Citations

465 Background: Molecular testing is crucial in advancing precision medicine, enabling oncologists to tailor targeted treatment strategies for cancer patients (pts). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and ASCO guidelines recommend comprehensive biomarker testing for pts with mPC. However, compliance can vary considerably among institutions. This study aimed to assess current practices of molecular testing in diverse healthcare settings across the state of Florida and identify opportunities for improvement to optimize outcomes for pts diagnosed with mPC. Methods: We conducted a detailed 12-question survey, distributed both electronically and in-person to evaluate the molecular testing practices of healthcare providers throughout the state. The survey assessed multiple parameters including adherence to testing, reviewing test results to guide treatment decisions, and the availability of different supportive resources in biomarker testing. This initiative was executed in partnership with the Florida Society of Clinical Oncology and industry partners. Results: A total of 40 responses were collected from 11 institutions in Florida, including 5 academic centers and 6 community-based hospitals. Notably, 22.5% of respondents reported that their institutions either do not fully comply with NCCN guidelines or lack protocols to identify eligible pts and 67.5% stated they are responsible for their own biomarker education and updates. Only 56.4% consistently review molecular testing results during disease progression to guide treatment decisions. Nearly all institutions lack clinical decision support tools in the electronic medical records (EMR) to support testing, and 82.5% receive biomarker results outside the EMR. Additionally, 38.5% lack a standard process for obtaining prior authorization for testing. Furthermore, 38.5% lack a multidisciplinary review process for genetic test results, and 76.3% reported that their biomarker testing process does not involve geneticists or genetic counselors. Conclusions: Our study identified critical gaps in adherence to biomarker testing guidelines with many practices lacking decision support tools across healthcare institutions in Florida. Potential areas for improvement include better standardization of result integration into EMR, targeted educational initiatives, and stronger multidisciplinary collaborations. The implementation of these measures aims to improve the quality of care and outcomes for pts with mPC.

Background: An extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) is commonly used to improve exposure and facilitate femoral component removal in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). An additional medial corticotomy may be used in conjunction with an ETO to correct a femoral deformity, particularly varus remodeling in association with a failed femoral component. This study evaluated the outcomes of combining an ETO with a medial corticotomy in revision THA, with emphasis on implant fixation, femoral alignment, bone union, and clinical outcomes. Methods: Of the 612 ETOs performed between 2003 and 2013, 13 patients (9 men and 4 women) underwent ETO combined with a medial corticotomy to correct varus remodeling, representing 2% of all ETOs during that period. The average follow-up was 8 ± 3.5 years. The mean age at surgery was 67 ± 13.5 years. The mean body mass index was 32 ± 7.7 kg/m 2 . Radiographs were reviewed to measure preoperative and postoperative femoral deformity, time to consolidation, and femoral fixation. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Results: All patients had preoperative varus femoral deformity (mean 16.3° ± 5.7°). The mean postoperative alignment was 4.3 ± 1.6° varus achieving an average correction of 12° (95% CI −15.7 to −8.3, p < 0.0001). Both the ETO and the medial corticotomy consolidated in 10 of 11 patients (91%) with available 1-year radiographs at a mean of 11 ± 7.7 months. The mean HHS improved significantly from 42 preoperatively to 82 at 5-year follow-up (p = 0.0002). Complications related to the ETO and corticotomy occurred in 4 patients (30%), including 1 intraoperative fracture, 1 postoperative greater trochanteric fracture, 1 nonunion of the medial corticotomy, and 1 postoperative wound-hematoma. All femoral components remained well fixed at final follow-up. Conclusion: The combination of ETO and medial corticotomy in revision THA effectively corrected femoral alignment in patients with a preoperative varus deformity and was associated with significant functional improvement at the final follow-up. Level of Evidence: Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

ABSTRACT Objective The optimal treatment for neurosarcoidosis myelitis is uncertain. We characterize incident neurosarcoidosis myelitis and assess treatment response by MRI and clinical scales. Methods Incident probable or definite neurosarcoidosis myelitis in adults was retrospectively identified from 13 academic medical centers. Cases were analyzed by initial treatment. The primary outcome was T1 post‐contrast gadolinium enhancement resolution at 6 months post‐treatment. Secondary outcomes were changes in modified Rankin scale (mRS) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) from nadir to final follow‐up. Results Two hundred two patients were identified (median diagnosis age: 47 years (IQR 39–55); male: female 1.3:1). Median nadir mRS and EDSS were 2 (IQR 2–3) and 4 (IQR 2.5–6). At initial treatment, 129 (63.9%) received prolonged corticosteroids ≥ 4 weeks (group A 1 ), 36 (17.8%) received corticosteroids < 4 weeks (B 1 ), 21 (10.4%) received corticosteroids plus sarcoidosis‐directed immunosuppressant (E), and 16 (7.9%) received corticosteroids plus non‐sarcoidosis‐directed agents (F). In 167 cases with sufficient imaging, there were no significant differences in contrast enhancement resolution at 6 months (A 1 27/106 (25.5%), B 1 9/28 (32.1%), E 5/19 (26.3%), F 5/14 (35.7%); Fisher's exact p = 0.76). There were no significant differences in changes in mRS or EDSS among treatment groups (Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.69 and 0.63, respectively) after median follow‐up of 46.5 months (IQR 18–91.3). Interpretation Different initial immunosuppression strategies did not correlate with MRI contrast enhancement resolution at 6 months or clinical scales (mRS, EDSS). However, conclusions are limited by retrospective design, imbalanced cohorts, and insensitivity of binary MRI outcomes and available clinical scales for treatment response in neurosarcoidosis.

