Citations

Abstract Both family caregivers and providers report numerous challenges to providing care for of adults with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (AD/RD). Many of these challenges stem from ineffective communication and coordination within the health and support service networks, including: (1) communication challenges posed by AD/RD patients; (2) communication barriers between caregivers and providers; and (3) communication barriers among providers across institutions. Caregivers increasingly rely on technology to fill gaps in their knowledge, identify social support, and learn how to execute more complex care demands. While technology has been suggested as an effective strategy for improving the quality of AD/RD care and support caregivers, the role that public policy and research can and should play in advancing the goal of such tech-based solutions is still emerging. This is especially true in respect to how technology can strengthen care networks for patients and caregivers who are racial/ethnic minorities and/or living in rural communities. This presentation will identify the role that past legislation (e.g. the Affordable Care Act, HITECH, Medicaid) has played, as well as the role that recent and proposed legislation (e.g. RAISE Caregiver Act, CARE Act, 21st Century Cures Act, BOLD Infrastructure for Alzheimer’s Act, Older American’s Act reauthorization) should play in strengthening the health, support networks that caregivers interact with to provide ongoing care. This presentation will also summarize the current state of research on caregiver technologies and discusses how future research and policy initiatives can promote the translation of tech-based interventions into everyday care settings.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the United States, with less than half of patients living >5 years from diagnosis. A major challenge in treating ovarian cancer is that most patients have advanced disease at initial diagnosis. The best outcomes are observed in patients whose primary treatment includes complete resection of all visible disease plus combination platinum-based chemotherapy. Research efforts are focused on primary neoadjuvant treatments that may improve resectability, as well as systemic therapies providing improved long-term survival. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy recommendations, including the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and the role of PARP inhibitors and bevacizumab as maintenance therapy options in select patients who have completed primary chemotherapy.

Abstract A key resistance mechanism to platinum-based chemotherapies and PARP inhibitors in BRCA-mutant cancers is the acquisition of BRCA reversion mutations that restore protein function. To estimate the prevalence of BRCA reversion mutations in high-grade ovarian carcinoma (HGOC), we performed targeted next-generation sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from pretreatment and postprogression plasma in patients with deleterious germline or somatic BRCA mutations treated with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib. BRCA reversion mutations were identified in pretreatment cfDNA from 18% (2/11) of platinum-refractory and 13% (5/38) of platinum-resistant cancers, compared with 2% (1/48) of platinum-sensitive cancers (P = 0.049). Patients without BRCA reversion mutations detected in pretreatment cfDNA had significantly longer rucaparib progression-free survival than those with reversion mutations (median, 9.0 vs. 1.8 months; HR, 0.12; P < 0.0001). To study acquired resistance, we sequenced 78 postprogression cfDNA, identifying eight additional patients with BRCA reversion mutations not found in pretreatment cfDNA. Significance: BRCA reversion mutations are detected in cfDNA from platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory HGOC and are associated with decreased clinical benefit from rucaparib treatment. Sequencing of cfDNA can detect multiple BRCA reversion mutations, highlighting the ability to capture multiclonal heterogeneity. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 151

Purpose To (1) assess clinical outcomes of revision multiligament knee injury (MLKI) reconstruction at a minimum of 2 years' follow‐up and (2) present a standardized treatment algorithm used in treating revision MLKI patients. Methods A retrospective review of our institution's MLKI database was performed to identify all patients who underwent revision MLKI reconstructions (≥2 ligaments reconstructed) after implementation of a standardized treatment algorithm in 2000 and had a minimum of 2 years' follow‐up. Patient demographic information, injury description (mechanism of injury, neurovascular status, knee dislocation grade, associated chondral or meniscal injury), surgical technique (repair vs reconstruction, staged vs nonstaged, concomitant procedures), mechanism of failure, knee stability, and range of motion, as well as International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores, were obtained. Results We assessed 23 patients (8 female and 15 male patients), with an average age of 26.7 ± 11.5 years at primary surgery and 30.8 ± 11.0 years at revision surgery. The mean follow‐up period was 7.5 ± 5.3 years. Of the 23 patients, 10 (43.4%) underwent staged revision procedures: isolated bone grafting in 3, osteotomy in 4, hardware removal with osteochondral allograft in 1, hardware removal with bone grafting in 1, and meniscus repair for a locked knee in 1. The average International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores were 74.5 ± 22.3 and 79.4 ± 20.2, respectively. High‐energy injury and increasing age at revision surgery were the only risk factors found to be associated with significantly worse outcomes ( P < .05). Conclusions Patients with recurrent instability after MLKI reconstruction present with many concomitant pathologies, including limb malalignment, bone tunnel widening, retained hardware, meniscal incompetence, and cartilage defects. Revision MLKI reconstruction can provide these patients with modest functional outcomes when a standardized treatment algorithm is used focusing on identification and treatment of the concomitant pathology, often in a staged manner. Level of Evidence Level IV, case series.

