Citations

Abstract Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS), an X-linked disorder characterized by immunodeficiency, thrombocytopenia, autoimmunity, and malignancy, can be effectively treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Older age at HCT and mismatched donors are known to affect overall survival (OS). However, the influence of specific clinical manifestations or WAS variant class on OS and factors associated with event-free survival (EFS) remain incompletely defined. We analyzed outcomes of 308 patients with WAS who underwent HCT at 37 institutions of the Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium from 1990 to 2018. With a median follow-up of 5.3 years, the 5-year OS and EFS were 87.2% and 79.7%, respectively. Age ≥5 years, donor type, and a pre-HCT history of severe infection had a negative impact on OS and EFS, whereas pre-HCT autoimmunity had no impact. Reduced-intensity regimens were associated with lower T-cell and myeloid donor chimerism, particularly when non–busulfan-based regimens were used. Low myeloid donor chimerism was associated with lower platelet counts. Mixed chimerism was not consistently associated with post-HCT autoimmunity. Patients with class I (exon 1-2 missense and intron 5 hot spot variants) and class II variants (all others) had similar pre-HCT clinical symptom severity and no difference in OS, EFS, or platelet recovery post-HCT. In conclusion, our study showed excellent long-term OS and EFS after HCT for WAS, highlighting the importance of early HCT, before the development of severe infections. We confirmed that HCT using busulfan-based conditioning was associated with improved donor chimerism and platelet recovery. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02064933.

Abstract Introduction Obecabtagene autoleucel (obe-cel) and brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) are CD19 targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies, approved for the treatment of adults with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Mechanistic differences between obe-cel and brexu-cel including differing costimulatory domains (4-1BB vs. CD28), CD19 binding domains (intermediate vs. high affinity) and split dose (Days 1 and 10) vs. single infusion may impact in-vivo cellular kinetics that translate into variant clinical outcomes. In pivotal trials, obe-cel resulted in lower rates of severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) compared to brexu-cel with comparable efficacy (Roddie et al., NEJM 2025; Shah et al., Lancet 2021). Real-world utilization and outcomes with obe-cel are unknown given the relatively recent approval. Methods The ROCCA database, comprising real world data from patients (pts) with r/r ALL treated at 40 North American institutions was utilized in this analysis. Pts with r/r ALL were eligible if they were apheresed for obe-cel since its approval (11/8/2024) or brexu-cel over a comparable period (since 8/1/24) and had at least 30 days of follow up. Data cut off was 7/15/2025. CRS/ICANS were graded per ASTCT criteria. Measurable residual disease (MRD) was assessed by flow cytometry and/or next generation sequencing per institutional standards. Results 38 pts have undergone apheresis for obe-cel (36 infused, all received both infusions) and 54 (53 infused) for brexu-cel over the study period. Pts in the obe-cel and brexu-cel cohorts had the following baseline characteristics: median age, 47 vs. 39 years; ECOG 2+, 15% vs. 26%; Ph+ disease, 24% vs 13%; KMT2Ar, 0 vs. 4%; TP53m, 11% vs 11%, and hypodiploid karyotype, 5% vs 6%. The following prior treatment patterns were observed: median lines of therapy before CAR-T 3 vs. 3; prior SCT 24% vs. 30%, prior blinatumomab 68% vs. 46%, prior inotuzumab 45% vs. 30%. At apheresis, active disease (>5% bone marrow blasts) was present in 47% vs. 55% of obe-cel and brexu-cel pts, respectively; the remainder were in CR (with 18% vs. 22% in MRD- CR, respectively). Among obe-cel (n= 35 [92% of cohort]) and brexu-cel (21 [38% of cohort] pts with disease re-assessment prior to lymphodepletion (LD), 31% vs. 43% had active BM disease, respectively; few pts (24% vs. 17%) had >20% marrow disease burden prior to LD. CAR-mediated toxicity differed significantly between the cohorts. CRS occurred in 56% of obe-cel pts compared to 94% of brexu-cel pts (p < 0.0001). There were no Gr3+ CRS events among the obe-cel pts; 3 (6%) brexu-cel pts had Gr3+ CRS (p = 0.27). ICANS occurred in 17% of obe-cel pts vs. 51% of brexu-cel pts (p = 0.001). Gr3+ ICANS occurred in 6% of obe-cel vs. 32% of brexu-cel pts (p = 0.0027). Among the obe-cel pts, CRS occurred in 31% after the first infusion and 46% after the second; ICANS occurred in 3% after the first infusion and 15% after the second. Prolonged Gr4 neutropenia (ANC < 500 cells/uL beyond day 30 from infusion) occurred in 24% of obe-cel vs. 28% of brexu-cel pts (p = 0.73). Deaths within the first 28 days of infusion occurred in 0 obe-cel pts and 4 brexu-cel pts (2 of infection, 1 of infection/brain bleed, and 1 of liver failure in the setting