Citations

Halliwill, John R., Lori A. Lawler, Tamara J. Eickhoff, Michael J. Joyner, and Sharon L. Mulvagh. Reflex responses to regional venous pooling during lower body negative pressure in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 84(2): 454–458, 1998.—Lower body negative pressure is frequently used to simulate orthostasis. Prior data suggest that venous pooling in abdominal or pelvic regions may have major hemodynamic consequences. Therefore, we developed a simple paradigm for assessing regional contributions to venous pooling during lower body negative pressure. Sixteen healthy men and women underwent graded lower body negative pressure protocols to 60 mmHg while wearing medical antishock trousers to prevent venous pooling under three randomized conditions: 1) no trouser inflation (control), 2) only the trouser legs inflated, and 3) the trouser legs and abdominopelvic region inflated. Without trouser inflation, heart rate increased 28 ± 4 beats/min, mean arterial pressure fell −3 ± 2 mmHg, and forearm vascular resistance increased 51 ± 9 units at 60 mmHg lower body negative pressure. With inflation of either the trouser legs or the trouser legs and abdominopelvic region, heart rate and mean arterial pressure did not change during lower body negative pressure. By contrast, although the forearm vasoconstrictor response to lower body negative pressure was attenuated by inflation of the trouser legs (Δforearm vascular resistance 33 ± 10 units, P < 0.05 vs. control), attenuation was greater with the inflation of the trouser legs and abdominopelvic region (Δforearm vascular resistance 16 ± 5 units, P < 0.05 vs. control and trouser legs-only inflation). Thus the hemodynamic consequences of pooling in the abdominal and pelvic regions during lower body negative pressure appear to be less than in the legs in healthy individuals.

Background In US clinical practice, many patients who undergo placement of an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator ( ICD ) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death receive dual‐chamber devices. The superiority of dual‐chamber over single‐chamber devices in reducing the risk of inappropriate ICD shocks in clinical practice has not been established. The objective of this study was to compare risk of adverse outcomes, including inappropriate shocks, between single‐ and dual‐chamber ICD s for primary prevention. Methods and Results We identified patients receiving a single‐ or dual‐chamber ICD for primary prevention who did not have an indication for pacing from 15 hospitals within 7 integrated health delivery systems in the Longitudinal Study of Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators from 2006 to 2009. The primary outcome was time to first inappropriate shock. ICD shocks were adjudicated for appropriateness. Other outcomes included all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure hospitalization, and death. Patient, clinician, and hospital‐level factors were accounted for using propensity score weighting methods. Among 1042 patients without pacing indications, 54.0% (n=563) received a single‐chamber device and 46.0% (n=479) received a dual‐chamber device. In a propensity‐weighted analysis, device type was not significantly associated with inappropriate shock (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–1.38 [ P =0.65]), all‐cause hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.87–1.21 [ P =0.76]), heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–1.21 [ P =0.59]), or death (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.93–1.53 [ P =0.17]). Conclusions Among patients who received an ICD for primary prevention without indications for pacing, dual‐chamber devices were not associated with lower risk of inappropriate shock or differences in hospitalization or death compared with single‐chamber devices. This study does not justify the use of dual‐chamber devices to minimize inappropriate shocks.

Objective: New, value-based regulations and reimbursement structures are creating historic care management challenges, thinning the margins and threatening the viability of hospitals and health systems. The Society of Critical Care Medicine convened a taskforce of Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine on February 22, 2016, during the 45th Critical Care Congress to develop a toolkit drawing on the experience of successful leaders of critical care organizations in North America for advancing critical care organizations (Appendix 1). The goal of this article was to provide a roadmap and call attention to key factors that adult critical care medicine leadership in both academic and nonacademic setting should consider when planning for value-based care. Design: Relevant medical literature was accessed through a literature search. Material published by federal health agencies and other specialty organizations was also reviewed. Collaboratively and iteratively, taskforce members corresponded by electronic mail and held monthly conference calls to finalize this report. Setting: The business and value/performance critical care organization building section comprised of leaders of critical care organizations with expertise in critical care administration, healthcare management, and clinical practice. Measurements and Main Results: Two phases of critical care organizations care integration are described: “horizontal,” within the system and regionalization of care as an initial phase, and “vertical,” with a post-ICU and postacute care continuum as a succeeding phase. The tools required for the clinical and financial transformation are provided, including the essential prerequisites of forming a critical care organization; the manner in which a critical care organization can help manage transformational domains is considered. Lastly, how to achieve organizational health system support for critical care organization implementation is discussed. Conclusions: A critical care organization that incorporates functional clinical horizontal and vertical integration for ICU patients and survivors, aligns strategy and operations with those of the parent health system, and encompasses knowledge on finance and risk will be better positioned to succeed in the value-based world.