Borden, Brittany A.

Abstract Purpose: The safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of elraglusib, a glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) small-molecule inhibitor, as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy, in patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors or hematologic malignancies was studied. Patients and Methods: Elraglusib (intravenously twice weekly in 3-week cycles) monotherapy dose escalation was followed by dose escalation with eight chemotherapy regimens (gemcitabine, doxorubicin, lomustine, carboplatin, irinotecan, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel/carboplatin, and pemetrexed/carboplatin) in patients previously exposed to the same chemotherapy. Results: Patients received monotherapy (n = 67) or combination therapy (n = 171) elraglusib doses 1 to 15 mg/kg twice weekly. The initial recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of elraglusib was 15 mg/kg twice weekly and was defined, without dose-limiting toxicity observation, due to fluid volumes necessary for drug administration. The RP2D was subsequently reduced to 9.3 mg/kg once weekly to reduce elraglusib-associated central/peripheral vascular access catheter blockages. Other common elraglusib-related adverse events (AE) included transient visual changes and fatigue. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 55.2% and 71.3% of patients on monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. Part 1 monotherapy (n = 62) and part 2 combination (n = 138) patients were evaluable for response. In part 1, a patient with melanoma had a complete response, and a patient with acute T-cell leukemia/lymphoma had a partial response (PR). In part 2, seven PRs were observed, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2–2.6] and 6.9 (95% CI, 5.7–8.4) months, respectively. Conclusions: Elraglusib had a favorable toxicity profile as monotherapy and combined with chemotherapy and was associated with clinical benefit supporting further clinical evaluation in combination with chemotherapy.

3079 Background: Elraglusib (9-ING-41), a novel inhibitor of GSK-3β, has been evaluated in >230 patients (pts) with advanced malignancies including metastatic melanoma in the 1801 phase 1/2 trial (NCT03678883). Pts with melanoma treated with single agent elraglusib demonstrated clinical benefit including a durable complete response despite multiple prior lines of therapy including checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). Methods: We collected data from numerous -omic modalities in the 1801 trial to characterize markers of elraglusib response with bioinformatics and machine learning (ML). Genomic panels were collected on 105 pts. The most frequent tumor types included colorectal cancer (n=35), pancreas (n=31), lung (n=15) and metastatic melanoma (n=12). Pts were treated with elraglusib as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy. Pathway based features were generated by quantifying the percent of each Reactome pathway that was mutated. These pathway features were iteratively evaluated for their performance in shallow neural networks predicting patient RECIST with each model using 5-15 randomly selected features at a time. Publicly available genomic data from an anti-PD-1 trial in patients with metastatic melanoma (Hugo et al., 2017) was transformed into pathway-based features and input into the final model to predict elraglusib response in this population. Results: Our final pathway based genomic model for elraglusib response performed with a training accuracy of 93% and a test accuracy of 88% on the 1801 patients. We then tested the model on metastatic melanoma patients who were treated with anti-PD-1 therapy. We found that patients from Hugo et al. were predicted to respond to elraglusib (22/26). In addition, most patients with tumors resistant to anti-PD-1 therapy were also predicted to respond to elraglusib (10/12). Finally, we tested the model on metastatic melanoma patients treated with elraglusib in the 1801 study that had failed CPI and for whom -omic data was available. The model correctly identified 5/5 patients that demonstrated clinical benefit (1 CR, ongoing>1400 days; 4 prolonged OS of 107, 256, 357, and 556 days). Conclusions: We applied robust in-silico modeling developed using 1801 trial data to develop a rationale for the development of elraglusib in the treatment of metastatic melanoma including patients that failed or were refractory to anti-PD-1 treatment. This model correctly identified metastatic melanoma patients in 1801 with good clinical outcomes that had failed prior CPI treatment. Further, we present this in silico approach as a robust way to repurpose prior clinical study genomics and ML modeling for population enrichment during the clinical development of novel drugs. Clinical trial information: NCT03678883 .

Abstract Background: We have previously identified Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 beta (GSK-3β) nuclear accumulation as a hallmark of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and demonstrated the antitumor effects of GSK-3β tool compound inhibitors in vivo (Ougolkov, Clin Cancer Res 2006). 9-ING-41 (Actuate Therapeutics Inc), a first-in-class, small-molecule potent selective GSK-3β inhibitor, has significant preclinical antitumor activity in PDAC. 9-ING-41 is synergistic with gemcitabine (GEM) in significantly reducing PDAC cell proliferation via impairment of ATR/Chk1 DNA damage response (Ding, Clin Cancer Res 2019). These data provided the rationale for inclusion of patients with PDAC in the 1801 phase 1/2 study evaluating 9-ING-41 alone and in combination with chemotherapy, including GEM and GEM plus nab-paclitaxel. Methods: Parts 1 and 2 of the 1801 phase 1/2 study evaluate the safety and tolerability of 9-ING-41 in patients with refractory malignancies. Part 1 establishes the recommended phase 2 study dose (RP2D) for 9-ING-41 monotherapy, while Part 2 assesses 9-ING-41 in combination with chemotherapies. For Part 1, patients received twice-weekly IV infusions of 9-ING-41 (21-day cycle). Based on prior treatment, Part 2 for those with PDAC consists of 9-ING-41 plus GEM (1000 to 1250 mg/m2 days 1 and 8; 21-day cycle) or 9-ING-41 plus GEM and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2). Part 3 (Simon 2-stage phase 2 at the RP2D) will assess clinical benefit in patients with refractory PDAC treated with 9-ING-41-based combinations at the RP2D established in Part 2. Response is defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria in evaluable lesions. The study is opening in 25 sites globally and will accrue approximately 300 patients. Results: To date, the study has accrued 34 patients with advanced solid tumors (n=33) or hematologic malignancies (n=1). Four dose levels (1, 2, 3.3, and 5 mg/kg) have been completed without dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Part 2 of the study evaluating combination of 9-ING-41 with chemotherapy agents has been activated. Six patients with advanced PDAC have enrolled. One patient has completed 5 cycles of treatment with 9-ING-41 (1mg/kg) with stable disease (SD) as the best response. Another patient with SD as the best response has completed 6 cycles and now is joining the arm combining 9-ING-41 with GEM after disease progression. Four additional patients are awaiting first response assessment with enrollment ongoing. 9-ING-41-attributable AE to date are Grade 1 transient visual changes (color perception). Conclusions: 9-ING-41 is well tolerated. Preclinical data support the inclusion of patients with advanced PDAC on clinical studies of 9-ING-41. Citation Format: Benedito A. Carneiro, Malika Dhawan, Brittany Borden, Ludimila Cavalcante, Howard Safran, Andrey Ugolkov, Andrew P. Mazar, Daniel D. Billadeau, Francis J. Giles, Pamela Munster. GSK-3β blockade with 9-ING-41 in pancreas cancer: The 1801 phase 1/2 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer: Advances in Science and Clinical Care; 2019 Sept 6-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(24 Suppl):Abstract nr B09.