. Patients with a known, a clinically suspected, or a previously operated AAA were excluded. Results: During the study period, 14876 patients underwent TTE. 13166 (88.5%) of the patients were 50 years and older. Of these 6953 (52.8%) were men and 6213 (47.2%) were women. A total of 108 (0.82%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–0.99) clinically unsuspected AAA of at least 3 cm in diameter (range 3 cm – 6.8 cm) were detected. There were 93 (86.1%) men and 15 (13.9%) women with a mean age of 73.8 years (range 59–90). In 7 patients an AAA was suspected by TTE but not verified on subsequent abdominal ultrasound, as the diameter of the abdominal aorta was less than 3 cm. The prevalence of an AAA in patients 50 years and older was 1.34% (95% CI 1.08–1.64) for men and 0.24% (95% CI 0.14–0.40) for women. In patients less than 50 years old no aneurysm was detected. Seventeen patients who were found to have an AAA with a mean diameter of 4.4 cm (range 3–6 cm) underwent successful elective conventional AAA repair after a mean interval of 13.9 months (range 0.2–49 months) following the initial diagnosis. Conclusions: TTE performed in a highly selected cardiac patient group in a tertiary referral center is not a useful tool to screen for clinically unsuspected abdominal aortic aneurysms due to the low prevalence. The detection of an aneurysm should be confirmed by conventional abdominal ultrasound.