Citations

Background: Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex vascular anomalies with a high risk of hemorrhage and neurological deficits, especially when located in eloquent brain regions. The eloquence of an AVM location is a critical factor in the treatment planning, influencing both the risk of complications and long-term functional outcomes. This study aims to compare outcomes between eloquent and non-eloquent AVMs. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study utilized data from the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs (MISTA) consortium. Patients with eloquent and non-eloquent AVMs were compared on baseline characteristics, angiographic outcomes, and functional outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Propensity score weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for confounding variables. Results: The study included 1013 patients, with 498 (49.2%) AVMs located in eloquent regions and 515 (50.8%) in non-eloquent regions. In unadjusted analysis, eloquent AVMs had lower complete obliteration rates (67.6% vs 79.5%, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.39–0.72, p < 0.001) and higher complication rates (24.5% vs 19.0%, OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.02–1.86, p = 0.03) compared to non-eloquent AVMs. After IPTW adjustment, eloquent AVMs continued to show significantly higher odds of overall complications (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.12–2.52, p = 0.01) and symptomatic complications (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.12–2.80, p = 0.01). Secondary analysis within the eloquent group indicated that embolization was linked to an elevated risk of complications. Surgery and radiosurgery showed comparable functional outcomes at last follow-up and complications rates with higher complete obliteration rates in surgery. Conclusion: AVMs in eloquent brain areas present higher risks of complications and lower obliteration rates, emphasizing the need for cautious, individualized treatment planning. Within the eloquent group, embolization increased the risk of complications, while surgery and radiosurgery showed comparable functional outcomes at last follow-up and complication rates with higher complete obliteration rates in surgery. These findings highlight the importance of location in AVM management and support further research focusing on comparing treatment strategies for AVMs in eloquent brain areas.

Background Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are abnormal connections between feeding arteries and draining veins, associated with significant risks of haemorrhage, seizures and other neurological deficits. Preoperative embolization is commonly used as an adjunct to microsurgical resection, with the aim of reducing intraoperative complications and improving outcomes. However, the efficacy and safety of this approach remain controversial. Methods This study is a subanalysis of the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs consortium. We retrospectively analysed 486 patients with brain AVMs treated with microsurgical resection between January 2010 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent microsurgery alone (n=245) and those who received preoperative embolization, followed by microsurgery (n=241). Propensity score matching was employed, resulting in 288 matched patients (144 in each group). The primary outcomes were rates of complete AVM obliteration and functional outcomes (measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS)). Secondary outcomes included complication rates, mortality, hospital length of stay and postsurgical rupture. Results After matching, the complete obliteration rate was 97% with no significant difference between the microsurgery-only group and the preoperative embolization group (p=0.12). The proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0–2 at the last follow-up was similar in both groups (83% vs 84%; p=0.67). The median hospital stay was significantly longer for the embolisation group (9 days vs 7 days; p=0.017). Complication rates (24% vs 22%; p=0.57) and mortality rates (4.9% vs 2.1%; p=0.20) were comparable between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in postsurgical rupture, recurrence or retreatment rates. Conclusions In this large multicentre study, preoperative embolization did not significantly improve AVM obliteration rates, functional outcomes or reduce complications compared with microsurgery alone.

ABSTRACT Genes involved in the regulation of chromatin structure are frequently disrupted in cancer, contributing to an aberrant transcriptome and phenotypic plasticity. Yet, therapeutics targeting mutant forms of chromatin-modifying enzymes have yielded only modest clinical utility, underscoring the difficulty of targeting the epigenomic underpinnings of aberrant gene regulatory networks. Here, we sought to identify novel epigenetic vulnerabilities in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Through phenotypic screens and biochemical analysis, we demonstrated that inhibition of the H3K9 demethylases KDM4A and KDM4C elicits potent, subtype-agnostic cytotoxicity by antagonizing transcriptional networks associated with B-cell identity and epigenetically rewiring heterochromatin. KDM4 demethylases associated with the KRAB zinc finger ZNF587, and their enzymatic inhibition led to DNA replication stress and DNA damage-induced cGAS-STING activation. Broad surveys of transcriptional data from patients also revealed KDM4 family dysregulation in several other cancer types. To explore this potential therapeutic avenue, we performed high-throughput small molecule screens with H3K9me3 nucleosome substrates and identified novel KDM4 demethylase inhibitors. AI-guided protein-ligand binding predictions suggested diverse modes of action for various small molecule hits. Our findings underscore the relevance of targeting fundamental transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms for anti-cancer therapy. HIGHLIGHTS Phenotypic screens identified JIB-04 as a potent anti-cancer agent for multiple subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma JIB-04 binds and inhibits KDM4 demethylases resulting in epigenomic rewiring of heterochromatin KDM4 demethylases cooperate with KRAB zinc fingers to limit DNA replication stress, and KDM4 inhibition instigates DNA-damage and cGAS-STING activation in several human cancers High-throughput small molecule screens with semi-synthetic nucleosome substrates and AI-guided molecular docking simulations identify novel KDM4 inhibitors

