An, Jian

Abstract E26 transformation-specific transcription factor ERG is aberrantly overexpressed in approximately 50% of all human prostate cancer due to TMPRSS2-ERG gene rearrangements. However, mice with prostate-specific transgenic expression of prostate cancer–associated ERG alone fail to develop prostate cancer, highlighting that ERG requires other lesions to drive prostate tumorigenesis. Forkhead box (FOXO) transcription factor FOXO1 is a tumor suppressor that is frequently inactivated in human prostate cancer. Here, we demonstrate that FOXO1, but not other FOXO proteins (FOXO3 and FOXO4), binds and inhibits the transcriptional activity of prostate cancer–associated ERG independently of FOXO1 transcriptional activity. Knockdown of endogenous FOXO1 increased invasion of TMPRSS2–ERG fusion–positive VCaP cells, an effect completely abolished by ERG knockdown. Patient specimen analysis demonstrated that FOXO1 and ERG protein expression inversely correlated in a subset of human prostate cancer. Although human ERG transgene expression or homozygous deletion of Foxo1 alone in the mouse prostate failed to promote tumorigenesis, concomitant ERG transgene expression and Foxo1 deletion resulted in upregulation of ERG target genes, increased cell proliferation, and formation of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Overall, we provide biochemical and genetic evidence that aberrantly activated ERG cooperates with FOXO1 deficiency to promote prostate tumorigenesis and cell invasion. Our findings enhance understanding of prostate cancer etiology and suggest that the FOXO1–ERG signaling axis can be a potential target for treatment of prostate cancer. Cancer Res; 77(23); 6524–37. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract The Cullin 3-based E3 ubiquitin ligase substrate-binding protein SPOP is inactivated in approximately 8-15% of human prostate cancers due to gene mutation. Intriguingly, SPOP mutations and inactivation of the PTEN tumor suppressor in human prostate cancers are mutually exclusive. However, it is unclear whether SPOP remains functionally active in PTEN-deficient prostate cancer cells. In the current study, we demonstrate that PTEN loss induces phosphorylation and nuclear exportation of SPOP. We identify a putative cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) phosphorylation site (serine 222) in SPOP BTB domain, a motif interacting with Cullin 3 and demonstrate that PTEN loss induces SPOP cytoplasm accumulation in a manner dependent on CDK2-mediated phosphorylation of SPOP at serine 222. We further show that serine 222 phosphorylation impairs dimerization and the E3 ligase activity of SPOP without affecting its interaction with Cullin 3. We also identify a potential p300 acetylation site in the C-terminal nuclear localization sequence of SPOP. We demonstrate that acetylation by p300 promotes SPOP translocation from nucleus to cytoplasm and this effect is enhanced by CDK2-mediated phosphorylation of SPOP at serine 222. In contrast, Sirt 2 and Sirt 6 of the sirtuin family are verified to be responsible for deacetylation of SPOP. In the conditional Pten knockout prostate cancer mouse model, Pten deletion induces cytosolic accumulation of SPOP, but the process is reversed in Pten and p300 double knockout prostatic cells. Collectively, our findings reveal cytoplasmic localization and enzymatic inactivation of SPOP as a previously uncharacterized mechanism that contributes to PTEN loss-induced prostate tumorigenesis. They also suggest that blocking SPOP cytoplasm localization represents a viable therapeutic option for treatment of prostate cancers harboring PTEN inactivation. Citation Format: Jian An, Haojie Huang. PTEN loss promotes phosphorylation-dependent acetylation and inhibition of SPOP tumor suppressor. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr LB-A25.

ASPP2 is an important tumor suppressor protein promoting p53‐dependent and‐independent apoptosis. However, it has been unclear how ASPP2 protein is regulated. Here, we identified Itch as the E3 ubiquitin ligase for ASPP2. Itch interacts with ASPP2 and mediates its degradation and ubiquitination in vivo. The PPXY motif of ASPP2 interacts with the WW domains of Itch. Yap1 competes with Itch for binding to ASPP2, and prevents Itch‐mediated degradation and ubiquitination of ASPP2. Together, these observations reveal that Itch and Yap1 have antagonistic roles in the regulation of ASPP2 protein stability through competing post‐translational regulatory mechanism of ASPP2.