Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND Mirdametinib is the first FDA-approved MEK1/2 inhibitor for both adults and children (≥2 years) with NF1 who have symptomatic PN not amenable to complete resection. We report updated results from the LTFU phase of the pivotal, phase 2b ReNeu trial (NCT03962543) evaluating the efficacy and safety of mirdametinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS In ReNeu, mirdametinib capsules or tablets for oral suspension (2 mg/m2 BID, max 4 mg BID) are administered in 3-weeks-on/1-week-off 28-day cycles. Following the 24-cycle (~2 years) treatment phase, patients could continue mirdametinib in an optional LTFU phase. These analyses are inclusive of the treatment and LTFU phases (data cutoff: June 12, 2024; an additional 9 months of cumulative data following the primary analysis). Exploratory analyses reported here included confirmed objective response rate (ORR; proportion of patients with ≥20% reduction of target PN volume from baseline on consecutive MRI scans within 2 to 6 months, assessed by blinded independent central review), duration of response (DoR), change from baseline in target PN volume, and safety. RESULTS Fifty-eight adults and 56 children were dosed with mirdametinib. Median (range) duration of mirdametinib treatment was 21.8 (0.4, 54.4) months in adults and 25.4 (1.6, 48.5) months in children. Among LTFU-eligible patients, 26/31 (84%) adults and 32/37 (86%) children entered the LTFU. Confirmed ORR was 47% (27/58; 95% CI, 33%, 60%) in adults and 55% (31/56; 95% CI, 42%, 69%) in children. Of patients with a confirmed objective response, 18 adults and 19 children achieved a deep response (best target PN volume reduction from baseline of >50%). Median (range) best percentage change from baseline in target PN volume was -41% (-90%, 13%) in adults and -43% (-98%, 48%) in children. Median DoR was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in ≥25% of patients were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhoea, nausea, and vomiting in adults, and diarrhoea, dermatitis acneiform, and paronychia in children. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 17% of adults and 25% of children. Dose interruptions, dose reductions, and discontinuations due to TRAEs occurred in 9%, 17%, and 22%, respectively, of adults, and in 14%, 14%, and 9%, respectively, of children. CONCLUSIONS An increase in confirmed ORR was observed with longer duration of mirdametinib treatment, with additional deep responses achieved in both adults and children with NF1-PN. Mirdametinib continued to be well tolerated with a manageable safety profile and no new safety signals identified in the LTFU phase. SUPPORTED BY SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.

Abstract BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer rarely metastasises to the brain, thus studies reporting the outcomes of affected patients are lacking. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is now the mainstay of management for patients with brain metastases (BM) from most primary sites, but little evidence of its efficacy in ovarian cancer is available. The current study was undertaken to provide guidance for SRS management using pooled data from multiple institutions. MATERIAL AND METHODS Centers participating in the IRRF (International Radiosurgery Research Foundation) were asked to provide outcome data for patients who had SRS for ovarian cancer brain metastases between 2020 and 2024 and at least one clinical and imaging follow-up after the procedure. Primary endpoints included survival from SRS, local tumor response according to RANO-BM criteria and occurrence of adverse radiation effects (ARE). Cox regression analyses were performed to identify variables impact each endpoint. RESULTS 128 patients had SRS for a total of 532 BM treated. Epithelial histology was the most common (91%). Median age at SRS was 62 years (IQR 56-70). Median KPS was 80% (IQR 80-90%) and 71.9% of patients had neurological symptoms at presentation. Other active systemic metastases were present in 41.4%. The median number of treated BM was 2 (IQR1-3) and the median cumulative treatment volume was 6 cc (IQR 2-12.9). The median margin dose was 18 Gy (IQR 16-20). At last follow-up, 19.5% of patients were still alive. The median overall survival (OS) after SRS was 27 months, and 6-, 12- and 24-month OS was 83.8%, 74.2% and 52.2%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that increasing age at SRS (HR 1.02, p=0.05), active systemic metastases (HR 2, p=0.005) and increasing number of brain metastases (HR 1.05, p=0.04) were associated with worse survival, while repeating SRS (HR 0.4, p=0.002) led to improved survival. Local failure occurred in 12.8% of treated BM. Actuarial progression-free survival (PFS) at 6, 12 and 24 months was 92.3%, 86.6% and 70.3%, respectively. Only prior WBRT (HR 4.36, p=0.03) led to worse local control on multivariate analyses. New remote BM appeared in 49.5% of patients and 14.5% suffered from leptomeningeal dissemination. ARE were seen in 12.1% of BM but were symptomatic in only 3.2%. On multivariate analyses, prior SRS (HR 3.13, p=0.002) was associated with increased risk of ARE. CONCLUSION Ovarian cancer brain metastases can be safely and effectively managed with SRS as the primary treatment modality in most patients.

