Citations

Abstract Introduction Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery is a well-established treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). There is little information in the literature regarding the utilization of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in primary and revision IPP surgeries. Objective We investigated the patterns of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis among a large multinational cohort of primary and revision IPP surgeries. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 5,400 patients (4,187 primary IPP patients and 849 revision IPP patients) from our Prosthetic Urology Multi-Institutional Partnership (PUMP) institutions. Usage data for intravenous (IV), preoperative oral, and postoperative oral antimicrobials were analyzed. We specifically assessed patient profiles, antimicrobial selection, and antimicrobial duration. Multivariate statistical analyses were conducted to identify significant variations between primary and revision surgeries. Results For patients undergoing primary IPP placement, 81.9% received IV antibiotics for <24 hours whereas 18.1% received IV antibiotics for >24 hours. Preoperative oral antimicrobials were used in 59.4% of patients and 99.4% received postoperative oral antimicrobials. The overall infection rate for primary implants was 2%. Notably, quinolone administration shows a higher postoperative infection rate (11.4%) compared to gentamicin (1.9%), cephalosporin (0%), and vancomycin (1.0%). Multivariable regression analysis identifies factors such as a history of infection, diabetes, and priapism as predictors for postoperative infections. Furthermore, the study finds that perioperative antifungal use is associated with a decreased risk of infection. Conclusions This study provides valuable insights into the patterns of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis. Duration, type, and route of antibiotics given preoperatively or postoperatively do not affect postoperative infection rates among high volume prosthetic urologists. Giving IV antibiotics for more than 24 hours does not affect postoperative infection. Perioperative antifungals are a protective factor. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast, Clarus Therapeutics, Antares Pharma, Acerus.

Abstract Introduction Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery is a well-established treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). There is little information in the literature regarding the utilization of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in primary and revision IPP surgeries. Objective We investigated the patterns of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis among a large multinational cohort of primary and revision IPP surgeries. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 5400 patients (4187 primary IPP patients and 849 revision IPP patients) from our Prosthetic Urology Multi-Institutional Partnership (PUMP) institutions. Usage data for intravenous (IV), preoperative oral, and postoperative oral antimicrobials were analyzed. We specifically assessed patient profiles, antimicrobial selection, and antimicrobial duration. Multivariate statistical analyses were conducted to identify significant variations between primary and revision surgeries. Results For patients undergoing primary IPP placement, 81.9% received IV antibiotics for <24 hours whereas 18.1% received IV antibiotics for >24 hours. Preoperative oral antimicrobials were used in 59.4% of patients and 99.4% received postoperative oral antimicrobials. The overall infection rate for primary implants was 2%. Notably, quinolone administration shows a higher postoperative infection rate (11.4%) compared to gentamicin (1.9%), cephalosporin (0%), and vancomycin (1.0%). Multivariable regression analysis identifies factors such as a history of infection, diabetes, and priapism as predictors for postoperative infections. Furthermore, the study finds that perioperative antifungal use is associated with a decreased risk of infection. Conclusions This study provides valuable insights into the patterns of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis. Duration, type, and route of antibiotics given preoperatively or postoperatively do not affect postoperative infection rates among high volume prosthetic urologists. Giving IV antibiotics for more than 24 hours does not affect postoperative infection. Perioperative antifungals are a protective factor. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast, Clarus Therapeutics, Antares Pharma, Acerus.

Background: Patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) form a unique subset of patients with complex ventricular tachycardia (VT). Objective: To evaluate the clinical and procedural characteristics and outcomes of patients with congenital heart disease who present for VT ablation. Methods: A single-center, retrospective study of patients undergoing VT ablation was conducted. The primary composite outcome was recurrent monomorphic VT, and repeat ablation. Results: Out of 508 procedures for ventricular tachycardia ablation, 37 were performed in ACHD patients. These patients were younger compared to the non-ACHD subtype.(Table 1). Out of 26 patients with congenital heart disease, a majority had a diagnosis of tetralogy of Fallot (57.6%) and 69% had 2-3 prior open-heart surgeries, including ventriculotomy (53.8%), ventricular septal defect repair (65.3%), and pulmonary valve replacement (57.6%) (Table2). They had a higher mean LVEF,and lower burden of comorbidities including hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and myocardial infarction compared to their non-ACHD counterparts and had been on fewer antiarrhythmics at baseline. ACHD patients were less likely to require epicardial access, but the requirement for induction meds was higher, and energy delivery times were longer. There were no significant differences in the VT characteristics and mapping techniques between the two groups. There were no significant differences in outcomes including complications, and time to recurrence, and a Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in VT free survival when ACHD patients were compared to patients without ACHD (Figure 3). After adjusting for age, sex and comorbidities, ACHD was not a predictor of having VT recurrence or repeat ablation (aHR =1.1 (0.7-1.9), p=0.6) Conclusion: VT ablation in patients with ACHD is safe, and as effective as ablation in non-ACHD patients. Procedure times tend to be longer owing to a more challenging substrate.