Background: Although patients often aim to lose weight after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA), long-term changes in body mass index (BMI) are unknown. We analyzed BMI at 2, 5, and 10 years after primary THA and TKA and determined predictors of BMI change. Methods: We identified patients who underwent primary THA or TKA for osteoarthritis between 2001 and 2011 and had a BMI at surgery and at 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. This resulted in 763 patients (310 who underwent THA and 453 who underwent TKA). The mean patient age was 66 years, and 60% of patients were female. BMI changes were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. Multinomial logistic regression determined predictors of BMI change. Results: Following THA, the mean BMI increased from 30.3 kg/m 2 at surgery to 30.9 kg/m 2 at both 2 years (p = 0.003) and 5 years (p = 0.002). Following TKA, the mean BMI increased from 32.7 kg/m 2 at surgery to 33.1 kg/m 2 at both 2 years (p = 0.053) and 5 years (p = 0.040). By 10 years, the mean BMI was 30.6 kg/m 2 (p = 0.453) for patients undergoing THA and 32.6 kg/m 2 (p = 0.947) for patients undergoing TKA, similar to the BMIs at surgery. At 10 years, 27% of patients who underwent THA and 30% of patients who underwent TKA had a BMI decrease of >5%, whereas 30% of patients who underwent THA and 32% of patients who underwent TKA had a BMI increase of >5%. Female sex among patients who underwent THA increased the odds of a >5% BMI increase at 10 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; p = 0.006). Older age among patients who underwent TKA decreased the odds of a >5% BMI increase at 10 years (OR per year, 0.95; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although most patients experienced a BMI change of >5% at 10 years, the mean BMI did not meaningfully change 2, 5, or 10 years after THA or TKA. Arthroplasty should not be viewed as a gateway to BMI improvement for patients overall, but female sex and older age may predict clinically important weight changes 10 years after arthroplasty. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abstract Introduction Biliary-tract cancers, including intra- and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma, are uncommon but highly lethal. They represent roughly 2–3 % of new cancer diagnoses yet contribute about 5 % of cancer-related deaths. Complete surgical resection remains the foundation of curative treatment, whereas the value of peri-operative chemotherapy continues to be debated. Materials and Methods The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients diagnosed with non- metastatic biliary tract cancer at age 18 or older between 2004 and 2019. After excluding patients with unknown timing of surgery and chemotherapy, patients who died within 90 days of the most definitive primary site surgery, and patients lost to follow-up, we split the cohort into three groups according to the clinical stage (stage I-III). Then, we evaluated the overall survival (OS) between the different treatment modalities (surgery only, chemotherapy only, adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery) in each group. We studied the OS using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariate Cox regression analyses to evaluate factors associated with OS. Results A total of 35,260 patients with non-metastatic biliary tract cancers were included in the analysis, of which 50.4% were females, 83% Caucasians, and 9.5% African Americans. The median age at diagnosis was 70 (range 18-90). 14,757 (41.9%) were stage I, 12,472 (35.4%) stage II, and 8,031 (22.8%) stage III. 7,286 (20.7%) had surgical resection only, 8,144 (23.1%) had chemotherapy only, 6,964 (19.7%) had surgical resection with perioperative chemotherapy, and 12,866 (36.5%) did not receive any treatment. We compared survival between different treatment modalities based on clinical stage. In stage I, patients treated with surgery alone exhibited superior median OS compared with those receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (65.7 vs 50.4 months, P < 0.001). Median OS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was numerically higher than surgery alone (79.8 vs 65.7 months); however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.63). Whereas in stage II, patients who were treated with adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy had better mOS compared to those treated with surgery only (33.9 and 40.3 vs 29.9 months with P<0.001 and P=0.005, respectively). The same trend was seen in stage III, patients who were treated with adjuvant and those treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy had better mOS compared to surgery only (22.6 and 41.5 vs 19.5 months, respectively, with P<0.001 for all). In multivariate analysis, adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not affect the OS in all stages, except in stage III, where neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better OS (HR 0.646, 95% CI 0.530-0.786; P<0.001). Conclusion Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy do not seem to have a survival benefit in early-stage (stage I and II) biliary tract cancers, whereas neoadjuvant chemotherapy tends to improve OS in stage III.