of Gr4 CRS and HLH). Response rates were high and did not significantly differ between cohorts (p = 0.85). Among the 31 obe-cel pts with available response data, 25 (81%) achieved an MRD- CR/CRi, 3 (10%) had an MRD+ CR/CRi, 2 (6%) had a CR/CRi with unknown MRD, and 1 (3%) did not respond. Among 41 brexu-cel pts with available response data, 33 (80%) had an MRD- CR/CRi, 4 (10%) an MRD+ CR/CRi, and 4 (10%) CR/CRi with unknown MRD. Conclusion Pts selected for obe-cel apheresis were similar to those for brexu-cel over the study period (noting that not all centers had access to obe-cel during this time). Similar to clinical trial results, obe-cel was associated with lower rates of CRS/ICANS. Rates of MRD-negative CR were high and did not differ between cohorts. A larger sample and longer follow up are required for further analyses; we anticipate a cohort of ~75 obe-cel treated pts by the annual meeting and will provide updated data.

Abstract Use of Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) has increased exponentially since their introduction in 2010. Over the years they have been used without any systematic oversight, there have been ongoing concerns related to inappropriate or incorrect dosing, incorrect duration, and non-adherence to the drugs leading to adverse patient outcomes. Several factors have been attributed to DOAC non-adherence such as presence or fear of adverse effects, affordability, lack of perceived benefit, or concerns for reversibility. These barriers impact both primary (first time prescription) and secondary adherence (longer term prescription). Poor adherence can lead to adverse outcomes such as stroke, death, and higher medical resource utilization hence increased cost to the patient and payors. This study was conducted as a quality improvement (QI) initiative to improve the adherence to the prescription DOACS. We included patients 18 years old, a diagnosis of Atrial fibrillation and flutter who had a primary care provider writing the prescription for chronic DOAC therapy. Patients with venous thrombosis, pregnancy or who were institutionalized were excluded. The charts were reviewed for primary and secondary adherence using Surescripts functionality which can provide baseline information about prescription fills from the participating pharmacies. In the preimplementation phase we identified 1030 patients meeting inclusion criteria associated with the pilot sites within Mayo Clinic practice in preceding 6 months. For this population, Surescripts data found that the rates of primary and secondary adherence to be 84% and 86% respectively. We then implemented a 6-month pilot where we created workflow for a pharmacy led DOAC management unit. Herein, once a DOAC prescription was made for patients meeting inclusion criteria, they would enter a registry where the pharmacy team would review the charts for primary adherence by utilizing Surescripts data. If adherent these patients would be marked for follow up in the secondary adherence phase. However, if non adherent, the team would initiate intervention including engagement with patient online services which was further escalated to phone calls by the pharmacy team. Once the barriers were identified several remediation approaches were incorporated in the process, these included education about DOACS, medicare education, social work assistance to even switching to warfarin if necessary. The same process was followed for secondary adherence management. In the intervention cohort, we had 411 patients during the pilot, for primary adherence 87.1% of patients were adherent at baseline and an additional 3.4% became adherent with interventions, while 9.5% remain nonadherent. The primary causes of nonadherence, amongst 9.5%, were cost (86%) while 1% were concerned about side effects and 3% were concerned about lack of perceived benefit. The inverntions lead to impoved adherence in most patients and very few patients were transitioned to warfarin. For secondary adherence 92% of the patients were adherent without any intervention, an additional 4% of patients benefited with the interventions of the DOAC management unit with approaches to address cost considerations, while another 4% remained nonadherent where cost remained the primary reason for nonadherence, other reasons being lack of perceived benefit and side effect concerns. In summary, with active intervention, in our patient population we were able to improve the primary adherence from 84% to 91% and secondary adherence from 86% to 96% . Cost remained the biggest barrier for adherence followed by concern for side effects and lack of perceived benefit. Our engaged team of pharmacy staff was able to manage those concerns with the education and cost mitigation strategies leading to improved adherence. Based on previously published literature even a 5% difference in adherence to DOACS can make a huge difference in population-based outcomes. Our work was able to demonstrate a positive impact of the intervention, highlighting the need for a well-managed DOAC unit especially for complex care populations.

