Citations

Abstract Background 2-stage exchange (2SE) surgery is often used to treat chronic prosthetic joint infections (PJI). IDSA guidelines do not recommend oral antibiotic suppression after 2SE. However, a recent randomized trial suggested that oral antibiotics for 3 months after arthroplasty reimplantation may prevent recurrent PJI. Objective: To compare rates of treatment failure (i.e., recurrent PJI) and adverse reactions (ARs) among patients who received < 1 month of antibiotics directly after reimplantation to those who received 1-3 months of antibiotics following reimplantation (extended antibiotics). Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients with hip, knee, or shoulder PJI who underwent 2SE at 83 VA hospitals between the years 2003-2017. PJI was defined using administrative codes and microbiology data. Patients were followed for 5 years to assess treatment failure (TF) and ARs. TF was defined as recurrent PJI, debridement, or reoperation. ARs included Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI), or antibiotic associated diarrhea (AAD) during or 72 hours after antibiotics. Chi-square tests were used to compare outcomes. Cumulative incidence function curves were created to compare TF rates between those who did and did not receive extended antibiotic treatment, incorporating the competing risks of TF and death. Results Of the 433 patients, most (97%) received < 1 month of oral antibiotics and 3% received extended antibiotics. The 15 patients who received extended antibiotics had similar rates of TF and ARs compared with patients who received < 1 month of oral antibiotics (Table). However, there was a trend toward higher rates of CDI (6.7% vs. 3.8%) and AAD (13.3% vs. 9.6%) among those who received extended antibiotics. There was no difference in TF comparing extended antibiotics with < 1 month of antibiotics, accounting for death (Figure). Table: Treatment Failure and Adverse Reactions Among Those Who Did and Did Not Receive Extended Antibiotics Conclusion Few patients received extended oral antibiotics in the study period. There were no statistically significant differences in TF or ARs between the 2 groups. Yet, there was a trend toward higher rates of ARs among the extended antibiotic group. Future prospective studies should assess both the potential benefits and ARs associated with extended antibiotics among patients undergoing 2SE surgery. Disclosures Marin L. Schweizer, PhD, 3M (Grant/Research Support)PDI (Grant/Research Support) Bruce Alexander, PharmD, Bruce Alexander Consulting (Independent Contractor) Daniel Suh, MS MPH, General Electric (Shareholder)Merck (Shareholder)Moderna (Shareholder)Smile Direct Club (Shareholder) Aaron J. Tande, MD, UpToDate.com (Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria for medical writing) Andrew Pugely, MD, MBA, Globus Medical (Research Grant or Support)Medtronic (Consultant)United Healthcare (Consultant)

ObjectivesIndications for peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with achalasia concomitant with esophageal carcinoma (EC) are unclear. This study aimed to clarify the role of POEM in cases of achalasia concomitant with EC and to elucidate the indications for ESD and efficient surveillance for EC.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter cohort study at 14 hospitals in Japan, including 3707 cases of achalasia‐related esophageal motility disorders (EMDs). Factors contributing to EC risk, the characteristics of EC, and clinical outcomes of POEM/ESD were analyzed.ResultsIn patients undergoing POEM, screening and surveillance endoscopy throughout a 1‐year period resulted in diagnosis of 72.1% new EC cases. Of 62 patients with 123 ECs, 40.3% had multiple or metachronous lesions within 37.5 months. EC was predominantly observed in the middle thoracic esophagus (58.5%) and posteriorly (73.2%). POEM had comparable safety and efficacy in cases of concomitant EC even after ESD. Endoscopic en bloc resection was performed in 95.8% and 89.3% of ECs diagnosed before and after POEM, respectively (P = 0.351); however, ESD on the POEM‐line was impaired by fibrosis. Multivariate analysis revealed risk factors for EC, including regular alcohol consumption, a history of smoking, advanced age, and extended disease duration. Alcohol intake and smoking had a synergistic effect on EC development.ConclusionsScreening and surveillance of POEM help in detecting EC. ESD is feasible in achalasia, although on the POEM‐line is challenging. Surveillance endoscopy for EC is recommended for cases with specific risks and a history of ECs.