Background: Surgeons often recommend weight loss for patients with obesity before total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it is unknown whether preoperative weight loss affects outcomes. The goals of this study were to determine how many patients with obesity lost weight before TKA, to identify weight loss predictors, and to evaluate if preoperative weight loss affected postoperative outcomes. Methods: Among 23,726 primary TKAs performed between 2002 and 2019, we identified 3,665 patients who had a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m 2 measured 1 to 24 months before surgery and had a weight measured at surgery. The mean patient age was 68 years, and 59% of patients were female. The mean patient BMI was 36 kg/m 2 . Univariable linear regressions evaluated weight loss predictors. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the impact of preoperative weight change on discharge, operative time, periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), complications, revisions, and reoperations. The mean follow-up was 6 years. Results: Overall, 20% of patients gained ≥5 pounds (1 pound = 0.45 kg), 39% maintained weight, 17% lost 5 to <10 pounds, 15% lost 10 to <20 pounds, and 9% lost ≥20 pounds before TKA. Male patients lost slightly more weight (−4.6 pounds) than female patients (−4.3 pounds) (p = 0.05). In univariable analyses, gaining >5 pounds was associated with increased odds of extended hospital length of stay (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; p = 0.01) and risk of complications (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; p < 0.01). Losing 10 to <20 pounds was associated with increased risks of revision (HR, 2.0; p = 0.01), PJI (HR, 3.1; p < 0.01), and complications (HR, 1.6; p = 0.03). In multivariable analyses, compared with maintaining weight, losing 10 to <20 pounds was associated with an increased risk of PJI (HR, 2.6; p = 0.01), whereas gaining >5 pounds was associated with an increased risk of complications (HR, 1.5; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Few patients with obesity lost substantial weight before primary TKA, and reaching common preoperative weight loss goals was not associated with improved outcomes. Although a healthy weight is important for general health, weight loss before TKA may not be sufficient to improve postoperative outcomes for most patients with obesity. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Objectives: Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is a rare and aggressive type of thyroid malignancy with a very poor prognosis and outcome despite therapy. The rarity of this disease and the poor functional status of ATC patients limit the ability to conduct clinical trials, thus there is a lack of large, controlled trials to guide treatment and evaluate the benefit of combined modality therapy. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients diagnosed with ATC at age 18 or older between 2004 and 2018. After excluding patients with unknown number of treatment modalities, Charlson-Deyo score—a weighted summary of 17 chronic disease categories where higher scores denote greater baseline comorbidity burden—of 3 or more and patients lost for follow-up, we split the cohort into 3 groups according to the number of treatment modalities they received. Treatment modalities included surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy. Then, we evaluated the overall survival (OS) between the 3 groups. We studied the OS using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariate Cox regression analyses to evaluate factors associated with OS. In addition, propensity score matching (accounting for age, sex, race, Charlson-Deyo score, and clinical M stage) was used for more robust results. Results: A total of 3460 patients with ATC were included in the analysis, of which 1472 (42.5%) either received one type of therapy or did not receive any therapy (group 1), 1092 (31.6%) received bimodal therapy (group 2), and 896 (25.9%) received trimodal therapy (group 3). We found that group 3 had better OS compared with group 1 and group 2 (median OS 9.1 vs. 1.7 and 4.9 mo, respectively, with P <0.001 for all comparisons). Propensity score matching yielded 896 patients in each group. We found that group 3 had better OS compared with group 1 and group 2 (median OS 9.1 vs. 1.9 and 5.2 mo, respectively, with P <0.001 for all comparisons). Same trend was found in subgroup analysis when we split the cohort according to the metastatic status; in M0 group (median OS was 10.4 vs. 1.9 and 6.1 mo, respectively, with P <0.001 for all), in M1 group (median OS was 5.9 vs. 1.4 and 3.7 mo, respectively, with P <0.001 for all). Modality-specific analyses further demonstrated that surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy each independently prolonged OS in both M0 and M1 cohorts (all P <0.001). These individual benefits explain the additive advantage of trimodal therapy and underscore that offering at least one evidence-based modality is preferable when comprehensive treatment is infeasible. On multivariate analysis, group 1 and group 2 were associated with worse OS compared with trimodal treatment (HR: 2.721; 95% CI: 2.466-3.002 and HR: 1.434; 95% CI: 1.299-1.582, P <0.001 for all). Conclusions: Patients with ATC who were treated with intensive trimodal therapy had statistically significant improvement in OS compared with patients who received less intense therapy. This survival benefit was observed in both metastatic and nonmetastatic groups. Although we acknowledge the limitations of this retrospective analysis, our results showed the critical role of an intensive therapy approach in this aggressive malignancy.

