Citations

Abstract Background Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A/B) received FDA approval as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2020. However, optimal subsequent treatment options are unclear. Here, we describe clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients following first-line treatment with A/B. Patients and Methods We conducted a multi-site analysis of patients with HCC treated with first-line A/B between January 2018 and December 2022 at Mayo Clinic. This study cohort included all patients receiving second-line systemic therapy after A/B. Median overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Child Pugh (CP) scores are also described at diagnosis, prior to first line, and prior to second-line therapy. Results Of the 342 patients who received A/B, 107 (31.3%) received second-line treatments including anti-VEGF therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and were included in the final analysis. Median OS for all patients was 11.1 months from initiation of second-line therapy. Median OS was 10.7 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.8) and 15.7 months (95%CI: 6.8-NE) for those receiving anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI ( P = .50). Median TTD for second-line therapies was 2.4 months (95% CI: 1.7-3.3) and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.5-5.1) for anti-VEGF inhibitors and ICI, respectively (P = .87). In multivariate analyses, CP was significantly associated with survival. Conclusion Following first-line A/B treatment, there is no statistically significant difference in survival between ICI and anti-VEGF therapy, nor in time to treatment discontinuation. CP score remains an important prognostic tool.

TPS2700 Background: Though immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to improvements in clinical outcomes in patients with cancer, when used as monotherapy in the advanced setting, only 18-25% of patients respond to ICI. Notably, ICI frequently lacks anti-tumor activity in immune-cold cancers where T cell priming is missing. Recent breakthroughs in identifying personal neoantigens via a comprehensive analysis of cancer sequencing data have brought increased attention to neoantigen cancer vaccines. Personalized cancer vaccines targeting neoantigens have shown early promise. While neoantigens have recently been investigated in some cancer types, the current neoantigen prediction algorithms have often focused on the MHC class-I subtype, single nucleotide mutations (SNM), small insertions and deletions (INDEL). We recently developed an informatics workflow, REAL-neo, for the identification, quality control (QC), and prioritization of both class-I and class-II human leukocyte antigen (HLA) bound neoantigens that arise from somatic SNM, INDEL, aberrant RNA splicing, and gene fusions, generating much more potent neoantigen candidates. Furthermore, we demonstrated robust T-cell response and prolonged survival by combining ICI and cancer vaccines in preclinical models. This single-arm phase I clinical trial is in progress to assess the safety, feasibility, and immunogenicity of personalized neoantigen vaccines in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid cancers. Methods: The vaccine consists of up to 20 peptides (15-30 mer) comprising patient-specific neoantigens identified from tumor DNA and mRNA sequencing data using REAL-neo and delivered with GM-CSF as an adjuvant. The first cohort of three patients will be treated at dose level 1 consisting of 4 or 5 peptides at 300 mcg/peptide and GM-CSF 125 mcg per injection site in each of four limbs. After Cohort 1 is deemed safe, the study will expand to cohort 2, when patients will be enrolled at the same dose level for vaccine plus Pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. Neoantigen vaccine will be given via subcutaneous injection on days 1, 4, 8, 15, and 21 (cohorts 1 and 2) and weeks 5 and 8 (booster dose for cohort 2 only). Cohort 1 has been completed without dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Enrollment in Cohort 2 began in January 2024. AEs are assessed according to CTCAE v5. and safety findings are reviewed by data safety medical board (DSMB). Key eligibility criteria include 1) histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic solid malignancies and 2) cancer progression after at least one line of the standard-of-care (SOC) systemic treatment. For cohort 2, patients must be eligible to receive pembrolizumab per SOC or the treating physician’s judgment. Clinical trial information: NCT05269381 .

