Citations

Abstract Background Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) is a commonly performed gender-affirming procedure that requires postoperative dilation to maintain vaginal canal patency. Aim To characterize patient-reported dilation experiences and evaluate temporal trends in postoperative outcomes. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing primary PIV at a single center were prospectively surveyed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Surveys were author-developed based on clinical experience and clinical review. Surveys assessed dilation frequency, session duration, depth achieved, and challenges encountered. Univariate analyzes were used to evaluate changes over time. Outcomes The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reporting any dilation-related challenge over time. Secondary outcomes included adherence metrics (frequency, days/week, session duration), depth achieved, and specific challenges. Results Seventeen of 27 patients completed all survey time points (63% response rate). On average, participants dilated 6.6 ± 1.4 days/week and 2.4 ± 0.9 times/day; sessions lasted 38.3 ± 16 minutes. Mean depth achieved was 4.05 ± 1.32 (13 cm standardized dilator set), with no significant decline over time. All patients reported at least one difficulty, most commonly tightness (71%), bleeding (71%), pain (65%), discharge (47%), and logistical barriers (24%). The prevalence of reported challenges declined significantly after six months (P < .05). Clinical Implications Early dilation-related difficulties are nearly universal and should be anticipated with proactive counseling and structured postoperative support, though symptoms improve over time. Strengths and Limitations This is the first prospective, longitudinal study of dilation following PIV, using an author-developed survey instrument to capture patient-reported outcomes. Limitations include modest sample size, potential response bias, and lack of assessment of challenge severity. Conclusion Reported dilation adherence following PIV is high, but most patients experience early challenges that diminish over time, highlighting the need for anticipatory counseling and individualized, symptom-responsive dilation protocols.

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is an eating disorder characterized by persistent restriction or avoidance of food intake leading to clinically significant nutritional, medical, and/or psychosocial consequences, without associated body-image disturbance. Although historically described in pediatric populations, ARFID is increasingly recognized in adults, particularly among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. Emerging data demonstrate a strong bidirectional relationship between ARFID and GI disease—especially disorders of gut–brain interaction—where fear of GI symptoms commonly drives restrictive eating, and chronic undernutrition may worsen GI motility, visceral sensitivity, and symptom severity, reinforcing a self-perpetuating cycle. Despite growing recognition of ARFID in adult gastroenterology patients, evidence guiding nutritional management and the use of nutrition support therapies in this population remains limited. This narrative review synthesizes the current literature on the epidemiology, clinical features, and nutritional consequences of ARFID in adults with GI disease, with a focus on screening and diagnostic considerations relevant to GI clinicians and principles of multidisciplinary management. Particular attention is given to the role of nutrition support therapies, including oral nutritional supplementation, enteral nutrition, and parenteral nutrition. While oral strategies are foundational to nutritional rehabilitation, available evidence supporting enteral or parenteral nutrition in adults with ARFID is sparse and largely extrapolated from pediatric or retrospective studies. Expert guidelines caution against routine or prolonged use of invasive nutrition support due to risks of reinforcing food avoidance, medical complications, and poor long-term outcomes, recommending their use only in carefully selected, medically necessary, and time-limited circumstances. Overall, ARFID represents an underrecognized but clinically significant contributor to malnutrition and symptom burden in adult patients with GI disorders, underscoring the need for routine screening, individualized multidisciplinary care, and high-quality prospective research to inform evidence-based treatment guidelines.