Abstract Introduction: Brexucabtagene autoleucel (Brexu-cel) is a CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-)T cell therapy approved for treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-ALL. Brexu-cel's approval was founded on data from the ZUMA-3 trial, in which 78 patients (pts) were treated at the pivotal dose of 1x10e6 CAR-T cells/kg, resulting in a complete remission (CR) rate of 73%. Three-year follow-up from ZUMA-3 demonstrated median relapse-free and overall survival (RFS/OS) of 11.6 and 25.6 months (mos) for all treated pts. Amongst responders, the median OS was 60.4 mos for those who did not receive a subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) (n=43), but only 36.3 months for those who did (n=14). This has led some to conclude that HCT may not be beneficial following brexu-cel therapy for r/r B-ALL; however, it must be noted that 29 (37%) of the pts treated on ZUMA-3 received brexu-cel for post-HCT relapse. T cells collected from individuals who relapse in the post-HCT setting are largely of donor origin, making the CAR-T product comparable to a genetically modified donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). The immunology at play in this scenario may be different from that in which CAR-T cells are of truly autologous origin. Methods: The Real-World Outcomes Collaborative for CAR-T in ALL (ROCCA) consortium database includes pt characteristics and outcomes of brexu-cel therapy given as standard-of-care across 41 US institutions. We identified pts who achieved an MRD negative (neg) CR by either flow cytometry (minimum sensitivity 10e-4) or NGS following brexu-cel for r/r Ph neg B-ALL and categorized them into three groups with regard to use of HCT: Never HCT, Pre-CAR HCT, or Post-CAR HCT. Pts who received second HCT following brexu-cel for post-HCT relapse (n=9) were excluded. Pt/disease characteristics, RFS, and OS were assessed for each group, landmarked at 73 days after brexu-cel infusion (the median time to consolidative allogeneic HCT). Results: In the ROCCA database we identified 165 pts who achieved MRD neg CR following brexu-cel, amongst whom 69 never underwent HCT, 49 were transplanted pre-CAR (ie, brexu-cel served as a genetically modified DLI), and 47 underwent post-CAR consolidative HCT while in CR. The median follow-up is 373 days. The median age was higher in the Never HCT group (49, range 19-83) in comparison with the Pre-CAR HCT (40, 24-72) and Post-CAR HCT (34, 18-70) groups. Thirty-five percent were >60yo in the Never HCT group vs 20% in the Pre-CAR HCT and 9% in the Post-CAR HCT groups. Ph-like disease was present in 38%, 29%, and 43% of the Never HCT, Pre-CAR HCT, and Post-CAR HCT groups, respectively (p=0.35). No significant differences were observed in pre-apheresis bone marrow blasts, presence of CNS disease at apheresis, prior blinatumomab or inotuzumab treatment, or use of bridging therapy across the groups, though there was a higher prevalence of non-CNS extramedullary disease in the Pre- and Post-CAR HCT groups (32, 39%) vs the Never HCT group (13%) (p=0.004). A minority of pts in all groups were deemed to be in MRD neg CR prior to apheresis (6-20%). Median RFS was 260 days in the Never HCT group and not reached in the Pre- and Post-CAR HCT groups (p=0.002), with respective 1-yr RFS of 38%, 64%, and 67%. Median OS was not reached in any group and was similar for all at 1-yr at 68-79% (p=0.13). Characteristics of those in the Never HCT group who were least likely to relapse included age >60 (OR 0.22, CI 0.07-0.73 vs age 18-39, p=0.024) and those with non-Ph-like B-ALL (OR 0.33, CI 0.12-0.94, vs Ph-like, p=0.037) in univariate analyses. Conclusions: Real-world data regarding outcomes following brexu-cel therapy allow evaluation of the role for consolidative allogeneic HCT, which remains one of the most important unresolved questions in the use of CAR-T therapy for r/r B-ALL. This analysis demonstrates that a first consolidative HCT after achieving MRD neg CR with brexu-cel is associated with a significant decrease in relapse. Additionally, use of brexu-cel for post-HCT relapse is also associated with a significantly lower risk of relapse compared with those who never received an allogeneic HCT. With the current duration of followup, OS is not significantly different across the three groups. These data suggest there is a benefit for relapse-free survival in pts receiving an allogeneic HCT at some point in the course of treatment for r/r Ph neg B-ALL.

