Back to Authors

Seelig, Matthias H.

Mayo Clinic

Klinikum Ludwigshafen

Citations 3

Carotid-Carotid Bypass: An Excellent Procedure for the Treatment of Complex Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease
Seelig, Matthias H., Seelig, S. K., Oldenburg, W. Andrew

Vascular Surgery | June 21, 2007 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 607-612

10.1177/153857440003400619 Get It

Carotid-carotid bypass grafting is a procedure only rarely performed. However, in selected cases it may provide an excellent treatment alternative. The authors report on two patients who were treated by carotid-carotid bypass. The first patient had recurrent cerebral emboli from a chronic aortic dissection extending into the right innominate, common carotid, and internal carotid artery. The second patient was symptomatic from a recurrent high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis and an ulcerated plaque in the right common carotid artery following radical neck dissection and radiotherapy. The indications for this procedure are described and the related literature is reviewed.
Ureteral Obstruction Following Aortic Surgery: Guidelines for Successful Management
Seelig, Matthias H., Oldenburg, W. Andrew

Vascular Surgery | June 21, 2007 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 215-223

10.1177/153857440003400304 Get It

Ureteral obstructions following aortoiliac or aortofemoral bypass grafting for aortoiliac occlusive and aneurysmal disease are infrequently reported. Ureteral obstructions can be self-limiting and resolve without further treatment or can signify a more serious underlying complication such as graft infection or a pseudoaneurysm formation. The authors present a series of five patients with ureteral obstruction secondary to aortobifemoral bypass grafting. Different treatment options are described and an algorithm for the management of these complications is presented.
Die klinische Wertigkeit des routinemäßigen Screenings nach abdominellen Aortenaneurysmen während der Echokardiographie
Seelig, Matthias H., Malouf, Klingler, Oldenburg, Atkinson

Vasa | January 31, 2006 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 265-268

10.1024/0301-1526.29.4.265 Get It

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical utility of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as a screening method for the detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Patients and methods: Each patient who was referred to the echocardiography laboratory TTE was included into the study. After complete cardiac assessment the abdominal aorta was evaluated. Patients with a known, a clinically suspected, or a previously operated AAA were excluded. Results: During the study period, 14876 patients underwent TTE. 13166 (88.5%) of the patients were 50 years and older. Of these 6953 (52.8%) were men and 6213 (47.2%) were women. A total of 108 (0.82%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–0.99) clinically unsuspected AAA of at least 3 cm in diameter (range 3 cm – 6.8 cm) were detected. There were 93 (86.1%) men and 15 (13.9%) women with a mean age of 73.8 years (range 59–90). In 7 patients an AAA was suspected by TTE but not verified on subsequent abdominal ultrasound, as the diameter of the abdominal aorta was less than 3 cm. The prevalence of an AAA in patients 50 years and older was 1.34% (95% CI 1.08–1.64) for men and 0.24% (95% CI 0.14–0.40) for women. In patients less than 50 years old no aneurysm was detected. Seventeen patients who were found to have an AAA with a mean diameter of 4.4 cm (range 3–6 cm) underwent successful elective conventional AAA repair after a mean interval of 13.9 months (range 0.2–49 months) following the initial diagnosis. Conclusions: TTE performed in a highly selected cardiac patient group in a tertiary referral center is not a useful tool to screen for clinically unsuspected abdominal aortic aneurysms due to the low prevalence. The detection of an aneurysm should be confirmed by conventional abdominal ultrasound.