Abstract Background The difference in clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early Barrett's esophagus (BE) neoplasia remains unclear. We compared the recurrence/residual tissue rates, resection outcomes, and adverse events after ESD and EMR for early BE neoplasia. Methods We included patients who underwent EMR or ESD for BE-associated high grade dysplasia (HGD) or T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) at eight academic hospitals. We compared demographic, procedural, and histologic characteristics, and follow-up data. A time-to-event analysis was performed to evaluate recurrence/residual disease and a Kaplan–Meier curve was used to compare the groups. Results 243 patients (150 EMR; 93 ESD) were included. EMR had lower en bloc (43 % vs. 89 %; P < 0.001) and R0 (56 % vs. 73 %; P = 0.01) rates than ESD. There was no difference in the rates of perforation (0.7 % vs. 0; P > 0.99), early bleeding (0.7 % vs. 1 %; P > 0.99), delayed bleeding (3.3 % vs. 2.1 %; P = 0.71), and stricture (10 % vs. 16 %; P = 0.16) between EMR and ESD. Patients with non-curative resections who underwent further therapy were excluded from the recurrence analysis. Recurrent/residual disease was 31.4 % [44/140] for EMR and 3.5 % [3/85] for ESD during a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 15.5 (6.75–30) and 8 (2–18) months, respectively. Recurrence-/residual disease-free survival was significantly higher in the ESD group. More patients required additional endoscopic resection procedures to treat recurrent/residual disease after EMR (EMR 24.2 % vs. ESD 3.5 %; P < 0.001). Conclusions ESD is safe and results in more definitive treatment of early BE neoplasia, with significantly lower recurrence/residual disease rates and less need for repeat endoscopic treatments than with EMR.

The current standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision surgery. However, the response to nCRT varies among patients and only about 20% of LARC patients achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) at the time of surgery. Therefore, there is an unmet need for biomarkers that could predict the response to nCRT at an early time point, allowing for the selection of LARC patients who would or would not benefit from nCRT. To identify blood-based biomarkers for prediction of nCRT response, we performed in-depth quantitative proteomic analysis of pretreatment plasma from mice bearing rectal tumors treated with concurrent chemoradiation, resulting in the quantification of 567 proteins. Among the plasma proteins that increased in mice with residual rectal tumor after chemoradiation compared to mice that achieved regression, we selected three proteins (Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 [VEGFR3], Insulin like growth factor binding protein 4 [IGFBP4], and Cathepsin B [CTSB]) for validation in human plasma samples. In addition, we explored whether four tissue protein biomarkers previously shown to predict response to nCRT (Epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR], Ki-67, E-cadherin, and Prostaglandin G/H synthase 2 [COX2]) also act as potential blood biomarkers. Using immunoassays for these seven biomarker candidates as well as Carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA] levels on plasma collected before nCRT from 34 patients with LARC (6 pCR and 28 non-pCR), we observed that levels of VEGFR3 (p = 0.0451, AUC = 0.720), EGFR (p = 0.0128, AUC = 0.679), and COX2 (p = 0.0397, AUC = 0.679) were significantly increased in the plasma of non-pCR LARC patients compared to those of pCR LARC patients. The performance of the logistic regression model combining VEGFR3, EGFR, and COX2 was significantly improved compared with the performance of each biomarker, yielding an AUC of 0.869 (sensitivity 43% at 95% specificity). Levels of VEGFR3 and EGFR were significantly decreased 5 to 7 months after tumor resection in plasma from 18 surgically resected rectal cancer patients, suggesting that VEGFR3 and EGFR may emanate from tumors. These findings suggest that circulating VEGFR3 can contribute to the prediction of the nCRT response in LARC patients together with circulating EGFR and COX2.

Background: In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), left ventricular (LV) systolic elastance (Ees) increases in tandem with increases in arterial elastance (Ea), which maintains ejection fraction but limits systolic reserve and precipitates volume sensitivity. The left atrium (LA) lies in series with the LV and contributes to LV stroke volume. We hypothesized that HFpEF is associated with increased LA systolic elastance (E LA ) and deranged atrioventricular (AV) coupling which may additionally compromise cardiac performance. Methods: HFpEF was modeled by experimental hypertension (bilateral renal wrap + DOCA) in elderly dogs (n=9). LA and LV structure, function (echo, MRI) and invasively assessed pressure-volume relationships (PVR, open-chest; pericardiotomy; admittance catheter) were compared to sham-operated young dogs (control; n=13). Results: As compared to controls, HFpEF dogs displayed concentric remodeling, with increased diastolic stiffness, Ea and Ees (p<0.05 for all) and reduced Ea/Ees (p=0.03). LA maximum volume (28±3 vs 23±3mL, p=0.007), LA stroke volume (4±1 vs2±1mL, p=0.006), LA active emptying fraction (18±6 vs 12±2%, p=0.03) and LA ejection rate (51±14 vs 30±16mL/s) were higher in HFpEF versus controls, suggesting increased LA stroke work and inotropy. At matched heart rate and LA pressure, E LA was steeper in HFpEF than control (2.7±0.9 vs 1.5±0.6mmHg/mL, p=0.01) and positively correlated with Ees (r=0.6, p=0.005) and Ea (r=0.66, p=0.002). However AV mismatch occurred as increases in E LA were not proportionate to increases in Ees (Ees/E LA 1.3±0.4 HFpEF vs 0.8±0.4 control, p<0.05). On linear regression, worse AV coupling (i.e. higher Ees/E LA ) was associated with lower LV stroke volume ( Figure ). Conclusion: In experimental HFpEF, despite enhanced LA contractility, AV coupling was deranged. Worse AV coupling may further contribute to reserve dysfunction, LA pressure rise, and susceptibility to pulmonary edema in HFpEF.

