BACKGROUND: Chronic anal fissures are a painful condition characterized by a tear in the anal mucosa. Botulinum toxin injection is a minimally invasive treatment option, but long-term effectiveness in recurrent or persistent cases remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the long-term outcomes of botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of chronic anal fissures. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: Adults with chronic anal fissures treated with botulinum toxin between 2018 and 2023 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short- and long-term healing, recurrence, or persistence after botulinum toxin injection. Persistent or recurrent fissure(s) were followed for outcomes after subsequent repeat injections or surgery (lateral internal sphincterotomy or fissurectomy). RESULTS: Among 161 patients, 45.3% (n = 73) experienced short-term healing after botulinum toxin as first-line therapy, but only 26% (n = 42) had sustained healing. Subsequent treatment patterns were similar for recurrent (n = 31) and persistent (n = 88) fissures: 35% versus 31% no further intervention, 55% versus 42% multiple subsequent injections, 10% versus 23% surgery, respectively. Sustained healing was achieved in 63% (n = 10/16) of patients who underwent surgery compared with 37% (n = 14/38) who had repeat botulinum toxin injections ( p = 0.06). Only 49% achieved sustained healing after a single injection, multiple injections, or injection(s) with surgery. Complications included 5 episodes of mild fecal incontinence in the botulinum toxin group and 2 instances of surgical site infection in the surgery group. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include a single-institution, retrospective study design and loss to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Botulinum toxin remains a valuable therapy for chronic anal fissures. Many patients have persistent or recurrent fissures after botulinum toxin injection and undergo additional interventions. Despite multiple interventions, only half of the patients achieved sustained healing, regardless of the treatment pattern. These data do not support the use of botulinum toxin over surgery for the treatment of chronic fissures, are helpful for counseling patients on the safety profile of each, and set expectations regarding the need for multiple interventions. See Video Abstract . RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO DEL USO DE TOXINA BOTULÍNICA EN EL TRATAMIENTO DE FISURAS ANALES CRÓNICAS: UN ENFOQUE GRADUAL PARA EL MANEJO DE CASOS RECURRENTES Y PERSISTENTES ANTECEDENTES: Las fisuras anales crónicas son una afección dolorosa caracterizada por un desgarro en la mucosa anal. La inyección de toxina botulínica es una opción de tratamiento mínimamente invasiva, pero su eficacia a largo plazo en casos recurrentes o persistentes sigue sin estar clara. OBJETIVO: Evaluar los resultados a largo plazo de las inyecciones de toxina botulínica para el tratamiento de las fisuras. DISEÑO: Revisión retrospectiva. ENTORNO: Centro académico terciario. PACIENTES: Adultos con fisuras crónicas tratados con toxina botulínica entre 2018 y 2023. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Curación a corto y largo plazo, recurrencia o persistencia después de la inyección de toxina botulínica. Se realizó un seguimiento de las fisuras persistentes o recurrentes para evaluar los resultados después de repetidas inyecciones o cirugía (esfinterotomía interna lateral o fisurectomía). RESULTADOS: Entre los 161 pacientes, el 45,3 % (n = 73) experimentó una curación a corto plazo tras la toxina botulínica como terapia de primera línea, pero solo el 26 % (n = 42) tuvo una curación sostenida. Los patrones de tratamiento posteriores fueron similares para las fisuras recurrentes (n = 31) o persistentes (n = 88): 35 % frente a 31 % sin intervención adicional, 55 % frente a 42 % con múltiples inyecciones posteriores, 10 % frente a 23 % con cirugía, respectivamente. Se logró una curación sostenida en el 63 % (n = 10/16) de los pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía, en comparación con el 37 % (n = 14/38) que recibió inyecciones repetidas de toxina botulínica ( p = 0,06). Solo el 49 % logró una curación sostenida después de una sola inyección, múltiples inyecciones o inyecciones con cirugía. Las complicaciones incluyeron 5 episodios de incontinencia fecal leve en el grupo de la toxina botulínica y dos casos de infección en el sitio quirúrgico en el grupo de la cirugía. LIMITACIONES: Estudio retrospectivo de una sola institución y pérdida de seguimiento. CONCLUSIÓN: La toxina botulínica sigue siendo una terapia valiosa para las fisuras anales crónicas. Muchos pacientes presentan fisuras persistentes o recurrentes tras la inyección de toxina botulínica y se someten a intervenciones adicionales. A pesar de las múltiples intervenciones, solo la mitad de los pacientes lograron una curación sostenida, independientemente del patrón de tratamiento. Estos datos no respaldan el uso de la toxina botulínica frente a la cirugía para el tratamiento de las fisuras crónicas, pero son útiles para asesorar a los pacientes sobre el perfil de seguridad de cada una y establecer expectativas con respecto a la necesidad de múltiples intervenciones. ( AI-generated translation )
Immune checkpoint blockade in locally advanced rectal cancer with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR): Retrospective multicenter experience.