Background: PAINESD score was established as a predictor of periprocedural acute hemodynamic instability, long-term mortality and heart failure among patients undergoing catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT-CA). Objective: To assess the validity of PAINESD score and compare outcomes of high-risk patients undergoing catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) with and without mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use during procedure. Methods: We conducted an observational dual-center study of consecutive patients with SHD undergoing VT-CA over a decade (2012-2022). The PAINESD score, based on 7 variables (COPD, age >60 years, general anesthesia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, NYHA class III or IV, ejection fraction <25%, VT storm, and diabetes mellitus), was calculated and categorized into low risk (<10), intermediate risk (10-16), and high risk (>16) as previously reported. Two survival analyses were performed to compare outcomes between different groups: one using all-cause mortality or heart transplant as the event, and another using recurrent or repeat ablation as the event. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios for each PAINESD category and to determine the hazard ratio for the use of MCS among high-risk patients. Results: We found that between 2012 to 2022, 559 ablations were performed on 441 patients. There were 296 (53%), 182 (32.6%) and 81(14.5%) patients in low, medium, and high risk. Using low risk as reference, aHR for medium risk was 2.1 (1.24-3.7; p=0.006) and for high risk was 4.6(2.54-8.3; p <0.001). Among patients with high PAINESD score (n=81), 5 patients (6.2%) required MCS (Intra-arterial balloon pump (IABP)=1, ECMO only=1, ECMO+IABP=1, bypass=2). 4/5 (80%) patients on MCS stayed on them post procedure, except one patient on IABP. In this cohort, there was no difference between patients with and without MCS in primary outcome [aHR= 1.6 (0.48-5.4); p=0.43] and in secondary OUTCOME [1.29 (0.3-5.5; p=0.735)]. Conclusion: PAINESD was a significant predictor of mortality or heart failure, but it did not help in prediction of recurrence of VT, or repeat VT-CA.

Background: Patients undergoing epicardial access for ventricular tachycardia (VT) have a higher rate of complications and VT recurrence post-procedure. Data regarding electrophysiological factors driving the outcomes are scant. Objective: To compare the factors and outcomes associated with epicardial vs endocardial VT ablation. Methods: A single-center, retrospective study of patients undergoing catheter ablation for scar-related VT was conducted. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, medications, relevant laboratory abnormalities, electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, detailed procedural characteristics, and outcomes. Results: Our cohort of 554 patients had 89 (16.1%) epicardial and 465 (83.9%) endocardial VT ablations. Patients undergoing epicardial ablation had a greater frequency of NICM, and more patients had undergone sympathetic modulation for VT (p < 0.05) but had lesser frequency of valve surgery, and CABG. Epicardial ablation was associated with greater use of both short-term (<3 months) and long-term (>6 months) anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) (p<0.01). Epicardial access was obtained by micropuncture or needle-in-needle technique for 22.5% (n=20) of patients. Except for more use of general anesthesia and the lesser usage of drugs for VT induction during epicardial procedures, there were no significant differences. Epicardial ablation had a higher risk of acute complications (<30 days) after the procedure (driven by pericarditis) (25% vs 7.8%, p<0.01). On survival analysis, epicardial access was associated with an increase in VT recurrence and repeat ablation (p<0.01) during a mean follow-up of 1072 days. On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for age, sex and comorbidities, epicardial access was an independent predictor of VT recurrence or repeat ablation [aHR 1.61 (CI: 1.18- 2.2)] Conclusion: Patients undergoing epicardial ablations with fewer comorbidities demonstrated increased AAD usage prior to and after the procedure, and a higher risk of acute complications after the procedure. Epicardial access was an independent predictor of VT recurrence or repeat ablation.

