Citations

Abstract The emergency department ( ED ) occupies a unique position within the healthcare system, serving as a safety net for vulnerable patients, regardless of their race, ethnicity, religion, country of origin, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, or medical diagnosis. Shared decision making ( SDM ) presents special challenges when used with vulnerable population groups. The differing circumstances, needs, and perspectives of vulnerable groups invoke issues of provider bias, disrespect, judgmental attitudes, and lack of cultural competence, as well as patient mistrust and the consequences of their social and economic disenfranchisement. A research agenda that includes community‐engaged approaches, mixed‐methods studies, and cost‐effectiveness analyses is proposed to address the following questions: 1) What are the best processes/formats for SDM among racial, ethnic, cultural, religious, linguistic, social, or otherwise vulnerable groups who experience disadvantage in the healthcare system? 2) What organizational or systemic changes are needed to support SDM in the ED whenever appropriate? 3) What competencies are needed to enable emergency providers to consider patients’ situation/context in an unbiased way? 4) How do we teach these competencies to students and residents? 5) How do we cultivate these competencies in practicing emergency physicians, nurses, and other clinical providers who lack them? The authors also identify the importance of using accurate, group‐specific data to inform risk estimates for SDM decision aids for vulnerable populations and the need for increased ED ‐based care coordination and transitional care management capabilities to create additional care options that align with the needs and preferences of vulnerable populations.

Context.— The diagnosis and grading of acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in lung allograft biopsies is important because rejection can lead to acute graft dysfunction and/or failure and may contribute to chronic graft failure. While acute cellular rejection is well defined histologically, no reproducible specific features of AMR are currently identified. Therefore, a combination of clinical features, serology, histopathology, and immunologic findings is suggested for the diagnosis of AMR. Objective.— To describe the perspective of members of the Pulmonary Pathology Society (PPS) on the workup of lung allograft transbronchial biopsy and the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection and AMR in lung transplant. Data Sources.— Reports by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), experience of members of PPS who routinely review lung allograft biopsies, and search of literature database (PubMed). Conclusions.— Acute cellular rejection should be assessed and graded according to the 2007 working formulation of the ISHLT. As currently no specific features are known for AMR in lung allografts, the triple test (clinical allograft dysfunction, donor-specific antibodies, pathologic findings) should be used for its diagnosis. C4d staining might be performed when morphologic, clinical, and/or serologic features suggestive of AMR are identified.

Background The study compared downstream coronary and conduit disease progression in the left anterior descending coronary artery treated with coronary artery bypass grafting using the left internal mammary artery ( LIMA ) versus percutaneous coronary intervention with bare metal stent ( BMS ) or drug eluting stent ( DES ). Methods and Results A total of 12 301 consecutive patients underwent isolated primary coronary revascularization, of which 2386 met our inclusion criteria (Percutaneous coronary intervention, n=1450; coronary artery bypass grafting, n=936). Propensity score analysis matched 628 patients, of which 468 were treated to the left anterior descending with coronary artery bypass grafting with LIMA (n=314), percutaneous coronary intervention with BMS (n=94), and DES (n=60). Coronary angiograms were analyzed by quantitative coronary angiography ( QCA ; n=433). Cumulative downstream coronary and conduit disease progression were estimated by Kaplan–Meier method and effect of treatment type by Cox proportional hazard models. Patients treated with LIMA had significantly lower risk of downstream coronary disease progression at follow‐up angiogram compared with BMS and DES (hazard ratio [ HR ] [95% CI ], 0.34; [0.20–0.59]; P =0.0002; and HR [95% CI ], 0.39; [0.20–0.79]; P =0.01, respectively). LIMA was associated with a lower risk of conduit disease progression compared to BMS and DES ( HR [95% CI ], 0.18; [0.12–0.28]; P <0.001; and HR [95% CI ], 0.27; [0.16–0.46]; P <0.001, respectively). BMS was associated with higher HR for downstream coronary and conduit disease progression compared with DES , but the difference did not reach statistical significance ( HR [95% CI], 1.13; [0.57–2.36]; P =0.73; and HR [95% CI ], 1.46; [0.88–2.50]; P =0.14, respectively). Conclusions LIMA grafting to left anterior descending is associated with significantly lower risk of downstream coronary and conduit disease progression compared to percutaneous coronary intervention with BMS and DES .

