Citations

Goals: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsies and to identify predictors of positive colonic histology in patients with chronic diarrhea. Background: Colonoscopy with biopsies is performed in chronic diarrhea with negative initial work-up. Study: We reviewed electronic medical records of 1022 consecutive patients with chronic diarrhea referred for a first colonoscopy (including 25% open-access referrals). Predictors of positive colonic histology were investigated using logistic regression. Results: Four hundred thirteen patients with macroscopically normal colon were divided into derivation (n=275) and validation (n=138) cohorts. All patients underwent colonoscopy; 369 had ileoscopy (biopsies in 43%), and 289 underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (duodenal biopsies in 93%). In patients with endoscopically normal colon, histology was positive in 13.3%: 10.6% microscopic colitis; 1.5% other colitides. Among 358 patients with negative histology, the recorded diagnoses were: 48% unexplained, 25% irritable bowel syndrome, 5.6% small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, and 4.7% bile acid diarrhea. The rates of diagnoses based on positive histologies were 4% for ileal and 5% for duodenal biopsies. Older age [odds ratio (OR)=1.05] was a positive predictor, whereas body mass index (OR=0.93) and duration of diarrhea (OR=0.98) were negative predictors of positive histology. A clinical diagnostic scoring system could correctly predict 41% to 54% of patients with normal colonic histology, with a false-negative rate of 0.8% to 2.6% and a negative predictive value of 95% to 98%. Conclusions: Positive colonic biopsies were detected in <15% of patients with chronic diarrhea with normal colonoscopy; a clinical score correctly predicts likelihood of normal histology in about half the patients.

Abstract Background We sought to compare the dysplasia detection rate of high-definition white light endoscopy (HDWLE) with that of chromoendoscopy in patients with long-standing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods This is a retrospective observational cohort of patients with IBD who underwent surveillance colonoscopy between October 1, 2016 and September 30, 2017. We assessed the association between dysplasia detection and multiple variables. Results A total of 808 unique colonoscopies were performed, of which 150 (18.6%) included chromoendoscopy. Primary sclerosing cholangitis was a comorbid diagnosis in 24.5% of patients. The performing endoscopist was an IBD specialist with 37.1% of patients and had &gt;10 years’ experience with 64.9% of patients. Prior dysplasia had been seen in 245 (30.3%) patients: 102 (68.0%) and 143 (22.0%) among patients who had chromoendoscopy and HDWLE, respectively. Dysplasia in polyps was found in 129 procedures (15.1%). Among patients who had chromoendoscopy and HDWLE, polypoid dysplasia was identified in 50 (33.0%) and 79 (12.0%) patients, respectively, P &lt; 0.01. Dysplasia in random biopsies was found in 39 patients (4.8%): 15 (10%) who had chromoendoscopy and 24 (3.6%) who had HDWLE (P &lt; 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patient and disease characteristics significantly associated with an increased odds for polypoid dysplasia included older age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.3 per 10 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.60), having an IBD physician endoscopist (OR = 1.6; 95% CI, 1.01-2.67), having an endoscopist with less than 10 years’ experience (OR = 1.8; 95% CI (1.16-2.89), and prior random dysplasia (OR = 4.2; 95% CI (1.93-9.17). Concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis was significantly associated with random dysplasia (OR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.02-5.07). After multivariate analysis adjusting for these variables, chromoendoscopy was no more likely to identify dysplasia than was HDWLE. Conclusions Chromoendoscopy and HDWLE had a similar diagnostic yield for dysplasia detection in patients with chronic IBD-colitis after adjusting for multiple known risk factors.

Abstract Background and Aims We aimed to evaluate the relationship of serum adalimumab trough levels (ATL) with disease activity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in a large, well-characterized referral center-based cohort. Methods We compared serum ATL between those with clinical, biochemical, or endoscopic/radiologic disease activity and those without. Results A total of 236 patients with IBD were included. Higher cutoff levels were associated with endoscopic and/or radiologic responses (cutoff value: 5.3 mcg/mL, P = 0.003) compared with improvement in C-reactive protein (cutoff value: 4.3 mcg/mL, P = 0.031). Conclusions Higher cutoff ATL was associated with endoscopic and/or radiologic response.

LINKED CONTENTThis article is linked to Sebastian et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15456 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15498.