Background: In recent years, catheter ablation has emerged as a sustainable, first-line therapy for the management of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Given the rise of the “obesity paradox” theory in atrial ablation outcomes, we sought to study the effect of BMI on patients undergoing structural VT ablation. Purpose: To assess the outcomes of VT ablation, specifically VT recurrence, in patients with elevated vs. normal BMI. Methods: Clinical characteristics and demographic data were collected for VT patients who underwent ablation at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 2012-2022. Patient BMI was classified as non-obese (<30 kg/m2), obese (30-40 kg/m2), and morbidly obese (≥40 kg/m2). The endpoint was a composite of initial monomorphic VT recurrence and repeat ablation after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities. Results: A total of 399 patients underwent 508 ablations. 51.4% of ablations had a BMI <30, 39.2% were between 30-40, and 9.4% were ≥40. There was a greater prevalence of hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus in morbidly obese patients (p <0.01). Morbidly obese individuals also had a significantly increased rate of general anesthesia during ablation and long VT cycle lengths. The Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrates no statistically significant differences in time to VT recurrence among the three BMI groups (p = 0.324). Neither morbid-obesity (aHR= 1.20; CI = 0.94-1.56, p = 0.14) nor nonmorbid-obesity (aHR = 0.92; CI = 0.76-1.10, p = 0.4), compared to non-obesity was a significant independent predictor of VT recurrence or repeat ablation on multivariate regression after adjusting for age, sex and comorbidities. Conclusion: There was no significant association between BMI groups and VT recurrence or repeat ablation, and no difference in complications. We did not find the obesity paradox to be relevant for VT ablation in our patient population. Further study would be needed with larger samples to corroborate these findings.

Background: The research on the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with balloon-expandable valves (BEV) and self-expanding valves (SEV) are limited. Hypothesis: This study aims to compare the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of BEV and SEV at short-term (30 days), mid-term (1 year), and long-term (>1 year) endpoints. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to April 25, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Random-effect model (DerSimonian–Laird method) was used to pool the risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. Results: A total of 11 RCTs comprising 4,325 patients (2,295 BEV, 2,030 SEV) were included. At short-term, the risk of cardiovascular (RR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.36-0.87) and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.81) were lower in the BEV group. However, no differences were noted between the two treatment modalities in longer follow-ups despite the lower risk of moderate to severe paravalvular leak (PVL) among BEV patients. The risk of stroke was comparable between two groups across all three follow-up endpoints, albeit a limited number of studies suggesting the BEV group showed a greater risk of clinical valve thrombosis in mid-term and long-term assessments. The need for permanent pacemaker implantation was lower in BEV arm in short-term (RR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37-0.87) and mid-term (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64-0.94). Yet, this difference was not observed in long-term follow-ups. Conversely, the SEV group had a larger effective orifice area with lower mean transvalvular pressure gradient from short-term (MD: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.07-0.26 and MD: 3.71, 95% CI: 2.64-4.78, respectively) to long-term (MD: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.17-0.32 and MD: 3.73, 95% CI: 3.19-4.27, respectively) periods. Conclusions: BEV is associated with reduced risk of clinical outcomes at short-term; however, most differences diminish in longer evaluations, except for moderate to severe PVL. Conversely, SEV is linked to better hemodynamic outcomes and a lower risk of clinical valve thrombosis across all follow-up durations.