Abstract Aims Calcium release channel deficiency syndrome (CRCDS) results from loss-of-function (LOF) variants in the RYR2-encoded type 2 ryanodine receptor (RyR2), predisposing patients to sudden cardiac arrest/death (SCA/SCD) without abnormalities on a stress electrocardiogram (ECG). Undetected CRCDS may underlie idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) and sudden unexplained death in the young (SUDY). We aimed to determine the prevalence of potential CRCDS-causative RYR2 variants in IVF and SUDY. Methods and results We reviewed clinical evaluation and RYR2 genetic analysis of 169 IVF patients and 279 SUDY victims. Only ultra-rare (<0.005% in gnomAD) nonsynonymous RYR2 variants were considered potentially pathogenic. Among IVF patients, 6/169 (3%) overall—and 6/67 (9%) with exertion-related SCA—harboured an RYR2 variant and represent potential CRCDS cases. All exhibited normal resting and stress ECGs. Genetic analysis revealed six distinct RYR2 variants, two previously characterized as LOF. In SUDY, 31/279 victims (11%) had a RYR2 variant (30 unique variants), predominantly observed in exertion-related SCD 20/83 (24%) vs. rest-related 11/196 (6%). Of the 14 SUDY victims with functionally characterized RYR2 variants, five (2% of total cohort) had a LOF variant; among the 56 exertion-related SUDY cases, four (7%) had a LOF variant. Conclusion CRCDS may account for 3% of IVF overall and 9% of exertion-related SCA in IVF. Ultra-rare RYR2 variants may underlie up to 11% of SUDY, with 65% of RYR2-positive cases occurring during exertion. LOF-RYR2 variants may contribute to ≥7% of exercise-associated SUDY. Accurate identification of the underlying ryanodinopathy is essential for clinical management of affected patients.

Objective: To examine microsurgical outcomes of medial sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS), defined as a spherical tumor within the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) without tubular internal auditory canal (IAC) extension, compared with a referent cohort of “typical” VS with IAC extension. Study design: Historical matched cohort study. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Forty patients with medial sporadic VS who met the inclusion criteria were each matched to 3 referent patients by age, CPA tumor size, preoperative hearing class, and surgical approach. Interventions: Microsurgical resection. Main outcome measures: Extent of resection, immediate and long-term postoperative facial nerve weakness (House-Brackmann grade >I), and long-term hearing preservation were compared between patients with medial VS and the referent cohort using conditional logistic regression. Results: Medial VS and matched patients with IAC extension were not statistically significantly different in nongross total extent of resection (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.47-2.31), immediate (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.40-1.67) or long-term (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.23-1.48) postoperative facial nerve weakness, or long-term nonserviceable hearing (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.17-4.22). Conclusions: In this matched cohort study of medial VS, we found no statistically significant differences in the extent of resection, facial nerve function, or hearing preservation between tumors with and without IAC extension.

According to the current WHO classification, noninvasive germ cell neoplasia of the testis comprises germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS), specific forms of intratubular germ cell neoplasia, and gonadoblastoma. Because type II germ cell tumors (GCT, type II) arise from GCNIS, accurate detection of precursor lesions is diagnostically important. In preparation for the 2024 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on genitourinary precursor lesions, which took place in Florence, Italy, an anonymous survey was distributed to ISUP members to assess current diagnostic practices regarding testicular precursor lesions. The literature and current WHO classification affirm the significance of precursor lesions in testicular tumours. Working Group 4—Precursor Lesions of the Testis—focused on their practical application by individual pathologists rather than establishing consensus from scientific data. There is strong agreement that GCNIS is the preferred and appropriate term for GCT precursor lesions and that its presence should be reported in cases of invasive GCT. Respondents also agree that “seminoma with intratubular nonseminoma” is the appropriate terminology for seminoma with an associated noninvasive nonseminomatous (embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac tumor, trophoblasts, or teratoma) component. Most pathologists prefer to use OCT3/4 as the primary immunohistochemical marker, and a panel was generally not considered necessary. No consensus is reached regarding the requirement for immunohistochemistry to confirm GCT precursor lesions in the testis. Three questions remain open: the value of subtyping intratubular lesions, the immunohistochemical approach to gonadoblastoma, and the criteria distinguishing Sertoli cell nodules from Sertoli cell tumors.

