Saeed, Anwaar

e15628 Background: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) with cytotoxic chemotherapy and chemoradiation followed by surgical resection is a standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In a limited number of LARC patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR), treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) resulted in all patients achieving complete clinical response (cCR) (median follow-up of 29 months) such that radiotherapy and surgery were avoided. These and other data have resulted in the routine use of neoadjuvant ICI for dMMR LARC. Here we report a multicenter series of patients with dMMR LARC treated with neoadjuvant ICI. Methods: Adult patients (N = 21) with dMMR LARC who received neoadjuvant ICI at Mayo Clinic, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Duke University or University of Pittsburgh were identified from the electronic medical record (EMR) and relevant data were abstracted. All patients were staged with pelvic MRI; clinical response was evaluated by repeat pelvic MRI and sigmoidoscopy. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic IRB. Results: Patients with clinical stage I (n = 2), II (n = 3) or III (n = 15) dMMR LARC were treated with neoadjuvant PD-1 monotherapy (n = 20) or combination (n = 1, ipilimumab+ nivolumab). Median age was 46 years (IQR 39, 65), 15 (71%) were male, 10 (48%) had distal tumors, and 14 had Lynch Syndrome. Median duration of ICI treatment was 7 mos (IQR 6, 12); one patient remains on dostarlimab at data cut-off. Clinical complete response (cCR) was achieved in 11 (52%) patients, partial response (PR) in 7 (33%), stable disease (SD) in 1 (5%), and progressive disease (PD) in 2 (10%) patients. Median time from first dose of ICI to best clinical response was 6 mos (IQR 5, 8) months. All partial or non-responders received salvage TNT with (n = 6) or without (n = 3) surgery. At a median follow up of 19 mos (range 6 to 56), tumor regrowth occurred in 1 patient who was subsequently treated with TNT. Any grade immune-related adverse event occurred in 6 (29%) patients; one grade 3 hepatitis occurred in the patient on Ipi+Nivo (Table1). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ICI treatment of dMMR LARC resulted in half of treated patients achieving cCR. Careful monitoring is necessary to identify non responders who will require salvage TNT. Patient characteristics and clinical response to ICI. ID Sex Age Stage ICI Response to ICI ID Sex Age Stage ICI Response to ICI 1 M 62 T3N+ Pembro cPR 12 M 37 T3N+ Pembro cCR 2 M 60 T2N0 Pembro cCR 13 M 41 T3N0 Pembro cCR 3 M 80 T2N0 Pembro cPD 14 M 46 T4N+ Pembro cPR 4 M 36 T3N+ Ipi+Nivo cCR 15 M 68 T3N+ Pembro cPR 5 M 57 T3N+ Dostarli cCR 16 M 77 T3N0 Pembro cPR 6 M 39 T3N+ Dostarli cPR 17 M 40 T4Nx Pembro cCR 7 F 44 T2N+ Dostarli cPD 18 F 35 T3N+ Dostarli cCR 8 M 74 T3N+ Pembro cCR 19 M 60 T2N+ Pembro cPR 9 M 43 T3N+ Nivo cCR 20 F 65 T3N+ Pembro cCR 10 F 81 T3N0 Dorstali cPR 21 F 39 T4N+ Dorstali cSD 11 F 32 T2N+ Pembro cCR

TPS2675 Background: Checkpoint inhibitor therapy is the standard first-line treatment for advanced/recurrent HCC, but there is a significant unmet therapeutic need for patients (pts) who progress after first-line treatment. Adoptive cellular immunotherapy may provide a novel treatment option. Glypican-3 (GPC3), a heparan sulfate proteoglycan, is overexpressed by tumor cells in HCC and virtually absent in healthy tissues, making it an ideal target for CAR-T therapy. AZD5851 is an autologous CAR-T product that expresses a CAR specific for GPC3 and a dominant negative (dn)TGFβRII as an armoring strategy. Expression of dnTGFβRII can block TGFβ signaling, protecting CAR T-cells from the immunosuppressive effects of this cytokine. Early clinical data with C-CAR031, a CAR-T product with the same GPC3-specific CAR and dnTGFβRII-armoring transgene as AZD5851, showed promising tolerability and antitumor activity in pts with HCC [1]. ATHENA (NCT06084884) is a first-in-human, single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of AZD5851 in pts with GPC3+ advanced/recurrent HCC, for whom ≥1 prior line of standard therapy failed or was not tolerable. Methods: Eligible pts are aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced/recurrent or metastatic and/or unresectable HCC, GPC3+ tumor sample as determined by immunohistochemistry, ≥1 prior line of standard systemic therapy, ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1, Child-Pugh A, ECOG PS 0/1, and adequate organ and bone marrow function. Approximately 24 pts will be enrolled in Part A (Phase I, dose escalation) and 50 in Part B (Phase II dose expansion). Pts will undergo apheresis to collect peripheral blood mononuclear cells for AZD5851 production, after which they may receive approved bridging therapy for disease control. Upon successful generation of AZD5851 product, pts will undergo lymphodepletion before receiving a single dose of IV AZD5851. Subsequent follow-up is divided into 3 stages: Stage 1, active follow-up of all pts through 6 months post AZD5851 infusion; Stage 2, further evaluation of pts who have not progressed or started a new anticancer regimen during Stage 1; Stage 3, long-term follow-up for all pts who have received AZD5851. The primary endpoints are to assess the safety/tolerability of AZD5851 (both study parts), and to determine the recommended dose(s) of AZD5851 for expansion and phase 2 trials (Part A). Secondary endpoints include efficacy (objective response rate, best overall response, duration of response, disease control rate, durable response rate, time to response, progression-free survival, and overall survival) and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints include pharmacodynamic biomarkers and immunogenicity. Enrollment began Nov 2023. 1. Zhang et al. AACR 2023. Abstract CT097. Clinical trial information: NCT06084884 .