Abstract Germline and somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) confer PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Promoter hypermethylation is an alternate mechanism of gene down-regulation, and BRCA1 promoter methylation is relatively common in sporadic ovarian cancer. The clinical significance of BRCA1 methylation is less clear than for mutations, as the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and others have failed to show improved survival in ovarian carcinomas with BRCA1 methylation. No one has previously tested whether BRCA1 methylation confers in vivo sensitivity to PARP inhibitors in patients with ovarian cancer. ARIEL2 is a phase 2 study of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with recurrent platinum sensitive high-grade ovarian, peritoneal or fallopian tube carcinoma. At enrollment, ARIEL2 required pre-treatment tumor biopsies with the goal of developing tissue predictors of PARP inhibitor sensitivity other than BRCA mutations. The number of women with known germline mutations was capped at 15 patients in order to predominantly enroll BRCA wildtype cases. As presented at ASCO 2016, in cases with no BRCA mutations, a high fraction of genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) significantly predicted a better progression-free survival (the primary endpoint), longer duration of response, and a higher fraction of responders compared to cases with low LOH. We assessed BRCA1 and RAD51C promoter hypermethylation using methylation-sensitive polymerase chain reaction in paired archival and pre-treatment biopsies from patients on ARIEL2. Of 165 cases for which methylation analyses were completed, 21 (12.7%) were methylated at the BRCA1 promoter and four (2.4%) at the RAD51C promoter. Methylation of BRCA1 and RAD51C was mutually exclusive with mutation in BRCA or other homologous recombination genes. All four cases with RAD51C methylation and 15/19 (78.9%) with BRCA1 methylation were associated with high LOH. In 90 paired samples archival and pre-treatment tissues, RAD51C methylation was 100% concordant and BRCA1 methylation was highly concordant (p&lt;0·001). For 13 cases with BRCA1 methylation in the archival specimen, 4 (30·8%) were unmethylated in the paired pretreatment tumor, but for 77 unmethylated archival specimens, gain of methylation in the pretreatment biopsy was observed just once. Confirmed RECIST responses were seen in 52.4% (11/21) BRCA1 methylated and 75.0% (3/4) RAD51C methylated cases. In conclusion, BRCA1 and RAD51C methylation in ovarian carcinomas correlates with a high response rate to PARP inhibitors. If methylation was to be used as a predictor of PARP inhibitor sensitivity, it would need to be assessed in a pre-treatment (not archival) specimen. The loss of BRCA1 methylation in recurrent ovarian carcinoma, which was common even in these platinum sensitive cases, could explain why BRCA1 methylation is associated with similar survival to methylated cases, despite initial improved therapeutic sensitivity. Citation Format: Elizabeth Swisher, Maria Harrell, Kevin K. Lin, Clare Scott, Sandra Goble, Amit Oza, Robert L. Coleman, Gottfried Konecny, Anna V. Tinker, David M. O'Malley, Rebecca Kristeleit, Ling Ma, James Brenton, Katherine Bell-McGuinn, Ana Oaknin, Alexandra Leary, Elaina Mann, Heidi Giordano, Mitch Rapon, Iain McNeish, Scott H. Kaufmann. BRCA1 and RAD51C Promoter Hypermethylation Confer Sensitivity to PARP Inhibitors in Patients with Platinum Sensitive Ovarian Carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 12-13, 2016; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(11 Suppl):Abstract nr AP28.

Abstract High-grade epithelial ovarian carcinomas containing mutated BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) homologous recombination (HR) genes are sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors (PARPi), while restoration of HR function due to secondary mutations in BRCA1/2 has been recognized as an important resistance mechanism. We sequenced core HR pathway genes in 12 pairs of pretreatment and postprogression tumor biopsy samples collected from patients in ARIEL2 Part 1, a phase II study of the PARPi rucaparib as treatment for platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian carcinoma. In 6 of 12 pretreatment biopsies, a truncation mutation in BRCA1, RAD51C, or RAD51D was identified. In five of six paired postprogression biopsies, one or more secondary mutations restored the open reading frame. Four distinct secondary mutations and spatial heterogeneity were observed for RAD51C. In vitro complementation assays and a patient-derived xenograft, as well as predictive molecular modeling, confirmed that resistance to rucaparib was associated with secondary mutations. Significance: Analyses of primary and secondary mutations in RAD51C and RAD51D provide evidence for these primary mutations in conferring PARPi sensitivity and secondary mutations as a mechanism of acquired PARPi resistance. PARPi resistance due to secondary mutations underpins the need for early delivery of PARPi therapy and for combination strategies. Cancer Discov; 7(9); 984–98. ©2017 AACR. See related commentary by Domchek, p. 937. See related article by Quigley et al., p. 999. See related article by Goodall et al., p. 1006. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 920