Targeting three defects with one strategy The neurodegenerative diseases amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia are most commonly caused by a mutation in the C9orf72 gene. The mutation is an expanded hexanucleotide repeat in a noncoding region. The expanded repeat produces sense and antisense RNA transcripts, which accumulate in patient cells and appear to sequester RNA-binding proteins. The sense and antisense transcripts are also translated into dipeptide repeat proteins, which are aggregation-prone and accumulate in the brain and spinal cord. Last, loss of function from reduced expression of C9orf72 in neurons and glia could contribute to the disease. Kramer et al. targeted both sense and antisense repeats by blocking a single gene called SPT4 , which mitigated degeneration in human cells by reducing all three types of pathologies. Science , this issue p. 708

Histone deacetylase 3 prevents chondrocytes from producing inflammatory mediators that prevent bone development.

Abstract Several papers have implicated mutations in the AT-rich interactive domain containing protein 1B (ARID1B) in carcinoma formation in multiple tissue types, including the lung. The ARID1B protein functions as part of SWI/SNF, a multi-subunit chromatin remodeling complex that repositions nucleosomes and may act as a tumor suppressor in cancer. ARID1B is located in a region in 6q that was previously shown to have strong evidence of linkage with lung cancer risk. As it is one of the more promising candidates within the target region, this study presents the viability of ARID1B as a candidate gene for familial lung cancer. Here, we chose individuals from families in our previous linkage study that showed the strongest linkage signal on 6q. 75 individuals from 9 families were sequenced for 37Mb of chromosome 6 from 130Mb to 167Mb using Illumina technology and a custom Agilent kit. Genotypes were imported into GoldenHelix SVS 7 for quality control and dropped if read depth &lt; 10, quality score &lt; 10 or a quality score to read depth ratio &lt; 0.5. Variants with more than 1 Mendelian error were dropped. Variants with a single Mendelian inconsistency were dropped only for that family. Two-point parametric linkage analysis at theta = 0 was performed using R and an implementation of the Elston-Stewart algorithm in the paramlink package using a penetrance model of 0.01/0.1/0.1 (dd/Dd/DD) and a disease allele (D) frequency of 0.01. Family 102 showed strong evidence for linkage near ARID1B. The highest LOD score (1.34) out of all sequenced variants was located near this gene in a known conserved intergenic region between ARID1B and NOX3. Four other LOD scores &gt; 0.7 were found in the intergenic region between these two genes. Two are transcription factor binding sites; two are conserved genomic elements. We also observed two linked intronic variants of ARID1B in this family; an enhancer (LOD = 0.89) and a transcribed region (LOD = 0.73). Two other families (47 and 59) displayed evidence of linkage in ARID1B. Here, the interest is not the value of the LOD scores (top scores were 0.64 and 0.54), but the centering of the linked haplotype around the gene. Family 47 has 60 variants with LODs between 0.64 and 0.61; 45 located within ARID1B or known regulatory regions. Family 59 has 61 variants with LODs between 0.54 and 0.51; 29 located within ARID1B or known regulatory regions The variants appear to be spread evenly throughout ARID1B, suggesting the presence of linked haplotypes. Analyses are currently underway to reconstruct possible haplotypes in these families. The results of this study show that variants in the ARID1B gene at least partially account for the linkage signal on 6q in three of the nine most strongly linked families in our cohort and thus we believe that ARID1B is a plausible candidate gene for further studies involving familial lung cancer. Replication studies using 27 new extended families are currently underway to confirm this initial result. Citation Format: Anthony M. Musolf, Claire L. Simpson, Mariza de Andrade, Diptasri Mandal, Colette Gaba, Ping Yang, Ming You, Elena Y. Kupert, Marshall W. Anderson, Ann G. Schwartz, Susan M. Pinney, Christopher I. Amos, Joan E. Bailey-Wilson. Chromatin remodeling gene ARID1B is linked to familial lung cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2542.