Abstract Purpose: The safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of elraglusib, a glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) small-molecule inhibitor, as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy, in patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors or hematologic malignancies was studied. Patients and Methods: Elraglusib (intravenously twice weekly in 3-week cycles) monotherapy dose escalation was followed by dose escalation with eight chemotherapy regimens (gemcitabine, doxorubicin, lomustine, carboplatin, irinotecan, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel/carboplatin, and pemetrexed/carboplatin) in patients previously exposed to the same chemotherapy. Results: Patients received monotherapy (n = 67) or combination therapy (n = 171) elraglusib doses 1 to 15 mg/kg twice weekly. The initial recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of elraglusib was 15 mg/kg twice weekly and was defined, without dose-limiting toxicity observation, due to fluid volumes necessary for drug administration. The RP2D was subsequently reduced to 9.3 mg/kg once weekly to reduce elraglusib-associated central/peripheral vascular access catheter blockages. Other common elraglusib-related adverse events (AE) included transient visual changes and fatigue. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 55.2% and 71.3% of patients on monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. Part 1 monotherapy (n = 62) and part 2 combination (n = 138) patients were evaluable for response. In part 1, a patient with melanoma had a complete response, and a patient with acute T-cell leukemia/lymphoma had a partial response (PR). In part 2, seven PRs were observed, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2–2.6] and 6.9 (95% CI, 5.7–8.4) months, respectively. Conclusions: Elraglusib had a favorable toxicity profile as monotherapy and combined with chemotherapy and was associated with clinical benefit supporting further clinical evaluation in combination with chemotherapy.

PURPOSE Compared with people living without HIV (PWOH), people living with HIV (PWH) and cancer have traditionally been excluded from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) trials. Furthermore, there is a paucity of real-world data on the use of ICIs in PWH and cancer. METHODS This retrospective study included PWH treated with anti–PD-1- or anti–PD-L1-based therapies for advanced cancers. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Objective response rates (ORRs) were measured per RECIST 1.1 or other tumor-specific criteria, whenever feasible. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to compare OS and PFS between matched PWH and PWOH with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). RESULTS Among 390 PWH, median age was 58 years, 85% (n = 331) were males, 36% (n = 138) were Black; 70% (n = 274) received anti–PD-1/anti–PD-L1 monotherapy. Most common cancers were NSCLC (28%, n = 111), hepatocellular carcinoma ([HCC]; 11%, n = 44), and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC; 10%, n = 39). Seventy percent (152/216) had CD4+ T cell counts ≥200 cells/µL, and 94% (179/190) had HIV viral load <400 copies/mL. Twenty percent (79/390) had any grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and 7.7% (30/390) had grade ≥3 irAEs. ORRs were 69% (nonmelanoma skin cancer), 31% (NSCLC), 16% (HCC), and 11% (HNSCC). In the matched mNSCLC cohort (61 PWH v 110 PWOH), 20% (12/61) PWH and 22% (24/110) PWOH had irAEs. Adjusted 42-month RMST difference was –0.06 months (95% CI, –5.49 to 5.37; P = .98) for PFS and 2.23 months (95% CI, –4.02 to 8.48; P = .48) for OS. CONCLUSION Among PWH, ICIs demonstrated differential activity across cancer types with no excess toxicity. Safety and activity of ICIs were similar between matched cohorts of PWH and PWOH with mNSCLC.

