Citations

Background: The morphologic effect of squamosal synostosis has not been clarified, due to its low occurrence rate, and its inclination to be combined with premature closure of other major sutures, especially in syndromic synostosis. This study's goal is to explore the morphological influence of squamosal synostosis in both syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients. Methods: Twenty-five computed tomography (CT) scans from nonsyndromic squamosal synostosis (NSS), Crouzon syndrome with squamosal synostosis (CSS), Crouzon syndrome without squamosal synostosis, and normal controls were included. Three-dimensional (3D) cephalometry, entire cranial volume and cranial fossa volume were measured using Materialise software. Results: The entire cranial volume of all groups was similar. The NSS developed a gradual reduction in the severity of reduced segmental volume from the anterior cranial fossa, to the middle cranial fossa, and to the unaffected volume of posterior cranial fossa. The CSS developed the most severe volume reduction of middle cranial fossa (12608.30 ± 2408.61 mm3 vs 26077.96 ± 4465.74 mm3, 52%), with proportionate volume reduction of the anterior (7312.21 ± 2435.97 mm3 vs 10520.63 ± 2400.43 mm3, 30%) and posterior cranial fossa (33487.29 ± 5598.93 mm3 vs 48325.04 ± 14700.44 mm3, 31%). The NSS developed a narrower anterior cranial fossa, a clockwise rotated Frankfort horizontal plane, and a retracted chin (pogonion). Conclusion: Squamosal synostosis may alter the development of cranial fossa volume, especially the volume of middle cranial fossa. However, the development of cranial base, and related facial features are determined largely by major vault sutures and associated syndromic conditions, rather than the squamosal suture alone. Level of Evidence: II

Background From infancy to adulthood, the mandible develops increased ramus height, prominence of the chin, and laterally widened gonial angles. In Crouzon and Apert syndromes, both relative retrognathia and prognathic jaws have been reported. Growth is influenced by a variety of factors, including the growth and relative position of the skull base, functional coordination, and the spatial influence of the laryngopharynx. Thus, this study aimed to explore in detail the evolution of the mandible in both syndromes and its relationship with the entire facial structure and skull base. Methods One hundred twenty-three preoperative computed tomographic scans (Crouzon, n = 36; Apert, n = 33; control, n = 54) were included and divided into 5 age subgroups. Computed tomographic scans were measured using Materialise software. Cephalometrics relating to the mandible, facial structures, and cranial base were collected. Statistical analyses were performed using t test and statistical power analysis. Results In Crouzon syndrome, the angle between the cranial base and gnathion was increased prior to 6 months of age by 10.29 degrees (P < 0.001) and by adulthood to 11.95 degrees (P = 0.003) compared with normal. After 6 months of age, the distance between bilateral mandibular condylions (COR-COL) was narrower by 15% (P < 0.001) in Crouzon syndrome compared with control subjects. Before 6 months of age, Apert COR-COL decreased 16% (P < 0.001) compared with control subjects and 13% (P = 0.006) narrower than Crouzon. During 2 to 6 years of age, Apert mandibular ramus height caught up to, and became longer than, Crouzon by 12% (P = 0.011). The nasion-sella-articulare angle of the Apert skull was 5.04 degrees (P < 0.001) less than Crouzon overall. Conclusions In Crouzon syndrome, the changes of the spatial relationship of the mandible to the cranial base develop earlier than the mandibular shape deformity, whereas in Apert syndrome, the spatial and morphological changes are synchronous. The morphological changes of the mandible are disproportional in 3 directions, initially significant shortening of the mandibular width and length, and, subsequently, reduced height. Crouzon has more shortening in mandibular height compared with Apert, reflecting the more shortened posterior cranial base length. The narrowed angle between the mandible and the posterior cranial base in Apert skulls is consistent with the more limited nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal airway space.

Common genetic variation in CYP2C19 (cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily C, polypeptide 19) *2 and *3 alleles leads to a loss of functional protein, and carriers of these loss-of-function alleles when treated with clopidogrel have significantly reduced clopidogrel active metabolite levels and high on-treatment platelet reactivity resulting in increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, especially after percutaneous coronary intervention. The Food and Drug Administration has issued a black box warning advising practitioners to consider alternative treatment in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers who might receive clopidogrel and to identify such patients by genotyping. However, routine clinical use of genotyping for CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is not recommended by clinical guidelines because of lack of prospective evidence. To address this critical gap, TAILOR-PCI (Tailored Antiplatelet Initiation to Lessen Outcomes due to Decreased Clopidogrel Response After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) is a large, pragmatic, randomized trial comparing point-of-care genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy with routine care to determine whether identifying CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele patients prospectively and prescribing alternative antiplatelet therapy is beneficial.

Background: Apert syndrome patients are different in clinical pathology, including obstructive sleep apnea, cleft palate, and mental deficiency. These functional deficiencies may be due to anatomic deformities, which may be caused by different forms of associated suture fusion. Therefore, a classification system of Apert syndrome based on the type of craniosynostosis pattern might be helpful in determining treatment choices. Methods: CT scans of 31 unoperated Apert syndrome and 51 controls were included and subgrouped as: class I. Bilateral coronal synostosis; class II. Pansynostosis; and class III. Perpendicular combination synostosis: a. unilateral coronal and metopic synostosis; b. sagittal with bilateral/unilateral lambdoid synostosis; and c. others. Results: Class I is the most common (55%) subtype. The cranial base angulation of class I was normal; however, the cranial base angulation on the cranium side of the skull in class II increased 12.16 degrees (P = 0.006), whereas the facial side cranial base angle of class IIIa decreased 4.31 degrees (P = 0.035) over time. The external cranial base linear measurements of class I showed more evident reduction in anterior craniofacial structures than posterior, whereas other subtypes developed more severe shortening in the posterior aspects. Conclusions: Bicoronal synostosis is the most common subtype of Apert syndrome with the normalized cranial base angulation. Combined pansynostosis patients have flatter cranial base, whereas the combined unilateral coronal synostosis have a kyphotic cranial base. Class I has more significant nasopharyngeal airway compromise in a vertical direction, whereas classes II and III have more limited oropharyngeal space.

Abstract Objective The objective is to formulate clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of diabetes in older adults. Conclusions Diabetes, particularly type 2, is becoming more prevalent in the general population, especially in individuals over the age of 65 years. The underlying pathophysiology of the disease in these patients is exacerbated by the direct effects of aging on metabolic regulation. Similarly, aging effects interact with diabetes to accelerate the progression of many common diabetes complications. Each section in this guideline covers all aspects of the etiology and available evidence, primarily from controlled trials, on therapeutic options and outcomes in this population. The goal is to give guidance to practicing health care providers that will benefit patients with diabetes (both type 1 and type 2), paying particular attention to avoiding unnecessary and/or harmful adverse effects.