Abstract Background Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been effective in managing premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Despite improvement in ablation techniques, recurrence remains high for LV summit PVCs. Epicardial ablation here is often precluded due to fat and proximity to coronaries, thus, aggressive but safe endocardial options are needed. Purpose To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ultra-long ablation (&gt;240 seconds) duration for refractory LV summit PVCs. Methods Patients with deep intramural LV summit PVCs were identified by lack of PVC elimination or late (&gt;60 s suppression) and recurrence post-lesion under the left aortic sinus of Valsalva. We included patients who received the longest RFA of at least 240 seconds (maximum 15 minutes). RFA power was titrated slowly from 20 to 35W, carefully ensuring that the impedance drop did not exceed 12 ohms. Acute procedure success was defined as clinical PVC suppression for ≥60 minutes after the last lesion. Short-term success was defined as symptom improvement, ejection fraction (EF) recovery, and drop in PVC burden at 3 months. Results Twenty patients (59.5 ± 16.4 years, 55% male) were included. Baseline features are shown in Table 1. All RFA were delivered endocardially. No steam pops were noted. PVC burden was significantly lower at 3-month follow-up (P&lt; 0.01), Figure 1A. Most patients had a normal ejection fraction (EF) at baseline; thus, no significant difference change in EF was observed (Figure 1B). One complication was recorded, which was tamponade likely caused by coronary sinus dissection requiring pericardiocentesis. Acute success was achieved in 95.0% of the cases, and all cases followed at 3 months (18/18) achieved short-term success. Conclusion Ultra-long duration RFA with lesions ≥ 240 seconds at 35W per lesion for LV summit PVCs appeared to be safe and effective in achieving acute and short-term success. The lack of acute suppression should not discourage operators, as there seems to be delayed suppression in some cases. Careful monitoring of biophysics is paramount when attempting this technique.

Abstract Background Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening arrhythmia that can complicate structural heart disease. While catheter ablation is effective in treating this condition, the recurrence of VT after the procedure continues to be a concern. Consequently, there is a need for a reliable system to evaluate the likelihood of arrhythmia recurrence following an ablation. Objective To predict recurrence or repeat ablation after a VT catheter ablation procedure using machine learning (ML) models. Methods We conducted a single-center, retrospective study of all patients undergoing catheter ablation for scar-related VT between 2012 and 2022. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, medications, relevant laboratory abnormalities, electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, detailed procedural characteristics, and outcomes. Python version 3.8.5 for exploratory data analysis (EDA) and visualization. Using six different ML models from the training set (90:10 split), we used 34 variables to predict the primary outcome, including VT recurrence or repeat catheter ablation. The accuracy of these models was compared using ROC curves based on their performance on the test set. Results Out of 508 VT ablation procedures, 261 experienced a recurrence. Support Vector Classifier (SVM) performed the best, having an AUC of 0.73, followed by logistic regression at 0.69 (Figure A). SVM yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 0.73, 0.73, 0.79, and 0.67, respectively. The F1 score was 0.70. Among the factors with the highest feature importance in the model, the most influential variable was the proceduralist’s experience level, followed by QRS width at baseline, LVEF, and patient’s age (Figure B). Conclusion Our model can predict recurrent VT after ablation with reasonable accuracy, outperforming the existing clinical risk scores significantly. Larger training sample sizes will help achieve more robust ML models and improve predictive accuracy further.Figure A: ROC curve depicting the AUROCB. Feature importance graph

Vitamin C is a vital nutrient that functions as an antioxidant and is important as a co-factor and regulator of several immune system pathways. The role of vitamin C in the treatment of COVID-19 is largely debatable. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vitamin C in the treatment of COVID-19. We searched several electronic databases from inception to March 2023 to retrieve randomized controlled trials on the use of Vitamin C for COVID-19. RevMan 5.4 was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and Mean Differences (MDs) along with confidence intervals (95% CI) using a random-effects model. We included 9 randomized controlled trials in our meta-analysis. Vitamin C did not reduce the all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19 compared to the standard treatment [RR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.65-1.14; I 2 =66%]. Vitamin C was found to be associated with an increased incidence of ventilation in COVID-19 patients when compared to standard treatment [RR 1.37, 95% CI: 1.18-1.59; I 2 =58%]. There were no significant differences between both groups regarding the incidence of hospitalization [RR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.98-1.02; I 2 =0%], incidence of recovery [RR 1.57, 95% CI: 0.45-5.50; I 2 =52%], hospital mortality [RR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.44-1.06; I 2 =0%] and length of hospital stay [MD -0.63, 95% CI: -3.04 to 1.78; I 2 =81%]. Vitamin C administration did not reduce all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients. Additional studies are required to evaluate the role of Vitamin C in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 especially in ICU patients.