Abstract 9-ING-41 (elraglusib) is a potent and selective GSK-3 inhibitor that has shown anti-tumor activity in patient-derived xenograft models and phase1/2 clinical studies in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that elraglusib downregulates PD-1, TIGIT and LAG-3, upregulates expression of MHC class I proteins in tumor cells from “cold tumors”, and shows synergy when combined with PD-1 blockade in mouse xenografts. Clinical activity has been observed both as a single agent and in combination with standard of care chemotherapies in several advanced cancer histologies. Here we present initial ‘omics data from our phase 1/2 study (NCT03678883; ACT1801) spanning &gt;100 pts with advanced cancer evaluating both single agent and chemotherapy combinations. The patients (pts) included in this study received elraglusib as a ≥3rd line therapy for advanced disease. Most pts with melanoma treated with elraglusib monotherapy (8/9; 89%) stayed on study for &gt;2 cycles. One patient with melanoma refractory to checkpoint inhibitors achieved a confirmed and durable CR. Clinical benefit was also observed among pts with colorectal cancer with 4/12 (33.3%) pts treated with monotherapy and 12/15 (80%) that received elraglusib plus irinotecan rechallenge stayed on study &gt;2 cycles reaching median overall survival of 106 and 211 days, respectively. Based on emerging in vivo and in vitro results demonstrating that elraglusib activates T and NK cells promoting anti-tumor immune responses, we hypothesize immunomodulation by elraglusib may be contributing to anti-tumor immune response in the 1801 trial. We have acquired TCRseq and RNAseq profiles of PBMC samples from seven patients in 1801 during the first two weeks of treatment with elraglusib monotherapy. In these pts, reduced TCR clonality was observed and specific TCR clonotypes expanded after treatment, indicating T cell activation and expansion. These pts also showed changes in PBMC populations during elraglusib therapy as measured by immune deconvolution of PBMC RNAseq. Taken together, these data support a novel, previously unrecognized immunomodulatory mechanism of action for elraglusib and could provide rationale for future clinical development of elraglusib in pts with advanced malignancies. Additional analysis from TCRseq, immune profiling and cytokine analysis from expanded cohort of pts is ongoing. Citation Format: Taylor Weiskittel, Joseph McDermott, Daniel Billadeau, Hu Li, Anwaar Saeed, Devalingam Mahalingam, Solmaz Sahebjam, Pamela Munster, Ludimila Cavalcante, Frank J. Giles, Andrew Mazar, Benedito Carneiro. Multimodal mechanism of action of the GSK-3 inhibitor 9-ING-41 (elraglusib) includes an immunomodulatory component: preliminary results from the 1801 phase 1/2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT222.

TPS153 Background: The clinical benefit of approved therapies in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progress on first- and second-line chemotherapy (FOLFOX and FOLFIRI) is limited. In pts with chemotherapy-refractory RAS wild type mCRC, antibodies targeting EGFR offer a monotherapy response rate of approximately 20% and a progression-free survival (PFS) of 4 months (Price 2014). HER2 is a validated target in gastric and breast cancers, with HER2 amplification occurring in ~3–5% of pts with mCRC. Tucatinib (TUC), recently approved for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) highly selective for HER2 with minimal inhibition of EGFR. In pt-derived xenograft models of HER2+ mCRC, the combination of TUC + trastuzumab (TRAS) showed significantly greater antitumor activity compared with either agent alone (Kulukian 2020). The MOUNTAINEER trial was initiated to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TUC in combination with TRAS in pts with HER2+ RAS wild-type mCRC. Interim analysis of the initial 26 pts enrolled in MOUNTAINEER demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 52.2% (12 partial responses [PRs] in 23 evaluable pts), median duration of response of 10.4 months, with a median PFS of 8.1 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 18.7 months (Strickler 2019). Based on these results, the trial was expanded to enable better estimation of ORR and safety. Methods: MOUNTAINEER (NCT03043313) is an open-label, pivotal phase 2 trial that initially consisted of a single cohort of up to 45 pts (Cohort A) treated with TUC (300 mg BID) and TRAS (8 mg/kg IV followed by 6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks). The trial was expanded to include an additional 70 pts randomized 4:3 into 2 cohorts: Cohort B (N = 40) who will receive TUC + TRAS, and Cohort C (N = 30) who will receive TUC monotherapy. Pts in Cohort C will be treated with TUC (300 mg orally twice daily) with the option to crossover to TUC + TRAS if an objective response is not achieved by 12 weeks, or if progressive disease develops at any time. Eligible pts have RAS wild-type and HER2+ mCRC, and must have previously received regimens that include fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, anti-VEGF therapy, and an anti-PD-1 if the tumor has dMMR proteins or is MSI-H. Pts who have received prior HER2-directed therapies are not eligible. Additionally, pts must have measurable disease and ECOG PS of 0 to 2. The primary endpoint of this trial is confirmed ORR (per RECIST v1.1) in Cohorts A + B as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints include duration of response, PFS, OS, and safety and tolerability. Enrollment is ongoing in the US and planned for the EU. Clinical trial information: NCT03043313.