TPS2675 Background: Checkpoint inhibitor therapy is the standard first-line treatment for advanced/recurrent HCC, but there is a significant unmet therapeutic need for patients (pts) who progress after first-line treatment. Adoptive cellular immunotherapy may provide a novel treatment option. Glypican-3 (GPC3), a heparan sulfate proteoglycan, is overexpressed by tumor cells in HCC and virtually absent in healthy tissues, making it an ideal target for CAR-T therapy. AZD5851 is an autologous CAR-T product that expresses a CAR specific for GPC3 and a dominant negative (dn)TGFβRII as an armoring strategy. Expression of dnTGFβRII can block TGFβ signaling, protecting CAR T-cells from the immunosuppressive effects of this cytokine. Early clinical data with C-CAR031, a CAR-T product with the same GPC3-specific CAR and dnTGFβRII-armoring transgene as AZD5851, showed promising tolerability and antitumor activity in pts with HCC [1]. ATHENA (NCT06084884) is a first-in-human, single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of AZD5851 in pts with GPC3+ advanced/recurrent HCC, for whom ≥1 prior line of standard therapy failed or was not tolerable. Methods: Eligible pts are aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced/recurrent or metastatic and/or unresectable HCC, GPC3+ tumor sample as determined by immunohistochemistry, ≥1 prior line of standard systemic therapy, ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1, Child-Pugh A, ECOG PS 0/1, and adequate organ and bone marrow function. Approximately 24 pts will be enrolled in Part A (Phase I, dose escalation) and 50 in Part B (Phase II dose expansion). Pts will undergo apheresis to collect peripheral blood mononuclear cells for AZD5851 production, after which they may receive approved bridging therapy for disease control. Upon successful generation of AZD5851 product, pts will undergo lymphodepletion before receiving a single dose of IV AZD5851. Subsequent follow-up is divided into 3 stages: Stage 1, active follow-up of all pts through 6 months post AZD5851 infusion; Stage 2, further evaluation of pts who have not progressed or started a new anticancer regimen during Stage 1; Stage 3, long-term follow-up for all pts who have received AZD5851. The primary endpoints are to assess the safety/tolerability of AZD5851 (both study parts), and to determine the recommended dose(s) of AZD5851 for expansion and phase 2 trials (Part A). Secondary endpoints include efficacy (objective response rate, best overall response, duration of response, disease control rate, durable response rate, time to response, progression-free survival, and overall survival) and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints include pharmacodynamic biomarkers and immunogenicity. Enrollment began Nov 2023. 1. Zhang et al. AACR 2023. Abstract CT097. Clinical trial information: NCT06084884 .

3078 Background: Q901 is a potent, covalently binding CDK7 inhibitor with excellent specificity for CDK7 against other protein kinases. Transcriptional regulation by CDK7 inhibition in cancer cells leads to DNA damage repair response inhibition and increased genomic instability. Q901 also regulates cell cycle checkpoints by inhibiting T-loop phosphorylation and transcriptionally downregulating CDK1, 2 and 4. In preclinical in vivo models, intravenous (iv) administration of Q901 once a week and once every three-week dosing regimen was well tolerated and showed significant antitumor activity. The safety profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and efficacy data for 18, 36 and 60 mg/m2 are presented. Methods: QRNT-009 (NCT05394103) is an ongoing Phase 1/2 multicenter, open-label, dose escalation and expansion study. Q901 is administered iv once weekly for four weeks, then once every two weeks thereafter in patients with advanced or metastatic ovarian cancer, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), breast cancer, endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), or pancreatic cancers. Results: As of data cutoff (12Jan2024), 17 patients received Q901 across 3 dose levels: 5 patients at 18 mg/m2, 4 patients at 36 mg/m2, and 8 patients at 60 mg/m2. The median prior lines of systemic therapy were 4 (range 2 - 17). Of 17 patients who received Q901 across all doses, there were no treatment related SAEs, treatment discontinuations, or dose reductions. Most common TRAEs ≥ 15% were nausea (29.4%), anemia (23.6%) and fatigue (23.5%). As of data cutoff, no DLTs were observed. All plasma PK analyses across dose levels showed dose dependent increase of AUC0-last and Cmax. No major metabolite was observed. POLR2A, which is a CDK7 target engagement marker showed biologically effective change starting from 18 mg/m2. 1 patient with pancreatic cancer who received 18 mg/m2 had a partial response with CA19-9 reduction from 4,632 to 219. 2 patients at 18 mg/m2 and 2 patients at 36 mg/m2 had stable disease. Additional safety and efficacy data will be presented. Conclusions: Preliminary data from QRNT-009 study showed that selective CDK7 inhibitor Q901 is well tolerated. Preliminary antitumor activity and pharmacodynamic observations are encouraging. Dose escalation is ongoing to identify MTD or recommended dose for further studies. Clinical trial information: NCT05394103 .

