Citations

Abstract Castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a deadly disease with a poor prognosis. Treatment options for CRPC patients involve taxanes or newly developed drugs targeting the androgen pathway or androgen synthesis, including CYP17 inhibitors. However, response to therapy varies dramatically among patients, which might be due, in part, to tumor heterogeneity. Therefore, understanding of the genomic landscape of CRPC would be important to help achieve better outcomes by developing personalized therapies. One challenge contributing to our lack of therapies for CRPC is a paucity of clinically relevant animal models predictive of response to therapy in human patients. The Prostate Cancer Medically Optimized Genome Enhanced Therapy (PROMOTE) study is a Mayo Clinic prospective trial designed for patients with metastatic CRPC who are treated with abiraterone acetate, a CYP17 inhibitor, over a 12 week period. Fresh tissue from metastatic lesions, primarily bone metastases, was obtained by needle core biopsy before and 12 weeks after initiating abiraterone acetate treatment. The samples were submitted for DNA and RNA sequencing and were also used to generate patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. PDX models were developed by injecting biopsy samples subcutaneously or under the renal capsule in male non-obese diabetic (NOD)/severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) or NOD/SCID/IL-2γ-receptor null (NSG) mice implanted with 25mg testosterone pellets at the time of tissue implantation and 2 months later. Baseline samples from 103 unique patients as well as second samples from 61 patients post abiraterone acetate treatment were injected into approximately 600 mice. Of the samples for which pathology is currently available, 31% of the biopsies injected into mice were confirmed to include tumor tissue, which may be compared with a figure of 37.5% of samples sent for sequencing. Thus far, we have established 8 PDX models, four from baseline and four from post treatment samples. Seven models were derived from metastatic bone lesions, and one model from a liver metastasis. The tumor tissue in each model was expanded into a second of generation of mice and harvested when the tumors grew. No tumor was expanded more than four times. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of xenograft tissue from different “generations” of xenograft expansion is ongoing and will be compared with similar data for the original biopsy. The evaluation of treatment response after exposure of these PDX models to different therapies including CYP19 inhibitors, AR blockers and taxanes is ongoing. These PDX models provide a tool for future drug testing and for studying mechanisms of resistance to therapy in CRPC. Citation Format: Fang Xie, Manish Kohli, Yin Ping, Rafael E. Jimenez, Richard M. Weinshilboum, Liewei Wang. Developing patient derived xenograft (PDX) models for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) during CYP17 inhibitor therapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Patient-Derived Cancer Models: Present and Future Applications from Basic Science to the Clinic; Feb 11-14, 2016; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(16_Suppl):Abstract nr A05.

Abstract Background: Post-mastectomy radiotherapy improves survival in women with node-positive breast cancer. Pencil beam scanning proton therapy is attractive due to potential to reduce the dose to the heart and lungs compared with traditional photon techniques while improving conformality and limiting skin dose compared with passively scanned proton therapy. The optimal dose and fractionation for pencil-beam scanning proton therapy remains unknown. Trial Design: This is a multi-center open label phase II randomized controlled trial to determine the safety of 15 fraction vs 25 fraction pencil beam scanning proton radiotherapy after mastectomy in patients requiring regional nodal irradiation. Eligibility Criteria: Patients ≥ 18 years with primary, non-inflammatory invasive breast cancer who have undergone mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction and chest wall and regional nodal irradiation planned. Aims: To determine whether the 24 month complication rate (defined as grade 3 or greater late adverse events, and unplanned surgical intervention in patients who undergo mastectomy with reconstruction) of 15 fraction chest wall and regional node pencil beam scanning proton radiotherapy is acceptable relative to 25 fraction chest wall and regional nodal pencil beam scanning proton radiotherapy and worthy of further investigation. Statistical methods: The study is designed as a non-inferiority/superiority “hybrid” design using the approach of Freidlin et al. It is Using a one-sided type I error rate of 0.05 (corresponding equivalently to constructing a 1-sided 95% confidence limit), 72 evaluable patients will have 80% power to reject the null hypothesis that the 24-month complication rate in the experimental arm is higher than that of the control arm by more than 10% (i.e. rule out inferiority) under the alternative hypothesis that the complication rate in the experimental arm is 5% less than that of the control arm (i.e. superiority). However, the design will have only 41% power when the two treatment arms are equivalent (i.e. the complication rate is 10% for both arms). Accrual: The study opened in June 2016. Five of a planned eighty-two patients have been accrued to date. Citation Format: Mutter RW, Park SS, Hieken TJ, Vargas CE, Mei-Yin PC, Kathryn RJ, Hector VR, Kimberly CS, Elizabeth YS, Daniel VW. A randomized trial of 15 fraction vs 25 fraction pencil beam scanning proton radiotherapy after mastectomy in patients requiring regional nodal irradiation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-03-03.