Abstract Background There is limited data on the clinical effectiveness of upadacitinib (UPA), an oral selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 (JAKi), in patients with perianal Crohn's disease (pCD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of UPA in pCD. Methods This retrospective analysis utilized data on adults (&gt;17 years) who initiated UPA at 45 mg/day for active pCD across 10 centers in the United States and Canada. Standardized data extraction and entry protocols were followed. The primary outcome was clinical response, defined as a ≥3-point reduction in Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI) between baseline and follow-up. Secondary outcomes included normalization of CRP (&lt;5 mg/L) or hsCRP (&lt;1 mg/L), clinical remission (PDAI ≤4), and rates of hospitalization, antibiotic use, corticosteroid initiation, and new pCD-related surgeries. Fistula healing on MRI pelvis fistula protocol was defined as an absence of T2-weighted hyperintensity and post-contrast enhancement on T1-weighted images. Predictive analyses used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate baseline factors influencing time to PDAI remission, including BMI, CRP, albumin, PDAI, pCD disease duration, Montreal location and prior biologic exposure (&lt;2 vs 2+). Results A total of 81 patients were treated with UPA for pCD (median age 35 years and 54.3% male). Most had ileocolonic disease (65.4%), with 54% presenting with complex fistulas. Of these, 92.6% had prior anti-TNF exposure, and 91 (88.9%) had prior exposure to 2+ biologics (Table 1). During a median follow-up of 4 months, clinical response (PDAI) was achieved in 17.3%. Improvement was observed in pain and restriction of activities (27.2%), restriction of sexual activity (13.6%), reduction in number of fistulas (11.1%), degree of induration (11.1%), and discharge (35.8%). Median CRP reduction was 21.05% [IQR: 0.00–74.53], and 21.0% achieved a ≥50% reduction in CRP. MRI healing was limited to 17.7% (6/34). Proctitis decreased from 23.5% at baseline to 7.4% at follow-up. During follow-up, hospitalizations occurred in 9.9%, 14.8% required antibiotics, 8.6% underwent examination under anesthesia in 8.6%, seton placement in 6.2%, and abscess drainage in 6.2%. Patients with ileocolonic disease showed the highest remission (54%) and response (15%) rates, while MRI healing was limited across all Montreal locations (7.4%). Lower baseline CRP (p &lt; 0.05) and PDAI scores (p &lt; 0.01) predicted shorter time to remission. Number of prior biologic exposures (p =0.2) and Montreal location (p = 0.7) were not predictive of time to PDAI remission (Figure 1). Conclusion UPA in a real-world cohort is effective in the management of treatment-refractory pCD. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these observations.

Abstract Background Upadacitinib (UPA) is an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the management of moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD). One in ten CD patients may need a permanent ostomy (colostomy or ileostomy) during their disease course, and this may impact the efficacy of UPA, given its extended-release formulation. However, there is no data available in this population since patients with an ostomy are excluded from registrational CD trials. This study addresses this gap by comparing the real-world clinical effectiveness of UPA in CD patients with and without ostomy. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network of sixty-eight tertiary institutions, to examine adult (≥18 years) CD patients treated with UPA from May 19th, 2023 (FDA approval date) to October 31st, 2024. Patients were categorized based on presence or absence of an ostomy during the previous 5 years, after exclusion of patients with rheumatologic disease indications for UPA usage. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance cohorts on demographics, baseline comorbidities, and CD severity indicators (CD phenotype, extraintestinal manifestations, concurrent corticosteroid and other biologics usage, hemoglobin, and body weight). Cox proportional hazards model estimated hazard ratios (HRs) in matched cohorts for clinical effectiveness as a composite outcome (corticosteroid use, hospitalizations, emergency room visits) and secondary individual outcomes, at one year post-treatment, with a significance threshold set at p &lt; 0.05. Results The study sample of CD patients on UPA included 170 with and 1,428 without a prior ostomy. There were 144 patients in each cohort after PSM. Baseline characteristics of the cohorts are shown in Figure 1. After PSM (Figure 2), there were no significant differences between patients with CD on UPA, with and without prior ostomy, for composite outcomes (HR 0.93, p = 0.64), corticosteroid use (HR 0.78, p = 0.18), hospitalizations (HR 1.13, p = 0.64), or emergency room visits (HR 0.99, p = 0.97). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in opioid use (HR 0.95, p = 0.76), switch to another advanced therapy (HR 1.62, p = 0.06), or elevated biomarkers, including CRP (&gt;10 mg/L, HR 1.00, p = 0.99) and fecal calprotectin (&gt;150 µg/g, HR 0.85, p = 0.63) at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion In CD patients, UPA demonstrated similar effectiveness for clinical outcomes of corticosteroid use, hospitalizations, emergency room visits and other secondary outcomes, regardless of their ostomy status.