2526 Background: Tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 (TNFR2) is expressed on effector CD8+, CD4+, and regulatory T (Treg) cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and myeloid cells. Activation of TNFR2 is anticipated to yield effective anti-tumor immunity by stimulating T-cell and NK-cell activation and proliferation in the tumor microenvironment. HFB200301 is a first-in-class anti-TNFR2 agonistic monoclonal antibody that triggers both innate and adaptive immune stimulation by binding to a specific epitope on TNFR2. We report initial results of an ongoing Phase I dose escalation, multicenter study (NCT05238883) of HFB200301 in monotherapy and in combination with tislelizumab (TIS) in patients (pts) with advanced refractory solid tumors. Methods: A Phase I trial designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and initial efficacy of HFB200301 in monotherapy and in combination with TIS. Eligible pts, ≥18 years with an ECOG PS 0-1 and advanced solid tumors, will be enrolled in dose escalation at 5 different dose cohorts in monotherapy (Q4W), 3 different dose cohorts in combination with TIS (Q4W), or in dose expansion following determination of safety. Radiographic response is assessed every 8 weeks. Results: A total of 39 pts have been enrolled, 27 pts in monotherapy and 12 pts in combination. All pts received prior systemic therapy (median 2, range 1-4); 23 pts (59%) had prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment. No dose limiting toxicities were observed in either the monotherapy or combination arms. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 44% of monotherapy and in 50% of combination pts, with pruritis (11%), tremor (7%), fatigue (7%), asthenia (7%) and nausea (7%) being the most common TRAEs. No ≥ Grade 3 TRAEs were reported, and there were no drug discontinuations due to TRAEs. Preliminary HFB200301 PK analysis demonstrated non-linear clearance of HFB200301, with dose-proportional maximum concentration [Cmax], achieving sufficient exposures for peripheral target engagement in all tested doses. Emerging PD data demonstrates evidence of immune activation and expansion of CD8+ T cells, but not Tregs, in the tumor microenvironment and peripheral blood. Single cell RNAseq analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells demonstrated PD modulation in TNFR2 positive immune cell types post-HFB200301 treatment. Early response evaluation reveals ongoing durable clinical responses (> 6 months) in a PD-L1+ pleural mesothelioma pt and an EBV+ gastric cancer pt from combination cohorts. Conclusions: HFB200301 demonstrates a favorable safety profile, dose-dependent PK, with PD and preliminary clinical activity in monotherapy and in combination with TIS in pts with heavily pre-treated refractory solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT05238883 .