Abstract Introduction: CD19-directed CAR T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has substantially improved clinical outcomes for adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, notable toxicities are associated with CAR-T, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Variable practice patterns have emerged regarding the use of CRS/ICANS prophylaxis (ppx) via corticosteroids and/or other pharmacologic agents, but the utility of these approaches on reducing CRS or ICANS following CAR-T in B-ALL remains unknown. Thus, we utilized the Real-World Outcomes Collaborative for CAR T in ALL (ROCCA) database to evaluate associations between ppx and the development and severity of CRS or ICANS following brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) for B-ALL. Methods: Adult patients (pts) who received standard-of-care brexu-cel for relapsed/refractory B-ALL across 40+ US centers were included. Primary endpoints were the incidence of CRS and ICANS within 28 days of CAR-T infusion. Secondary endpoints included timing of CRS and ICANS onset, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations between ppx and incidence of CRS/ICANS; KM and log-rank methods were used for survival analyses. Results: A total of 378 pts were included: 53 pts (14.0%) received CRS/ICANS ppx and 325 (86.0%) received no ppx. Ppx agents included steroids only (26.4%), steroid and anakinra (52.8%), anakinra only (15.1%), and steroid and tocilizumab (5.7%). Pts in the ppx group had a higher proportion of Hispanic pts (64% vs 34%), Ph-like (36% vs 19%) and a lower proportion had 0-5% bone marrow blasts at apheresis (38% vs 53%). The ppx and no ppx groups were similar in age, prior therapies, CAR-T indication, and marrow blasts >50%. Cumulative incidence of any grade (gr) CRS was 94% with ppx and 86% with no ppx (p=0.025), of any gr ICANS was 53% with ppx and 51% with no ppx (0= 0.85). Cumulative incidence of gr 3-4 CRS was 9% in the ppx group and 10% in the no ppx group (p=1.00), of gr 3-4 ICANS was 26% in the ppx group and 29% in the no ppx group (p=0.71). Median time to onset for any gr CRS or any gr ICANS was identical in the ppx and no ppx cohorts (CRS: 5 days, range ppx 1-9 days, no ppx 0-14 days; ICANS: 7 days, ppx 1-20 days, no ppx 0-16 days). Univariate logistic regression analyses showed no significant association between ppx and the incidence of gr 2-4 CRS (OR 1.34, 95% CI: 0.75-2.40, p=0.326) or gr 3-4 ICANS (OR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.46-1.70, p=0.708). Multivariate analysis adjusting for ethnicity, leukemia genetic sub-type, and pre-apheresis disease burden similarly found no significant associations between ppx and gr 2-4 CRS (adjusted OR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.55-2.01, p=0.870) or gr 3-4 ICANS (OR 1.23, 95% CI: 0.59-2.55, p=0.584). When comparing steroid-only ppx (N=14) to steroid combinations or other drug ppx (N=39), there was no significant differences in gr 2-4 CRS (57% vs 44%, p=0.345) or gr 3-4 ICANS (43% vs 21%, p=0.115). Comparing cumulative incidence of dexamethasone (dex) exposure, pts in the ppx group had numerically greater dex exposure than pts in the no ppx group, with median (range) dosing of 182 mg (10-1386mg) and 100mg (1-4000mg), respectively. Finally, we found no significant differences in PFS or OS based on ppx. Median PFS was 9.6 months in the ppx group vs 13.3 months in the no ppx group (p=0.646) and median OS was 17.2 months in the ppx group vs 34.4 months in the no ppx group (p=0.170). Conclusions: In this large cohort of adult patients with R/R ALL receiving brexu-cel CAR-T therapy, prophylaxis intended to prevent CRS/ICANS was ineffective at reducing CRS/ICANS incidence, time to onset, or overall steroid exposure. Furthermore, PFS and OS were comparable between patients who received prophylaxis and those who did not. In the absence of prospective trials in B-ALL, these data suggest that current strategies of CRS/ICANS prophylaxis has limited benefit.