ABSTRACT Interactions between clinical pharmacists and industry partners continue to evolve as health care increases in complexity and technology assumes a more dominant role. To address the corresponding ethical challenges, the 2025 Industry Relations Committee of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) was charged with updating the 2008 ACCP position statement, Pharmacists and Industry: Guidelines for Ethical Interactions . This update expands its perspective, reflecting the broader and more influential roles pharmacists play across the health care ecosystem. All clinical pharmacist–industry interactions should be grounded in improving patient care. Through this lens, six recommendations are provided: (1) Pharmacists should not engage in industry partnerships or collaborations that might unduly influence objectivity, independence, or fairness in clinical and professional judgments; (2) Pharmacists should disclose and mitigate financial, consulting, or other relationships that constitute potential conflicts of interest and should not participate in activities where an existing conflict cannot be resolved; (3) Pharmacists who participate in industry‐sponsored research should follow accepted ethical, regulatory, and scientific standards; (4) Pharmacists providing continuing education programs or developing drug information materials should maintain control of content; ensure their content is fair, balanced, and free from bias; and disclose and mitigate any conflicts; (5) Formal instruction on ethical interactions with industry professionals should begin early and continue through all stages of pharmacist education, training, and professional development; (6) Pharmacists should maintain the confidentiality and privacy of patients and other health care professionals when working with industry partners. Questions to guide personal industry interactions are provided. This paper does not detail every emerging area (e.g., artificial intelligence, social media), but recommendations are applicable wherever clinical pharmacists leverage their professional expertise. By maintaining a critical, discerning, and ethical approach to industry collaborations, clinical pharmacists can uphold professional obligations while contributing to the advancement of evidence‐based practice, ultimately prioritizing patient welfare.

Introduction Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with language therapy can aid in chronic aphasia recovery, but the neural mechanisms and biomarkers of treatment efficacy remain uncertain. Methods In this secondary analysis of data from a previously conducted clinical trial, we used a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, within-subject crossover design with a study sample of 19 participants with post-stroke aphasia. We assessed the degree to which baseline properties of cerebro-cerebellar white matter tracts can predict or moderate longitudinal treatment effects at three time points: post-treatment, 2 weeks post-treatment, and 2 months post-treatment. Tract properties were measured by fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). We also tested whether there are differential effects between trained and untrained language tasks and between cerebellar tDCS polarity (anodal and cathodal). Results Baseline measures of tracts connecting the left lesioned cortex to the right posterolateral cerebellum (stimulation target) influenced treatment gains for untrained tasks, relative to sham control. In contrast, for the trained task, treatment gains were influenced by baseline measures of tracts connecting the non-stimulated left cerebellum with the contralateral right cerebral cortex. Although there were no consistent effects from cerebellar tDCS polarity, a highly consistent pattern emerged across all tasks and tracts. Specifically, language improvements were predicted by a baseline tract profile (i.e., higher FA and lower MD) typically associated with higher white matter integrity, especially within the context of stroke-induced white matter decline. Discussion These findings corroborate the potential for baseline tract properties as a biomarker of treatment efficacy and support the notion that adjuvant (cerebellar tDCS + language) therapy preferentially benefits individuals with relatively preserved structural connections within functionally relevant networks. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov , identifier (NCT02901574).

Background and Objectives: Despite wide agreement on the importance of building research capacity to the specialty of family medicine, no standard exists for defining or measuring that growth. Previous work to address this gap yielded the Productivity and Capacity Evaluation in Research (PACER) Tool, a list of quantitative research metrics grouped into seven categories. We surveyed family medicine department chairs to understand which categories of PACER metrics they considered most valuable in evaluating their department’s research capacity. We also aimed to compare reported research capacity in 2024 with answers given by family medicine department chairs in 2021. Methods: A cross-sectional survey administered through the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) was used to gather information from family medicine department chairs in the United States and Canada. One question asked chairs to evaluate their department’s research capacity, and nine questions assessed the relative importance of the seven PACER Tool categories. Results: A total of 218 surveys were delivered, with 111 (50.9%) completed. Survey results demonstrated that program chairs determined funding to be the most impactful category. We found no clear trend in the second most important or least important categories. Results also showed no statistically significant change in reported research capacity between 2021 and 2024. Conclusions: Funding emerged as the category of research metrics viewed as most important by the greatest number of family medicine department chairs. Although other categories of metrics also were viewed as important, this survey demonstrated no clear pattern of their relative importance in this population.