2531 Background: The immune co-stimulatory receptor OX40 is expressed on CD4+ T cells, including regulatory T cells (Tregs). First generation OX40 agonists faced limitations from interference with endogenous OX40-OX40L binding, leading to decreased surface OX40 levels on T cells. Distinguished by its unique epitope on OX40, the novel next generation IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) HFB301001 facilitates agonistic activity without impeding endogenous OX40 ligand binding. This allows for effective co-stimulation of T cells without diminishing OX40 levels. Additionally, HFB301001 exhibited superior in vivoanti-tumor activity and ability to enhance effector CD8+ T cell function compared to a benchmark first generation OX40 agonist in preclinical studies. Here, we report initial data of an ongoing dose-escalation study (NCT05229601) of HFB301001 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: A Phase I trial designed to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary efficacy of HFB301001. Eligible pts ≥18 years old (ECOG PS 0-1) with advanced solid tumors are enrolled in 4 different dose cohorts in monotherapy (Q4W) dose escalation. Solid tumor types were selected using Drug Intelligent Science (DIS®), employing integrative bulk and single cell RNAseq (scRNAseq) analyses to confirm and prioritize prospective targets in specific immune cell types. Sequential analysis of peripheral blood and tumor tissue biomarkers is performed. Radiographic response is assessed every 8 weeks. Results: As of January 06, 2024, 26 pts were enrolled, all having received prior systemic therapy (median 2, range 1-4); 81% received prior checkpoint inhibitor treatment. The majority of pts (77%) were male, median age was 62.5 years (range 41-78). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 34.6% of pts, none ≥ grade 3. Common TRAEs included rash (19%), pruritis (12%) and arthralgia (8%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Preliminary results demonstrate dose-proportional increases in maximum concentration, typical mAb volume of distribution, and nonlinear clearance. On treatment biopsies revealed expansion of both natural killer and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, with no notable expansion of Tregs. Analysis of peripheral blood by scRNAseq and immunophenotyping revealed expansion of cytotoxic CD8+T cells relative to CD4+ T cells post treatment. Preliminary efficacy analysis indicates a disease-control rate (DCR) of > 60% with greatest effect seen in hepato-cellular and renal cell carcinoma. Median time on treatment was 1.9 months (range 0.9-17 months). Conclusions: HFB301001 demonstrates a favorable safety profile, dose-dependent PK and PD immunomodulation, and DCR in heavily pretreated solid tumors. HFB301001 warrants further evaluation and expansion in specific tumor types is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT05229601 .

e15146 Background: Wnt/ß-catenin signaling dysregulation is found in approximately 25% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The impact of B-catenin activation on HCC overall survival has remained controversial. Prior studies suggest activating CTNNB1 mutations may predict for immunotherapy (IO) resistance while others did not corroborate this finding. Here we describe the clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients (pts) with CTNNB1 (+) and without CTNNB1 (-) mutations treated with novel first line IO/anti-VEGF therapies. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of pts with HCC who had molecular analysis performed between 2019 and 2023 at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida. The study was reviewed and approved by the IRB. Clinical and molecular features were compared descriptively. The primary outcomes were time to treatment failure (TTF), defined as time from first-line treatment initiation to off treatment or death, and overall survival (OS), defined as time from first-line treatment initiation to death, compared between the two cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified 29 CTNNB1+ and 62 CTNNB1- (wt) pts with HCC. Median age at diagnosis was 66 (range 30-86), 80 (88%) were Caucasian, 68 (75%) were male gender, and 22 (24%) had etiology as hepatitis B/hepatitis C, 82 (90%) were Child-Pugh A and 77 (85%) were Barcelona Clinic Liver Clinic (BCLC)=C at diagnosis. Eighteen (90%, n=20) CTNNB 1+ pts received first-line IO (Atezolizumab/bevacizumab [AB]) vs 39 (72%, n=54) in CTNNB1- pts. All pts were microsatellite stable (MSS). CTNNB1+ had a similar median tumor mutational burden (TMB), higher rate of TERT co-mutation, and lower rate of TP53 co-mutation (table) compared to CTNNB-. Of 57 AB pts, 5 (27%) of CTNNB1 + had an objective response, compared to 6 (16.7%) CTNNB1- pts. Time to treatment failure with first-line AB and overall survival were similar between the two cohorts (Table). Conclusions: Our study suggests CTNNB1 status is not prognostic in HCC pts receiving IO based therapy. Prospective study is warranted to further investigate predictive biomarkers for HCC sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors and VEGF-targeted therapy. [Table: see text]