The accurate measurement of the linear accelerator (linac) radiation isocenter is critical, especially for stereotactic treatment. Traditional quality assurance (QA) procedure focuses on the measurement of single radiation isocenter, usually of 6 megavoltage (MV) photon beams. Single radiation isocenter is also commonly assumed in treatment planning systems (TPS). Due to different flattening filters and bending magnet and steering parameters, the radiation isocenter of one energy mode can deviate from another if no special effort was devoted. We present the first experience of the multiradiation isocenters alignment on an Elekta linac, as well as its corresponding QA procedure and clinical impact. An 8 mm ball‐bearing (BB) phantom was placed at the 6 MV radiation isocenter using an Elekta isocenter search algorithm, based on portal images. The 3D radiation isocenter shifts of other photon energy modes relative to the 6 MV were determined. Beam profile scanning for different field sizes was used as an independent method to determine the 2D multiradiation isocenters alignment. To quantify the impact of radiation isocenter offset on targeting accuracy, the 10 MV radiation isocenter was manually offset from that for 6 MV by adjusting the bending magnet current. Because our table isocenter was mechanically aligned to the 6 MV radiation isocenter, the deviation of the table isocentric rotation from the "shifted" 10 MV radiation isocenter after bending magnet adjustment was assessed. Winston‐Lutz test was also performed to confirm the overall radiation isocenter positioning accuracy for all photon energies. The portal image method showed the radiation isocenter of the 10 MV flattening filter‐free mode deviated from others before beam parameter adjustment. After the adjustment, the deviation was greatly improved from 0.96 to 0.35 mm relative to the 6 MV radiation isocenter. The same finding was confirmed by the profile‐scanning method. The maximum deviation of the table isocentric rotation from the 10 MV radiation isocenter was observed to linearly increase with the offset between 6 and 10 MV radiation isocenter; 1 mm radiation isocenter offset can translate to almost 2 mm maximum deviation of the table isocentric rotation from the 10 MV radiation isocenter. The alignment of the multiradiation isocenters is particularly important for high‐precision radiotherapy. Our study provides the medical physics community with a quantitative measure of the multiradiation isocenters alignment. A routine QA method should be considered, to examine the radiation isocenters alignment during the linac acceptance.PACS number: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.bd, 87.56.Fc

PurposeTo investigate the ability of slip interface imaging (SII), a recently developed magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)‐based technique, to predict the degree of meningioma–brain adhesion, using findings at surgery as the reference standard.Materials and MethodsWith Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent, 25 patients with meningiomas >2.5 cm in maximal diameter underwent preoperative SII assessment. Intracranial shear motions were introduced using a soft, pillow‐like head driver and the resulting displacement field was acquired with an MRE pulse sequence on 3T MR scanners. The displacement data were analyzed to determine tumor–brain adhesion by assessing intensities on shear line images and raw as well as normalized octahedral shear strain (OSS) values along the interface. The SII findings of shear line images, OSS, and normalized OSS were independently and blindly correlated with surgical findings of tumor adhesion by using the Cohen's κ coefficient and chi‐squared test.ResultsNeurosurgeons categorized the surgical plane as extrapial (no adhesion) in 15 patients, mixed in four, and subpial (adhesion) in six. Both shear line images and OSS agreed with the surgical findings in 18 (72%) cases (fair agreement, κ = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05–0.69), while normalized OSS was concordant with the surgical findings in 23 (92%) cases (good agreement, κ = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.67–1). The correlation between SII predictions (shear line images, OSS, and normalized OSS) and the surgical findings were statistically significant (chi‐squared test, P = 0.02, P = 0.02, and P < 0.0001, respectively).ConclusionSII preoperatively evaluates the degree of meningioma–brain adhesion noninvasively, allowing for improved prediction of surgical risk and tumor resectability.Level of Evidence: 1Technical Efficacy: Stage 1J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1007–1016.

Abstract Purpose of the Study Middle-aged adults are often called upon to support aging parents. However, providing support to an aging parent with health problems and disability may be a stressful experience. This study asked whether giving everyday support to parents in the context of health problems and disability has implications for middle-aged children’s diurnal cortisol and daily mood. Design and Methods During four consecutive days, 148 middle-aged adults (mean age = 55) reported the support they gave to their parents and provided saliva 4 times a day (wake, 30 min post-wake, lunchtime, and bedtime). Multilevel models estimated within-person differences in positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA), cortisol awakening response and area under the curve with respect to ground (AUC-G) as a function of giving same-day and previous-day support. We examined whether these associations are exacerbated when a parent has health problems or activities of daily living (ADL) needs. Results Middle-aged children had significantly higher next-day AUC-G on days after they gave support to parents with ADL needs. When participants gave support to parents with ADL needs, they had significantly greater same-day PA and lower next-day NA. Giving support to parents with health problems was associated with significantly higher next-day NA. Implications Giving support to parents is an ambiguous experience with implications for biological stress and daily mood. A biopsychosocial approach reveals under what conditions giving support to parents may become detrimental to health and well-being; this knowledge is essential for the development and implementation of interventions.