Abstract Background: Anemia is an extremely prevalent disease and contributes to a substantial percentage of worldwide years lived with disability. Clinicians generally agree that investigation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract with colonoscopy and/or endoscopy is warranted in the presence of either overt clinical evidence of GI bleeding or in the presence of documented iron deficiency. However, little is known about the appropriateness of these procedures in the evaluation of patients without either overt GI bleeding or iron deficiency. Additionally, while a large number of colonoscopies and endoscopies are performed each year, the proportion of such procedures performed in the absence of suspect history or findings has not been characterized. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients at Mayo Clinic Rochester who underwent endoscopy, colonoscopy, or both procedures between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015 for an indication of either "anemia" or "iron deficiency anemia." Sources of data included provider notes, laboratory values, procedure notes, and pathology reports. Information including patient demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, laboratory values related to anemia, findings at the time of gastrointestinal procedure, and procedure-related complications was collected. Data was entered into an electronic database and data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel. Results: 999 procedures were included, including 224 colonoscopies, 306 endoscopies, and 469 combined colonoscopy/endoscopies. Of the 999 total procedures, 78 (8%) had no documented pre-procedure hemoglobin value, 666 (67%) were performed after documented anemia (defined as hemoglobin ≤12 g/dL), and 255 (26%) were performed after a documented hemoglobin of >12 g/dL. Of the 675 procedures performed for "iron deficiency anemia," 462 (68%) patients had documented anemia and documented ferritin prior to the procedure, including only 237 (35%) with both hemoglobin ≤12 and ferritin ≤ 20. 388 (39%) had a documented pre-procedure patient and/or provider report of blood in the stool, and 111 (11%) had a documented pre-procedure positive hemoccult test. 365 (37%) of the 999 procedures identified a probable benign source of bleeding, 54 (5.4%) identified a probable malignant source, and 580 (58%) had no findings consistent with a bleeding source. Patients with documented anemia were more likely to have a probable bleeding source identified than those without documented anemia [46% versus 34%, p<.001]. Of the 83 patients with hemoglobin >12 and ferritin >20, only 1 procedure in 83 demonstrated a malignant finding, and this patient did have blood in the stool at the time of the procedure. There were 46 patients who underwent a procedure without any "warning signs" (either anemia and/or blood in the stool and/or positive hemoccult). Of these patients, 0 had a malignant finding. Conclusions: A large number of procedures performed for either "anemia" or "iron deficiency anemia" were done without pre-procedure documentation of anemia and/or iron deficiency. Documentation of anemia is associated with an increased chance of finding a source of bleeding during the procedure. There were no missed diagnoses of malignancy among patients undergoing procedures without anemia, blood in the stool, and/or positive hemoccult. Careful attention to documentation should be encouraged, and quality improvement initiatives requiring appropriate documentation prior to performing these procedures may be helpful. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

INTRODUCTION: Gastroparesis is defined as delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Diabetes and medication side effects are common causes. AL amyloidosis is a systemic disease due to extracellular fibril deposition that can affect multiple organs. Gastro-intestinal (GI) involvement is less common than in other organ systems but can present in many different ways, including gastroparesis. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS: A 77 year old non-diabetic man from Mississippi presented with a one year history of intermittent abdominal distention, nausea and bloating. In addition, he had increasing dyspnea on exertion and lower extremity edema. Outside work-up consisted of multiple imaging studies demonstrating marked gastric distention as well as delayed gastric emptying (Figures 1 and 2). Outside colonoscopy was unrevealing and EGD was negative except for a distal esophageal ulcer and focal active duodenitis. He was started on a PPI and trialed on an alternating regimen of metoclopramide and erythromycin, without symptomatic relief. He was referred to our hospital for further diagnostic work-up. Repeat colonoscopy showed congested distal ileal mucosa and friable ascending colonic mucosa. Biopsies from both sites revealed amyloid deposits by Congo red stain (Figure 3). Serum protein electrophoresis noted a monoclonal IgG lambda peak with M-spike of 1.5 g/dL and bone marrow biopsy revealed approximately 70% of marrow cellularity consisting of plasma cells. Echocardiogram confirmed severely increased concentric left ventricular wall thickening consistent with cardiac amyloidosis. Interestingly, neither fat pad biopsy nor bone marrow biopsy showed presence of amyloid. The patient was diagnosed with myeloma and AL amyloidosis with gastro-intestinal and cardiac involvement. DISCUSSION: This case highlights the broad differential for gastric distention and dysmotility. When the ‘usual suspects’ such as diabetes, medication, post-surgery and neurological disease have been ruled out, rarer causes like an infiltrative process should be considered. Common manifestations of GI tract amyloidosis include GI bleeding, malabsorption, protein-losing enteropathy and chronic dysmotility. The diagnosis of amyloidosis is based on positive tissue diagnosis. While the combination of a fat pad and a bone marrow biopsy has a high sensitivity (89%) for diagnosing AL amyloidosis, negative results do not rule out amyloid elsewhere and tissue sampling from the affected organ site is essential, as demonstrated in this case.

INTRODUCTION: Double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is an important tool for evaluation of obscure GI bleeding but is a limited resource given time and expertise required. Patient selection is important to help optimize diagnostic yield and subsequent successful management of small bowel bleeding. To maximize the efficiency of DBE performed, our endoscopy group established a screening protocol (Figure) prior to approval of any procedure. We developed a quality improvement project to assess the efficacy of this screening protocol and to evaluate which components of screening were most predictive for procedural success. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent anterograde or retrograde double balloon enteroscopy for suspected GI bleeding from January 2016 to December 2017. Our screening protocol was implemented on February 1 st , 2017. Data was obtained on patient demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory evaluation, and prior investigation for bleeding evaluation. Endoscopy outcomes were separated into procedural success, defined as lesion identified, and clinical success, defined as resolution of bleeding. Success rates were compared pre and post intervention. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate which components best predicted a successful procedure. RESULTS: We reviewed 114 DBE procedures in 89 patients, 53.5% male (n = 61) with a mean age of 62.8 + 13.3 years. Of these, 86% (n = 98) were performed prior to initiation of the screening protocol. Overall, there was no significant difference in procedural success pre and post intervention as defined by presence of recurrent bleeding, persistent anemia, or transfusion need (Table 1). On univariate analysis of clinical success, defined as lack of recurrent bleeding, gender, anticoagulation use, and presence of lesion on CE were significant (Table 2). Identification and intervention on a lesion during the balloon endoscopy did not impact future anemia, bleeding, or transfusion requirements. CONCLUSION: The patient screening protocol was successful in decreasing the number of procedures performed but did not improve our lesion detection rate on endoscopy and did not improve clinical outcomes as measured by rebleeding. Patients on anticoagulation and those who had prior lesions identified on capsule endoscopy had higher odds of rebleeding, indicating clinical failure. This data may help modify patient selection to maximize success of DBE procedures in the future.