Purpose: To investigate the molecular characteristics of and potential for precision medicine in KRAS wildtype pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Patients and Methods: We investigated 27 patients with KRASWT PDAC at our institution. Clinical data were obtained via chart review. Tumor specimens for each subject were interrogated for somatic single nucleotide variants, insertion and deletions, and copy number variants by DNA sequencing. Gene fusions were detected from RNA-seq. A patient-derived organoid (PDO) was developed from a patient with a MET translocation and expanded ex vivo to predict therapeutic sensitivity prior to enrollment in a phase 2 clinical trial. Results: Transcriptomic analysis showed our cohort may be stratified by the relative gene expression of the KRAS signaling cascade. The PDO derived from our patient harboring a TFG-MET rearrangement was found to have in vitro sensitivity to the multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib. The patient was enrolled in the phase 2 SPARTA clinical trial and received monotherapy with vebrelitinib, a c-MET inhibitor, and achieved a partial and durable response. Conclusions: KRASWT PDAC is molecularly distinct from KRASMUT and enriched with potentially actionable genetic variants. In our study, transcriptomic profiling revealed that the KRAS signaling cascade may play a key role in KRASWT PDAC. Our report of a KRASWT PDAC patient with TFG-MET rearrangement who responded to a cMET inhibitor further supports the pursuit of precision oncology in this sub-population. Identification of targetable mutations, perhaps through approaches like RNA-seq, can help enable precision-driven approaches to select optimal treatment based on tumor characteristics.

Abstract Background: The prognosis of patients with MM with CNS mets is poor. E6201 is an intravenous (IV) MEK inhibitor with activity against BRAF V600-mutated MM cell lines, including MAPK resistance alteration. A previous phase I trial demonstrated activity of E6201 in BRAF V600E mutated MM with a Maximal Tolerated Dose of 320mg/m2 given IV once a week x 3 weeks q 28 days. 2/23 (8.7%) of patients had a PR, 8/23 (34.8%) had SD. Two patients with MM and brain mets achieved near-CR which led to preclinical studies that demonstrated E6201 is unaffected by P-gp and BCRP transport and achieved higher brain to blood concentration (266%).In this trial, patients with BRAF mutation + MM with brain mets, single agent E6201 given at 320mg/m2 twice weekly x 3 weeks q 28 days was determined to be safe. One patient had CNS SD and a PR in lung mets, and a second patient achieved CNS stable disease and CR in a leg melanotic lesion. The drug was well-tolerated with one reversible AE thrombocytopenia (Gr 2). The final review showed intracranial response of SD in 2/4 (50%) patients and systemic SD in 3/4 (75%) patients. Methods: We are currently accruing to the dose escalation cohort of E6201 with dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily orally (n=up to 22 evaluable patients). E6201 is administered IV at 320mg/m2 twice weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days. Patients must have stage IV melanoma with BRAF mutation with at least one active lesion in the brain. Prior local therapy is allowed if done at least 3 weeks prior to cycle 1. Participants must be on a stable dose of steroids for at least 7 days and have an ECOG <!–=2. The study allows one prior BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. The primary objectives are to determine the MTD of E6201 when combined with dabrafenib and the response rate of brain mets. The secondary objectives include duration of response, extracranial response, progression free survival, overall survival, and impact of BRAF mutation subtype and safety of the combination. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05388877 References:1.Gampa G, et al. Brain distribution of a novel MEK inhibitor E6201: implications in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases. 2018. Drug Metab Dispos.2.Tibes R et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of E6201 in patients with advanced solid tumors, including melanoma: results of a phase I study. 2018. Brit J of Cancer. 3.Babiker Gm et al, E6201, an intravenous MEK1 inhibitor, achieves an exceptional response in BRAF V600E mutated metastatic malignant melanoma with brain metastases. 2018. Inv New Drugs4.Gampa G, Kim M, Cook-Rostie N, Laramy JK, Sarkaria JN, Paradiso L, DePalatis L, Elmquist WF. Brain distribution of a novel MEK inhibitor E6201: Implications in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases. 2018. Drug Met Disp.–> Citation Format: Mahesh Seetharam, Roxana Dronca, Arkadiusz Z. Dudek, Garth Nelson, Matthew Block, Skylar Starling, Amber Baskin, Renee Bradshaw, Courtney Nelson, Kylee Andrews, Alisha Birgin, Cristina Watson, Yiyi Yan, Daruka Mahadevan, Svetomir Markovic, Tom Myers, Linda Paradiso, Hani Babiker. Phase 1 trial of MEK1 inhibitor E6201 plus dabrafenib in patients (pts) with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma (MM) with central nervous system (CNS) metastases (mets) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT157.