Abstract Introduction: Brexu-cel is a highly effective treatment for R/R B-ALL, with complete responses achieved in 71% of patients (pts) treated in the pivotal ZUMA-3 trial. Patients with B-ALL with high-risk (HR) genetics are known to have inferior outcomes with chemotherapy, but little is known about the influence of HR ALL genetics on responses to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T in adults. In this study, we assessed the impact of HR ALL genetics on outcomes in a large cohort of adult patients treated with brexu-cel for R/R Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative B-ALL. Methods: Patient characteristics and outcomes were obtained from the Real-World Outcomes Collaborative of CAR-T in Adult ALL (ROCCA) database which includes data from 40 U.S. centers. NCCN guidelines (NCCN Guidelines in Oncology, ALL v2.2025) were used to define HR B-ALL genetics; lack of HR genetics was defined as standard-risk (SR). The primary outcome was event-free survival (EFS), defined as lack of response, disease progression, or death from any cause. Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), relapse free survival (RFS) and response rates including complete response (CR), CR incomplete count recovery (CRi), measurable residual disease negative CR (MRD-) by flow or NGS and progressive disease (PD). Multivariable models were adjusted for age, pre-infusion blast percentage, prior allo-HCT, and post CAR-T allo-HCT (modeled as a time-varying covariate). Results: The cohort included 286 pts: 169 with HR and 117 with SR B-ALL. The HR cohort included TP53m (n=24, 14%), KMT2Ar (n=16, 9%), CRLF2r (n=65, 39%) and other HR genetics such as JAK2 and other Ph-like, IKZF1, complex cytogenetics (n=64, 38%). Relative to SR pts, HR pts were more commonly Hispanic (50% vs 28%). HR and SR pts had similar disease burden pre-apheresis (>5% blasts: 58% vs 53%), prior blinatumomab (60% vs 58%), prior inotuzumab (42% vs 46%), and prior allo HCT (27% vs 37%). The presence of CNS disease (11% HR vs 12% SR) and extramedullary disease (EMD, 22% HR vs 29% SR) at apheresis was also similar. CR/CRi was achieved in 90.5% of evaluable HR pts (n=147) and 90.2% of evaluable SR pts (n=102); MRD- rates were also similar between HR and SR pts at 78.9% and 78.2% respectively. In unadjusted analyses, EFS did not significantly differ between HR pts (median 9.6 mos; 1-yr: 46%, 95% CI 38%-54%) and SR pts (median 11.6 mos; 1-yr: 48%, 95% CI 38%- 58%). Median RFS (HR: 12.2 mos, SR: 13.3 mos) and median OS (HR: 22.4 mos, SR: 21.0 mos) were also similar. Multivariable models demonstrated no significant associations between HR B-ALL and EFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.73-1.63), RFS (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.71-1.80), or OS (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.62- 1.48) relative to SR ALL. 28% of HR patients and 21% of SR patients underwent consolidative allo-HCT. Among the HR subgroup, CR/CRi rate was lowest in KMT2Ar (71%) relative to TP53m (95%), CRLF2r (95%), and other HR genetics (89%). The median EFS was lowest in KMT2Ar (4.1 mos), followed by TP53m (6.9 mos), CRLF2r (11.6 mos), and other HR (11.1 mos). Median OS was also lowest in KMT2Ar (6.8 mos) vs 22.4 mos in TP53m and not reached in CRLF2r or other HR. PD was highest in KMT2Ar pts (29%), as compared to 11% HR other, 10% SR, and 5% TP53 and CRLF2r. The rate of relapse among those that achieved CR across the groups was similar and ranged between 28% -40%. Rates of CD19 negative relapse were similar between all subgroups (13%-15%), however 21% of KMT2A pts underwent myeloid transformation as compared 0% for TP53 and CRLF2 pts, and 2% among other HR and SR pts. 25% of KMT2Ar patients underwent consolidative allo-HCT as compared to 32% CRLF2 pts, 29% TP53 pts, 25% other HR pts and 21% SR pts. Multivariable models evaluating the different genomic subgroups demonstrated that relative to SR B-ALL, only KMT2Ar was associated with inferior OS (HR 3.17, 95% CI 1.53-6.58, p=0020). No associations were seen between HR subgroups and EFS. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this analysis represents the largest examination of adult B-ALL recipients of CAR-T assessed by genomic risk group. We found that response rates and survival outcomes following brexu-cel were similar among HR and SR B-ALL pts, including pts with TP53m and CRLF2r. However, pts with KMT2Ar had lower response rates and dismal EFS and OS, with higher rates of PD and myeloid transformation at relapse, suggesting that alternative strategies are necessary to improve outcomes for patients with R/R KMT2Ar B-ALL.