Background: Reduced left atrial (LA) compliance (LAC) contributes to pulmonary venous hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF); however the underlying mechanisms are poorly defined. We hypothesized that microvascular inflammation with rarefaction and impaired nitric oxide (NO) signaling, LA titin hypophosphorylation and fibrosis may each contribute to reduced LAC in HFpEF. Methods: Invasive LA pressure-volume (PV) analyses (open-chest; pericardiotomy; admittance catheter) were performed in 9 aged dogs with experimental hypertension (bilateral renal wrap + DOCA; HFpEF) compared to 13 sham-operated young adult dogs (control). LAC was measured at end-LA reservoir during acute preload reduction (cava occlusion). LA tissue and LA microvascular function were analyzed. Results: Compared to controls, the curvilinear end-LA reservoir PV relationship ( Fig A ) was shifted upward/leftward in HFpEF (LA diastolic stiffness constant 0.08 vs 0.16 mmHg/mL in controls, p=0.005). LA microvascular density (MVD; CD31 stain) tended to be lower in HFpEF than controls (2154±578 vs 2650±523 vessels/mm 2 , p=0.07) and LA MVD negatively correlated with the LA diastolic stiffness constant (r=-0.66, p=0.006). LA microvessels from HFpEF dogs showed impaired endothelium-dependent shear stress-mediated dilation compared to controls, consistent with impaired NO signaling ( Fig B ). Titin isoform expression was similar between groups, but isoform N2B (stiffer) was (p=0.03) and N2BA (compliant) tended to be (p=0.09) hypophosphorylated in HFpEF LA appendage (LAA) tissue. Fibrosis (Picrosirius Red) was similar between groups in the LA free wall and LAA, but increased in areas adjacent to the pulmonary veins in HFpEF (27±12% vs controls 15±8%, p=0.01). Conclusion: In experimental HFpEF, LAC was reduced in association with evidence of LA microvascular rarefaction and impaired NO signaling, titin hypophosphorylation and regional increases in LA fibrosis.

Background: The Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) risk levels are a validated tool to assess the risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). The objective of this study is to determine if the risk levels predict 60-day outcomes in well-defined ADHF patients from NIH Heart Failure Clinical Research Network (HFCRN) trials. Methods: Our study cohort included 835 unique patients with ADHF enrolled in 3 NIH HFCRN trials: Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation (DOSE), CARdiorenal REScue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (CARRESS-HF), and Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation (ROSE). ADHERE risk level was assigned, as previously described, by baseline BUN (<43 vs. ≥43 mg/dL), Cr (<2.2 vs. ≥2.2, a modification from 2.75 mg/dL used in ADHERE due the Cr distribution in our study population), and systolic BP (≥ 115 vs < 115 mmHg). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between risk levels. Results: Of the 835 patients enrolled in DOSE (308), CARRESS-HF (188), and ROSE (360), an ADHERE risk level could be assigned to 830, with 62 (8%) high, 521 (63%) intermediate, 247 (30%) low risk. Baseline characteristics (Table 1) and outcomes (Table 2), including combined 60-day death and re-hospitalization (hazard ratio 1.94, high risk versus low risk, p<0.01), varied by ADHERE risk level. Conclusion: ADHERE risk levels predict 60-day death and re-hospitalization rates in patients with ADHF. These results extend the utility of the ADHERE risk levels, by informing longer-term clinical decisions regarding advanced heart failure treatment, care transition strategies and clinical trial design.