Background: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved a bupivacaine and meloxicam extended-release (ER) intra-articular injection for pain during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the real-world evidence with regard to analgesic efficacy of that medication has been limited. This randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy of this new medication compared with our standard periarticular injection for postoperative analgesia after primary TKA. Methods: Eligible patients undergoing primary, unilateral TKA for osteoarthritis at our academic center were enrolled. Patients were blinded and were randomized 1:1 to the bupivacaine-meloxicam ER (ZYNRELEF) injection group or the standard injection (ropivacaine, ketorolac, epinephrine) control group. A standardized, multimodal analgesic pathway was implemented. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores and tallies of opioid consumption were collected. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) for NRS pain, adjusted for opioid consumption, over 72 hours. The minimal clinically important difference was considered to be 30%. Power analysis determined a minimum of 44 patients per group. The final groups included 53 patients in the experimental group and 48 patients in the control group. Results: Similar postoperative analgesia was observed, with an AUC for the adjusted NRS pain score up to 72 hours of 331 in the experimental group and 373 in the control group (p = 0.09). The mean maximum NRS pain scores were similar and reflected good, but not complete, analgesia. Scores were 3 to 5 on the day of the surgery, 4 to 6 on postoperative day (POD) 1, 5 to 6 on POD 2, and 4 to 5 on POD 3 (p > 0.05). One patient in the experimental group and 2 patients in the control group had early postoperative complications, none of which was deemed to be related to the analgesic choice. Conclusions: This randomized clinical trial demonstrated similar analgesia with a bupivacaine-meloxicam ER solution and a standard periarticular injection up to 72 hours after primary TKA. Cost, reimbursement, and convenience may ultimately prove to be more important than analgesic differences when choosing between these 2 effective options for managing postoperative pain. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abstract Epcoritamab and glofitamab are CD20-directed bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) approved in the United States for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Limited data exist for patients treated outside of trials. Patients with R/R DLBCL receiving commercial epcoritamab or glofitamab between 1 January 2023 and 15 October 2024 were collected from 21 United States institutions. Among 245 patients, 156 received epcoritamab and 89 received glofitamab, 113 were refractory to front-line therapy, 40 had MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements, 147 received prior chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and 174 patients would have been ineligible for registrational trials. The overall response rate (ORR) for epcoritamab and glofitamab was 51% (23% complete response, [CR]) and 53% (30% CR), respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-3.8 months), and median overall survival (OS) was 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-11.0 months). The 6-month PFS was 36% (95% CI, 30-44) and the 6-month OS was 60% (95% CI, 54-67). Both trial ineligibility and undetectable CD20 pre-BsAbs portended shorter PFS and OS. Of 17 individuals with paired biopsies, 15 (88.2%) lost CD20 expression after BsAbs with a median time to progression of 3.7 months. This analysis including patients with R/R DLBCL shows the ORR to CD3/CD20 BsAbs was comparable to pivotal trials, although PFS and OS were lower. Baseline undetectable levels of CD20 were associated with poor outcomes. These results demonstrate the activity of BsAbs in R/R DLBCL, and underscore the importance of target antigen expression.