Abstract Background DNA methylation profiling can be used to robustly predict postsurgical outcomes and response to radiotherapy (RT) for meningioma patients. To allow for seamless integration of these complementary models into clinical practice, a practical framework is needed. Methods We leveraged a cohort of nearly 2000 surgically-treated meningiomas with DNA methylation profiling and clinical outcomes data. Existing methylation-based prediction models were dichotomized to yield four risk groups: low and high recurrent risk, each with RT sensitive and resistant subgroups. Risk groups were correlated with progression-free survival in the context of existing biomarkers including extent of resection and WHO grade. Results We first demonstrated that all risk groups benefit from gross total resection. All “high-risk, RT sensitive” tumors (n = 306, 15.7%) also benefited from adjuvant RT: after GTR, median PFS increased from 4.68 (4.13-9.48) years to not reached (P = .003); after subtotal resection (STR), from 2.12 (1.59-3.02) to 4.09 (3.41-not reached) years (P = .004). “Low-risk, RT sensitive cases” (n = 1207, 61.8%) also benefited from RT after STR (median PFS 7.39 (6.66-12.8) vs. 16.53 (10.35-not reached) years, P = .03), suggesting that RT be considered in these patients. Neither “low-risk RT resistant” (n = 84, 4.3%) nor “high-risk RT resistant” (n = 356, 18.2%) cases benefited from RT, and the latter group was associated with universally poor outcomes. Conclusions We identify methylation-defined risk groups of meningioma for which additional benefit is gained from adjuvant RT, leading to a clinical decision-making framework for straightforward integration of molecular models into clinical practice.

Abstract BACKGROUND Tovorafenib is a type II rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (RAF) kinase inhibitor approved by the FDA in 2024 for relapsing or chemotherapy-refractory pediatric low-grade gliomas with mutations or alterations in the gene BRAF. There is potential for the use of this drug outside the pediatric population. We present a single institution case series of adults with CNS tumors with mutations or alterations in BRAF treated (off-label) with tovorafenib. METHODS Chart review. RESULTS 8 adult (age >18) patients were treated with tovorafenib at our institution between March 2024 and June 2025. Age range was 21-66 years old (median age 42). The population included 5 males and 3 females. Indications for treatment were pilocytic astrocytoma (n = 2), high grade astrocytoma with piloid features (HGAP) (n = 2), Erdheim-Chester disease (n = 2), pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (n = 1), and otherwise unclassified low-grade glioma (n = 1). All patients had mutations or alterations in BRAF including KIAA1549 fusion (n = 4), V600E mutation (n = 3), or GAB2 fusion (n = 1). Radiographic response to therapy was seen in 5/8 patients with 3 cases of radiographic stability (though one patient later progressed) and 2 cases of decrease in tumor size (in a pilocytic astrocytoma and in an HGAP). Both cases of decreased tumor size after treatment were in tumors with KIAA1549 fusions. Adverse effects of tovorafenib included fatigue (n=2), headache, myalgias, diplopia, cytopenias, and transaminitis (n=1). 3/8 patients had to pause or stop treatment due to adverse effects (intolerable headache, cytopenias, and transaminitis respectively). CONCLUSION Tovorafenib is a promising new treatment for CNS tumors with BRAF mutations or alterations. Our single institution case series suggests the efficacy of this drug for multiple tumor types in adults. Certain tumor subtypes such as KIAA1549 fusions may be more likely to benefit from this treatment.

Background: Orthopaedic sports medicine fellowships are highly competitive, yet objective data defining characteristics of successful applicants remain limited. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that greater academic productivity, top-tier residency training, and certain demographic factors would be associated with matching into a top-ranked orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed applicants who matched into one of the top 10 orthopaedic sports medicine fellowships from 2020 to 2025, as identified by previous applicant preference rankings. Applicant data were obtained from publicly available sources and verified by 2 independent reviewers. Variables included sex, degree type, residency program ranking, geographic region, and research productivity (total publications, primary publication count, H-index, and sports-related publications). Multivariate logistic regression assessed predictors of matching into top 5 versus 6th- to 10th-ranked programs. Results: Among 226 matched applicants, 87.7% were male and 99.1% held a doctorate in medicine degree. The mean total publication count was 12.4, mean H-index was 8.2, and 30.5% trained at a top 20 orthopaedic residency. Applicants matching into top 5 programs had significantly higher research metrics than those in the 6th- to 10th-ranked programs: total publications (20.1 vs 4.7), primary publication count (6.2 vs 1.6), and sports-related publications (11.4 vs 1.9). On regression analysis, total publications, H-index, and residency ranking were independent predictors of matching into a top 5 program. Conclusion: Matching into a top orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship is associated with higher academic productivity and training at a top-tier residency program.