PURPOSE Public reporting of health care outcomes can have unintended effects such as inappropriate risk aversion in patient selection. METHODS The center-specific survival analysis annually assigns all hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) centers in the United States a +1, −1, or 0 score for observed outcomes that are above, below, or within a center-specific predicted range of outcome. For each index year (2012-2016), centers receiving a −1 score after 0 scores in the preceding 2 years were compared with contemporaneous centers with as-predicted outcomes (0 score). Changes in the patient population characteristics in the 3 years before versus the 3 years after the index years were compared between the newly below-expected centers (NBCs) and the controls. A multivariate model adjusted for baseline patient population characteristics and center volume. RESULTS No differences in patient selection behavior were identified when comparing the NBCs with the controls across eight key patient population characteristics. For the statistically modeled (predicted) 1-year overall survival (OS), reflecting a holistic measure of centers' patient population risk, we observed no statistically significant difference in change (−0.23% [95% CI, −1.4 to 0.9]; P = .70). The observed OS increased in both NBCs and controls by 0.9% and 4.5%, respectively, without statistically significant difference in change. CONCLUSION Centers receiving a −1 score were not observed to deviate significantly from patient selection trends in the HCT field. These findings suggest that public reporting of HCT outcomes in the United States does not result in unintended bias against HCT for high-risk patients.

Abstract Background Hemoglobin A1c is used to assess glycemic control to both diagnose and monitor diabetes mellitus. Several different methodologies are available including high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), capillary electrophoresis (CE), and immunoassay (IA). These methods are standardized and traceable to the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in HbA1c results between methods and percent of reportable results in variant samples. Methods The HPLC (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc; D-100), the CE(Sebia Inc; Capillarys 3), and IA(Roche Diagnostics Inc; Tina-quant Generation 3) were compared using two sets of residual patient samples left after physician ordered testing was complete: 1) samples with an absence of abnormal hemoglobin peaks (i.e. non-variant) detected by HPLC; 2) samples with abnormal hemoglobin peaks (i.e. variant) characterized by hemoglobin electrophoresis performed clinically or lacking an A1c peak by HPLC/CE. The samples were tested within manufacturers stability claims. 317 non-variant samples were compared between the HPLC and CE methods. The absolute difference was calculated for each method using this equation (HbA1c%avg – HbA1c%X) where HbA1c%avg is the average of the methods that produced reportable results and X is the result from each method evaluated. Differences less than or equal to +/-0.3% were considered acceptable. 28 of the 317 non-variant and 47 variant samples were tested by all 3 methodologies. The 47 variant samples grouped into 3 cohorts: common heterozygous variants (HbC, HbD, HbE, HbS and HbF, n=10), uncommon heterozygous variants (n=29) and homozygous variants lacking HbA (n=8). The absolute differences in variant sample results were calculated for samples that did not surpass manufacturer’s claims for producing an accurate result. The frequency of producing a numeric result in variant samples was calculated for each method. Results The HPLC/CE non-variant sample comparison (N=317) had results spanning the measuring range (3.8% - 14.0%) with average(range) of absolute difference=0.1(-0.4to0.6%) with 293/317(92.4%) samples within +/-0.3%. The HPLC/CE/IA non-variant sample comparison (N=28) had a result range=4.0%-9.4%, the average(range) of difference=0.1(-0.2to0.5%) with 25/28 (89.2%) of samples within +/-0.3%. Common heterozygous variant samples gave numeric results with no disqualifying flags in 9 of 10(HPLC), 8 of 10(CE), and 9 of 10(IA) samples tested. The average(range) difference from average=0.0(-0.3,0.5%) for HPLC, 0.0(-0.2,0.3%) for CE, and -0.1(-0.6,0.2%) for IA. Uncommon variant samples gave results in 4 of 29 (HPLC), 20 of 29 (CE), and 26 of 29 (IA) of samples tested. The average(range) difference from average=-0.1(-0.3,0.1%) for HPLC, 0.0(-1.0,1.1%) for CE, and 0.0(-1.1,1.0%) for IA. The homozygous variant (no HbA) samples gave results in 0 of 8 (HPLC), 0 of 8 (CE), and 4 of 8 (IA) of those tested. Conclusion All three methods meet their claims for accurately measuring hemoglobin A1c from non-variant and common hemoglobin variants. The advantage of HPLC and CE is the ability to identify hemoglobin variants that may impact HbA1c quantitation. The IA method provides the most numeric results. IA gave results even when HbA was absent. The lab should understand the capabilities and limitations of their HbA1c method on the population served.

