Capelozzi, Vera Luíza

AbstractObjectivePrevious studies have reported a close relationship between malignant mesothelioma (MM) and the immune matricial microenvironment (IMM). One of the major problems in these studies is the lack of adequate adjustment for potential confounders. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify and quantify risk factors such as IMM and various tumor characteristics and their association with the subtype of MM and survival.MethodsWe examined IMM and other tumor markers in tumor tissues from 82 patients with MM. These markers were evaluated by histochemistry, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and morphometry. Logistic regression analysis, cluster analysis, and Cox regression analysis were performed.ResultsHierarchical cluster analysis revealed two clusters of MM that were independent of clinicopathologic features. The high‐risk cluster included MM with high tumor cellularity, high type V collagen (Col V) fiber density, and low CD8+ T lymphocyte density in the IMM. Our results showed that the risk of death was increased for patients with MM with high tumor cellularity (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.29‐2.89, P = .02), overexpression of Col V (OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 0.98‐6.84, P = .04), and decreased CD8 T lymphocytes (OR = 1.001, 95% CI = 0.995‐1.007, P = .008). The hazard ratio for the high‐risk cluster was 2.19 (95% CI = 0.54‐3.03, P < .01) for mortality from MM at 40 months.ConclusionMorphometric analysis of Col V, CD8+ T lymphocytes, and tumor cellularity can be used to identify patients with high risk of death from MM.

Context.— The diagnosis and grading of acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in lung allograft biopsies is important because rejection can lead to acute graft dysfunction and/or failure and may contribute to chronic graft failure. While acute cellular rejection is well defined histologically, no reproducible specific features of AMR are currently identified. Therefore, a combination of clinical features, serology, histopathology, and immunologic findings is suggested for the diagnosis of AMR. Objective.— To describe the perspective of members of the Pulmonary Pathology Society (PPS) on the workup of lung allograft transbronchial biopsy and the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection and AMR in lung transplant. Data Sources.— Reports by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), experience of members of PPS who routinely review lung allograft biopsies, and search of literature database (PubMed). Conclusions.— Acute cellular rejection should be assessed and graded according to the 2007 working formulation of the ISHLT. As currently no specific features are known for AMR in lung allografts, the triple test (clinical allograft dysfunction, donor-specific antibodies, pathologic findings) should be used for its diagnosis. C4d staining might be performed when morphologic, clinical, and/or serologic features suggestive of AMR are identified.