Abstract Background The SEQUENCE trial, in bio-exposed Crohn's disease (CD) patients, demonstrated non-inferiority for clinical remission at 24 weeks and superiority for endoscopic remission at week 48 for risankizumab (RZB) compared to ustekinumab (UST). However, this comparison has not been adequately explored in bio-naive CD patients. Our study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness among bio-naive CD patients treated with RZB vs. UST in a real-world setting, using data from a US-based multicenter cohort. Methods This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, comprising sixty-eight tertiary institutions, to examine adult (≥18 years) bio-naive CD patients initiated on RZB or UST from June 17th, 2022 (FDA approval date) to October 31st, 2024. Patients with prior advanced therapy usage and those with approved rheumatologic disease indications for RZB/UST were excluded. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to balance cohorts on demographics, baseline comorbidities, and indicators of CD severity, including CD phenotype, extraintestinal manifestations, concurrent corticosteroid use, hemoglobin, and body weight. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) in matched cohorts for one-year post-treatment composite outcomes (need for corticosteroids, hospitalizations, emergency room visits, surgeries) with a priori significance threshold of p &lt; 0.05. Results The study sample included 1,630 bio-naive CD patients treated with RZB and 3,105 with UST. Among patients on UST, 658 (21%) were dosed every four to six weeks, after the first dose. Baseline characteristics of the PSM RZB and UST cohorts are shown in Table 1 with 1,568 patients in each cohort. After PSM (Figure 1), there were no significant differences in composite outcome (HR 1.077, p = 0.170), corticosteroid use (HR 1.099, p = 0.110), CD-related surgery (HR 1.231, p = 0.284), hospitalization (HR 0.947, p = 0.615) or ER visits (HR 1.041, p = 0.687). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in opioid use (HR 1.062, p = 0.366), switch to different advanced therapy (HR 1.097, p = 0.468) or elevated disease biomarkers, including CRP (&gt;10mg/l, HR 1.186 p = 0.101) or fecal calprotectin (&gt;150 µg/g; HR 1.109, p = 0.407) at 1-year follow-up. Conclusion In this real-world experience allowing for drug optimization, no difference was observed in bio naïve patients between UST and RZB as far as clinical remission and progression of CD.

Abstract Therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (t-MN), characterized by its association with prior exposure to cytotoxic therapy, remains poorly understood and is a major impediment to long-term survival even in the era of novel targeted therapies due to its aggressive nature and treatment resistance. Previously, cytotoxic therapy–induced genomic changes in hematopoietic stem cells were considered sine qua non in pathogenesis; however, recent research demonstrates a complex interaction between acquired and hereditary genetic predispositions, along with a profoundly senescent bone marrow (BM) microenvironment. We review emerging data on t-MN risk factors and explore the intricate interplay among clonal hematopoiesis, genetic predisposition, and the abnormal BM microenvironment. Significance: t-MN represents a poorly understood blood cancer with extremely poor survival and no effective therapies. We provide a comprehensive review of recent preclinical research highlighting complex interaction among emerging therapies, hereditary and acquired genetic factors, and BM microenvironment. Understanding the risk factors associated with t-MN is crucial for clinicians, molecular pathologists, and cancer biologists to anticipate and potentially reduce its incidence in the future. Moreover, better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of t-MN may enable preemptive screening and even intervention in high-risk patients.

Background Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are uncommon cerebral lesions that can cause significant neurological complications. Surgical resection is the gold standard for treatment, but endovascular embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are viable alternatives. Objective To compare the outcomes of endovascular embolization versus SRS in the treatment of AVMs with Spetzler-Martin grades I–III. Methods This study combined retrospective data from 10 academic institutions in North America and Europe. Patients aged 1 to 90 years who underwent endovascular embolization or SRS for AVMs with Spetzler-Martin grades I–III between January 2010 and December 2023 were included. Results The study included 244 patients, including 84 who had endovascular embolization and 160 who had SRS. Before propensity score matching (PSM), complete obliteration at the last follow-up was achieved in 74.5% of the SRS group compared with 57.8% of the embolization group (OR=0.47; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.48; P=0.01). After propensity score matching, SRS still achieved significantly higher occlusion rates at last follow-up (78.9% vs 55.3%; OR=0.32; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.90; P=0.03). Hemorrhagic complications were higher in the embolization group than in the SRS group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance after PSM (13.2% vs 2.6%; OR=5.6; 95% CI 0.62 to 50.47; P=0.12). Similarly, re-treatment rate was higher in the embolization group (10.5% vs 5.3%; OR=2.11; 95% CI 0.36 to 12.31; P=0.40) compared with the SRS group. Conclusion Our findings indicate that SRS has a significantly higher obliteration rate at last follow-up compared with endovascular embolization. Also, SRS has a higher tendency for fewer hemorrhagic complications and lower re-treatment rate. Further prospective studies are needed.