Abstract Aims The efficacy and safety of vericiguat in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) on contemporary heart failure (HF) therapies and without recent worsening was investigated in the VICTOR trial, yet some subgroups may be more susceptible to symptomatic hypotension. Methods and results Among VICTOR trial participants that received at least one dose of study drug or placebo, we describe the systolic blood pressure (SBP) trajectories over time (mean change from baseline), symptomatic hypotension events and efficacy of vericiguat in potentially vulnerable patient subgroups: lower baseline blood pressure (SBP ≤110 mmHg), older patients (>75 years) and those taking angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) or sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) at baseline. The efficacy outcomes of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death alone across baseline SBP were examined using Cox proportional hazards models. Overall SBP trajectories showed a small initial decline from baseline in vericiguat-treated patients compared with placebo (placebo-corrected differences of −1.17 [−1.84, −0.50], p = 0.0007) that was relatively stable throughout follow-up. This trajectory was similar in those >75 years (vs. younger) as well as those receiving ARNI or SGLT2i (as compared with those not receiving these) or those with SBP ≤110 mmHg at baseline (compared with >110 mmHg). Symptomatic hypotension occurred in 11.3% of vericiguat-treated patients compared with 9.2% of placebo-treated patients with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.24 (95% confidence interval 1.06–1.46), which was similar across age, SBP, SGLT2i and ARNI groups (all interaction p >0.05). The treatment effect of vericiguat compared with placebo on the efficacy outcomes was similar across the spectrum of baseline SBP (both interaction p >0.15). Conclusions Vericiguat showed a slight adjusted decrease in SBP and resulted in more symptomatic hypotension compared with placebo but was overall well-tolerated in a broad population with HFrEF on contemporary therapy even among those predisposed to hypotension. Treatment effects on efficacy outcomes were consistent regardless of baseline SBP.

Abstract Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mortality is increasing globally, partly due to the growing prevalence of nonviral liver diseases. Genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) have identified genetic variants associated with HCC development. Leveraging GWAS summary statistics and linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSR), we investigated disease co‐development with hepatitis C virus‐negative (HCV‐negative) HCC to provide unique insights into HCC etiology and prioritize relationships for further causal inquiry. We utilized the LDSR statistical framework to estimate the genetic correlation and heritability between HCV‐negative HCC with 901 epidemiologic, behavioral, and clinical traits from the United Kingdom Biobank (UKBB). First, we set the threshold for observed scale heritability of each trait at 0.02 to ensure reliable inferences with adequate study power. Next, we observed significant positive genetic correlations between HCV‐negative HCC and blood‐based biomarkers of liver injury (ALT, GGT) and allostatic load (including glycated hemoglobin, blood pressure, and total albumin). We also identified a positive genetic correlation between HCV‐negative HCC and diseases associated with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), including diabetes, hypertension, chronic ischemic heart disease, and others. Taken together, our results help to identify polygenic and pleiotropic signals related to different phenotypic traits associated with HCC and support further exploration of the predictive power of blood‐based biomarkers identified in this study for inferring HCC development among HCV‐negative individuals.

