Back to Authors

Wang, Yanru

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8272-2450

Mayo Clinic

Wuhan University

Citations 3

A TGF-β1/LEF1/β-catenin/JLP network motif regulates autophagy and tubule injury in renal fibrosis
Li, Chen, Zhang, Meng, Tian, Maoqing, Tang, Zeyu , Hu, Yuanming , Long, Yuyu, Wang, Xiaofei , Qiao, Liwen, Zeng, Jiefei, Wang, Yanru , Chen, Xinghua, Chen, Cheng, Li, Xiaoyan, Zhang, Lu, Wang, Huiming, Hu, Yuying

JCI Insight | January 8, 2026 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 13 | Pages: No page available

10.1172/jci.insight.196835 Get It

Sustained injury to renal tubular epithelial cells (TECs), driven by excessive autophagy, is a critical mechanism underlying kidney fibrosis. Our previous work identified JLP — a TEC-expressed scaffolding protein — as an endogenous antifibrotic factor that counteracts TGF-β1–induced autophagy and fibrogenesis. However, the mechanism underlying JLP downregulation in renal fibrosis remains unclear. Here, we delineated a TGF-β1/LEF1/β-catenin/JLP axis that governs TEC autophagy through a dichotomous regulatory circuit. Under physiological conditions, low levels of β-catenin and LEF1 with minimal nuclear localization permitted normal JLP expression, which in turn maintained autophagy in check. In contrast, during renal injury, TGF-β1 promoted the expression and nuclear translocation of β-catenin and LEF1, which together suppressed JLP transcription. This loss of JLP-mediated inhibition led to unchecked autophagy and exacerbated fibrotic damage. Analyses of kidney tissues from patients with CKD, murine fibrotic kidneys, and cultured HK-2 cells confirmed consistent JLP downregulation accompanied by upregulation and nuclear accumulation of LEF1 and β-catenin. Therapeutic intervention using the β-catenin/LEF1 inhibitor iCRT3 or LEF1-targeted silencing in murine fibrosis models restored JLP expression, attenuated TEC autophagy, and ameliorated renal fibrosis. These findings revealed an autoregulatory circuit controlling TEC autophagy and fibrogenesis, and supported LEF1 and β-catenin as potential therapeutic targets in CKD.
Identification of Blood-Based Biomarkers for the Prediction of the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer
Daydé, Delphine , Hirayama, Yutaka, Weksberg, David C., Boutin, Adam T., Parhy, Gargy, Aguilar-Bonavides, Clemente , Katayama, Hiroyuki , Abe, Yuichi , Kinoshita, Takashi , Komori, Koji , Shimizu, Yasuhiro , Niwa, Yasumasa, Wang, Yanru , DePinho, Ronald A. , Krishnan, Sunil, Taguchi, Ayumu , Katayama, Hiroyuki , Taguchi, Ayumu , DePinho, Ronald A , Gunther, Jillian Rebecca , Wang, Hong , Do, Kim‐Anh , Hara, Kazuo , Tajika, Masahiro , Hanash, Samir

Cancers | July 20, 2021 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 14 | Pages: 3642

10.3390/cancers13143642 Get It

The current standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision surgery. However, the response to nCRT varies among patients and only about 20% of LARC patients achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) at the time of surgery. Therefore, there is an unmet need for biomarkers that could predict the response to nCRT at an early time point, allowing for the selection of LARC patients who would or would not benefit from nCRT. To identify blood-based biomarkers for prediction of nCRT response, we performed in-depth quantitative proteomic analysis of pretreatment plasma from mice bearing rectal tumors treated with concurrent chemoradiation, resulting in the quantification of 567 proteins. Among the plasma proteins that increased in mice with residual rectal tumor after chemoradiation compared to mice that achieved regression, we selected three proteins (Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 [VEGFR3], Insulin like growth factor binding protein 4 [IGFBP4], and Cathepsin B [CTSB]) for validation in human plasma samples. In addition, we explored whether four tissue protein biomarkers previously shown to predict response to nCRT (Epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR], Ki-67, E-cadherin, and Prostaglandin G/H synthase 2 [COX2]) also act as potential blood biomarkers. Using immunoassays for these seven biomarker candidates as well as Carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA] levels on plasma collected before nCRT from 34 patients with LARC (6 pCR and 28 non-pCR), we observed that levels of VEGFR3 (p = 0.0451, AUC = 0.720), EGFR (p = 0.0128, AUC = 0.679), and COX2 (p = 0.0397, AUC = 0.679) were significantly increased in the plasma of non-pCR LARC patients compared to those of pCR LARC patients. The performance of the logistic regression model combining VEGFR3, EGFR, and COX2 was significantly improved compared with the performance of each biomarker, yielding an AUC of 0.869 (sensitivity 43% at 95% specificity). Levels of VEGFR3 and EGFR were significantly decreased 5 to 7 months after tumor resection in plasma from 18 surgically resected rectal cancer patients, suggesting that VEGFR3 and EGFR may emanate from tumors. These findings suggest that circulating VEGFR3 can contribute to the prediction of the nCRT response in LARC patients together with circulating EGFR and COX2.
Loss of FOXO1 Cooperates with TMPRSS2–ERG Overexpression to Promote Prostate Tumorigenesis and Cell Invasion
Yang, Yinhui , Blee, Alexandra M. , Wang, Dejie , An, Jian , Pan, Yunqian , Yan, Yuqian , He, Yundong , Dugdale, Joseph , Hou, Xiaonan , Zhang, Jun , Weroha, S. John , Zhu, Wei‐Guo , Wang, Yanru , DePinho, Ronald A. , Xu, Wanhai , DePinho, Ronald A , Ma, Tao , Huang, Haojie

Cancer Research | October 6, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 6524-6537

10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0686 Get It

Abstract E26 transformation-specific transcription factor ERG is aberrantly overexpressed in approximately 50% of all human prostate cancer due to TMPRSS2-ERG gene rearrangements. However, mice with prostate-specific transgenic expression of prostate cancer–associated ERG alone fail to develop prostate cancer, highlighting that ERG requires other lesions to drive prostate tumorigenesis. Forkhead box (FOXO) transcription factor FOXO1 is a tumor suppressor that is frequently inactivated in human prostate cancer. Here, we demonstrate that FOXO1, but not other FOXO proteins (FOXO3 and FOXO4), binds and inhibits the transcriptional activity of prostate cancer–associated ERG independently of FOXO1 transcriptional activity. Knockdown of endogenous FOXO1 increased invasion of TMPRSS2–ERG fusion–positive VCaP cells, an effect completely abolished by ERG knockdown. Patient specimen analysis demonstrated that FOXO1 and ERG protein expression inversely correlated in a subset of human prostate cancer. Although human ERG transgene expression or homozygous deletion of Foxo1 alone in the mouse prostate failed to promote tumorigenesis, concomitant ERG transgene expression and Foxo1 deletion resulted in upregulation of ERG target genes, increased cell proliferation, and formation of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Overall, we provide biochemical and genetic evidence that aberrantly activated ERG cooperates with FOXO1 deficiency to promote prostate tumorigenesis and cell invasion. Our findings enhance understanding of prostate cancer etiology and suggest that the FOXO1–ERG signaling axis can be a potential target for treatment of prostate cancer. Cancer Res; 77(23); 6524–37. ©2017 AACR.