e15628 Background: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) with cytotoxic chemotherapy and chemoradiation followed by surgical resection is a standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In a limited number of LARC patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR), treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) resulted in all patients achieving complete clinical response (cCR) (median follow-up of 29 months) such that radiotherapy and surgery were avoided. These and other data have resulted in the routine use of neoadjuvant ICI for dMMR LARC. Here we report a multicenter series of patients with dMMR LARC treated with neoadjuvant ICI. Methods: Adult patients (N = 21) with dMMR LARC who received neoadjuvant ICI at Mayo Clinic, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Duke University or University of Pittsburgh were identified from the electronic medical record (EMR) and relevant data were abstracted. All patients were staged with pelvic MRI; clinical response was evaluated by repeat pelvic MRI and sigmoidoscopy. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic IRB. Results: Patients with clinical stage I (n = 2), II (n = 3) or III (n = 15) dMMR LARC were treated with neoadjuvant PD-1 monotherapy (n = 20) or combination (n = 1, ipilimumab+ nivolumab). Median age was 46 years (IQR 39, 65), 15 (71%) were male, 10 (48%) had distal tumors, and 14 had Lynch Syndrome. Median duration of ICI treatment was 7 mos (IQR 6, 12); one patient remains on dostarlimab at data cut-off. Clinical complete response (cCR) was achieved in 11 (52%) patients, partial response (PR) in 7 (33%), stable disease (SD) in 1 (5%), and progressive disease (PD) in 2 (10%) patients. Median time from first dose of ICI to best clinical response was 6 mos (IQR 5, 8) months. All partial or non-responders received salvage TNT with (n = 6) or without (n = 3) surgery. At a median follow up of 19 mos (range 6 to 56), tumor regrowth occurred in 1 patient who was subsequently treated with TNT. Any grade immune-related adverse event occurred in 6 (29%) patients; one grade 3 hepatitis occurred in the patient on Ipi+Nivo (Table1). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ICI treatment of dMMR LARC resulted in half of treated patients achieving cCR. Careful monitoring is necessary to identify non responders who will require salvage TNT. Patient characteristics and clinical response to ICI. ID Sex Age Stage ICI Response to ICI ID Sex Age Stage ICI Response to ICI 1 M 62 T3N+ Pembro cPR 12 M 37 T3N+ Pembro cCR 2 M 60 T2N0 Pembro cCR 13 M 41 T3N0 Pembro cCR 3 M 80 T2N0 Pembro cPD 14 M 46 T4N+ Pembro cPR 4 M 36 T3N+ Ipi+Nivo cCR 15 M 68 T3N+ Pembro cPR 5 M 57 T3N+ Dostarli cCR 16 M 77 T3N0 Pembro cPR 6 M 39 T3N+ Dostarli cPR 17 M 40 T4Nx Pembro cCR 7 F 44 T2N+ Dostarli cPD 18 F 35 T3N+ Dostarli cCR 8 M 74 T3N+ Pembro cCR 19 M 60 T2N+ Pembro cPR 9 M 43 T3N+ Nivo cCR 20 F 65 T3N+ Pembro cCR 10 F 81 T3N0 Dorstali cPR 21 F 39 T4N+ Dorstali cSD 11 F 32 T2N+ Pembro cCR