Objectives: Historically, horizontal cleavage meniscus tears have been debrided with single leaflet preservation, but more recently this has been challenged by repair of these tear types. While circumferential meniscus repair with all-inside and inside-out instrumentation has been described, there remains a paucity of literature regarding the clinical outcomes of this technique. Our purpose was to assess clinical outcomes and reoperation rates of circumferential meniscus repair for horizontal cleavage tears at minimum 2-year follow-up. Methods: Patients with isolated horizontal cleavage tears of the meniscus (Fig. 1a) undergoing primary circumferential meniscus repair (Fig. 1b), including both inside-out and all-inside suturing techniques, at a single institution between 2015 and 2022 were eligible for inclusion and analyzed retrospectively. Arthroscopic images and operative notes were examined to confirm circumferential meniscal repair. Patient demographics, surgery details, and clinical findings were extracted from the institutional electronic medical records. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients not consenting for research, less than 2-years of clinical follow-up, and concurrent ipsilateral repair of a non-horizontal cleavage tear. Patients were not excluded if they had a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Thirty-seven patients met the criteria for inclusion in this study. Knees were analyzed for laterality, number of sutures, suturing technique, concurrent injuries, concurrent procedures, and surgical history. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were collected at minimum 2-year follow-up and analyzed. Return to sport (RTS) and revision surgery were analyzed. Results: Thirty-seven patients (25 male, 12 female; mean age, 29.4 ± 12.4 years) who underwent circumferential meniscal repair of a horizontal cleavage tear were included in the study and followed for a mean of 6.2 years (range, 2.2-9.3 years, Table 1). There was a total of 38 knees (23 right, 15 left). One patient (3%) had bilateral circumferential meniscal repair surgeries done at separate times. Three (16%) patients failed primary repair and had secondary partial meniscectomy. Similar numbers of circumferential meniscal repairs were performed on lateral and medial menisci, 21 (55%) and 17 (45%), respectively. An average number of 3 ± 2 sutures were used at the time or repair with one of 38 menisci (3%) having a hybrid combination of both all-inside and inside-out suture technique, 24 menisci (63%) had all-inside technique, and 13 menisci (34%) had inside-out technique. Concurrent procedures included 4 ACL reconstructions (3 autograft, 1 allograft), and 8 chondroplasties (4 patella, 2 trochlea, 1 medial femoral condyle, and 1 unspecified, Table 2). At the time of final follow-up, patients reported mean Tegner activity scores of 6.2 ± 2.3, VAS pain with rest of 1.0 ± 2.0, VAS pain with use of 2.5 ± 2.7, and IKDC of 81.6 ± 18.6. When asked, using a VAS Five Point scale, how their knee is currently compared to before their surgery, 14 (74%) feel much better than before surgery, 2 (11%) feel slightly better than before surgery, 1 (5%) feels no change when compared to before their surgery, 2 (11%) feel slightly worse than before surgery, and no one felt much worse than before surgery. Sixteen patients were involved in sports before their surgery. Of those that played sports before their surgery, 14 (88%) returned to sport (Table 3). The most common sports played were hockey (19%), volleyball (19%), tennis (13%), and football (13%). Levels of sport played before surgery included 7 (44%) recreational, 6 (38%) high school, 2 (13%) college, and 1 (6%) club. Levels of sport played after surgery for those who returned to sport included 6 (43%) recreational, 2 (14%) high school, 5 (36%) college, and 1 (7%) club with a significant increase in levels of sport played after surgery ( p ≤ 0.006) compared to before surgery. Conclusions: At an average of 6-years of follow up, there was an 84% success rate of circumferential meniscal repair for horizontal cleavage tears. Most patients who play sports, return to sport and do so at the same or higher level and report successful PROMs. Circumferential meniscal repairs should be considered for patients with horizontal cleavage tears.

Objectives: There is a paucity of research comparing the outcomes of medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) repair with internal bracing to isolated MUCL reconstruction in professional baseball players. Further, the practice of supplementing a MUCL reconstruction with an internal brace, a "hybrid" reconstruction, has increased in the surgical treatment of MUCL injuries for professional baseball players, without any currently known published research defining the clinical outcomes of this modification. We sought to investigate the trends and outcomes of MUCL repair with internal bracing and "hybrid" MUCL reconstruction with internal bracing. Using a matched cohort analysis, we also sought to compare the clinical outcomes of both MUCL repair with internal bracing and "hybrid" MUCL reconstruction with internal bracing to isolated MUCL reconstructions, without internal bracing, in professional baseball players. Methods: The MLB Health and Injury Tracking System was used to identify all professional baseball players who underwent MUCL surgery, regardless of surgery technique, from 2010 to 2023. Professional players of all levels (MLB and MiLB) and players of all positions were included. Player demographics, injury characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were obtained. Player demographics included age at surgery, position of play, professional level of play and surgical technique. Outcomes assessed were return to play (RTP) status, time to RTP, return to same level of play (RTSL), time to RTSL, revision MUCL surgery, and time to revision MUCL surgery, with a minimum of 2 years of follow up. Players were considered to have RTP if they participated in at least one game at any professional level. RTSL was defined as returning to the same league of professional play or higher. Patients undergoing MUCL repair and "hybrid" MUCL reconstruction with internal bracing were independently compared to propensity matched patients undergoing isolated MUCL reconstruction, without internal bracing, to assess for a difference in postoperative outcomes. Four subgroup analyses were conducted by further categorizing patients to MLB players, MiLB players, pitchers, and position players. Results: 76 patients underwent MUCL repair with internal bracing from 2016-2021 and were successfully propensity matched to 76 patients undergoing isolated MUCL reconstructions. Baseline patient demographic variables of MUCL repairs were statistically similar to those of controls except for age at time of surgery (24.5 vs 21.8; p<0.001). 81 patients underwent "hybrid" MUCL reconstructions with internal bracing from 2016-2021 and were successfully propensity matched to 81 patients undergoing isolated MUCL reconstructions. Baseline demographic variables of "hybrid" MUCL reconstructions were statistically similar to those of controls except for age at time of surgery (24.3 vs. 23.3; p=0.006). Compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, all patients undergoing MUCL repair demonstrated significantly shorter time to RTP (mean 421.2 vs. 546.2 days; p<0.001), shorter time to RTSL (mean 436.2 vs. 558.8 days; p<0.001), and shorter time to revision (mean 465.2 vs.1648 days; p=0.036). The number of patients who RTP at any level, RTSL, and number of revision surgeries were not significantly different. Compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, all patients undergoing "hybrid" MUCL reconstructions demonstrated no significant differences with respect to the number of patients who RTP, time to RTP, number of patients who RTSL, days to RTSL, number of revision surgeries, and time to revision surgery. In MLB players only, compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, patients who underwent MUCL repairs demonstrated significantly shorter time to RTP (mean 282.8 vs 507.3 days; p=0.008) and shorter time to RTSL (mean 299.7 vs. 598.0 days; p = 0.024). No other outcomes were significant. In MLB players only, compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, patients who underwent "hybrid" MUCL reconstructions demonstrated significantly shorter time to RTP (mean 436.2 vs. 525.3 days; p=0.026). No other outcomes were significant. In MiLB players only, compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, patients who underwent MUCL repairs demonstrated significantly shorter time to RTP (mean 444.3 vs 550.7 days; p<0.001) and shorter time to RTSL (mean 451.7 vs. 556.5 days; p<0.001). No other outcomes were significant. In MiLB players only, compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, patients who underwent "hybrid" MUCL reconstructions demonstrated no significant differences in outcomes. In evaluating pitchers only, compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, patients undergoing MUCL repair demonstrated significantly shorter time to RTP (mean 421.7 vs. 578.6 days; p<0.001), shorter time to RTSL (mean 434.8 vs. 591.6 days; p <0.001), and shorter time to revision surgery (mean 465.2 vs.1648 days; p=0.036). No other outcomes were significant. In pitchers only, compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, patients undergoing "hybrid" MUCL reconstructions demonstrated significantly shorter time to RTP (mean 488.1 vs. 549.0 days; p=0.013) and shorter time to RTSL (mean 505.7 days vs. 577.0 days, respectively; p=0.021). No other outcomes were significant. Notably, all revision surgeries in occurred in pitchers only. Conclusions: Based on a matched cohort anaylsis of professional baseball players undergoing MUCL surgery, when compared to an isolated MUCL reconstruction, MUCL repair with internal bracing may allow for a shorter time to RTP and RTSL, with a shorter time to revision surgery. For pitchers, "hybrid" MUCL reconstruction may allow for a shorter time to RTP and RTSL. For MLB players, "hybrid" MUCL reconstruction may allow for a shorter RTP.

Objectives: The number of medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) reconstructions are increasing. The epidemiology surrounding revision MUCL reconstructions in professional baseball players has not been well defined. The purpose of this study was to report the epidemiology of revision MUCL reconstruction in professional baseball players. The authors hypothesized that the number of revision MUCL reconstructions would increase over time and that the return to sport rate at the same level of play would be less than 70%. Methods: All professional baseball pitchers who underwent revision MUCL reconstruction between 2010-2023 were identified using the MLB Health and Injury Tracking System (HITS). Rate of return and time to return to play (RTP) and return to same level of play (RTSL) was recorded and analyzed for pitchers with a minimum follow up of 2 years. Surgical variables including technique and graft choice were also recorded. Results: Overall, 191 pitchers (avg age 26.0 years), underwent revision MUCL reconstruction. The average time between primary and revision surgery was 1,381 days (45 months). 130 (68%) of these players were MLB pitchers and the other 61 (32%) were MiLB pitchers. 59% of pitchers were able to RTSL at an average of 604 ± 250 days after surgery. 2023 was the year with most revision MUCL reconstructions (n = 27) and the fewest reconstructions were performed in 2010 and 2011 (n = 4). Monthly distribution demonstrates the highest surgery months to be May (17%), June (20%), and July (17%). Hamstring tendon autograft was found to be the most commonly used graft source (n = 90, 47%), compared to palmaris longus autograft (n = 67, 35%). No significant differences were found in the types of grafts used over time ( P = .238 for palmaris and P = .133 for hamstring). In terms of tunnel configuration, both the Modified Jobe and Docking techniques were used in equal occurrence (n = 70, 37%) Conclusions: Following revision MUCL reconstruction, only 72% of professional baseball pitchers were able to return to play at any level at an average of 556 days (18 months), and only 59% were able to return to the same level of play at an average of 604 days (20 months). The average time between primary and revision MUCL reconstruction was 45 months (3.75 years). Pitchers should be counseled on the relatively low RTSL rate and the prolonged time to RTSL.

Objectives: Value based decision making regarding nonoperative management vs. early surgical stabilization for first-time anterior shoulder instability (ASI) events remains controversial. Thus, the purpose of this study was to perform 1) a systematic review of the current literature and 2) a Markov model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing an initial trial of nonoperative management to arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) for first-time ASI. Methods: A Markov Chain Monte Carlo probabilistic model (Figure 1) was developed to evaluate the outcomes and costs of 1,000 simulated patients (average age » 20 years old) with first-time ASI undergoing nonoperative management vs. ABR. Utility values, recurrence rates, and transition probabilities were derived from the published literature. Costs were determined based on the typical patient undergoing each treatment strategy at our institution. Outcome measures included costs, quality-adjust life-years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Probabilities of recurrence as well as the utility of each treatment strategy were obtained from the literature search as described above. Probabilities were pooled across studies to obtain a weighted average for both nonoperative treatment and ABR. Similarly, studies reporting scores on the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) scale were utilized to approximate shoulder-related quality of life after each treatment strategy and outcome. Costs for each treatment strategy and transition state in the model were considered from the payer perspective (commercial or government) and obtained from institutional data at a large, academic medical center. Results: The Markov model with Monte Carlo microsimulation demonstrated average (± standard deviation) costs for nonoperative management and ABR of $38,649 ± 10,521 and $43,052 ± 9,352, respectively. Total QALYS acquired over the 10-year time horizon were 7.7 ± 0.4 and 8.4 ± 0.5 for nonoperative management and ABR, respectively. The ICER comparing ABR to nonoperative management was found to be just $5,725/QALY, which falls substantially below the $50,000 willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold (Figure 2). The mean number of recurrences were 2.6 ± 0.3 and 1.2 ± 0.2 for patients initially assigned to the nonoperative and ABR treatment groups, respectively. Out of 1,000 samples run over 1,000 trials, ABR was the optimal strategy in 98.7% of cases, with nonoperative management the optimal strategy in 1.3% of cases (Figure 3). Conclusions: The primary findings of this systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis were as follows: 1) when compared to nonoperative management, arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) substantially reduces the risk of recurrent dislocations, 2) ABR results in greater shoulder function and higher WOSI scores than does nonoperative management, and 3) despite substantially higher upfront costs, ABR proved to be more cost-effective than an initial trial of nonoperative management, which can be attributed to both fewer recurrent dislocations and greater utility over the long-term.